RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We would like to investigate the if IMRT produced better target coverage and dose sparing to adjacent normal structures as compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and lateral opposing fields (LOF) for patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy treated with retro-orbital irradiation. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients diagnosed with Graves' ophthalmopathy were prospectively recruited into this study. An individual IMRT, 3DCRT and LOF plan was created for each patient. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI) and other dosimetric parameters of the targets and organs-at-risk (OAR) generated by IMRT were compared with the other two techniques. RESULTS: Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated that CI generated by IMRT was superior to that produced by 3DCRT and LOF (p=0.005 for both respectively). Similarly HI with IMRT was proven better than 3DCRT (p=0.007) and LOF (p=0.005). IMRT gave rise to better dose sparing to some OARs including globes, lenses and optic nerves as compared with 3DCRT but not with LOF. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT, as compared with 3DCRT and LOF, was found to have a better target coverage, conformity and homogeneity and dose sparing to some surrounding structures, despite a slight increase but clinically negligible dose to other structures. Dosimetrically it might be a preferred treatment technique and a longer follow up is warranted to establish its role in routine clinical use.
Assuntos
Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Oftalmopatia de Graves/radioterapia , Órbita/efeitos da radiação , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Lesões por Radiação/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: We wanted to investigate dosimetric parameters that would predict radiation-induced acute nausea and vomiting in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with newly diagnosed NPC were treated with IMRT alone in this prospective study. Patients receiving any form of chemotherapy were excluded. The dorsal vagal complex (DVC) as well as the left and right vestibules (VB-L and VB-R, respectively) were contoured on planning computed tomography images. A structure combining both the VB-L and the VB-R, named VB-T, was also generated. All structures were labeled organs at risk (OAR). A 3-mm three-dimensional margin was added to these structures and labeled DVC+3 mm, VB-L+3 mm, VB-R+3 mm, and VB-T+3 mm to account for physiological body motion and setup error. No weightings were given to these structures during optimization in treatment planning. Dosimetric parameters were recorded from dose-volume histograms. Statistical analysis of parameters' association with nausea and vomiting was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Six patients (12.2%) reported Grade 1 nausea, and 8 patients (16.3%) reported Grade 2 nausea. Also, 4 patients (8.2%) complained of Grade 1 vomiting, and 4 patients (8.2%) experienced Grade 2 vomiting. No patients developed protracted nausea and vomiting after completion of IMRT. For radiation-induced acute nausea, V40 (percentage volume receiving at least 40Gy) to the VB-T and V40>=80% to the VB-T were predictors, using univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, V40>=80% to the VB-T was the only predictor. There were no predictors of radiation-induced acute vomiting, as the number of events was too small for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating that a V40 to the VB-T is predictive of radiation-induced acute nausea. The vestibules should be labeled as sensitive OARs, and weightings should be considered for dose sparing during optimization in the treatment planning of IMRT.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Náusea/etiologia , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Nervo Vago/efeitos da radiação , Vestíbulo do Labirinto/efeitos da radiação , Vômito/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Náusea/classificação , Órgãos em Risco/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Erros de Configuração em Radioterapia , Regressão Psicológica , Carga Tumoral , Nervo Vago/diagnóstico por imagem , Vestíbulo do Labirinto/diagnóstico por imagem , Vômito/classificaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was conventional-fractionation radiotherapy plus concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy as recommended by the Intergroup-0099 Study. This combined analysis of the NPC-9901 and the NPC-9902 Trials aims to provide more comprehensive data to evaluate the efficacy of the Intergroup-0099 regimen and the contributing factors. METHODS: Eligible patients with stage III-IVB non-keratinizing NPC were randomly assigned to radiotherapy-alone (RT(i) group: 218 patients) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT(i) group: 223 patients) using cisplatin (100mg/m(2)) for three cycles in concurrence with radiotherapy, followed by cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) plus fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/day for 4 days) for three cycles. The median follow-up was 6.1 years. FINDINGS: Comparison by intention-to-treat showed that the CRT(i) group achieved significant