In vitro activity of cefiderocol against European Enterobacterales, including isolates resistant to meropenem and recentß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-|resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-|97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-|92.1% vs 0%-|88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and ß-|lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-|20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-|56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-ß-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in ß-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved ß-lac|tam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates. IMPORTANCE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.

Evaluation of the activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam against Enterobacterales bacteria collected in Europe from 2019 to 2021, including third-generation cephalosporin-resistant isolates.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to investigate the activity of the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination cefepime/enmetazobactam, against recently circulating Enterobacterales isolates from Europe from 2019 to 2021. METHODS: A total of 2627 isolates were collected, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Isolates with phenotypic resistance to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime (but susceptible to meropenem) and isolates nonsusceptible to meropenem were screened for the presence of ß-lactamases. RESULTS: Overall, susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins was 77%, and 97.3% were susceptible to meropenem. Cefepime/enmetazobactam susceptibility was 97.9% (72% of these isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae from Italy), compared with 80.0% susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam and 99.4% to ceftazidime/avibactam. A total of 320 isolates (12.2%) were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins but susceptible to meropenem, and virtually all (96.3%) carried an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase with or without an AmpC and these were all susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. Most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carried a KPC (68%), which were not inhibited by cefepime/enmetazobactam but were inhibited by ceftazidime/avibactam. Additionally, most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carrying OXA-48 (9/12 isolates) were susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime/enmetazobactam was highly active against Enterobacterales isolates, especially those resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. These data suggest that cefepime/enmetazobactam could be used as a carbapenem-sparing agent to replace piperacillin/tazobactam.

Antibacterial effect of seven days exposure to ceftolozane-tazobactam as monotherapy and in combination with fosfomycin or tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with ceftolozane-tazobactam MICs at or above 4 mg/l in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

OBJECTIVES: To use a pre-clinical pharmacokinetic infection model to assess the antibacterial effect of ceftolozane/tazobactam alone or in combination with fosfomycin or tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains with MICs at or higher than the clinical breakpoint (MIC ≥ 4 mg/L). METHODS: An in vitro model was used to assess changes in bacterial load and population profiles after exposure to mean human serum concentrations of ceftolozane/tazobactam associated with doses of 2 g/1 g q8h, fosfomycin concentrations associated with doses of 8 g q8h or tobramycin at doses of 7 mg/kg q24 h over 168 h. RESULTS: Simulations of ceftolozane/tazobactam at 2 g/1 g q8h alone produced 3.5-4.5 log reductions in count by 6 h post drug exposure for strains with MIC ≤32 mg/L. The antibacterial effect over the first 24 h was related to ceftolozane/tazobactam MIC. There was subsequent regrowth with most strains to bacterial densities of >106 CFU/mL. Addition of either fosfomycin or tobramycin resulted in suppression of regrowth and in the case of tobramycin more rapid initial bacterial killing up to 6 h. These effects could not be related to either fosfomycin or tobramycin MICs. Changes in population profiles were noted with ceftolozane/tazobactam alone often after 96 h exposure but such changes were suppressed by fosfomycin and almost abolished by the addition of tobramycin. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of either fosfomycin or tobramycin to ceftolozane/tazobactam at simulated human clinically observed concentrations reduced P. aeruginosa bacterial loads and the risk of resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam when strains had ceftolozane/tazobactam MIC values at or above the clinical breakpoint.

Exploring Cluster-Dependent Antibacterial Activities and Resistance Pathways of NOSO-502 and Colistin against Enterobacter cloacae Complex Species.

The Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) is a group of diverse environmental and clinically relevant bacterial species associated with a variety of infections in humans. ECC have emerged as one of the leading causes of nosocomial infections worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the activity of NOSO-502 and colistin (CST) against a panel of ECC clinical isolates, including different Hoffmann's clusters strains, and to investigate the associated resistance mechanisms. NOSO-502 is the first preclinical candidate of a novel antibiotic class, the odilorhabdins (ODLs). MIC50 and MIC90 of NOSO-502 against ECC are 1 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL, respectively, with a MIC range from 0.5 µg/mL to 32 µg/mL. Only strains belonging to clusters XI and XII showed decreased susceptibility to both NOSO-502 and CST while isolates from clusters I, II, IV, and IX were only resistant to CST. To understand this phenomenon, E. cloacae ATCC 13047 from cluster XI was chosen for further study. Results revealed that the two-component system ECL_01761-ECL_01762 (ortholog of CrrAB from Klebsiella pneumoniae) induces NOSO-502 hetero-resistance by expression regulation of the ECL_01758 efflux pump component (ortholog of KexD from K. pneumoniae) which could compete with AcrB to work with the multidrug efflux pump proteins AcrA and TolC. In E. cloacae ATCC 13047, CST-hetero-resistance is conferred via modification of the lipid A by addition of 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose controlled by PhoPQ. We identified that the response regulator ECL_01761 is also involved in this resistance pathway by regulating the expression of the ECL_01760 membrane transporter.

Cefepime pharmacodynamic targets against Enterobacterales employing neutropenic murine lung infection and in vitro pharmacokinetic models.

BACKGROUND: Very limited studies, so far, have been conducted to identify the pharmacodynamic targets of cefepime, a well-established fourth-generation cephalosporin. As a result, conventional targets representing the cephalosporin class are used for cefepime target attainment analysis. OBJECTIVES: We employed both a neutropenic murine lung infection model and an in vitro pharmacokinetic model (IVPM) to determine cefepime's pharmacodynamic target [percentage of the dosing interval during which unbound drug concentrations remain higher than the MIC (%fT>MIC)] for bacteriostatic and 1 log10 kill effects. METHODS: Ten strains with cefepime MICs ranging from 0.03 to 16 mg/L were studied in the lung infection. In the IVPM, five cefepime-resistant strains with cefepime/tazobactam (fixed 8 mg/L) MICs ranging from 0.25 to 8 mg/L were included. Through 24 h dose fractionation, both in lung infection and IVPM (in the latter case, tazobactam 8 mg/L continuous infusion was used to protect cefepime), varying cefepime exposures and corresponding pharmacodynamic effect scenarios were generated to identify the pharmacodynamic targets. RESULTS: Using a non-linear sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model, the cefepime's plasma fT>MIC for 1 log10 kill in lung infection ranged from 17% to 53.7% and a combined exposure-response plot yielded 30%. In the case of IVPM, T>MIC ranged from 6.9% to 75.4% with a mean value of 34.2% for 1 log10 kill. CONCLUSIONS: Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that cefepime's pharmacodynamic requirements are lower than generally reported for cephalosporins (50%-70% fT>MIC). The lower requirement for cefepime could be linked with factors such as cefepime's better permeation properties and multiple PBP affinity-driven enhanced bactericidal action.

Evaluation of perturbed iron-homeostasis in a prospective cohort of patients with COVID-19.

Background: Marked reductions in serum iron concentrations are commonly induced during the acute phase of infection. This phenomenon, termed hypoferremia of inflammation, leads to inflammatory anemia, but could also have broader pathophysiological implications. In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), hypoferremia is associated with disease severity and poorer outcomes, although there are few reported cohorts. Methods: In this study, we leverage a well characterised prospective cohort of hospitalised COVID-19 patients and perform a set of analyses focussing on iron and related biomarkers and both acute severity of COVID-19 and longer-term symptomatology. Results: We observed no associations between acute serum iron and long-term outcomes (including fatigue, breathlessness or quality of life); however, lower haemoglobin was associated with poorer quality of life. We also quantified iron homeostasis associated parameters, demonstrating that among 50 circulating mediators of inflammation IL-6 concentrations were strongly associated with serum iron, consistent with its central role in inflammatory control of iron homeostasis. Surprisingly, we observed no association between serum hepcidin and serum iron concentrations. We also observed elevated erythroferrone concentrations in COVID-19 patients with anaemia of inflammation. Conclusions: These results enhance our understanding of the regulation and pathophysiological consequences of disturbed iron homeostasis during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Comparative bactericidal activity of representative ß-lactams against Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: There is surprisingly little comparative published data on the bactericidal action of different sub-classes of ß-lactams against aerobic Gram-negative rods, and the assumption is that all behave in the same way. OBJECTIVES: To describe a systematic investigation of a representative penicillin, cephalosporin, monobactam and carbapenem against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Concentration-time-kill curves (TKC) were determined for three strains each of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. All strains were susceptible to the agents used. The antibiotics were piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, aztreonam and meropenem. The initial inoculum was 106 cfu/mL and TKC were determined over 48 h. The area-under-the-bacterial-kill curve to 24 h (AUBKC 24 log cfu·h/mL) and 48 h (AUBKC 48) were used to measure antibacterial effect (ABE). Population profiles before and after antibiotic exposure were recorded. RESULTS: Against E. coli and K. pneumoniae meropenem had a maximal ABE at ≥MIC × 1 concentrations while piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime had maximal effect at ≥MIC × 4 and aztreonam at ≥MIC × 8 concentrations. Ceftazidime, aztreonam and meropenem had less ABE against K. pneumoniae than E. coli. Against P. aeruginosa, meropenem was most bactericidal, with a maximum ABE at 8×/16 × MIC. Other ß-lactams had notably less ABE. In contrast, against A. baumannii, ceftazidime and meropenem had the greatest ABE, with a maximal effect at ≥MIC × 4, concentration changes in population profiles were least apparent with E. coli. CONCLUSIONS: ß-Lactam sub-classes (penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams and carbapenems) have different antibacterial effects against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. Extrapolation of in vitro pharmacodynamic findings from one species to another or one sub-class of ß-lactam to another is not justified.

Blood group type A secretors are associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 cardiovascular disease complications.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus causes COVID-19, an infection capable of causing severe disease and death but which can also be asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic. We investigated whether ABO blood group or secretor status was associated with COVID-19 severity. We investigated secretor status because expression of ABO glycans on secreted proteins and non-erythroid cells are controlled by a fucosyltransferase (FUT2), and inactivating FUT2 mutations result in a non-secretor phenotype which protects against some viral infections. Data combined from healthcare records and our own laboratory tests (n = 275) of hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction positive patients confirmed higher than expected numbers of blood group A individuals compared to O (RR = 1.24, CI 95% [1.05, 1.47], p = 0.0111). There was also a significant association between group A and COVID-19-related cardiovascular complications (RR = 2.56, CI 95% [1.43, 4.55], p = 0.0011) which is independent of gender. Molecular analysis revealed that group A non-secretors are significantly less likely to be hospitalized than secretors. Testing of convalescent plasma donors, among whom the majority displayed COVID-19 symptoms and only a small minority required hospitalization, group A non-secretors were slightly over-represented. Our findings showed that group A non-secretors are not resistant to infection by SARS-CoV-2, but are more likely to experience a less severe form of associated disease.

