Long-Term Follow-up of Over 600 Living Related Kidney Donors: Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Kidney transplant is the treatment of choice in patients with end-stage renal disease because it offers improved survival and better quality of life. Although most epidemiologic studies have suggested that living kidney donors have a minimal lifetime risk of developing end-stage renal disease, long-term complications and physiologic and psychologic sequelae resulting from donation remain unclear. Here, we examined the long-term results of living-related kidney donors who donated kidneys at the Baskent University Ankara Hospital over the past 25 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We were able to examine 607 kidney transplant donors (mean age of 52.03 ± 11.54 years) who were seen at our center from 1986 to 2021 and who agreed to a general health evaluation. Collected data included donor age, sex, blood type, body mass index, duration after donation, blood pressure measurements, biochemical parameters, abdominal ultrasonograph for size, structure, and renal blood flow of the solitary kidney, comorbid conditions, chronic drug use, and surgical procedures after donation. RESULTS: Mean time after donation was 10.4 ± 3.2 years. Twenty-four donors (3.9%) were diagnosed with diabetes and 21 (3.4%) with thyroid disease, 64 (10.5%) developed hypertension, and 48 (8.8%) developed atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Obesity was found to be an increasing problem in our donor population, with 174 (28.6%) developing mild to moderate obesity (body mass index >25 kg/m2). Older age, obesity, smoking, and hyperlipidemia were found to be the major and independent risk factors of both hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in donors. None of our donors developed endstage renal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and hypertension were the most common comorbidities that developed in our kidney donor population. Our principle is to avoid unrelated and nondirected donors because of the possible long-term complications. Unrelated donors may be desperate if a family member needs donation in the future.

Liver Transplant Recipients Who Survive for More Than 10 Years: A Long-Term Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Liver transplant is the gold standard treatment for end-stage liver failure. Short-term and midterm surveys have been published, but there are few long-term surveys. Here, we report the outcomes of our long-term liver transplant survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 1988, we have performed 694 liver transplants (366 adult, 328 pediatric), including the first deceased donor transplant in Turkey (December 8, 1988); the first pediatric segmental living related transplant in Turkey, the Middle and Near East, and Europe; the world's first adult segmental living related transplant (April 24, 1990); and the world's first living related donor combined liver-kidney transplant (May 16, 1992). We retrospectively evaluated data from recipients who survived >10 years with normal graft function. RESULTS: Of 215 recipients, survival ranges were ≥20 years (n = 13), 15 to 19 years (n = 86), and 10 to 14 years (n = 116); 211 remain alive today with normal liver function. There were 5 retransplants to treat chronic graft rejection, of which 4 recipients are alive with normal graft function after a second liver transplant (15, 20, 22, and 31 years after first transplant). One patient died soon after the second liver transplant (15 years after first transplant). Acute rejection episodes were seen in 72 (34%), and 7 were steroid resistant. There were 48 (22.7%) drug-induced complications. Ten patients had de novo malignancy: 5 lymphoma, 2 squamous cell carcinoma, 1 gastrointestinal stromal tumor, 1 thyroid papillary carcinoma, and 1 multiple myeloma. There were also 31 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplant: 13 were beyond Milan criteria, 6 had incidental HCC, and 12 were within Milan. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after liver transplant is possible with expert care. Few reports have mentioned long-term surveys; our long-term liver transplant survey is among the largest series in the literature.

Comparison of Mortality Rates in Patients Waiting for Liver Transplant and Patients With Colorectal Metastatic Tumors.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify outcomes of liver surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer, which result in primary and secondary liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 51 patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases and 63 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were prepared for liver transplant due to cirrhosis who underwent hepatic resection or local ablation treatments; patients were seen between January 2011 and December 2021. RESULTS: Most patients with colorectal cancer were men (58.8%). Mean age was 65.76 ± 13.818 years (range, 27-88 y). Most patients had planned, elective surgery (86.3%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 58.8% of patients. The most common location of metastasis in the liver was in the right lobe (43.1%), and the most common surgery was low anterior resection (17 patients). During simultaneous liver surgery, 31 patients required metastasectomy and 7 patients required radiofrequency ablation plus metastasectomy. No deaths occurred in the early posttransplant period, and cumulative survival was 82.624 ± 7.962 months. Disease-free survival was 45.2 ± 7.495 months. Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were men (82.5%). Mean age was 58.73 ± 17.428 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma lesions were mostly located in both the right and left lobes (23.8%). In the hepatocellular cancer group, 60.3% had transarterial chemoembolization and 42.9% had radiofrequency ablation. The primary surgical resection was metastasectomy (17.9%) because of multiple localized lesions. Median follow-up was 22 months (range, 1-126 mo). Overall survival was 101.898 ± 7.169 months, with 10-year overall survival of 38%. Disease-free survival was 74.081 ± 8.732 months, with 1-year and 5-year disease-free survival of 90.5% and 54%. CONCLUSIONS: Better survival was shown in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma than in patients with colorectal cancer.Therefore, more aggressive treatment options, as used in hepatocellular carcinoma, including liver transplant, may be options for patients with colorectal cancer.

