The association between stent type and developing angina pectoris following percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Angina pectoris can occur in up to 40% of patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is limited data assessing whether the type of stent implanted during revascularization can predict post-PCI angina symptoms. METHODS: In this study, data regarding revascularization characteristics including the stent type in patients admitted for PCI was collected. Prospective data including occurrence of angina and the presenting class, new onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and other clinical outcomes were collected at 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up intervals. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the potential predictors of angina symptoms at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 787 patients (64.5% males) undergoing PCI with three stent types (Orsiro, Promus, and Xience) were included in the study. The occurrence of post PCI angina pectoris and new STEMI was similar among the stent types (p > 0.05). A linear association was found between the development of new STEMI (p = 0.018) and stroke (p = 0.003) and the worsening of angina class. The stent type was not a predictor of angina during the follow-up period. Other variables including dyslipidemia (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI), 1.51 (1.08; 2.10)), prior coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR (95% CI), 1.63 (1.02; 2.61)), and previous hospitalization (OR (95% CI), 2.10 (1.22; 3.63)) were independent predictors of angina. CONCLUSIONS: Although the type of stent may not have an association with the post-PCI angina, other predictors such as dyslipidemia and previous CAD and hospitalization may predict recurrence of cardiac angina. The class of angina severity may have a linear association with new-onset STEMI and stroke.

Constant current or constant voltage deep brain stimulation: short answers to a long story.

PURPOSE: Recently, the feature of generating constant current output has been added to the implantable pulse generators (IPGs). The efficacy of the conventionally used constant voltage (CV) stimulation has been proved in different movement and psychiatric disorders. In this systematic review, we aimed to discuss the effect of constant current (CC) and constant voltage stimulation on patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who had subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation implantation; we also compared these methods of stimulation with each other. METHODS: Using the words "Deep brain stimulation", "constant current" and "constant voltage", we developed a broad search strategy and a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases. Studies on the Parkinson's disease patients with subthalamic deep brain stimulation, which mentioned constant current or/and constant voltage setting stimulation were included. RESULTS: After screening of 284 articles, 10 reports were found eligible for this study. The score of unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part 3 was improved compared to the baseline, whether the stimulation was CV at baseline or CC. No significant change in non-motor outcomes was found. CONCLUSIONS: Although CC stimulation has shown a significant improvement in both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD, switching from CV to CC did not result in a significant change in the score of these items based on UPDRS. To sum up, implantation of constant current devices is safe and significantly improves motor function; it also maintains an acceptable safety profile in patients with PD.