Stabilizing effect of an elbow orthosis with an adjustable hinge axis after lateral collateral ligament injury: A biomechanical study.

Background: Current commercial elbow braces have a straight hinge that does not account for the native carrying angle of the elbow. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a custom-designed hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) with variable valgus angulations in stabilizing a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow. Methods: Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the abducted varus gravity-loaded position. The specimens were examined before and after simulated LCL injury and then with the addition of the custom-designed HEO with 0°, 10°, and 20° of valgus angulation. Kinematic data were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system. Results: The LCL injured state with or without the brace resulted in significant increases in varus angulation of the elbow compared to the intact state in both pronation and supination (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in varus-valgus angulation or ulnohumeral rotation between any of the brace angles and the LCL injured state with the forearm pronated and supinated. Discussion: The custom-designed HEO did not provide any additional stability to the LCL injured elbow. The varus arm position should be avoided during the rehabilitation of an LCL injured elbow even when an HEO is used.

The effect of lateral collateral ligament repair tension on elbow stability: An in vitro biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal repair tension of the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow by performing simulated active flexion with the arm in the varus gravity loaded position using an in vitro elbow simulator. METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens were mounted in the varus gravity loaded orientation onto an elbow motion simulator. Four states were studied (intact, lateral collateral ligament injured, and 15 N and 20 N lateral collateral ligament repairs) with the forearm in supination and pronation. An electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure joint kinematics during active elbow flexion. FINDINGS: There was no difference in ulnohumeral rotation between the intact state and the 15 N repair (P = .150 for pronation; P = 1.0 for supination) or the 20 N repair (P = 1.0 for pronation; P = .568 for supination). For varus-valgus angulation, the 20 N repair was not statistically different from the intact state (P = .059 in pronation; P = 1.0 in supination). INTERPRETATION: Repair of the lateral collateral ligament following injury can restore joint kinematics with the arm in the varus position. A repair tension of 20 N was successful in restoring joint stability for simulated active motion with the forearm in pronation and supination. This study shows that when the lateral collateral ligament is repaired with adequate tension, avoidance of the varus position may not be as crucial during early motion.

Medial elbow exposure: an anatomic comparison of 5 approaches.

PURPOSE: Several surgical approaches to the medial elbow are described; however, it remains unclear which exposure provides the optimal view of relevant medial elbow structures. The purpose of this anatomic study was to determine the visible surface area of the coronoid process, distal humerus, and radial head through 5 approaches to the medial elbow. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremity specimens were dissected. Five surgical approaches were performed on each specimen. The Smith muscle-splitting approach to the ulnar collateral ligament was performed first (Smith), followed by the Hotchkiss medial "Over the top" approach (Hotchkiss), the extended medial elbow approach (EMEA), the flexor carpi ulnaris splitting approach (FCU-Split), and the Taylor and Scham approach (T&S). Bony visualization was determined using laser surface scanning (Artec Space Spider; Artec 3D). The scans were segmented using commercially available digital software (Geomagic Wrap; 3D Systems Corporation), and the surface area visualized was determined. A descriptive analysis of the joint areas visible using the medial collateral ligament (MCL) as a clinical landmark was performed. RESULTS: The EMEA visualized the highest proportion of the total elbow joint from the medial side showing 13.9 ± 6.0 cm2, or 15% ± 4% of the joint. It also provided the best visualization of the coronoid (3.2 ± 1.7 cm2 of surface area, or 26% ± 9%) and distal humerus (9.9 ± 4.3 cm2, or 15% ± 4%). The Hotchkiss approach was best at visualizing the radial head (0.8 ± 0.3 cm2, or 7% ± 3%). The EMEA, Hotchkiss, and Smith approaches showed primarily the anterior bundle of the MCL, its insertion, and the regions anterior to it, whereas the FCU-Split showed the anterior bundle of the MCL and regions both anterior and posterior to it. The T&S showed primarily the areas posterior to the anterior bundle of the MCL; the anterior regions were not visible. The FCU-Split and the T&S allowed visualization of the posterior bundle of the MCL. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intraobserver reliability were 0.997, 0.992, and 0.974 for the test distal humerus, test coronoid, and test radial head, respectively. The ICCs for interobserver reliability were 0.915 for the test distal humerus, 0.66 for the coronoid, and 0.583 for the radial head. CONCLUSION: The EMEA provides the most visualization of the coronoid and distal humerus, whereas the Hotchkiss showed the most radial head. However, these approaches mainly visualize structures anterior to the MCL. If exposure of structures posterior to the MCL is required, the FCU-Split and T&S approaches are more appropriate.

The role of biceps loading and muscle activation on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: An in vitro biomechanical study.

