Does an individualized feedback mechanism improve quality of out-of-hospital CPR?

BACKGROUND: Despite its prevalence, survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains low. High quality CPR has been associated with improved survival in cardiac arrest patients. In early 2014, a program was initiated to provide feedback on CPR quality to prehospital providers after every treated cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether individualized CPR feedback was associated with improved CPR quality measures in the prehospital setting. METHODS: This before and after retrospective review included all treated adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients in an urban community. Data was compared prior to and after the initiation of the CPR feedback program. We compared the percent of encounters reaching the system defined benchmarks as well as the average values for compression fraction, compression rate, compression depth, and pre-shock pause in the before period compared to the after period. RESULTS: There were 159 encounters in the before period and 117 in the after. Compared to the before group, the after group had higher average compression rates (111.2/min vs 113.8/min; p=0.042), increased compression depths (4.9cm vs 5.6cm; p<0.001), and increased rates of benchmark achievement for compression depth greater than 5cm (48.1% vs 72.6%; p<0.001). No significant difference was noted in pre-shock pause (21.4s vs 14.7s; p=0.068). Additionally, no difference was noted between groups for compression fraction, though goal achievement was high in both groups. CONCLUSION: We found that individual CPR feedback is associated with marginally improved quality of CPR in the prehospital setting. Further investigation with larger samples is warranted to better quantify this effect.

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

The widely recognized benefits of early diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have only emphasized the importance of emergency physician (EP) competence in electrocardiographic interpretation. As such, the EP must be an expert in the interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in the emergency department chest pain center patient. The ECG is a powerful clinical tool used in the evaluation of patients, assisting in making the diagnosis of AMI and other syndromes, selecting appropriate therapies (including thrombolysis and primary angioplasty), securing the location of an adequate inpatient disposition, and predicting the risk of cardiovascular complications and death. This article will discuss the appropriate uses of the ECG in the patient with possible or confirmed AMI and review the typical electrocardiographic findings of AMI, diagnostically confounding patterns, mimickers of infarction, and new techniques.

Cause of ST segment abnormality in ED chest pain patients.

The objective of this study was to determine the electrocardiographic diagnoses of chest pain patients with ST segment elevation (STE) on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). This study was a retrospective ECG review of adult chest pain patients in a university hospital emergency department (ED) over a 3-month period (January 1, 1996 to March 31, 1996). STE was determined if the ST segment was elevated >/=1 mm in the limb leads and >/=2 mm in the precordial leads in at least two anatomically contiguous leads. Results showed 902 patients who met entry criteria and of whom 202 (22.4%) had STE. Thirty-one (15%) patients had STE acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as the final hospital diagnosis which caused the STE; 171 (85%) patients with STE had non-AMI diagnosis responsible for the ST segment elevation, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) 51 (25%), left bundle branch block (LBBB) 31 (15%), benign early repolarization (BER) 25 (12%), right bundle branch block 10 (5%), nonspecific bundle branch block 10 (5%), left ventricular aneurysm 5 (3%), acute pericarditis 2 (1%), ventricular paced rhythm 2 (1%), and undefined ST segment elevation 35 (17%). Forty-four patients had AMI as the final diagnosis of whom 31 showed STE on presentation to the ED. In 2 of 31 (6%) cases of STE AMI, the ST segment waveform was atypical for acute infarction. We concluded that AMI is not the most common cause of STE in ED chest pain patients. LVH is most often responsible for electrocardiographic STE followed by AMI and LBBB which occur at equal frequencies.

The added diagnostic value of automated QT-dispersion measurements and automated ST-segment deviations in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia.

The purpose of this study was to determine the added value of automated QT dispersion and ST-segment measurements to physician interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients with chest pain. To date, poor reproducibility of manual measurements and lack of shown added value have limited the clinical use of QT dispersion. Twelve-lead ECGs (n = 1,161) from the Milwaukee Prehospital Chest Pain Database were independently classified by 2 physicians into 3 groups (acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute cardiac ischemia (ACI), or nonischemic), and their consensus was obtained. QT-end and QT-peak dispersions were measured by a computerized system. The computer also identified ST-segment deviations. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPV) for AMI and ACI were evaluated independently and in combinations. For AMI, physicians' consensus classification was remarkably good (sensitivity, 48%, specificity, 99%). Independent classification by QT-end and QT-peak dispersions or ST deviations was not superior to the physicians' consensus. Optimal classification occurred by combining automated QT-end dispersion and ST deviations with physicians' consensus. This combination increased sensitivity for the diagnoses of AMI by 35% (65% vs 48%, P < .001) and ACI by 55% (62% vs 40%, P < .001) compared with physicians' consensus, while maintaining comparable specificity. This study supports a potential clinical role for automated QT dispersion when combined with other diagnostic methods for detecting AMI and ACI.