improvement in overall failure-free rate (FFR), locoregional-FFR and cancer-specific survival (p ≤ 0.019); but the improvements for distant-FFR and overall survival (OS) were statistically insignificant (p ≥ 0.14). Further exploratory studies based on actual treatment showed that an additional improvement achieved was a significant gain in OS (CRT(a) versus RT(a) group: 72% versus 63% at 5-year, p=0.037). Multivariate analyses showed that the dose of cisplatin during the concurrent phase had significant impact on locoregional-FFR and OS, while that of fluorouracil during the adjuvant phase was significant for distant-FFR. The 5-year locoregional-FFR for patients who received 0-1, 2 and 3 concurrent cycles were 79%, 88% and 88%, respectively; the corresponding distant-FFR by adjuvant cycles were 68%, 78% and 77%, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Our results support the current practice of adding concurrent cisplatin plus adjuvant cisplatin-fluorouracil to radiotherapy for treating patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. The concurrent phase is important for locoregional control and survival, cisplatin 200mg/m(2) in two concurrent cycles might be adequate. Additional chemotherapy using fluorouracil-containing combination contributed to improving distant control.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic benefits by adding chemotherapy (+C) and/or accelerated-fractionation (AF) for patients with T3-4N0-1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1999 to 2004, 189 eligible patients were randomized to one of four treatment groups (CF/CF+C/AF/AF+C). The number of fractions/week was 5 for the CF groups and 6 for the AF groups. Patients in the +C groups were given concurrent cisplatin plus adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil. RESULTS: The AF+C group achieved significantly higher failure-free rate (88% at 5-year) than the CF group (63%; p=0.013), the AF group (56%; p=0.001) and the CF+C group (65%; p=0.027). As compared with CF alone, the increase in late toxicity was statistically insignificant (36% vs. 20%; p=0.25). Deaths due to cancer progression decreased (7% vs. 33%; p=0.011) but deaths due to incidental causes increased (9% vs. 2%; p=0.62). Improvement in overall survival reached borderline significance (85% vs. 66%; p=0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with AF significantly reduced failure and cancer-specific deaths. Although the increase in major late toxicity and incidental deaths were statistically insignificant, a subtle increase in non-cancer deaths narrowed the overall survival gain.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cooperação do PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current practice of adding concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy to radiotherapy (CRT) for treating advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is based on the Intergroup-0099 Study published in 1998. However, the outcome for the radiotherapy-alone (RT) group in that trial was substantially poorer than those in other trials, and there were no data on late toxicities. Verification of the long-term therapeutic index of this regimen is needed. METHODS: Patients with nonkeratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma staged T1-4N2-3M0 were randomly assigned to RT (176 patients) or to CRT (172 patients) using cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for three cycles in concurrence with radiotherapy, followed by cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) plus fluorouracil (1000 mg per m(2) per day for 4 days) every 4 weeks for three cycles. Primary endpoints included overall failure-free rate (FFR) (the time to first failure at any site) and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, locoregional FFR, distant FFR, and acute and late toxicity rates. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were well balanced in all patient characteristics, tumor factors, and radiotherapy parameters. Adding chemotherapy statistically significantly improved the 5-year FFR (CRT vs RT: 67% vs 55%; P = .014) and 5-year progression-free survival (CRT vs RT: 62% vs 53%; P = .035). Cumulative incidence of acute toxicity increased with chemotherapy by 30% (CRT vs RT: 83% vs 53%; P < .001), but the 5-year late toxicity rate did not increase statistically significantly (CRT vs RT: 30% vs 24%; P = .30). Deaths because of disease progression were reduced statistically significantly by 14% (CRT vs RT: 38% vs 24%; P = .008), but 5-year overall survival was similar (CRT vs RT: 68% vs 64%; P = .22; hazard ratio of CRT = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.58 to 1.13) because deaths due to toxicity or incidental causes increased by 7% (CRT vs RT: 1.7% vs 0, and 8.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Adding concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy statistically significantly reduced failure and cancer-specific deaths when compared with radiotherapy alone. Although there was no statistically significant increase in major late toxicity, increase in noncancer deaths narrowed the resultant gain in overall survival.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia , Razão de Chances , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Capecitabine monotherapy had activity in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) as demonstrated previously in a small pilot study. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received capecitabine for recurrent and metastatic NPC to further evaluate its clinical benefits. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with recurrent and metastatic NPC received capecitabine at a dose of 1-1.25 G/m(2) twice daily for 14 days in 3-week cycles. Disease sites were locoregional in 29%, distant in 45% and locoregional plus distant in 26%. All except one had prior platinum-based chemotherapy for relapse or as adjunctive treatment. Median follow-up was 10 months (range: 3-41). RESULTS: Treatment was generally well tolerated. Hand-foot syndrome was common and occurred in 86% (25% Grade 3). Grade 3 hematological toxicity occurred in 6%. Partial response rate was 31% (95% CI: 18%, 44%) and complete response rate was 6% (95% CI: 0%, 13%), for an overall response rate of 37% (95% CI: 23%, 50%). Median time-to-progression was 5 months and median survival was 14 months. One- and two-year survival rates were 54 and 26%, respectively. Significantly better survival was observed in patients treated for locoregional recurrence and those with severe hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine has single agent activity in NPC and severe hand-foot syndrome predicts favorable outcome. Based on our experience, capecitabine monotherapy should be considered in patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Dermatoses do Pé/induzido quimicamente , Dermatoses da Mão/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
CONTEXT: MicroRNAs have potential as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer. No study has evaluated the association between microRNA expression patterns and colon cancer prognosis or therapeutic outcome. OBJECTIVE: To identify microRNA expression patterns associated with colon adenocarcinomas, prognosis, or therapeutic outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: MicroRNA microarray expression profiling of tumors and paired nontumorous tissues was performed on a US test cohort of 84 patients with incident colon adenocarcinoma, recruited between 1993 and 2002. We evaluated associations with tumor status, TNM staging, survival prognosis, and response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Associations were validated in a second, independent Chinese cohort of 113 patients recruited between 1991 and 2000, using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. The final date of follow-up was December 31, 2005, for the Maryland cohort and August 16, 2004, for the Hong Kong cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MicroRNAs that were differentially expressed in tumors and microRNA expression patterns associated with survival using cancer-specific death as the end point. RESULTS Thirty-seven microRNAs were differentially expressed in tumors from the test cohort. Selected for validation were miR-20a, miR-21, miR-106a, miR-181b, and miR-203, and all 5 were enriched in tumors from the validation cohort (P < .001). Higher miR-21 expression was present in adenomas (P = .006) and in tumors with more advanced TNM staging (P < .001). In situ hybridization demonstrated miR-21 to be expressed at high levels in colonic carcinoma cells. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 57.5% for the Maryland cohort and was 49.5% for the Hong Kong cohort. High miR-21 expression was associated with poor survival in both the training (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.2) and validation cohorts (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.9), independent of clinical covariates, including TNM staging, and was associated with a poor therapeutic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Expression patterns of microRNAs are systematically altered in colon adenocarcinomas. High miR-21 expression is associated with poor survival and poor therapeutic outcome.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/genética , MicroRNAs/análise , RNA Neoplásico/análise , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Hibridização In Situ , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Prognóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This single-center, phase II study assessed the safety/tolerability and initial efficacy of gefitinib in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with recurrent and metastatic NPC who had treatment failure with at least 2 lines of chemotherapy including platinum were given gefitinib at a fixed dose of 250 mg daily. Treatment was continued until the patient experienced unacceptable side effects or disease progression. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled, having had treatment failure with a median of 2 chemotherapy regimens. Treatment was well tolerated, and only grades 1 to 2 adverse events were observed. None of the patients achieved partial or complete response. Median time-to-progression was 4 months, and median overall survival was 16 months. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib was well tolerated, but the response rate was poor in this heavily pretreated study population, and its use in NPC is not recommended outside the context of clinical trial.