Development and validation of Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) for Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) and factor analytic assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) for Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) in adolescents. METHODS: Questions and threshold criteria of the K-SADS-IGD was generated based on the related section of K-SADS-PL. Then, the sample consist of IGD group and matched control group with no significant difference in psychiatric comorbidities from clinical settings were included to assess the psychometric properties of the K-SADS-IGD. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor analysis were conducted to evaluate and compare DSM model of IGD and two different Models of IGD proposal in adolescents. RESULTS: Exploratory Factor Analysis of K-SADS-IGD revealed a single factor explaining 61.469% of the total variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicates that although the K-SADS-IGD model fit indices were also acceptable, Model 1, which excluded the 7th criterion of IGD criteria of DSM-5 showed better fit in adolescent population. The Likelihood Ratio Positive and the Likelihood Ratio Negative estimates for the diagnosis of K-SADS-IGD were 31.4 and 0.12, respectively, suggesting that K-SADS-IGD was beneficial for determining the presence and the absence of IGD in adolescents. Also, K-SADS-IGD could detect disordered gamers with significantly low functionality (even after controlling the impact of comorbidities) from non-disordered gamers. CONCLUSION: K-SADS-IGD was found to be a reliable and valid instrument in adolescents. The model excluding 7th criteria of DSM-5 IGD was found to be more consistent than the current DSM-5 IGD model in the adolescent population. Therefore, the diagnostic criteria might be required to adjust according to the age group since the clinical symptomatology of IGD in adolescents may differ from that in adults. The K-SADS-IGD may meet the need for a certain and standardized tool to assess IGD in this population.

When to Use Amisulpride in Adolescents: A Retrospective Chart Examination of Inpatients.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Despite increasing interest in amisulpride, current knowledge about its use in the pediatric population is scarce. This chart review aimed to investigate the use of amisulpride in a naturalistic adolescent population. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Electronic medical records of a tertiary care adolescent inpatient unit were screened between January 2015 and April 2021. Sociodemographic data and all clinical information were collected via data collection forms, and targeted symptoms were obtained from patients' files. Patients with early-onset psychotic disorders (n = 58), bipolar I disorder (n = 29), major depressive disorder (n = 14), and other psychiatric diagnoses (n = 9) were included. Treatment response was defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement of at least much improvement after treatment. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Median titration rate of amisulpride was 400 mg/wk, and the maximum administered daily dose ranged between 100 and 1200 mg/d. The maximum daily dose and number of previous antipsychotics were higher in the early-onset psychotic disorder group. Persistent positive symptoms and resistance to previous treatments were leading causes for amisulpride treatment. Other indications were also impulsive/disruptive behaviors, antipsychotic adverse effects, depressive symptoms, somatic complaints, and abnormalities in liver function tests. Finally, patients with lower daily treatment doses and more previous antipsychotic trials are less likely to benefit from the treatment. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Persistent psychotic/mood symptoms, impulsive/disruptive behaviors, and abnormalities in liver function tests were reasons for the amisulpride treatment in adolescents. Randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment in adolescents.

Topical neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist Fosaprepitant ameliorates ocular graft-versus-host disease in a preclinical mouse model.

PURPOSE: to assess the effect of topical administration of the Neurokin-1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist Fosaprepitant in a pre-clinical model of ocular Graft-versus-Host disease (GVHD). METHODS: BALB/c mice were pre-conditioned by myeloablative total body irradiation and subjected to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and mature T cell infusion (BM + T). BM-transplanted mice (BM) were used as controls. Ocular GVHD was specifically assessed by quantifying corneal epithelial damage, tear secretion, blepharitis and phimosis, 3 times/week for 28 days post-transplantation. A group of BM + T mice received Fosaprepitant 10 mg/mL, 6 times/day, topically, from day 7-29 after transplantation. After sacrifice, the expression of NK1R, CD45, CD3, and CXCL10 was quantified in the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: BM + T mice developed corneal epithelial damage (day 0-29, p < 0.001), blepharitis (day 0-29, p < 0.001), and phimosis (day 0-29, p < 0.01), and experienced decreased tear secretion (day 21, p < 0.01) compared to controls. NK1R was found upregulated in corneal epithelium (p < 0.01) and lacrimal gland (p < 0.01) of BM + T mice. Fosaprepitant administration significantly reduced corneal epithelial damage (p < 0.05), CD45+ (p < 0.05) and CD3+ (p < 0.01) immune cell infiltration in the cornea and conjunctiva (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, Fosaprepitant reduced the expression of CXCL10 in the cornea (p < 0.05) and in the lacrimal gland (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that NK1R represents a novel druggable pathway for the therapy of ocular GVHD.