Effect of Ozone Added to University of Wisconsin Solution on Preservation Damage in Perfused Liver.

OBJECTIVES: Ischemia is defined as the inability of the tissue to provide oxygen and other metabolites by the circulation and the removal of residual products. The University of Wisconsin solution is widely used to preserve ischemia and to preserve organs for transplant. Ozone is used in various areas of ischemia damage due to its antioxidant properties. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of ozone added to University of Wisconsin solution on perfused liver preservation injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 24 Sprague Dawley rats with an average weight of 300 to 350 g. Animals were divided into 4 groups: group 1 (Ringer lactate), group 2 (Ringer lactate + ozone), group 3 (University of Wisconsin solution), and group 4 (University of Wisconsin + ozone). Solutions were perfused from the liver portal vein and aorta. After perfusion, rats were killed and liver biopsies were taken at 0, 6, and 12 hours of storage for pathological examination. For biochemical analysis, samples were collected from liver specimen storage solutions at 0, 6, and 12 hours. RESULTS: Mean alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels in group 3 were 77/82 U/L at hour 0, 680/461 U/L at hour 6, and 1027/682 U/L at hour 12. In group 4, these levels were 35/31 U/L at hour 0, 415/295 U/L at hour 6, and 546/372 U/L at hour 12. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of liver function values, we observed favorable result with University of Wisconsin solution with added ozone. Therefore, we suggest that the addition of ozone to the University of Wisconsin solution may be effective in preventing liver preservation damage.

The New Anterior Less Invasive Crescentic Incision for Living Donor Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Living-donor nephrectomy is a devoted procedure performed in a healthy individual; for these procedures, it is essential to complete the surgery with the lowest possible risk and morbidity and allow donors to regain their normal daily activity. To minimize anatomic and physiologic damage, we modified a surgical technique. Here, we report our experiences with the new anterior less invasive crescentic donor nephrectomy technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 728 donor nephrectomy patients who had the new anterior less invasive cresentic incision (n = 224), the classic open (n = 431), or the laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (n = 73) procedures. Demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative parameters, acute renal graft dysfunction, and firstyear graft and patient survival rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: During the operation, the new cresentic incision living-donor nephrectomy allowed a safe and comfortable position for the patient and the anesthesiologist. Also, it procures safe access especially for grefts with multiple vessels. Patients had lower pain scores (P = .010), shorter hospital stays (2.25 vs 3.49 days) than those who received the classic open living-donor nephrectomy. Patients who received laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy had significantly longer mean operation time (P = .016) and warm ischemia time (P ≤ .001) than those who had the new cresentic incision technique. All groups showed similar rates of first-year survival and delayed graft dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The new anterior less invasive cresentic incision open-donor nephrectomy approach is a safe, comfortable, effective, and less invasive modification of the living donor nephrectomy. Also, it procures safe access for grefts with multiple vessels.