Predicting outcomes of COVID-19 from admission biomarkers: a prospective UK cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has an unpredictable clinical course, so prognostic biomarkers would be invaluable when triaging patients on admission to hospital. Many biomarkers have been suggested using large observational datasets but sample timing is crucial to ensure prognostic relevance. The DISCOVER study prospectively recruited patients with COVID-19 admitted to a UK hospital and analysed a panel of putative prognostic biomarkers on the admission blood sample to identify markers of poor outcome. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted to hospital with proven or clinicoradiological suspected COVID-19 were consented. Admission bloods were extracted from the clinical laboratory. A panel of biomarkers (interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), Krebs von den Lungen 6, troponin, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, B-type natriuretic peptide, procalcitonin) were performed in addition to routinely performed markers (C reactive protein (CRP), neutrophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio). Age, National Early Warning Score (NEWS2), CURB-65 and radiographic severity score on initial chest radiograph were included as comparators. All biomarkers were tested in logistic regression against a composite outcome of non-invasive ventilation, intensive care admission or death, with area under the curve (AUC) (figures calculated). RESULTS: 187 patients had 28-day outcomes at the time of analysis. CRP (AUC: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.78), lymphocyte count (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.72) and other routine markers did not predict the primary outcome. IL-6 (AUC: 0.77, 0.65 to 0.88) and suPAR (AUC: 0.81, 0.72 to 0.88) showed some promise, but simple clinical features alone such as NEWS2 score (AUC: 0.70, 0.60 to 0.79) or age (AUC: 0.70, 0.62 to 0.77) performed nearly as well. DISCUSSION: Admission blood biomarkers have only moderate predictive value for predicting COVID-19 outcomes, while simple clinical features such as age and NEWS2 score outperform many biomarkers. IL-6 and suPAR had the best performance, and further studies should focus on the additive value of these biomarkers to routine care.

Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) as a marker for disease severity and persistent radiological abnormalities following COVID-19 infection at 12 weeks.

INTRODUCTION: Acute presentations of COVID-19 infection vary, ranging from asymptomatic carriage through to severe clinical manifestations including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Longer term sequelae of COVID-19 infection includes lung fibrosis in a proportion of patients. Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) is a mucin like glycoprotein that has been proposed as a marker of pulmonary epithelial cell injury. We sought to determine whether KL-6 was a marker of 1) the severity of acute COVID-19 infection, or 2) the persistence of symptoms/radiological abnormalities at medium term follow up. METHODS: Prospective single centre observational study. RESULTS: Convalescent KL-6 levels were available for 93 patients (male 63%, mean age 55.8 years) who attended an 12-week follow up appointment after being admitted to hospital with COVID-19. For 67 patients a baseline KL-6 result was available for comparison. There was no significant correlations between baseline KL-6 and the admission CXR severity score or clinical severity NEWS score. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the baseline KL-6 level and an initial requirement for oxygen on admission or the severity of acute infection as measured at 28 days. There was no significant difference in the 12-week KL-6 level and the presence or absence of subjective breathlessness but patients with abnormal CT scans at 12 weeks had significantly higher convalescent KL-6 levels compared to the remainder of the cohort (median 1101 IU/ml vs 409 IU/ml). CONCLUSIONS: The association between high KL-6 levels at 12 weeks and persisting CT abnormalities (GGO/fibrosis), is a finding that requires further exploration. Whether KL-6 may help differentiate those patients with persisting dyspnoea due to complications rather than deconditioning or dysfunctional breathing alone, is an important future research question.

Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up: results from a prospective UK cohort.

The longer-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection are uncertain. Consecutive patients hospitalised with COVID-19 were prospectively recruited to this observational study (n=163). At 8-12 weeks postadmission, survivors were invited to a systematic clinical follow-up. Of 131 participants, 110 attended the follow-up clinic. Most (74%) had persistent symptoms (notably breathlessness and excessive fatigue) and limitations in reported physical ability. However, clinically significant abnormalities in chest radiograph, exercise tests, blood tests and spirometry were less frequent (35%), especially in patients not requiring supplementary oxygen during their acute infection (7%). Results suggest that a holistic approach focusing on rehabilitation and general well-being is paramount.

The pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin against Staphylococcus aureus studied in an in vitro model of infection.