A comparison of 12- and 15-lead ECGS in ED chest pain patients: impact on diagnosis, therapy, and disposition.

The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of the 15-lead electrocardiogram (15ECG) on the emergency department (ED) management of chest pain (CP) patients. The design was prospective use of 15ECG with real-time physician survey and retrospective comparison to 12-lead ECG (12ECG). The study took place in a University hospital ED. Adult CP patients participated. During the 15ECG period (June 1996 to July 1996), 595 patients (92% of CP patients) had 15ECG analysis. Diagnoses of acute coronary ischemic syndromes (ACIS) were as follows: 13 acute myocardial infarction (AMI, 7 anterior [ANT], 5 inferior [INF], 1 lateral [LAT], 2 posterior [POST], 1 right ventricular [RV]) and 136 unstable angina (USA) with 47% exhibiting ECG abnormality; the 2 POST and 1 RV AMI occurred in the setting of coexisting INF AMI. The following management strategies were used: 6 fibrinolytic therapy (TT), 4 primary angioplasty (PTCA), 67 rule-out myocardial infarction (ROMI), and 144 admission to critical care unit (CCU). During the 12ECG period (June 1995 to July 1995), 599 patients were encountered. The diagnoses of ACIS were as follows: 11 AMI (5 ANT, 4 INF, 2 LAT) and 146 USA with 51% exhibiting ECG abnormality (P = NS for diagnostic comparisons to 15ECG). The following management strategies were used: 5 TT, 5 PTCA, 59 ROMI, and 137 admission to CCU (P = NS for all treatment comparisons to 15ECG). Of 15ECG cases 81% had completed real-time physician survey, showing that the diagnosis and management ACIS were not altered by the 15ECG; physicians felt, however, that the 15ECG provided a more complete anatomic picture of the ACIS. No false-positive cases of additional lead STE were noted in this investigation except in cases involving abnormal intraventricular conduction such as the bundle branch block scenario. The 15ECG provided a more complete description of myocardial injury without altering the ED diagnosis, ED-based therapy, or hospital disposition in adult CP patients. Further study is required to identify patient subset(s) which may benefit from the 15ECG.

Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Discharging patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina from the emergency department because of missed diagnoses can have dire consequences. We studied the incidence of, factors related to, and clinical outcomes of failure to hospitalize patients with acute cardiac ischemia. METHODS: We analyzed clinical data from a multicenter, prospective clinical trial of all patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggesting acute cardiac ischemia who presented to the emergency departments of 10 U.S. hospitals. RESULTS: Of 10,689 patients, 17 percent ultimately met the criteria for acute cardiac ischemia (8 percent had acute myocardial infarction and 9 percent had unstable angina), 6 percent had stable angina, 21 percent had other cardiac problems, and 55 percent had noncardiac problems. Among the 889 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 19 (2.1 percent) were mistakenly discharged from the emergency department (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.1 percent); among the 966 patients with unstable angina, 22 (2.3 percent) were mistakenly discharged (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.2 percent). Multivariable analysis showed that patients who presented to the emergency department with acute cardiac ischemia were more likely not to be hospitalized if they were women less than 55 years old (odds ratio for discharge, 6.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 32.5), were nonwhite (odds ratio, 2.2; 1.1 to 4.3), reported shortness of breath as their chief symptom (odds ratio, 2.7; 1.1 to 6.5), or had a normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (odds ratio, 3.3; 1.7 to 6.3). Patients with acute infarction were more likely not to be hospitalized if they were nonwhite (odds ratio for discharge, 4.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 11.8) or had a normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (odds ratio, 7.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 20.2). For the patients with acute infarction, the risk-adjusted mortality ratio for those who were not hospitalized, as compared with those who were, was 1.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 5.2), and for the patients with unstable angina, it was 1.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 17.0). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients who present to the emergency department with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina who are not hospitalized is low, but the discharge of such patients is associated with increased mortality. Failure to hospitalize is related to race, sex, and the absence of typical features of cardiac ischemia. Continued efforts to reduce the number of missed diagnoses are warranted.

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by hemodynamically unstable bradyarrhythmia: prehospital and ED treatment with atropine.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic response to atropine of patients experiencing hemodynamically compromising bradyarrhythmia related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the prehospital (PH) setting and the therapeutic impact of the PH response to atropine on further Emergency Department (ED) care. In addition, the prevalence of AMI in patients presenting with atrioventricular block (AVB) is noted. Retrospective review of PH, emergency department (ED), and hospital records. PH patients, with hemodynamically compromising bradycardia or AVB with evidence of spontaneous circulation, who received atropine as delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, were used. Urban/suburban fire department-based emergency medical services (EMS) system with on-line medical control serving a population of approximately 1.6 million persons. Hemodynamic instability was defined as the presence of any of the following: ischemic chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. Bradycardia was defined as sinus bradycardia, junctional bradycardia, or idioventricular bradycardia (grouped as bradycardia), whereas AVB included first-, second- (types I and II), or third-degree (grouped as AVB). The response that occurred within 1 minute of atropine dosing was recorded as none, partial, complete, or adverse. Comparisons were made between patients with AMI and non-AMI hospital discharge diagnoses. The diagnosis of AMI was confirmed by abnormal elevations in creatinine phosphokinase MB fraction. One hundred seventy-two patients meeting entry criteria were identified. Of these, 131 (76.1%) had complete PH, ED, and hospital records and were used for data analysis. Forty-five patients (34.3%) had a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI; the remaining patients had a non-AMI discharge diagnosis. AMI patients were significantly younger (67 +/- 12 v 73 +/- 13 years, P = .025), were less likely to have a history of heart disease (35.5% v54.7%, P = .038), and were more likely to present with chest pain (68.9% v24.4%, P < .001) or hypotension (60% v37.2%, P = .013) compared with non-AMI patients. Forty-five of 131 patients presented with AVB, of which 25 had a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI (55.6%). The mean time from first dose of atropine to ED arrival and the total dose of atropine received in the PH setting did not differ between AMI and non-AMI groups (15.2 +/- 7.7 v 16.2 +/- 8.7 minutes, P= .5; and 0.9 +/- 0.49 v 1.0 +/- 0.58 mg, P = .25). The likelihood of achieving normal sinus rhythm in the PH setting did not differ between AMI and non-AMI groups (40% v 18.6%, P = .07). No differences were found between AMI and non-AMI groups in the amount of additional atropine given (1.2 +/- 0.58 v 1.3 +/- 1.1 mg, P = .58) or the use of other resuscitative therapies after ED arrival (isoproterenol, 13.3% v12.8%, P = .93; dopamine, 28.9% v26.7% P = .79; transcutaneous pacing, 26.7% v26.7%, P = .99; transvenous pacing, 8.9% v5.8%, P = .51), with the exception of thrombolytic therapy (24.4% v 0%, P< .001) and cardiac catheterization (22.2% v3.4%, P = .001). Despite a lack of significant difference in achieving a normal sinus rhythm in the prehospital or ED setting, AMI patients were more likely to achieve a normal sinus rhythm over the total course of PH and ED care than non-AMI patients (44.4% v24.4%, P = .019). Hemodynamically unstable (by ACLS criterion) AVB presenting in the PH setting is associated with a hospital diagnosis of AMI in most (55.6%) patients in this study. AMI patients with hemodynamically unstable AVB or bradycardia are no more likely to respond to atropine therapy in the PH setting than patients with non-AMI hospital diagnoses. Finally, although there is no difference in the treatment of compromising AVB or bradycardia received by AMI versus non-AMI patients in the PH or ED setting, AMI patients are more likely to achieve a normal sinus rhythm over the t

The efficacy of atropine in the treatment of hemodynamically unstable bradycardia and atrioventricular block: prehospital and emergency department considerations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of atropine therapy in patients with hemodynamically compromising bradycardia or atrioventricular block (AVB) in the prehospital and emergency department settings. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prehospital, emergency department, and hospital records. PARTICIPANTS: Prehospital patients with hemodynamically compromising bradycardia or AVB with evidence of spontaneous circulation who received atropine as delivered by emergency medical services personnel (advanced life support level). SETTING: Urban/suburban fire department-based emergency medical service system with on-line medical control serving a population of approximately 1.6 million persons. DEFINITIONS: Hemodynamic instability was defined as the presence of any of the following: ischemic chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg. Bradycardia was defined as sinus bradycardia, junctional bradycardia, or idioventricular bradycardia (grouped as bradycardia) while AVB included first-, second- (types I and II), or third-degree (grouped as AVB). The response that occurred within one minute following each dose of atropine was defined as none, partial, complete, or adverse. MAIN RESULTS: Of 172 patients meeting entry criterion complete data was available for 131 (76.1%) and constitutes the study population. The mean age was 71 years. Fifty-one percent were female. Forty-five patients had AVB and 86 bradycardia. Patients with AVB were more likely to have a presenting systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg than those with bradycardia. In the 131 patients, responses to atropine were as follows: 26 (19.8%) = partial, 36 (27.5%) = complete, 65 (49.6%) = none, and 4 (2.3%) = adverse. Patients presenting with bradycardia (compared to AVB) more commonly: (1) received a single dose of atropine; (2) a lower total dose of atropine in the prehospital interval; (3) were more likely to arrive in the ED with a normal sinus rhythm; and (4) were less likely to receive additional atropine or isoproterenol in the ED. Those patients who achieved normal sinus rhythm over the total course of care were likely to have achieved that rhythm during the prehospital interval. There was no difference between groups in the likelihood of leaving the ED with a normal sinus rhythm achieved during the ED interval. Acute myocardial infarction was more common in patients presenting with AVB (55.5%) than with bradycardia (23.2%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-half of patients who received atropine in the prehospital setting for compromising rhythms had either a partial or complete response to therapy. Adverse responses were uncommon. Those patients who presented with hemodynamically unstable bradycardia to EMS personnel responded more commonly to a single dose and a lower total dose of atropine compared to similar patients with AVB. Those patients who achieve normal sinus rhythm by ED discharge were likely to have achieved it during the prehospital interval.

Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. A multicenter, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 6 million U.S. patients present to emergency departments annually with symptoms suggesting acute cardiac ischemia. Triage decisions for these patients are important but remain difficult. OBJECTIVE: To test whether computerized prediction of the probability of acute ischemia, used with electrocardiography, improves the accuracy of triage decisions. DESIGN: Controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 10 hospital emergency departments in the midwestern, southeastern, and northeastern United States. PATIENTS: 10689 patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. INTERVENTION: The probability of acute ischemia predicted by the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI), either automatically printed or not printed on patients' electrocardiograms. MEASUREMENTS: Emergency department triage to a coronary care unit (CCU), telemetry unit, ward, or home. Other measurements were the bed capacity of the CCU relative to that of the telemetry unit; training or supervision status of the triaging physician; and patient diagnoses and outcomes based on clinical, electrocardiographic, and creatine kinase data. RESULTS: For patients without cardiac ischemia, in hospitals with high-capacity CCUs and relatively low-capacity cardiac telemetry units, use of ACI-TIPI was associated with a reduction in CCU admissions from 15% to 12%, a change of -16% (95% CI, -30% to 0%), and an increase in emergency department discharges to home from 49% to 52%, a change of 6% (CI, 0% to 14%; overall P=0.09). Across all hospitals, for patients evaluated by unsupervised residents, use of ACI-TIPI was associated with a reduction in CCU admissions from 14% to 10%, a change of -32% (CI, -55% to 3%); a reduction in telemetry unit admissions from 39% to 31%, a change of -20% (CI, -34% to -2%); and an increase in discharges to home from 45% to 56%, a change of 25% (CI, 8% to 45%; overall P=0.008). Among patients with stable angina, in hospitals with high-capacity CCUs, use of ACI-TIPI was associated with a reduction in CCU admissions from 26% to 13%, a change of -50% (CI, -70% to -17%), and an increase in discharges to home from 20% to 22%, a change of 10% (CI, -29% to 71%; overall P=0.02). At hospitals with high-capacity telemetry units, use of ACI-TIPI was associated with a reduction in telemetry unit admissions from 68% to 59%, a change of -14% (CI, -27% to 1%), and an increase in emergency department discharges to home from 10% to 21%, a change of 100% (CI, 22% to 230%; overall P=0.02). Among patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina, use of ACI-TIPI did not change appropriate admission (96%) to the CCU or telemetry unit at hospitals with high-capacity CCUs or telemetry units. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ACI-TIPI was associated with reduced hospitalization among emergency department patients without acute cardiac ischemia. This result varied as expected according to the CCU and cardiac telemetry unit capacities and physician supervision at individual hospitals. Appropriate admission for unstable angina or acute infarction was not affected. If ACI-TIPI is used widely in the United States, its potential incremental impact may be more than 200000 fewer unnecessary hospitalizations and more than 100000 fewer unnecessary CCU admissions.

QT dispersion may be a useful adjunct for detection of myocardial infarction in the chest pain center.

