Assessment of biofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture in the Great Mekong Region.

A growing concern on the deleterious effects of chemical inputs to the environment has been on the rise from the excessive use of chemical inputs leading to soil and water pollution, destruction to fauna and microbial communities, reduced soil fertility and increased crop disease susceptibility. In the Great Mekong Region (GMR), a large majority of the population relies on agriculture and faces severe challenges including decline in soil fertility, increased pests and diseases, leading to lower ecosystem productivity. In this region, over-dependence on chemical fertilizers also continues to impact negatively on soil health and the wider ecosystem. Agroecological practices, and beneficial microorganisms in particular, offer an affordable and sustainable alternative to mineral inputs for improved plant nutrition and soil health for optimal crop performance and sustainable production. Biofertilizers are a key component in integrated nutrient management as well as for increased economic benefits from reduced expenditure on chemical fertilizers, holistically leading to sustainable agriculture. To cope with the need for biofertilizer adoption for sustainable agricultural production, the countries in the GMR are putting efforts in promoting development and use of biofertilizers and making them available to farmers at affordable costs. Despite these efforts, farmers continue to use chemical fertilizers at high rates with the hope of increased yields instead of taking advantage of microbial products capable of providing plant nutrients while restoring or improving soil health. This study explored the current agricultural practices in the six countries in the GMR (China, Vietnam, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Lao PDR), the critical need for sustainable agroecological practices with a special emphasis on biofertilizers. We highlighted the current status, distribution, adoption and gaps of biofertilizer production in the GMR, in order to obtain an insight on the nature of biofertilizers, efficacy and production standards, adoption or lack of biofertilizers in the GMR.

Aqueous peat extract exposes rhizobia to sub-lethal stress which may prime cells for improved desiccation tolerance.

Inoculation of legume seed with rhizobia is an efficient and cost-effective means of distributing elite rhizobial strains to broad-acre crops and pastures. However, necessary drying steps after coating seed expose rhizobia to desiccation stress reducing survival and limiting potential nitrogen fixation by legumes. Rhizobial tolerance to desiccation varies with strain and with growth conditions prior to drying. Cells grown in peat generally survive desiccation better than cells grown in liquid broth. We aimed to identify peat-induced proteomic changes in rhizobia that may be linked to desiccation tolerance. Proteins expressed differentially after growth in peat extract when compared with a minimal defined medium were measured in four rhizobial strains. Proteins showing the greatest increase in abundance were those involved in amino acid and carbohydrate transport and metabolism. Proteins involved in posttranslational modification and cell defence mechanisms were also upregulated. Many of the proteins identified in this study have been previously linked to stress responses. In addition, analysis using nucleic acid stains SYTO9 and propidium iodide indicated that membranes had been compromised after growth in peat extract. We targeted the membrane repair protein PspA (ΔRL3579) which was upregulated in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae 3841 after growth in peat extract to validate whether the inability to repair membrane damage after growth in peat extract reduced desiccation tolerance. The ΔRL3579 mutant grown in peat extract had significantly lower survival under desiccation stress, whereas no difference in survival between wild-type and mutant strains was observed after growth in tryptone yeast (TY) or minimal medium (JMM) media. Staining mutant and wild-type strains with SYTO9 and propidium iodide indicated that membranes of the mutant were compromised after growth in peat extract and to a lesser extent in TY. This study shows that growth in peat extract causes damage to cell membranes and exposes rhizobia to sub-lethal stress resulting in differential expression of several stress-induced proteins. The induction of these proteins may prime and protect the cells when subjected to subsequent stress such as desiccation. Identifying the key proteins involved in desiccation tolerance and properties of peat that stimulate this response will be important to inform development of new inoculant technology that maximises survival of rhizobia during delivery to legume crops and pastures.

Efficiency of different formulations of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and effect of co-inoculation of Bacillus subtilis with two different strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.

A key constraint in successfully obtaining an effective inoculant is overcoming difficulties in formulating a viable and user-friendly final product and maintaining the microbial cells in a competent state. Co-cultures of rhizobia and PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria) are a logical next subject for formulation researchers as they can influence the efficacy of rhizobia. A greenhouse experiment was set to assess the formulation effect of one strain i.e. Bradyrhizobium japonicum, 532c (granules, liquid and broth) and also to determine the efficiency of co-inoculation of Bacillus with two commercial strains of B. japonicum (532c and RCR 3407) on 2 soybean (Glycine max L.) varieties. PCR-RFLP analysis was used to determine the nodule occupancy in each treatment. Most of the inoculants showed increased nodulation and biomass yields (by approximately 2-5 and 4-10 g plant(-1) respectively) as compared to the uninoculated controls. TGx1740-2F showed no significant differences in nodule fresh weights for the formulation effect while the co-inoculants increased the nodule fresh weights by up to 4 g plant(-1). The liquid and granule-based inoculants induced higher biomass yields (4-8 g plant(-1)) suggesting a possible impact of formulation on the effectiveness of the inoculants. The co-inoculants also gave higher yields but showing no significant differences to the rhizobial inoculants. Nodule occupancy was 100 % for the rhizobial inoculants as well as the co-inoculants emphasizing the infectivity and high competitiveness of 532c and RCR 3407 strains despite the high population of indigenous rhizobia.