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Quinazolinas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gefitinibe , Humanos , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limited local failure of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) can often be salvaged by reirradiation using different techniques. Both gold grain implantation (GGI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have been used as salvage treatment of NPC but the relative efficacy of these two treatments is not known. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 74 patients with local NPC failure were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these patients, 37 underwent SRS (median dose, 12.5 Gy) and 37 split-palatal GGI at a dose of 60 Gy. The two groups were individually matched for prognostic factors, except for tumor volume. The median follow-up was 42 months. RESULTS: Local control was better in the GGI group. The 3-year local failure-free rate was 77.9% for the GGI group compared with 68.3% for the SRS group. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.098). In the subgroup with a tumor volume of Assuntos
Radioisótopos de Ouro/uso terapêutico
, Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia
, Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/cirurgia
, Radiocirurgia/métodos
, Terapia de Salvação/métodos
, Adulto
, Idoso
, Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
, Estudos de Casos e Controles
, Feminino
, Radioisótopos de Ouro/efeitos adversos
, Humanos
, Masculino
, Pessoa de Meia-Idade
, Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade
, Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia
, Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia
, Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia
, Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos
, Carga Tumoral
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) promises optimistic results in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). The objective of the current study was to map out prospectively the impact of NPC and RT on patients from diagnosis to 1 year posttreatment. METHODS: For this study, 67 Chinese patients (46 men and 21 women) with newly diagnosed stage I or II NPC who received primary RT were recruited. Physical and psychosocial adjustments were measured by using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale, and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Semistructured clinical interviews were conducted at bimonthly intervals from pre-RT to 1 year post-RT. RESULTS: Physical and psychosocial adjustments were poorest from pre-RT to the end of RT. Rapid improvements in all areas were noted in the first 2 months post-RT and reached a plateau at around the 6th month. At 1 year, except for physical symptoms and perceived stress, patient measures recovered to their pre-RT levels. At 1 year, patients had more physical complaints (P < .001) but less perceived stress (P = .002). The percentage of patients who expressed fear of dying dropped from 28% pre-RT to 2% at 1 year. However, patients who expressed "fear of the worst happening" increased from 51% pre-RT to 57% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Different periods in treatment of NPC imposed different psychosocial demands on patients. The current results indicated that the period from diagnosis to 2-month post-RT was a high-risk period both physically and emotionally. After treatment, most patients showed resilience despite persistent side effects of RT and successfully resumed their pretreatment level of functioning by the end of the year. Despite resuming a normal or near-normal living, patients still noted a subdued fear of recurrence.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/psicologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/psicologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery has been employed as a salvage treatment of local failures of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). To identify patients that would benefit from radiosurgery, we reviewed our data with emphasis on factors that predicted treatment outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 48 patients with local failures of NPC were treated by stereotactic radiosurgery between March 1996 and February 2005. Radiosurgery was administered using a modified linear accelerator with single or multiple isocenters to deliver a median dose of 12.5 Gy to the target periphery. Median follow-up was 54 months. RESULTS: Five-year local failure-free probability after radiosurgery was 47.2% and 5-year overall survival rate was 46.9%. Neuroendocrine complications occurred in 27% of patients but there were no treatment-related deaths. Time interval from primary radiotherapy, retreatment T stage, prior local failures and tumor volume were significant predictive factors of local control and/or survival whereas age was of marginal significance in predicting survival. A radiosurgery prognostic scoring system was designed based on these predictive factors. Five-year local failure-free probabilities in patients with good, intermediate and poor prognostic scores were 100%, 42.5%, and 9.6%. The corresponding five-year overall survival rates were 100%, 51.1%, and 0%. CONCLUSION: Important factors that predicted tumor control and survival after radiosurgery were identified. Patients with good prognostic score should be treated by radiosurgery in view of the excellent results. Patients with intermediate prognostic score may also be treated by radiosurgery but those with poor prognostic score should receive other salvage treatments.