A family-centered approach to social needs awareness in the pediatric emergency department.

Objective: We aimed to understand family preferences around reporting and receiving health-related social needs (HRSN) information by assessment modality during pediatric emergency department (PED) visits. Methods: Families were randomized into paper (control), cell phone, or tablet modality groups by their child's exam room. Nurses alerted families to complete a single HRSN assessment during routine workflow. We used logistic regression and McNemar's test to assess discordance in modality preference. Results: Forty-seven percent of families disclosed at least one HRSN across a total 611 assessments. Disclosure of HRSN was similar by modality. Twenty-three percent of those assigned tablet preferred cell phone (p < 0.001). Two-thirds of families preferred receiving digitally formatted community resources (email or text). There was no difference in preferred timing of HRSN assessment completion. Conclusions: Assessment modality did not appear to influence family HRSN disclosure. Families were generally satisfied with all HRSN assessment modalities but demonstrated a particular preference in using personal cell phones over tablets. Digitally formatted community referrals also pose numerous advantages over conventional paper handouts. Innovation: Use of personal cell phones is a novel, streamlined method of HRSN interventions in the clinical setting, performing similar to more conventional modalities, with a preference among families when compared to tablets.

Social Care Education and Training Among US Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to assess the association of social determinants of health (SDOH) education and social needs training on pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician perception and practices of social care. METHODS: Data were derived from the 2021 National Social Care Practices Survey of PEM program directors (PDs) and fellows. Ordinal and binary logistic regression modeling were completed for educational/training factors and social care perspective and practice outcomes. RESULTS: A national sample of 44 PDs (49% response rate) and 109 fellows (28%) participated. A minority of fellows received SDOH education and social needs training during fellowship. Fellows and PDs with SDOH education had a 3.1 odds (95% confidence interval CI, 1.4-6.9) of screening for social needs, with 4.4 odds among fellows (95% CI, 1.2-20.7). Those with social needs training were more comfortable assessing social risk, with 2.4 odds overall (95% CI, 1.2-4.7) and 3.1 odds among fellows (95% CI, 1.4-6.7). They also had 2.4 odds overall (95% CI, 1.1-4.9) of screening for social needs, with a 2.9 odds among fellows (95% CI, 1.3-6.8). CONCLUSIONS: Social care education and training appear to be associated with comfort assessing social risk and social needs screening tendency among both PEM PDs and fellows. Key areas for educational interventions are identified among PEM fellows, who are uniquely positioned as clinical leaders and patient advocates.

Pediatric emergency department organization and social care practices among U.S. fellowship programs.

Background: Social care has become increasingly relevant to the emergency physician and includes activities that address health-related social risk and social needs. The literature has consistently documented substantial health care provider challenges in incorporating social care into routine practice. Yet, interventions on the health care organizational level hold promise to bring about more widespread, sustainable impact. Methods: This study was a subanalysis of the 2021 National Social Care Practices Survey data set among pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) program directors (PDs) and fellows. The purpose was to investigate the association between health care organizational factors and PEM physician social care practices and perceptions among PEM PDs and fellows. We performed binary and ordinal logistic regressions of organizational factors and five specific PEM physician social care perspective and practice outcomes. Results: The sample population included 153 physicians-44 PDs (49% response rate) and 109 fellows (28%). PDs and fellows with access to a social care systematic workflow in their pediatric emergency department (PED) had higher odds of comfort assessing social risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.0), valuation of social care (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.9), preparedness to assist families (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.2), screening tendency (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5), and ability to refer to community resources (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.6). A similarly directed, but less pronounced pattern was noted with access to a community resource database for referrals and 24-h access to a social worker in the PED. Conclusions: PED organizational factors-particularly access to a social care systematic workflow-appear positively associated with PEM physician practices and perceptions of social care delivery. Further research is under way to advance understanding of PEM training factors in social care.

Social care practices and perspectives among U.S. pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs.

Background: The emergence of social emergency medicine-the incorporation of social context into the structure and practice of emergency care-has brought forth greater embracement of the social determinants of health by medical professionals, yet workforce practices and training have remained elusive. Academic literature particularly in the field of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship training is lacking relative to general pediatrics and adult emergency medicine. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to assess the social care knowledge, perspectives, and training of PEM program directors (PDs) and fellows across a national cross-sectional sample. A secondary aim was to uncover key actionable areas for the development of social care curricula in PEM training programs. A social care practices assessment tool was developed via snowball sampling interviews among clinician researcher experts and disseminated to PEM PDs and fellows nationally in accredited academic PEM training institutions. Results: A total of 153 participants-44 PDs (49% response rate) and 109 fellows (28%)-completed the assessment tool. Responses among PDs and fellows were highly concordant. Only 12% reported regular use of a standardized social needs screening tool. The majority felt unprepared to assist families with social needs and less than half felt comfortable talking to families about social need. At the same time, social care was highly valued by 73% of participants. All participants felt that providing social care training during PEM fellowship would be beneficial. PDs and fellows identified five priority areas for PEM curricular development. Conclusions: PEM PDs and fellows have an overall favorable perception of social care yet report significant deficits in current practice organization and training. This study is part of a larger national collaborative advocacy project to organize and advance social care delivery across academic PEM training institutions through evidence-based approaches, best practices, and expert consensus.