INTRODUCTION: Little evidence-based information is available to direct the optimal rehabilitation of patients with anterior Monteggia injuries. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aims of this biomechanical investigation were to (1) quantify the effect of biceps loading and (2) to compare the effect of simulated active and passive elbow flexion on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study. METHODS: Six cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. The effect of biceps loading, simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions was examined with application of 0N, 20N, 40N, 60N, 80N, and 100N of load. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions were then performed with the forearm supinated. Radial head translation relative to the capitellum was measured using an optical tracking system. After testing the intact elbows, the proximal ulna was osteotomized and realigned using a custom jig to simulate an anatomical reduction. We then sequentially sectioned the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane to simulate soft tissue injuries commonly associated with anterior Monteggia fractures. RESULTS: Greater magnitudes of biceps loading significantly increased anterior radial head translation. However, there was no significant difference in radial head translation between simulated active and passive elbow flexion except in the final stage of soft tissue sectioning. There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with progressive injury states with both isometric biceps loading and simulated active and passive motion. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that anatomic reduction of the ulna may not be sufficient to restore radial head alignment in anterior Monteggia injuries with a greater magnitude of soft tissue injury. In cases with significant soft tissue injury, the elbow should be immobilized in a flexed and supinated position to allow relaxation of the biceps and avoid movement of the elbow in the early postoperative period.

Effect of ulnar angulation and soft tissue sectioning on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: an in vitro biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Radial head instability continues to be a challenge in the management of anterior Monteggia injuries; however, there is a paucity of literature on the factors that contribute to this instability. The aim of this biomechanical investigation was to examine the effects of ulnar angulation and soft tissue insufficiency on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries. METHODS: Six cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. Radial head translation was measured during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm supinated. After testing the elbows in the intact state, the ulna was osteotomized and tested at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° of extension angulation. To examine the effect of soft tissue insufficiency, the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane (IOM) were sequentially sectioned. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with greater ulnar extension angulation. Sequential soft tissue sectioning also significantly increased anterior radial head translation. There was no increase in radial head translation with isolated sectioning of the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule. Additional sectioning of the annular ligament and quadrate ligament slightly increased anterior radial head translation but did not reach statistical significance. Subsequent sectioning of the proximal and middle IOM resulted in significant increases in anterior radial head translation. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that progressive ulnar extension angulation results in an incremental increase in anterior radial head translation in anterior Monteggia injuries. Moreover, increasing magnitudes of soft tissue disruption result in greater anterior radial head instability.

The effect of torsional moments on the posterolateral rotatory stability of a lateral ligament deficient elbow: An in vitro biomechanical investigation.

BACKGROUND: Clinical tests for posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow apply external torsional moments to the forearm; however, biomechanical studies of lateral collateral ligament injuries and their surgical repair, reconstruction and rehabilitation have primarily relied on varus gravity loading to quantify instability. The aim of this investigation was to determine the effect of torsional moments on the posterolateral rotatory instability of the lateral ligament deficient elbow. METHODS: Six cadaveric arms were tested in an elbow motion simulator with the arm in the varus position. A threaded outrigger was inserted on the dorsal aspect of the proximal ulna to suspend 400 g, 600 g, and 800 g of weight to allow torsional moments of 0.12, 0.18, and 0.23 Nm respectively on the ulna. An injured model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the lateral collateral ligament. FINDINGS: During simulated active flexion with the arm in varus, the injured model resulted in a significant increase in external rotation of the ulnohumeral articulation with the forearm both pronated and supinated (pronation: P = .021; supination: P = .015). The application of torsional moments to the lateral ligament deficient elbow resulted in a significant increase in the posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. INTERPRETATION: This investigation demonstrates that the application of even small amounts of external torsional moments on the forearm with the arm in the varus position increases the rotational instability of the lateral ligament deficient elbow. During clinical examination for posterolateral rotatory instability and biomechanical studies of lateral ligament injury, the application of external torsion to the forearm should be considered to detect subtle instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study.

Role of the anconeus in the stability of a lateral ligament and common extensor origin-deficient elbow: an in vitro biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: The role of the anconeus in elbow stability has been a long-standing debate. Anatomic and electromyographic studies have suggested a potential role as a stabilizer. However, to our knowledge, no clinical or biomechanical studies have investigated its role in improving the stability of a combined lateral collateral ligament and common extensor origin (LCL + CEO)-deficient elbow. METHODS: Seven cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An injured model was created by sectioning of the CEO and the LCL. The anconeus tendon and its aponeurosis were sutured in a Krackow fashion and tensioned to 10 N and 20 N using a transosseous tunnel. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. RESULTS: During active motion, the injured model resulted in a significant increase in varus angulation (P = .0001 for pronation; P = .001 for supination) and external rotation (P = .001 for pronation; P = .003 for supination) of the ulnohumeral articulation compared with the intact state. Tensioning of the anconeus significantly decreased the varus angulation (P = .006 for 10 N pronation; P = .0001 for 20 N pronation; P = .0001 for 10 N supination; P = .0001 for 20 N supination) and external rotation angle (P = .008 for 10 N pronation; P = .0001 for 20 N pronation; P = .0001 for 10 N supination; P = .0001 for 20 N supination) of the injured elbow. CONCLUSIONS: In the highly unstable varus elbow orientation, anconeus tensioning restores the in vitro stability of a combined LCL + CEO-deficient elbow during simulated active motion with the forearm in both pronation and supination. These results may have several clinical implications in managing symptomatic lateral elbow instability.