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy has not been shown to improve survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Phase III trials. To evaluate the effect of induction chemotherapy in NPC further, we performed subgroup analysis of two Phase III trials according to the T and N stage. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from two phase III trials comparing cisplatin/epirubicin or cisplatin/bleomycin/5-fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy (RT) vs. RT alone in NPC were pooled together for analysis. Patients were stratified into four subgroups according to the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer T and N stage: T1-T2N0-N1, Group 1 (early-stage disease); T1-T2N2-N3, Group 2 (advanced N disease); T3-T4N0-N1, Group 3 (advanced T stage); and T3-T4N2-N3, Group 4 (advanced T and N disease). Group 1 consisted entirely of patients with Stage IIB disease. A total of 784 patients were included for analysis on an intent-to-treat basis. The median follow-up for the surviving patients was 67 months. RESULTS: No significant differences in overall survival, locoregional failure-free, or distant metastasis-free rates were observed between the combined and RT arms in Groups 2 to 4. Significant differences in the overall survival and distant metastasis-free rates were observed only in Group 1, favoring the combined chemotherapy and RT arm. The 5-year overall survival rate was 79% in the combined arm and 67% in the RT-alone arm (p = 0.048). The corresponding 5-year distant metastasis-free rates were 86% and 74% (p = 0.0053). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that patients in Group 1, with early-stage NPC treated by RT alone, had relatively poor survival because of distant metastases. The observation of improved outcomes in this subgroup after the addition of induction chemotherapy has not been previously reported and warrants additional investigation.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Adulto , Bleomicina/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Epirubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Indução de Remissão , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcome in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2001 and May 2004, 31 patients with locally recurrent NPC received re-irradiation using IMRT. The rT classification distribution was 3 for rT1, 5 for rT2, 9 for rT3, and 14 for r T4. Median time from first course of radiotherapy to re-irradiation was 51 months. IMRT was performed using step-and-shoot method with nine 4-6 MV photon fields and median prescribed dose was 54 Gy (range: 50-60 Gy). Additional treatments included cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy in 68% and radiosurgery boost with a single dose which ranged from 8.5 to 12.5 Gy in 32%. Median follow-up time was 11 months. RESULTS: After re irradiation, 58% of patients had complete regression of primary tumor. One-year loco-regional progression-free, distant metastasis-free and overall survival rates were 56, 90, and 63%, respectively. Significantly better 1-year local progression-free rate was observed in rT1-3 than r T4 tumor (100 vs. 35%). Grade 3 late toxicities, mostly ototoxicity/cranial neuropathy, occurred in six patients (19%). One-year actuarial rates of late toxicities were 70% for all grades and 25% for Grade 3. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results showed that good control of rT1-3 NPC can be achieved using IMRT with a dose between 50 and 60 Gy, whereas the outcome for r T4 tumor remained poor. Late toxicities were common but incidence of severe toxicities was relatively low.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Lesões por Radiação , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients with advanced local recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have a poor prognosis. Retreatment by external radiotherapy is frequently the only option but results are usually poor. This study was conducted to evaluate the benefits of adding induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine before reirradiation for locally recurrent NPC. METHODS: Twenty patients with locally recurrent NPC not amenable to brachytherapy or surgery were enrolled between September 2001 and October 2003. The T stage distribution at recurrence was 5% rT2, 30% rT3, and 65% rT4. Induction chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1.25 g/m days 1 and 8 for 3 times per week for 3 cycles, followed by reirradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 58 chemotherapy cycles were administered to patients and most received 3 cycles. Hematological toxicities were mild, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 55% and 5% of patients, respectively, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 5%. After chemotherapy, 15 patients achieved partial response (75%). Seventeen patients received external reirradiation and one had radiosurgery after chemotherapy. Severe acute radiation toxicities were uncommon. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, 55% of patients had locoregional progression and 45% had died. The 1-year locoregional progression-free, local progression-free, and overall survival rates were 63%, 68%, and 80%, respectively. In patients with external reirradiation, the 1-year local progression-free and overall survival rates were 75% and 88%. Patients with rT2-3 stage had significantly better 1-year local control rates than those with rT4 stage (100% versus 52%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination cisplatin and gemcitabine is active and well-tolerated in locally recurrent NPC. The current approach of using induction chemotherapy before reirradiation may improve the outcome of patients with advanced local recurrence and merits further investigation.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , GencitabinaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This randomized study compared the results achieved by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with advanced nodal disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with nonkeratinizing/undifferentiated NPC staged T1-4N2-3M0 were randomized to CRT or RT. Both arms were treated with the same RT technique and dose fractionation. The CRT patients were given cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43, followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/d for 96 hours starting on days 71, 99, and 127. RESULTS: From 1999 to January 2004, 348 eligible patients were randomly assigned; the median follow-up was 2.3 years. The two arms were well-balanced in all prognostic factors and RT parameters. The CRT arm achieved significantly higher failure-free survival (72% v 62% at 3-year, P = .027), mostly as a result of an improvement in locoregional control (92% v 82%, P = .005). However, distant control did not improve significantly (76% v 73%, P = .47), and the overall survival rates were almost identical (78% v 78%, P = .97). In addition, the CRT arm had significantly more acute toxicities (84% v 53%, P < .001) and late toxicities (28% v 13% at 3-year, P = .024). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results confirmed that CRT could significantly improve tumor control, particularly at locoregional sites. However, there was significant increase in the risk of toxicities and no early gain in overall survival. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the ultimate therapeutic ratio.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma/patologia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Nineteen previously untreated metastatic NPC patients received one to six cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin. Fifteen patients received at least three cycles. The starting dose was 75 mg/m2 every three weeks for both drugs in 15 patients, and 60 mg/m2 for both drugs in four patients. All patients were included in toxicity and survival analysis, and 16 patients were evaluable for response. Median follow-up time was 11.6 months. Hematological toxicity was severe with Grade 4 neutropenia in 78.9% patients and 51.3% cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 42% patients and 12.5% cycles, with two septic deaths in the population treated with 75 mg/m2. Patients treated with a dose subsequently reduced to 60 mg/m2 had a lower incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia and no incidence of neutropenic fever/sepsis. Overall response rate was 62.5%, with a 95% confidence interval of 35-85%. Partial and complete response rates were 56.3% and 6.3%, respectively. Median time to progression was 5.6 months and median survival was 12.4 months. Three patients (15.6%) survived >2 years following chemotherapy. The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is active in metastatic NPC. The dose of 60 mg/m2 for both drugs without colony-stimulating factor support should be further evaluated as a high incidence of febrile neutropenia was observed with 75 mg/m2 dose.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/secundário , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma/patologia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Docetaxel , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Seguimentos , Doenças Hematológicas/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to report the overall survival (OS) outcome of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with local failure who received salvage treatment and to identify prognostic factors for OS. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2000, 2915 patients received primary radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy for nonmetastatic NPC. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 319 patients had developed local failure as the first failure, with or without synchronous regional/distant failure. OS was calculated from the start of primary RT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for OS in patients with isolated local failure. RESULTS: The T classification distribution of the local failure (rT classification) was as follows: 68 (21%) rT1 to T2a, 92 (29%) rT2b, 82 (26%) rT3, and 77 (24%) rT4. The rT classification was the same as the initial T classification in 82% of patients. Two hundred seventy-five patients (86%) had isolated local failure, and 232 (84%) of them did not have any distant metastasis or regional failure develop during follow-up. Salvage treatment was given to 200 patients (73%) with isolated local failure. One hundred fifty-nine patients (80%) received reirradiation (108 external beam RT [EBRT], 44 brachytherapy, and seven EBRT plus brachytherapy), 22 patients (11%) underwent nasopharyngectomy with or without postoperative RT, and 19 patients (9%) were treated with chemotherapy alone. Four patients died of RT complications, and one died of chemotherapy toxicity in the absence of active NPC. The 3-year actuarial OS for patients with isolated local failure was 74%. On multivariate analysis, advanced initial T classification (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; p = .0006) and the use of salvage treatment (HR, 0.54; p = .0038) were independent prognostic factors. For the subgroups of patients who had the same recurrent and initial T classification, salvage treatment was associated with improved OS only in the subgroup with T1 to T2 local failure (n = 127; p = 0.0446), but not in the subgroups with T3 (n = 48) or T4 (n = 54) disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with first local failure have localized disease. Salvage treatment is feasible in most of the patients with clinically isolated local failure. Patients who had early initial T classification have a more favorable prognosis. Subgroup analysis suggests that salvage treatment only prolongs survival in patients with T1 to T2 recurrent disease.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Adulto , Braquiterapia , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Prognóstico , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Retratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia de SalvaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Xerostomia is a uniform complication after radiotherapy (RT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Dosimetric studies suggested that intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) can spare part of the parotid glands from high-dose radiation. Disease control and salivary function after IMRT for early-stage NPC was studied prospectively. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with T1,N0-N1,M0 NPC were treated with IMRT from 2000 to 2002. The prescribed dose was 68-70 grays (Gy) in 34 fractions to gross tumor volume, 64-68 Gy to the planning target volume, and 70 Gy to enlarged cervical lymph nodes. Nineteen patients had stimulated whole salivary (SWS) flow assessment and stimulated parotid salivary (SPS) flow assessment at baseline and at 2 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months after the completion of IMRT. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2 years, only 1 neck failure was observed. The 2-year and 3-year local control, distant metastases-free, and overall survival rates all were 100%. The lymph node control and progression-free survival rates were 100% at 2 years and 92.3% at 3 years, respectively. The average mean dose to the parotid gland was 38.8 Gy. The SWS and SPS flow showed continuous recovery: 60% and 47.1% of patients recovered at least 25% of their baseline SPS flow and SWS flow, respectively, at 1 year after completion of IMRT, and the proportions rose to 85.7% and 71.4%, respectively, by 2 years. The pH and buffering capacity of saliva also improved with time. CONCLUSIONS: Parotid-sparing IMRT achieved good locoregional control, and there was continuous recovery of salivary flow, pH, and buffering capacity in the first 2 years after IMRT in patients with NPC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Glândula Parótida/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Glândula Parótida/efeitos da radiação , Estudos Prospectivos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Ho's stage T3 or N2/N3 NPC or neck node > or = 4 cm were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to have radiotherapy (RT) or CRT with uracil and tegafur and to have AC or no AC after RT/CRT. AC comprised alternating cisplatin, fluorouracil, vincristine, bleomycin, and methotrexate for six cycles. There were four treatment groups: A, RT; B, CRT; C, RT and AC; D, CRT and AC. For CRT versus RT, groups B and D were compared with groups A and C. For AC versus no AC, groups C and D were compared with groups A and B. RESULTS: Three-year failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for CRT versus RT were 69.3% versus 57.8% and 86.5% versus 76.8%, respectively (P =.14 and.06; n = 110 v 109). Distant metastases rate (DMR) was significantly reduced with CRT (14.8% v 29.4%; P =.026). Locoregional failure rates (LRFR) were similar (20% v 27.6%; P =.39). Three-year FFS and OS for AC versus no AC were 62.5% versus 65% and 80.4% versus 83.1%, respectively (P =.83 and.69; n = 111 v 108). DMR and LRFR were not reduced with AC (P =.34 and.15, respectively). Cox model showed CRT to be a favorable prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 0.42; P =.009). CONCLUSION: An improvement in OS with CRT was observed but did not achieve statistical significance. The improvement seemed to be associated with a significant reduction in DMR. AC did not improve outcome.