Liver and Kidney Transplant During a 6-Month Period in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: With the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, many studies have indicated that elective surgeries should be postponed. However, postponement of transplants may cause diseases to get worse and increase the number in wait lists. We believe that, with precautions, transplant does not pose a risk during pandemic. Here, we aimed to evaluate our transplant results, which we safely performed during a 6-month pandemic period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Until September 2020, 3140 kidney and 667 liver transplants have been performed in our centers. We evaluated 38 kidney transplants and 9 liver transplants procedures performed during the pandemic (March 1 to September 2, 2020). Recipient and donor candidates were screened for COVID-19 with polymerase chain reaction and thoracic computed tomography. All recipients had routine immunosuppressive protocol. During hospitalization at our COVID-19-free transplant facility, we restricted the interactions during multidisciplinary rounds. RESULTS: During the pandemic, 38 kidney transplants with an average length of hospital stay of 8.1 days were performed. Mean serum creatinine values of recipients were 0.91, 0.86, and 0.74 mg/dL on postoperative days 7, 30, and 90, respectively. During the pandemic, 9 living donor liver transplants (1 adult, 8 pediatric) were performed with an average length of hospital stay of 17.1 days. Mean serum total bilirubin levels were 0.9, 0.5, and 0.4 mg/dL on postoperative days 7, 30, and 90, respectively. Mean serum aspartate aminotransferase levels were 38.1, 28.3, and 22.3 U/L on postoperative days 7, 30, and 90, respectively. All recipients and donors were successfully discharged. Only 1 liver recipient died (on day 55 after discharge as a result of oxalosis-induced heart failure). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, when precautions are taken, transplant does not pose a risk to patients during the pandemic period. We attribute the safety and success shown to our newly developed protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our Living Donor Protocol for Liver Transplant: A SingleCenter Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The shortage of deceased donor organs is a limiting factor in transplant. The growing discrepancy between the wait list demand versus the supply of deceased donor organs has created an incentive for consideration of living donor liver transplant as an alternative. Here, we describe our evaluation process and donor complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 1988, we have performed 659 (449 living donor and 210 deceased donor) liver transplants. The most important evaluation criteria is the relationship between donor and recipient, and we require thatthe donor must be related to the recipient. The evaluation protocol has 5 stages. Donor complications were defined as simple, moderate, and severe. RESULTS: We retrospectively investigated data for 1387 candidates, and 938 (67.7%) were rejected; subsequently, 449 living donor liver transplants were performed. There were no complications in 398 of the donors (88.7%). Total complication rate was 11.3%. Simple complications were seen in 31 patients (6.9%). Moderate complications were seen in 19 patients (4.2%). We had only 1 severe complication, ie, organ failure from unspecified liver necrosis, which resulted in death. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between donor and recipient and donor safety should be the primary focus for living donor liver transplant. Donor selection should be made carefully to minimize complications and provide adequately functional grafts.

Oxalosis Crystals' Redeposition in Cardiac Tissue Leading to New-Onset Fatal Cardiac Complication After Liver Transplant in Primary Oxalosis Patient: Case Report.

Primary oxalosis is a rare hereditary disorder of metabolism resulting in accumulation of calcium oxalate in almost all tissues of the body. All published data point out the improvement of cardiac function after transplant. Here, we report the first case in the literature of an 8-year-old patient with primary oxalosis in which oxalosis implantations increased in cardiac tissue after liver transplant and manifested as new-onset ventricular tachycardia and cardiomyopathy, leading to death.

Organ Donation Decisional Balance Survey: Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version

OBJECTIVES: Despite the positive view about organ donation in our society, many people remain reluctant to donate. Identifying the perceived advantages and disadvantages and raising awareness about organ donation may help promote willingness for eligible people to become donors. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of the Organ Donation Decisional Balance Survey for the Turkish community in order to implement the transtheoretical model of behavior change and to emphasize the positive aspects of organ donation during the process of decision making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 420 adults, including 304 women and 116 men, voluntarily participated in the study. A personal information form, now known as the Organ Donation Decisional Balance Survey, and the Compassion of Others' Lives scale were used to evaluate the participants. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the questionnaire. All data were analyzed with confirmatory factor analysis using the Amos 16 programs. RESULTS: Analysis results showed that the fit index values of the survey were acceptable (P < .01). Factor loads of the survey for the advantages subdimension were between 0.53 and 0.78, and the factor loads for the disadvantages subdimension were from 0.46 to 0.75. Internal consistency of these 2 components resulted in an acceptable Cronbach alpha value. We also identified a positive correlation between the advantages score and the Compassion of Others' Lives scale score. CONCLUSIONS: This survey can guide those who prepare training programs on organ donation by highlighting positive thoughts and reducing negative judgments. The Turkish version of the Organ Donation Decisional Balance Survey is acceptable, valid, and reliable.

