Vitamin K antagonist anticoagulation in the antiphospholipid syndrome: time in therapeutic range and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome is still frequently treated with vitamin K antagonists with a target international normalized ratio of 2-3. Time in therapeutic range of international normalized ratio of ≥ 70% is considered optimal. Time in therapeutic range among antiphospholipid syndrome patients is not well documented and the clinical consequences of poor international normalized ratio control are uncertain. AIMS: To determine the proportion of vitamin K antagonist -treated antiphospholipid syndrome patients achieving time in therapeutic range ≥ 70%, to define the features associated with poor control and to determine its association with thrombotic and bleeding events. METHODS: This medical records review included antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, between 2012-2023. The proportion of patients achieving a time in therapeutic range≥ 70% was determined and thrombotic and bleeding events were compared between patients with time in therapeutic range ​​≥ 70% versus < 70%. RESULTS: 67 antiphospholipid syndrome patients were studied. 29.9% achieved time in therapeutic range ≥ 70%. 9.1% of patients with 3 or more comorbidities achieved time in therapeutic range values ≥ 70% compared to 40% of patients with less than 3 comorbidities. Fewer recurrent arterial and overall thrombotic events occurred with time in therapeutic range ​​≥ 70%. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with vitamin K antagonist s achieve optimal anticoagulation and are at risk for recurrent thrombotic events, particularly arterial. Presence of multiple comorbidities is associated with poor international normalized ratio control. Careful monitoring of this patient population is warranted.

Heart valve disease in primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated heart valve disease (HVD) is well described. Nonetheless, limited data exist on clinical parameters associated with the course of primary APS (pAPS) patients with HVD. The goal of this study was to assess clinical features and related outcomes in patients with APS associated HVD. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, we identified 33 pAPS patients with HVD (pAPS-HVD group) and compared their clinical course with 128 pAPS patients with normal heart valves on echocardiography (pAPS-control group). RESULTS: pAPS-HVD patients had more cerebrovascular events 56.3% vs 25% (p= 0.005) and livedo reticularis 24.2% vs 7.8% (p= 0.013) than pAPS-controls. Furthermore, catastrophic-APS (CAPS) (12.1% vs 2.4%, p= 0.034), recurrent thrombosis (33.3% vs 4.7%, p< 0.001), and need for advanced therapy (i.e. IVIG, plasmapheresis or rituximab) were more frequent in pAPS-HVD patients. Anti-B2GPI-IgG. [84.8% vs 63.2% (p= 0.034)], anti-cardiolipin IgG [90.9% vs. 64.8% (p= 0.005)] and triple positive aPL [75.8% vs 56.5% (p= 0.047)] were commoner in pAPS-HVD patients vs pAPS-controls. Ten of the 33 patients with pAPS-HVD underwent valve surgery which was associated with male gender, smoking, arterial limb ischaemia and livedo reticularis. CONCLUSION: pAPS-HVD patients had a more severe APS clinical course including CAPS and thrombotic events as well as with specific serology namely IgG isotype aPL antibodies and triple positivity. Our data suggest that pAPS-HVD represents a high-risk subgroup of APS patients.

Thrombosis in multiple myeloma: mechanisms, risk assessment and management.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Pathophysiologic mechanisms include patient, disease and treatment related factors. Risk assessment models have been developed to determine whichpatients are at highest thrombotic risk and pursuant to this, risk adapted thrombosis prophylaxis has been suggested. Areas in which further basic and clinical research is imperative include the molecular and cellular mechanisms of thrombosis in myeloma, the inclusion of relevant biomarkers in risk assessment scores and controlled clinical trials of VTE prophylaxis and treatment using direct oral anticoagulants.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and hematological malignancies.