OBJECTIVES: The pharmacodynamics of intravenous fosfomycin have not been described for Gram-positive pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). This paper described the dominant pharmacodynamic index for fosfomycin against S. aureus and its size for antibacterial effect. METHODS: A single-compartment dilutional in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to provide fosfomycin exposures against S. aureus, three methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), two methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); fosfomycin MICs were 2 mg/L (one strain), 4 mg/L (one strain), 8 mg/L (two strains) and 16 mg/L (one strain). For all simulations, a fosfomycin half-life of 2.5 hours was modelled. Cmax/MICs from 0-74.8, AUC/MICs from 0-750 and T>MIC 0-100% were simulated. The primary end-points were changes in bacterial load after 24 hours and changes in population profiles after 48 hours. RESULTS: Log AUC/MIC R2 = 0.55 and log Cmax/MIC R2 = 0.66 were related to S. aureus log reduction in viable count at 24 hours; T>MIC was poorly related. Cmax/MIC for a 24 hour static, -1 log drop and -2 log drop were 3.0 ± 1.7, 4.6 ± 2.4 and 6.6 ± 3.8, respectively. AUC/MIC for a 24 hour static, -1 log drop and -2 log drop were 26.4 ± 11.8, 42.8 ± 21.8 and 66.6 ± 39.1. Emergence of resistance as indicated by > 2 log growth on MICx8 recovery media was maximal at AUC/MIC ratios of 10-40 and was suppressed at AUC/MIC ratios of ≥ 250. CONCLUSIONS: The dominant pharmacodynamic index for fosfomycin against S. aureus was Cmax/MIC in terms of reduction of bacterial load and AUC/MIC in terms of suppressing emergence of resistance. AUC/MIC ratios of 20-75 were associated with a -1 log reduction in bacterial load and AUC/MIC of 10-40 maximally increased emergence of resistance.

Pharmacodynamics of plazomicin and a comparator aminoglycoside, amikacin, studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

The new aminoglycoside plazomicin shows in vitro potency against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriales. The exposure-response relationship of plazomicin and the comparator aminoglycoside amikacin was determined for Escherichia coli, while for Klebsiella pneumoniae only plazomicin was tested. An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used. Five E. coli strains (two meropenem-resistant) and five K. pneumoniae strains (two meropenem-resistant) with plazomicin MICs of 0.5-4 mg/L were used. Antibacterial effect was assessed by changes in bacterial load and bacterial population profile. The correlation between change in initial inoculum after 24 h of drug exposure and the AUC/MIC ratio was good (plazomicin R2 ≥ 0.8302; amikacin R2 ≥ 0.9520). Escherichia coli plazomicin AUC/MIC ratios for 24-h static, -1, -2 and -3 log drop were 36.1 ± 18.4, 39.3 ± 20.9, 41.2 ± 21.9 and 44.8 ± 24.3, respectively, and for amikacin were 49.5 ± 12.7, 55.7 ± 14.8, 64.1 ± 19.2 and 73.3 ± 25.3. Klebsiella pneumoniae plazomicin AUC/MIC ratios for 24-h static, -1, -2 and -3 log drop were 34.0 ± 15.2, 46.8 ± 27.8, 67.4 ± 46.5 and 144.3 ±129.8. Plazomicin AUC/MIC ratios >66 and amikacin AUC/MIC ratios >57.7 were associated with suppression of E. coli growth on 4 × or 8 × MIC recovery plates. The equivalent plazomicin AUC/MIC to suppress resistance emergence with K. pneumoniae was >132. The plazomicin AUC/MIC for 24-h static effect and -1 log reduction in E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacterial load was in the range 30-60. Plazomicin AUC/MIC targets aligned with those of amikacin for E. coli.

Antibacterial effect of imipenem/relebactam on aerobic Gram-negative bacilli: in vitro simulations of 7 or 14 day human exposures.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the antibacterial effect of human simulations of dosing with imipenem/relebactam (with or without amikacin) on Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa over 7 or 14 day antibiotic exposures. METHODS: An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to assess changes in bacterial load and population profiles. RESULTS: Imipenem/relebactam produced an initial >4 log drop in viable counts followed by suppression for 7 days for Enterobacteriaceae whether the strain was WT, produced KPC enzymes or produced an AmpC enzyme with porin loss. Similarly, with the P. aeruginosa strains, there was an initial >4 log clearance over the first 24 h irrespective of whether the strain was WT, hyperexpressed AmpC or had OprD mutation with porin loss. However, with three of four strains there was modest regrowth over the 7 days. There were no changes in imipenem/relebactam MICs over the 7 days. Addition of amikacin in 7 day simulations resulted in more suppression of pseudomonal growth. In 14 day simulations with P. aeruginosa there was regrowth to 8 log10 by 14 days with imipenem/relebactam alone and associated increases in MICs. Addition of amikacin resulted in clearance from the model and prevented changes in population profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Imipenem/relebactam was highly effective at reducing the bacterial load of Enterobacteriaceae and there was no emergence of resistance. Against P. aeruginosa, the initial bacterial burden was also rapidly reduced, but there was subsequent regrowth, especially after 7 days of exposure. Addition of amikacin increased the clearance of P. aeruginosa and prevented emergence of resistance.

Antibacterial effect of ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with amikacin against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Objectives: To use a pre-clinical infection model to assess the antibacterial effect of human simulations of dosing with ceftolozane/tazobactam (with or without amikacin) or meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to assess changes in bacterial load and profiles after exposure to mean human serum concentrations over 168 h. Changes in area under the bacterial kill curve (AUBKC; log cfu/mL·h) and growth on 4 × MIC recovery plates were the co-primary outcome measures. Results: Simulations of ceftolozane/tazobactam at 1 g/0.5 g or 2 g/1 g q8h or meropenem 2 g q8h all produced a >4 log reduction in bacterial load of Escherichia coli. Meropenem had smaller AUBKC values, indicating greater reduction in bacterial load than ceftolozane/tazobactam. Meropenem was also more effective than ceftolozane/tazobactam against Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. All regimens were equally effective in reducing P. aeruginosa bacterial load measured by AUBKC but growth on 4 × MIC recovery plates and changes in population profiles were only seen with meropenem. Addition of amikacin at 15 mg/kg q24h or 7.5 mg/kg q12h to 2 g/1 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam produced greater reductions in bacterial load but generated changes in amikacin population profiles with the 7.5 mg/kg q12h amikacin simulation. Conclusions: The doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam simulated were highly effective in reducing the bacterial load of E. coli (MIC ≤0.25 mg/L), but less so for K. pneumoniae (MIC 4 mg/L). For both species, meropenem produced an overall greater reduction in pathogen load. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem were equally effective as monotherapy against P. aeruginosa but emergence of resistance occurred with meropenem. Addition of amikacin to ceftolozane/tazobactam reduced the bacterial load of P. aeruginosa at the expense of emergence of resistance to amikacin.

Pharmacodynamics of inhaled amikacin (BAY 41-6551) studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Background: The pharmacodynamics of inhaled antimicrobials are poorly studied. Amikacin is being developed for inhalational therapy as BAY 41-6551. Objectives: We employed an in vitro pharmacokinetic model to study the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of amikacin. Methods: A dose-ranging design was used to establish fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC targets for static, -1 log drop and -2 log drop effects for strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We then modelled epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentration associated with inhaled amikacin (400 mg every 12 h), over 5 days using mean human concentrations. Results: The 24 h static effect fAUC/MIC targets and -1 log drop targets were 51.0 ±âŸ26.7 and 71.6 ±âŸ27.6 for all species of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. fAUC/MIC targets for static effect, -1 log drop or -2 log drop were smaller than the 24 h values at 12 h and larger at 48 h. Emergence of resistance occurred maximally with E. coli in the fAUC/MIC range 12-60; K. pneumoniae 0-60 (48 h) and P. aeruginosa 12-80. When human ELF concentrations were modelled for strains with MIC ≤8 mg/L, there was rapid clearance and no regrowth. For strains with MIC ≥32 mg/L, there was initial clearance followed by regrowth. If MIC values were related to bacterial clearance then at least a static effect or -1 log drop in count would be expected for bacterial strains with MICs of ≤180 mg/L (static effect) or ≤148 mg/L (-1 log drop effect). Conclusions: An fAUC/MIC amikacin target of 50-80 is appropriate for aerobic Gram-negative bacilli and mean ELF concentrations of BAY 41-6551 would produce a static to -1 log clearance with strains up to 128 mg/L.