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Kidney and Liver Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The novel 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) was first described in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and subsequently announced as a pandemic on March 12, 2020. In several studies, solid-organ transplant recipients were reported to have higher risk for COVID-19. Here, we aimed to determine the frequency of COVID-19 in our kidney and liver transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 583 transplant patients who were admitted to our outpatient transplant clinics and emergency departments between March 1 and May 1, 2020. Seventy-four of them were liver transplant recipients (46 male, 28 female, of which 14 were pediatric and 60 were adult patients) and 509 of them were kidney transplant recipients (347 male, 162 female, of which 16 were pediatric and 493 were adult patients). We retrospectively evaluated demographic characteristics, currently used immunosuppressant treatment, present complaints, treatment and diagnosis of comorbid diseases, and results of COVID-19 tests. RESULTS: Of 583 transplant recipients, 538 were seen in our outpatient transplant clinics and 45 were seen in our emergency departments. Of these, 18 patients who had had cough and fever were evaluated by respiratory clinic doctors, and nasopharyngeal swab samples were taken. One kidney transplant recipient had a positive COVID-19 test; he was followed with home isolation. He received treatment with hydroxychloroquine (400 mg/day). The other 17 patients had negative tests. There were no mortalities due to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients also got affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the data of our centers, this effect is not much more different from the normal population. We recommend that transplant recipients should be warned in terms of personal hygiene and should be closely monitored by organ transplant centers. If there is an indication for hospitalization, they should be followed in an isolated unit, with no aggressive changes made to immunosuppressive doses unless necessary.

Incidence and Immunologic Analysis of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Hemodialysis Patients:A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 is a great threat to the modern world and significant threat to immunocompromised patients, including patients with chronic renal failure. We evaluated COVID-19 incidence among our hemodialysis patients and investigated the most probable immune mechanisms against COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baskent University has 21 dialysis centers across Turkey, with 2420 patients on hemodialysis and 30 on peritoneal dialysis. Among these, we retrospectively evaluated 602 patients (257 female/345 male) with chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis as renal replacement therapy; 7 patients (1.1%) were infected with SARS-CoV-2. We retrospectively collected patient demographic characteristics, clinical data, and immunological factors affecting the clinical course of the disease. We divided patients into groups and included 2 control groups (individuals with normal renal functions): group I included COVID-19-positive patients with normal renal function, group II included COVID-19-positive hemodialysis patients, group III included COVID-19-negative hemodialysis patients, and group IV included COVID-19-negative patients with normal renal function. Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood and typing of human leukocyte antigens were analyzed in all groups, with killer cell immunoglobulin like receptor genes analyzed only in COVID-19-positive patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: No deaths occurred among the 7 COVID-19-positive hemodialysis patients. Group I patients were significantly older than patients in groups II and III (P = .039, P = .030, respectively) but not significantly different from group IV (P = .060). Absolute counts of natural killer cells in healthy controls were higherthan in other groups (but not significantly). ActivatedT cells were significantly increased in both COVID-19-positive groups versus COVID-19-negative groups. Groups showed significant differences in C and DQ loci with respect to distribution of alleles in both HLA classes. CONCLUSIONS: Although immunocompromised patients are at greater risk for COVID-19, we found lower COVID-19 incidence in our hemodialysis patients, which should be further investigated in in vitro and molecular studies.

Single-Center Experience of Recurrence Patterns and Survival Analyses of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a major health problem with increased rates of mortality. The curative treatment options are resection or liver transplant. Because the Milan criteria are restrictive for candidates, they have been expanded into alternative sets of criteria. We aimed to evaluate our indications for liver transplant and their results for hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1988 and January 2020, we performed 652 liver transplant procedures (443 living donors, 209 deceased donors) at Baskent University (Ankara, Turkey). At Baskent University, we developed liver transplant criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. For our criteria, liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma was performed in patients without major vascular invasion and distant metastasis. Clinical data on cancer demographics, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Of 652 total patients, 49 adult patients (8%) with diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this study. Median age was 55 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplant was detected in 13 patients. Median overall survival was 64.3 months for all study patients; however, median survival was significantly lower in patients who had recurrence (126.3 vs 43.4 mo for nonrecurrent vs recurrent groups; P = .024). In the expanded criteria group (n = 25), 7 patients (28%) had hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence during follow-up, whereas this ratio was 25% (6/24 patients) in the Milan criteria group, with median time to recurrence of 12.6 versus 11.7 months, respectively (not significantly different). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary treatment modalities, including surgery, interventional radiology techniques, and medical treatments, will probably lead to prolonged survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. According to our center's expanded criteria, recurrence rates and time to recurrence were similar to those shown with the Milan group. We showed that Milan criteria can be safely expanded with promising results even in patients beyond Milan criteria.