BACKGROUND: QT dispersion has been proposed as a noninvasive measurement of the degree of inhomogeneity in myocardial repolarization. Increased QT dispersion has been reported after myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that increased QT dispersion may be a useful adjunct for risk stratification in patients being evaluated in a chest pain center. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were admitted to the chest pain center for evaluation of chest pain. Exclusion criteria included (1) systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, (2) ischemia or infarction on the initial electrocardiograph (ECG), (3) elevated creatine kinase or MB fraction, and (4) chest pain associated with cocaine use. Serial creatine kinase and MB levels and ECGs were obtained at 0, 6, and 9 hours. Patients were monitored for (1) creatine kinase and MB rise, (2) ECG changes for infarction, (3) ST-segment changes, and (4) rest angina. A negative evaluation at the chest pain center led to an exercise stress test. Patients with a positive exercise stress test were admitted for further evaluation and patients with a negative exercise stress test result were discharged home. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of patients who were found to have an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), group 2 consisted of patients with prior history of coronary artery disease but no evidence of AMI, and group 3 consisted of patients without prior coronary artery disease or AMI. QT dispersion was measured on the initial ECG in all patients. A total of 586 patients were evaluated. Group 1 consisted of 13 patients with mean QT dispersion of 44.6+/-18.5 ms, group 2 consisted of 267 patients with a mean QT dispersion of 10.0+/-13.8 ms, and group 3 consisted of 303 patients with a mean QT dispersion of 10.5+/-10.0 ms. Analysis of variance showed a significantly higher QT dispersion in patients who had AMI compared with other patients with chest pain (P< .001). CONCLUSIONS: QT dispersion can be a useful diagnostic adjunct for detection of AMI in patients with chest pain with a normal ECG and normal cardiac enzymes.

Arrhythmias associated with acute myocardial infarction and thrombolysis.

Ninety percent of patients with acute myocardial infarction have some cardiac rhythm abnormality, and approximately twenty-five percent have cardiac conduction disturbance within 24 hours following infarct onset. Almost any rhythm disturbance can be associated with acute myocardial infarction, including bradyarrhythmias, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias, and atrioventricular block. With the advent of thrombolytic therapy, it was found that some rhythm disturbances in patients with acute myocardial infarction may be related to successful coronary artery reperfusion. This article addresses the role and treatment of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances that complicate the course of patients with acute infarction and thrombolysis.

The electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with ventricular paced rhythms.

Use of the ECG for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease is more difficult in the setting of ventricular paced rhythms (VPRs). ST-segment/T-wave configuration are changed by the altered intraventricular conduction associated with ventricular pacing. The anticipated, or expected, morphology in patients with VPRs is one of QRS-complex-ST-segment to T-wave discordance. Several strategies are available to the physician to assist in the correct interpretation of the 12-lead ECG in patients with permanent ventricular pacemakers, including: a knowledge of the anticipated ST-segment-T-wave changes of VPRs and consequently the ability to recognize acute, ischemic morphologies; the performance of serial ECGs or ST-segment trend monitoring demonstrating dynamic changes encountered in acutely ischemic patients; a comparison with previous ECGs; and, if appropriate, an analysis of the native, underlying rhythm. The first strategy, an awareness of the anticipated ST-segment morphologies of VPRs, is the most important and not dependent on additional diagnostic testing, past medical records, or additional expertise in pacemaker function. Two cases are reported in which an analysis of the ECG in the setting of VPR assisted the treating physicians in establishing the correct diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Left bundle branch block pattern complicating the electrocardiographic evaluation of acute myocardial infarction.

The ECG diagnosis of ischemic heart disease is made more difficult in the setting of left bundle branch block (LBBB). The ECG diagnosis of prior or remote myocardial infarction (MI) is extremely difficult in this setting. Furthermore, the associated--and expected--ST-segment--T-wave abnormalities of LBBB may mimic acute ischemic change. However, ECG detection of abnormalities arising from acute ischemic cardiac disease in the setting of LBBB can be valuable. Several strategies are available to the emergency physician (EP) to assist in the correct interpretation of this ECG pattern, including: a knowledge of the anticipated ST-segment--T-wave changes of LBBB and, consequently, the ability to recognize ischemic morphologies; the performance of serial ECGs demonstrating dynamic changes encountered in ischemic patients; and a comparison with previous ECGs. Three cases are reported in which an analysis of the 12-lead ECG in the setting of LBBB assisted the EP in establishing the correct diagnosis of acute MI and applying timely, appropriate therapy.