Infection of Human Macrophage-Like Cells by African Swine Fever Virus.

BACKGROUND: The African swine fever (ASF) virus (ASFV) and ASF-like viral sequences were identified in human samples and sewage as well as in different water environments. Pigs regularly experience infections by the ASFV. The considerable stability of the virus in the environment suggests that there is ongoing and long-term contact between humans and the ASFV. However, humans exhibit resistance to the ASFV, and the decisive factor in developing infection in the body is most likely the reaction of target macrophages to the virus. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the responses of human macrophages to the virus and explore the distinct features of the viral replication cycle within human macrophages. METHODS: The ASFV Armenia/07 strain was used in all experiments. In this study, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the ASFV gene expression; flow cytometry analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of the inactive and active ASFV (inASFV and aASFV) treatments on the phenotype of THP-1-derived macrophages (Mφ0) and inflammatory markers. Moreover, other methods such as cell viability and apoptosis assays, staining techniques, phagocytosis assay, lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP-1) cytometry, and cytokine detection were used during experiments. RESULTS: Our findings showed that the virus initiated replication by entering human macrophages. Subsequently, the virus shed its capsid and initiated the transcription of numerous viral genes, and at least some of these genes executed their functions. In THP-1-derived macrophages (Mφ0), the ASFV implemented several functions to suppress cell activity, although the timing of their implementation was slower compared with virus-sensitive porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). Additionally, the virus could not complete the entire replication cycle in human Mφ0, as indicated by the absence of viral factories and a decrease in infectious titers of the virus with each subsequent passage. Overall, the infection of Mφ0 with the ASFV caused significant alterations in their phenotype and functions, such as increased TLR2, TLR3, CD80, CD36, CD163, CXCR2, and surface LAMP-1 expression. Increased production of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-10 and decreased production of interferon (IFN)-α were also observed. Taken together, the virus enters human THP-1-derived macrophages, starts transcription, and causes immunological responses by target cells but cannot complete the replicative cycle. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that there may be molecular limitations within human macrophages that at least partially restrict the complete replication of the ASFV. Understanding the factors that hinder viral replication in Mφ0 can provide valuable insights into the host-virus interactions and the mechanisms underlying the resistance of human macrophages to the ASFV.

The pattern of stability of African swine fever virus in leeches.

African swine fever virus (ASFV) can accumulate and survive in leeches for a long time. The reasons for the survival of ASFV in leeches are not entirely clear. Here, we elucidate the virus survival pathway in infected leeches. One of the questions reported previously is addressed in this article. How the virus concentration in the body of the leech is equal to or higher than in the water infected with ASFV? Examination of blood swallowed by leeches reveals that the blood cells retain their morphological characteristics for several weeks. It can explain the long-term persistence of the high levels of ASFV in the leeches that ingested ASFV-infected pig blood. qRT-PCR assay showed the transcription of ASFV genes in infected leeches. However, the infectious particles of the virus measured by HADU haven't increased. Quantitative studies of the ASFV revealed a high content of both viral genes and infectious particles in the skin of leeches compared with other body parts. Electron microscopy analysis revealed the ability of the ASFV to effectively bind to the skin surface of the leeches, which explained the high concentrations of ASFV in the leeches' skin. A significant difference in the transcriptional activity between early and late viral genes indicates that the virus entered the initial stage of replication, but for some reason failed to complete it, which is typical of abortive infections.

African Swine Fever Virus Manipulates the Cell Cycle of G0-Infected Cells to Access Cellular Nucleotides.

African swine fever virus manipulates the cell cycle of infected G0 cells by inducing its progression via unblocking cells from the G0 to S phase and then arresting them in the G2 phase. DNA synthesis in infected alveolar macrophages starts at 10-12 h post infection. DNA synthesis in the nuclei of G0 cells is preceded by the activation of the viral genes K196R, A240L, E165R, F334L, F778R, and R298L involved in the synthesis of nucleotides and the regulation of the cell cycle. The activation of these genes in actively replicating cells begins later and is less pronounced. The subsequent cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase is also due to the cessation of the synthesis of cellular factors that control the progression of the cell cycle-cyclins. This data describes the manipulation of the cell cycle by the virus to gain access to the nucleotides synthesized by the cell. The genes affecting the cell cycle simply remain disabled until the beginning of cellular DNA synthesis (8-9 hpi). The genes responsible for the synthesis of nucleotides are turned on later in the presence of nucleotides and their transcriptional activity is lower than that during virus replication in an environment without nucleotides.