Effect of Liver Transplant on Neurologic Manifestations and Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Wilson Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Wilson disease is an autosomal recessive disorder of copper metabolism. It leads to copper accumulation in various organs (liver, eye, brain) and deteriorates their functions. Symptoms usually appear in the second and third decades of life. Neurologic symptoms and manifestations may appear 2 to 5 years after liver involvement, and neurologic symptoms are usually movement disorders. The main treatment objective is to decrease accumulation of copper by increasing urinary copper excretion. With early diagnosis and treatment, the quality of life of patients with Wilson disease evolves. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of liver transplant on neurologic manifestations and radiologic findings in patients with Wilson disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 1988, our center has performed 642 liver transplant procedures. Fifty-three patients with Wilson disease received a liver transplant during this period, with 15 adults patients included in our study. All study patients were evaluated by the same neurologist and radiologist. Tremor was scored by the glass scale test. Radiologic evaluations were made by cranial magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Before liver transplant, 4/15 study patients had tremor. In 1 patient, tremor was accompanied by dystonia; the patient's imaging findings and neurologic manifestations had regressed posttransplant. In the other 3 study patients with tremor, tremor decreased without any change in imaging findings. New-onset tremor was seen in 1 patient after liver transplant, but this patient had no observed imaging changes. This situation was correlated with immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic recovery can be achieved in patients with Wilson disease with early diagnosis and treatment. Radiologic findings can be improved after therapy.

Over 5 Years of Excellent Graft Kidney Function Determinants: Baskent University Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Kidney graft survival may be evaluated according to the duration of time with a functioning graft. Survival alone may not satisfy expectations of a successful kidney transplant if the graft kidney does not show excellent function. In our study, we analyzed the characteristics of kidney transplant recipients who showed excellent graft function after 5 to 10 years of follow-up in an aim to improve graft survival and to ensure the best kidney function in the long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated graft function and demographic characteristics of 288 patients who underwent kidney transplant between January 2008 and December 2012. RESULTS: We found that 149 patients (51.7%) had excellent graft function, 88 patients (30.5%) had a functioning graft with a glomerular filtration rate lower than 60 mL/min and/or had signs of graft kidney dysfunction, and 45 patients (15.6%) experienced graft loss. Of 288 kidney transplant recipients enrolled in the study, most were male (56%), and mean age was 30.47 ± 14.36 years at time of transplant. Median time on dialysis was 39.09 ± 59.30 months. The overall graft survival rate in the patient group was 82.2% after 5 to 10 years of follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that excellent graft survival predictors beyond 5 years were negative panel reactive antibody levels, lower donor age, shorter duration on dialysis, absence of acute rejection episodes, 3 or less HLA mismatches, lower immunosuppressive levels, and lower recipient age at transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Lower panel reactive antibody levels, lower donor age, shorter duration on dialysis, absence of acute rejection episodes, 3 or less HLA mismatches, and lower recipient age at transplant are major determinants of excellent graft survival in our kidney transplant recipients.

Gender Imbalance and the Relationship Between Living Donors and Recipients in Liver Transplantations in an Organ Transplant Center in Turkey.

OBJECTIVES: Because of the scarcity of publications on gender differences and the relationship between living donors and recipients in liver transplant procedures, we carried out this study with the objective to examine the gender distribution of donors and recipients and the relationships between donors and recipients in living related-donor liver transplants performed in a university hospital in Ankara, Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 549 patients who underwent living related-donor and deceased-donor liver transplant procedures conducted in a university hospital between 1988 and 2017 and the 409 living donors. RESULTS: Males constituted 53.1% of the 409 living related liver donors and 63.6% of the living liver recipients. We found that 72.9% of the deceased-donor liver transplant recipients were also male. Of living related donors, 91.4% were blood relatives, with 74.8% being first-degree relatives. The most common donor-recipient relation was mother to son. Analyses of interspousal donations showed a significant difference between husband to wife and vice versa (7 vs 17; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Most recipients and donors in living related-donor liver transplants were males with a young predominance. It is not known whether this might be related to biologic, psychologic, or socio cultural features of patients, gender issues, or economic factors. Further research with qualitative components on the influential factors, including gender, is needed.

Liver Transplant in a Patient With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a rare and life-threatening systemic disease that can cause hepatic infiltration and present as acute liver failure. Here, we report a case of a 3-year-old pediatric patient who presented with acute liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy secondary to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. She had left lateral segment liver transplant from her father. After 27 months, she had bone marrow transplant from her sister. At the time of reporting (36 months after liver transplant), she showed normal liver function and blood peripheral counts. We found that liver transplant can be a curative treatment for this type of rare disorder, not only to improve the quality of life but also to prolong survival.