Data are needed on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hematological malignancies (HM). Retrospective studies to date lacked a control group and did not focus on patients with VTE. Out aim was to assess the incidence of VTE recurrence and bleeding in HM patients treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or DOACs for acute VTE. This is a retrospective cohort study including patients with active HM and newly-diagnosed VTE, indexed on the first day of anticoagulation and followed for 12 months. The outcome was a composite of recurrent VTE, major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Cumulative incidence [95% confidence interval (CI)] was calculated for each anticoagulation group (LMWH, DOAC) and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using cox-proportional hazards model, with death as a competing risk. 143 HM patients treated with LMWH (96) or DOACs (47) for acute VTE were included. The most common HM types were lymphoma in 83 (58%) and plasma cell dyscrasia in 32 (22.3%). The 12-month cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 24.2% (95% CI 15.9-33.5%; n = 22) in the LMWH group and 18.5% (8.5-31.5%; n = 8) in the DOAC group (HR 1.51 [0.695-3.297]). Two recurrent VTE occurred (both in the DOAC group while off-treatment). Nine (9.4%) LMWH-treated patients had major bleeding compared to 1 (2.1%) DOAC-treated patient (HR 4.85 [0.64-36.56]). This study generates the hypothesis that DOACs may be a safe and effective alternative to LMWH for VTE in patients with HM types represented in the study.

Patterns of Recurrent Thrombosis in Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Multicenter, Real-Life Long-Term Follow-Up.

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired hypercoagulable condition associated with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) presence. Data on re-thrombosis following APS-diagnosis are limited. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of new thrombotic events among primary APS (pAPS) patients followed for up to 15 years in three medical centers in Israel. Results: Among 312 primary-APS patients, 143 (46%) had new thrombotic event classified to three patterns: (1) Arterial-associated with heart valve disease (OR 7.24, 95% C.I. 2.26-24.6), hypertension (OR 3, 95% C.I. 1.44-6.25), elevated anti-B2-GPI IgM (OR 1.04, 95% C.I. 0.996-1.08), arterial thrombosis at presentation (OR 1.74 95% C.I. 0.992-3.26), and older age (41 vs. 34 years, p < 0.001). (2) Venous-linked with venous thrombosis at presentation (OR 12.9, 95% C.I. 5.27-31.6, p < 0.001), heart valve disease (OR 9.81 95% C.I. 1.82-52.9, p = 0.018), aGAPSS (OR 1.15 95% C.I. 1.02-1.29), and younger age (31 vs. 36.5 years, p = 0.001); and (3) Combined pattern-associated with heart valve disease (OR 40.5 95% C.I. 7.7-212) and pulmonary embolism (OR 7.47 95% C.I. 1.96-28.5). A 4th variant "the Breakthrough pattern" defined by re-thrombosis despite prophylactic therapy was observed in 100/143 (70%) patients and linked with heart valve disease (OR 8. 95% C.I. 2.43-26.3), venous thrombosis at presentation (OR 2.61 95% C.I. 1.47-4.66), leg ulcers (OR 12.2, 95% C.I. 1.4-107), hypertension (OR 1.99, 95% C.I. 0.92-4.34), and higher aGAPSS (OR 1.08, 95% C.I. 0.99-1.18). Conclusion: In this real-life observation, re-thrombosis was common among pAPS patients including in those recommended to receive prophylactic therapy. Different patterns of recurrence were identified and linked with presenting symptoms, specific serological markers, APS manifestations, and comorbidities. Studies that will address interventions to prevent recurrences of APS-related events are needed.

Long Term Follow up of Patients With Primary Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Introduction: Primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is defined by specific morbidities and/or losses of pregnancy in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). This variant of APS is usually treated during pregnancy and the post-partum period. Data on occurrence of thrombotic event during long term follow-up of OAPS patients is limited. Methods: A multi-centre retrospectively cohort of female patients with primary APS (pAPS) was assembled during 2004-2019. Patients were grouped according to disease presentation as pure OAPS or thrombotic APS (tAPS) for those presenting with thrombosis. Clinical and serological data were compared between groups. Results: Of 219 pAPS female patients 67 (30.6%) were diagnosed with OAPS and 152 (69.4%) with tAPS. During >10 years of follow-up 24/67 (35.8%) OAPS and 71/152 (50%) tAPS suffered a new thrombotic event (p = 0.06), while obstetric morbidity was more likely in the OAPS group (31.3 vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001) respectively. Among patients with OAPS at presentation heart valve disease and the presence of ANA were related to thrombosis following diagnosis (25 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.02; and 45.8 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.04 respectively). Conclusion: Thrombotic event following diagnosis were common among female patients with pAPS regardless of disease presentation. Heart valve disease and ANA positivity may be risk factors for thrombosis during follow-up of patients presenting with pure OAPS.

Ethnicity and Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Israel.

OBJECTIVE: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired coagulopathy associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Whether ethnicity modulates APS clinical course is not known. The aim of our study was to assess the interplay of ethnicity and APS in Israel. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the ethnic distribution of APS patients from 3 medical centers in Israel compared to the general population. Ethnic groups were defined according to the Israeli Bureau of Statistics as Ashkenazi (European), former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), North African, Asian (West Asia, Greece, and Turkey), Israeli Arab individuals, and others. RESULTS: Our cohort included 382 patients. The prevalence of Ashkenazi and Asian ethnicities was more pronounced (33% versus 12.8% and 15.4% versus 7.7%, respectively; P < 0.001), while Israeli Arabs were less represented (5.2% versus 31.1%; P < 0.001) relative to their part in the general population. Arab patients were younger at presentation (mean ± SD 28 ± 10 years versus 34 ± 13 years; P < 0.001) and were more likely to present with venous thrombosis (50% versus 35%; P = 0.037) and to suffer from venous thrombotic recurrence (45% versus 16%; P < 0.001) compared to other ethnicities. Mortality was higher among patients of Asian ethnic origin (8.8% versus 1.1%; P = 0.005); intriguingly, this group experienced cardiovascular risk factors more often (i.e., dyslipidemia and hypertension). CONCLUSION: Ethnicity may affect the prevalence and/or natural course of APS, which is less prevalent and differs clinically in Israeli Arab patients, while mortality was linked with Asian ethnicity.

Decision-Making in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism comprising deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus is common. Patients with venous thromboembolism may present to a variety of health care providers, and while a significant proportion of patients begin treatment in the hospital, ambulatory management of both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus is feasible and becoming more common. Initial anticoagulant management, investigation of venous thromboembolism etiology, and decisions about extended anticoagulation require coordinated care by physicians from multiple specialties. Comprehensive management of venous thromboembolism requires coordinated care from the time of presentation in order to expedite diagnosis, initiate timely anticoagulant treatment, determine the need for extended anticoagulation based on risk of bleeding and recurrent thrombosis, and advise on thromboprophylaxis during future high-risk periods for venous thromboembolism. In this review we use case scenarios to provide an operational framework, based on current evidence-based recommendations, for informed decision-making about a number of clinical practice issues that are frequently encountered in the management of venous thromboembolism patients.

Direct oral anticoagulation and mortality in moderate to high-risk atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the recommended antithrombotic therapy for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), anticoagulation in patients with NVAF is still inadequate. The effect of withholding DOAC therapy on patient survival is unknown. Therefore, our objective was to compare all-cause mortality rates between DOAC-treated patients with NVAF and similar patients receiving no anticoagulation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study analysing Clalit Health Services' extensive electronic database, regarding all newly diagnosed, anticoagulant-naïve patients with NVAF who were eligible for DOAC therapy from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2016. Patients who received DOAC therapy were matched by propensity scoring to patients receiving no anticoagulation. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Final patient follow-up date was 15 May 2017. RESULTS: 18 901 eligible patients were identified. 8298 received treatment with a DOAC and 10 603 received no anticoagulation therapy. Of those, 5657 patients who received DOAC therapy were matched with 5657 patients who did not receive any anticoagulant. Death occurred in 715 patients in the DOAC-treated group (7.6% per year) and in 2075 patients in the non-anticoagulated patient group (11.1% per year). DOAC therapy was associated with significantly lower risk for all-cause mortality (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75, p<0.001). The benefit of DOAC therapy was demonstrated across all subgroups analysed. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of newly diagnosed patients with NVAF, DOAC therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of death compared with no oral anticoagulation. Our findings provide further evidence for the importance of providing DOAC anticoagulation in patients with NVAF.

[PRACTICAL ADVICE FOR THE APPROPRIATE USE OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS].

INTRODUCTION: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a class of drugs used for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for prevention and treatment of venous thrombo-embolism. They are as effective and are safer than the vitamin K antagonists that were the oral drugs previously used for this purpose. The DOACs are convenient to use because of their fixed dose-response relationship which makes routine monitoring of drug levels unnecessary. Further, they have no food interactions and relatively few drug interactions. A number of practical considerations related to the routine clinical use of the DOACs have become apparent. These include choosing the appropriate drug and importantly dose-based on patient characteristics, managing the use of DOACs peri-operatively and the appropriate management of the acutely bleeding DOAC-treated patient. Recent controlled and observational studies provide guidance for dealing with these clinical situations thus enhancing the efficacy and safety of DOAC treatment in routine clinical practice.

Effectiveness and Safety of Off-Label Dose-Reduced Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation but may result in serious bleeding complications. Off-label dose-reduced use of DOACs to mitigate bleeding is common in routine clinical practice although data about its consequences on patient outcomes are limited. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of off-label dose-reduced vs per-label standard-dose DOAC treatment. METHODS: The study cohort included newly diagnosed patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation that had initiated DOAC therapy between 2011 and 2017 in Clalit Health Services (Tel Aviv, Israel). Effectiveness was defined as the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The safety outcome was defined as bleeding events requiring hospitalization. Patients were followed until March 30, 2018 or until occurrence of an outcome event. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted for 21 variables, including comorbidities, concomitant medications, and socioeconomic factors, using multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 8425 patients met the study criteria; 5140 (61%) patients were treated with DOACs at per-label dosing and 3285 (39%) patients were treated with off-label dose-reduced DOAC. Off-label dose-reduced treatment was associated with a higher rate of the composite effectiveness outcome: adjusted HR 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.83; P < .001) and a higher rate of bleeding: adjusted HR 1.63 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.34; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Almost 4 of 10 patients were treated with off-label dose-reduced DOAC, which was associated with reduced effectiveness without a safety benefit. Compliance with per-label dosage may significantly improve outcomes of this population.

Thrombosis, anticoagulation and outcomes in malignant superior vena cava syndrome.

Anticoagulation is often used in superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) associated with cancer (i.e malignant SVCS), even without thrombosis, but its effect on outcomes has not been reported. We aimed to determine factors and outcomes associated with thrombosis and anticoagulation in malignant SVCS. Patients with malignant SVCS diagnosed on computerized tomography (CT) were retrospectively included, indexed at diagnosis and followed for 6 months using medical records. The cohort included 183 patients with malignant SVCS of which 153 (84%) were symptomatic. Thirty of the 127 patients (24%) with a reviewable baseline CT had thrombosis of the SVC or tributaries at diagnosis. Patients with baseline thrombosis more often had symptomatic SVCS (p < 0.01). 70% (21/30) of patients with thrombosis and 52% (49/97) of those without thrombosis at baseline received anticoagulation, most often at therapeutic doses. Thrombosis occurred in 5/39 patients with anticoagulation (13%) compared to 2/18 (11%) of those without, during follow-up (p = 0.85). Anticoagulation was associated with a reduction in risk of SVC stent placement during follow-up that did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.2-1.13, p = 0.09). Major bleeding occurred in 7 (4%) patients, six of whom received anticoagulation (four therapeutic and two intermediate dose). Neither thrombosis nor anticoagulation affected survival. Anticoagulation is commonly used as primary prevention but its benefit remains to be proven. The role of reduced-dose anticoagulation in non-thrombotic malignant SVCS should be prospectively assessed.

The anti-leukemic and lipid lowering effects of imatinib are not hindered by statins in CML: a retrospective clinical study and in vitro assessment of lipid-genes transcription.

Imatinib, which has revolutionized chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment, was suggested to improve lipid profile. Statins, a dyslipidemia drug, were reported to potentiate imatinib's antileukemic effect. However, analysis of imatinib combined with statins is lacking. We have retrospectively analyzed the normalization period of bcr-abl, blood counts, and lipids in 40 CML patients, 19 of which co-treated with statins, during short (<12 months) and prolonged (>12 months) imatinib treatment. Prior statins treatment did not hinder nor sensitized imatinib's anti-leukemic and lipid-lowering effects. CML cells (K562) treated with 1µM imatinib (24-96 h) were further assessed for the expression of central lipid-related genes by real-time PCR. HMGCoAR, LDL-R, and apobec1 expressions were significantly increased while CETP declined after 48-96 h. To conclude, imatinib produces an independent favorable lipid profile, which is not hindered by statins and is partly mediated via transcription regulation of genes involved in the clearance of plasma lipids.