Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ESMO Open ; 8(4): 101610, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37536254

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Investigation of the disparities in the access to experimental treatment in early-phase clinical trials is lacking. The objective of the EGALICAN-2 study was to identify the factors underpinning such inequalities. METHODS: A national prospective survey was conducted in 11 early-phase clinical trial centers (CLIP2) certified by the French National Cancer Institute. Sociodemographic, socioeconomic and medical data were collected. Univariate logistic regression models were carried out to estimate odds ratios and 90% confidence intervals associated with the effect of each study variable. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to explore the independent factors associated with the administration of the experimental treatment (C1D1). A post hoc analysis was carried out excluding female cancer patients. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2016, 1355 patients referred from 11 CLIP2 centers in France were included in the study. Eight hundred and forty-eight patients received C1D1 (73%) and 320 patients (27%) were screening failure. Median age was 58 years (range 17-97 years) and 667 patients (54%) were female. Most patients had a metastatic disease (n = 751, 87%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the significant independent factors associated with C1D1 were male sex, initial care received in a hospital with an early-phase unit and living in wealthy metropolitan areas (P values <0.05). In the post hoc analysis, the sex factor was no longer significant [odds ratio = 1.21 (95% confidence interval 0.86-1.70), P value = 0.271]. CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated the factors producing social inequalities in the context of early-phase clinical trials in oncology. Our research highlights factors of sex, care pathway and geographic location. Gynecological cancer was found to impact C1D1 significantly, unlike breast cancer. The results of this study should contribute to improve patient access to early-phase clinical trials.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Prospectivos , França/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico
2.
ESMO Open ; 7(3): 100468, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533427

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Access to clinical trials and especially early-phase trials (ECT) is an important issue in geriatric oncology. As cancer can be considered an age-related disease because the incidence of most cancers increases with age, new drugs should also be evaluated in older patients to assess their safety and efficacy. The EGALICAN-2 study was primarily designed to identify social and/or regional inequalities regarding access to ECT. We focused on the factors of inequalities in access to ECT in older patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 1-year period (2015-2016), a survey was conducted in 11 early-phase units certified by the French National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: A total of 1319 patients were included in the analyses: 1086 patients (82.3%) were <70 years and 233 patients (17.7%) were >70 years. The most common tumor types at referral in older patients were gastrointestinal (19.3%), hematological (19.3%), and thoracic tumors (18.0%). Most patients referred to the phase I unit had signed informed consent and the rate was similar across age (92.7% in younger patients versus 90.6% in older patients; P = 0.266). The rate of screening failure was also similar across age (28.5% in younger patients versus 24.3% in older patients; P = 0.219). Finally, in older patients, univariate analyses showed that initial care received in the hospital having a phase I unit was statistically associated with first study drug administration (odds ratio 0.49, 90% confidence interval 0.27-0.88; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients are underrepresented in early clinical trials with 17.7% of patients aged ≥70 years compared with the number of new cases of cancer in France (50%). However, when invited to participate, older patients were prone to sign informed consent.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Idoso , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/terapia
3.
Bull Cancer ; 87(6): 463-7, 2000 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10903788

RESUMO

This review on psychological consequences of chemotherapies presents the research directions developed during the last two years: the first direction is a descriptive one and identifies the prevalence of psychological syndromes associated with these treatments. Besides psychological distress such as anxiety and depression, often underestimated in medical practice, some secondary cognitive deficiencies ought to be considered. It is also emphasized that the point of view of patients should be taken into account since their own assessment of the side effects is often discrepant with those of their medical providers. The second orientation developed here is the evaluation of actions aimed at controlling and alleviating the psychological consequences of these treatments by different protocols of information and psychotherapy. Good quality research is necessary in psycho-oncology in France and should be co-ordinated with clinical practice in psychology the offer of which is still too limited in our present health care system.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Ansiedade/terapia , Transtornos Cognitivos/induzido quimicamente , Depressão/induzido quimicamente , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/psicologia , Psicoterapia , Estresse Psicológico/induzido quimicamente , Vômito Precoce/psicologia , Vômito Precoce/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA