[Analysis of causes of destruction of labile blood products in health institutions: A multicentric study]. / Analyse des causes de destruction des produits sanguins labiles dans les établissements de santé : une étude multicentrique.

OBJECTIVE: One of the tasks of haemovigilance correspondents in Health Institutions (HI) is to reduce the destruction of labile blood components (LBC). The objective of this study was to analyse in depth, five years after a first multicentric study, the causes of LBC destruction in order to assess the impact of measures taken and to define new ways of improvement. METHODS: Prospective analysis was carried out throughout 2016. For every LBC destroyed, the following elements were reported: type of LBC, transfusion department, cause of destruction analysed according to a decision tree, subsequently classed as avoidable or unavoidable. RESULTS: The study included 15 HI. A total 3058 LBC were destroyed, representing an average 0.90% of issued LBC, and this analysis concerned 2576 LBC. Sixty-seven percent of LBC were issued for surgery, intensive care or emergencies. Forty percent of the causes of destruction were patient-related (death, clinical worsening, adverse effects or abnormal constants prior to delivery). Thirty percent were prescription-related, mainly cases of excessive prescription for different reasons. Eleven percent were linked to organisational issues. The rate of destruction judged avoidable, all causes combined, was 36%. CONCLUSION: Comparison with the precedent study shows improvement, thus revealing the efficacy of implemented measures (single-dose distribution, return procedures back to the site of distribution, training of participants). In order to further reduce this rate of destruction, we suggest to promote storage procedures and, above all, to continue to raise awareness within healthcare teams.

[Is the research of posttransfusional alloantibodies still relevant?] / Est-ce que la réalisation de la recherche d'anticorps antiérythrocytaires post­transfusionnelle est toujours pertinente ?

The decision of November 6th, 2006 defining the principles of best practices recommends that posttransfusional red cell alloantibodies research is performed after one to three months after. In the University hospital of Brest, the haemovigilance unit takes charge of sending the medical prescription within the required time and centralizing the results. We wished to estimate if the realization of this research still remains relevant. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed in 2015. We evaluated the realization rate, the red cell alloantibodies rate and the recipient adverse reactions with the diagnostic category: alloimmunization (delayed serological transfusion reaction, DSTR). RESULTS: In 2015, 2162 prescriptions were sent to the 3271 transfused patients. One thousand and eighteen red cell alloantibodies research were done, i.e. a return rate of 61%. Among them, 12 alloantibodies appeared (0.9%) within an average of 56 days. Thirty-three other alloantibodies appeared and were discovered most frequently before a new transfusion. In 10 cases, a posttransfusional research was done that was negative. A survey was conducted among GHCOH members to describe the practices in these health institutions. Twelve questionnaires were analysed. Ten institutions performed a posttransfusional alloantibodies research by issuing a prescription at the patient's exit with a return rate between 0.14 and 16%; 1 institution has a centralized organization with a return rate of 68.3%; 1566 red cell alloantibodies research were performed and among them, 24 alloantibodies appeared (1.53%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that to be effective, the management of this biological test must be centralized. Despite this, the red cell alloantibodies rate remains very low (0.9 and 1.53%) and raises the question of the relevance of this systematic testing after transfusion, which is in any case mandatory before a new transfusion of red blood cells.

[Use of thrombelastography to guide posttraumatic hemostatic therapy: More coagulation factor concentrates and less allogenic blood transfusion?] / Intérêt de la thromboélastographie pour guider la correction de la coagulopathie post-traumatique : plus de MDS, moins de PSL ?

Viscoelastic technics are used for 10 years and include the ROTEM® and the TEG®. These devices that exploit the viscoelastic properties of the clotting blood, allow a rapid and global analysis of the haemostatic process taking into account all the process interfering with haemostasis such as inflammation. It has been shown that the use of these technics in clinical situations such as trauma, postpartum haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding or cardiac surgery may reduce the need for blood product, the cost and perhaps may improve the outcome of the patients. Thanks to a rapid identification of the underlying coagulation deficit, these technics facilitate decision-making during acute care and help to guide the treatment, particularly with coagulation factor's concentrate.

[Surgical risk of transfusion in a French Universitary Hospital]. / Cartographie du risque d'être transfusé en chirurgie au CHU de Lyon : un outil de rationalisation de la prescription des examens immunohématologiques (Hospices civils de Lyon - HCL).

INTRODUCTION: Immunohaematology examinations are usually prescribed preoperatively according to more or less standardized protocols. We wanted to assess the relevance of these protocols on the basis of factual data: an overview of the rate of transfusions carried out as part of surgery within the HCL in 2009. STUDY DESIGN: The list of patients operated in 2009 in the HCL (IPOP by Cristalnet) has been combined with the list of patients transfused in the same time period (CTS server, Inlog). The percentage of patients transfused during the stay, and the percentage of patients transfused on the day of the intervention itself were determined for each type of surgery. The study focused on 13,571 patients affected by 44 surgeries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and thirty-three patients were transfused, 45% of them the day of the intervention. The risk of needing to carry out a transfusion depends on the risk to the patient and surgery. For example, the total hip arthroplasty transfusion risk is 11.9% when it's programmed against 37.8% in emergency surgery. The transfusion risk of knee arthroscopies, osteosynthesis of wrist fracture, carpal canal surgeries and of appendectomies, thyroidectomies, herna repair surgeries are below 0.5%. The transfusion risk of colectomy is 18.1%. Thus, new recommendations for good clinical practices on the relevance of settled surgery-preoperative immunohematologic exams can be established. CONCLUSION: The emergency degree of the transfusion must be taken into account for such recommendation. Each hospital should perform its own cartography to justify its own protocols.

[Evaluation of adherence to the regulations for declaration of notification of transfusion reactions with fever and chills. A study of the Association Inter-Régionale du Sud-Est d'Hémovigilance (AIRSEH)]. / Evaluation de la conformité à la réglementation des déclarations d'incidents transfusionnels pour frissons-hyperthermie dans des établissements de santé du sud-est de la France (groupe AIRSEH).

Febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) are the most frequently reported acute adverse effects of blood products, and should be notified within 48 h according to the hemovigilance regulation. In order to study the conformity of these notifications and to search for factors associated with non-conformity, we retrospectively studied all FNHTR notified by voluntary centers of the AIRSEH group from 1st September 1994 to 31st December 1999. Seven hundred and sixty-one FNHTR were registered by 10 centers, most of them were benign (grade 1); 67.8% were non-conform. The non-conformity was associated with the number of biological investigations performed (median number, respectively, 4.24 and 2.94--P = 0.038--in non-conform and conform notifications--P = 0.038) in univariate analysis. Using a logistic regression model, center and severity were the only two factors significantly associated with non-conformity. Different center practices, and in particular the interface between the hospital and the blood bank, may be responsible for the effect center. Moreover, the non-conformity concerns first of all benign FNHTR. A stronger separation between alert and epidemiological surveillance is proposed in order to improve the notifications' conformity.