Liver Biopsy Results in Potential Donor Evaluation in Living Related Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: The number of living-donor liver transplants has been increasing due to the growing discrepancy between the number of patients on wait lists for liver transplant and the availability of deceased donations. Evaluations of potential liver donors should ensure the safety of the surgical procedure for both the donor and recipient. Liver biopsy is the criterion standard for selecting optimal donors. In this study, we evaluated the importance of preoperative liver biopsy in selecting donor candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the data of 612 living-related liver donor candidates who received liver biopsies between January 2001 and June 2017 at our center. RESULTS: In the 612 liver donor candidates (328 male, 284 female; age range, 18-69 years), 416 liver biopsies (68%) were reported as normal and 196 liver biopsies (32%) had pathologic findings. Of 196 donors with pathologic findings, 86 (44%) had fatty changes and 24 (12%) had portal inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of pathologic findings in liver biopsy of healthy-appearing donor candidates indicated the importance of liver biopsy in the preoperative evaluation of donors.

Pretransplant Renal Arterial Vasculopathy of Donor Predicts Poor Renal Allograft Survival.

OBJECTIVES: Transplant vasculopathy is a significant predictor of poor outcome. We investigated whether age or pretransplant renal arterial vasculopathy of grafted kidneys affected allograft survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 148 recipients and their donors. All donors underwent pretransplant renal arterial biopsy, with renal artery vascular score determined for each artery. Chronic rejection and graft loss were noted for all patients. RESULTS: Variable grades of pretransplant renal arterial lesions were noted in 103 donors (69.6%). A positive correlation was found between donor age and renal artery score (r = 0.650, P < .001), and chronic rejection and graft loss were found to increase with increasing score (P < .001). Recipient and donor age was significantly associated with graft loss and chronic rejection. With either younger or older donors, recipients had similar and best results regarding chronic rejection and graft loss if donors had renal artery scores of 0 or 1, but worse effects if donors had scores of 2 or 3. Five-year allograft survival rates for scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 91%, 68%, 46%, and 33%. Univariate analyses showed that acute rejection episode (relative risk: 2.729, 95% confidence interval, 1.496-4.977; P = .001), older (? 50 y) donor age (relative risk: 1.970, 95% confidence interval, 1.038-3.736; P = .04), and donor renal artery score (relative risk: 2.466, 95% confidence interval, 1.382-4.401; P = .002) were associated with decreased allograft survival. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that only acute rejection episode (relative risk: 3.585, 95% confidence interval, 1.781-7.217; P < .001) and renal artery score (relative risk: 2.642; 95% confidence interval, 1.355-5.150; P = .004) were independent predictors of allograft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant vasculopathy in donor renal artery implies a poor prognosis for renal allograft survival and is independent of other risk factors. Pretransplant renal artery biopsy is recommended for both deceased and living donors, and therapeutic interventions to modify transplant vasculopathy progression should start early posttransplant in recipients with affected renal arteries.

Early Postoperative Infections After Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Despite surgical advances and effective prophylactic strategies in liver transplant, infection is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Up to 80% of liver recipients will develop at least 1 infection during the first year after liver transplant. The spectrum and manifestations of these infections are broad and variable. Their diagnosis and treatment are often delayed because immunosuppressive therapy diminishes inflammatory responses. However, if an infection is not identified early enough and treated properly, it can have devastating consequences. In addition, prophylactic approaches remain controversial. Our aim was to review our early postoperative infection management after liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated infections that occurred during the first hospital stay of transplant patients. Infections were grouped as surgical site and nonsurgical site infections. Consequences and treatment protocols of infections were stratified according to the Clavien scale. RESULTS: Between December 1988 and January 2017, we performed 561 liver transplants at our center (patient age range, 6 months to 64 years), which included 401 living-donor (72%) and 160 deceaseddonor (28%) liver transplants. Early postoperative infections were detected in 131 patients (23.3%), comprising 67 surgical site (51%), 56 nonsurgical site (43%), and 8 combined surgical and nonsurgical site infections (6%). Although no mortalities occurred in patients with single nonsurgical or surgical site infections, there were 4 mortalities in patients with combined surgical and nonsurgical site infections. In the 4 other patients with combined infections, 3 patients required endoscopic or radiologic intervention and 1 recovered from single-organ dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of appropriate prophylactic and therapeutic protocols at the right time decreases morbidity and mortality due to infection in liver transplant recipients. Increased understanding and effective approaches to prevent infection are essential to improving both graft and recipient survival.