Attitudes and understanding of premium intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a public health sector patient survey.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate patient understanding of, and attitudes to, premium (toric, extended depth of focus/multifocal) intraocular lenses (premIOLs) in public health sector patients undergoing cataract surgery (CS) in the UK. METHODS: A 12 question survey with Likert scale questions was designed, to assess patient attitudes to post-operative spectacle dependence, refractive target and desirability of spectacle independence whilst considering possible complications of dysphotopsias and need for premIOL exchange/adjustment. RESULTS: 360 surveys were collected. CS had not been performed in 66.5%. Separate spectacles were worn for reading and distance in 28.8%, 19.2% had varifocals, 11.2% bifocals, 22.9% reading glasses only and 1.6% computer glasses only. Contact lenses were not worn in 95.7%. Only 41.6% were drivers. Most patients (85.8%) did not mind wearing glasses after CS, with 78.9% preferring reading glasses, compared with 29.7% preferring distance glasses. Most patients (75.3%) were not familiar with premIOLs, with 58.9% not willing to consider them in the context of a 2% risk of debilitating dysphotopsia and 54.2% rejecting a 5% risk of second surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of awareness of premIOLs in public health sector (NHS) patients in the UK, suggesting limitations in the "fully informed" consent process for CS. Most NHS CS patients are currently willing to wear spectacles after CS, especially reading glasses. There is reluctance in such patients to consider premIOLs on a background of small risks of debilitating dysphotopsias and increased risks of a second operation.

Corneal astigmatic outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery combined with surface penetrating arcuate keratotomies.

AIM: To evaluate corneal astigmatic outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomies (FAKs) combined with femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) over 12mo follow-up. METHODS: Totally 145 patients with bilateral cataracts and no ocular co-morbidities were recruited to a single-centre, single-masked, prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Eyes with corneal astigmatism (CA) of >0.8 dioptres (D) received unpaired, unopened, surface penetrating FAKs at the time of FLACS. Visual acuity, subjective refraction and Scheimpflug tomography were recorded at 1, 6, and 12mo. Alpins vectoral analyses were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (61 eyes), mean age 68.2±9.6y [standard deviation (SD)], received FAKs. Sixty eyes were available for analysis, except at 12mo when 59 attended. There were no complications due to FAKs. Mean pre-operative CA was 1.13±0.20 D. There was a reduction of astigmatism at all post-operative visits (residual CA 1mo: 0.85±0.42 D, P=0.0001; 6mo: 0.86±0.35 D, P=0001; and 12mo: 0.90±0.39, P=0.0001). Alpins indices remained stable over 12mo. Overall, the cohort was under-corrected at all time points. At 12mo, 61% of eyes were within ±15 degrees of pre-operative astigmatic meridian. CONCLUSION: Unpaired unopened penetrating FAKs combined with on-axis phacoemulsification are safe but minimally effective. CA is largely under-corrected in this cohort using an existing unmodified nomogram. The effect of arcuate keratotomies on CA remained stable over 12mo.

Visual and refractive outcomes and glistenings occurrence after implantation of 2 hydrophobic acrylic aspheric monofocal IOLs.

PURPOSE: To compare the Clareon IOL with the Tecnis PCB00 IOL in terms of visual performance, refractive outcomes, glistenings occurrence, and quality-of-life outcomes. SETTING: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Single-center, single-masked, prospective, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine patients with bilateral cataracts were randomized to receive the Clareon (C IOL) or Tecnis (T IOL) IOL. Visual acuity, refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell loss, contrast sensitivity, mesopic gap acuity, evaluation of glistenings, and rates of perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Quality-of-life outcomes were measured with the EuroQOL-5 dimensions questionnaire and the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaire. Optimized A-constants were available for the T IOL but not for the C IOL. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (140 eyes) received the C IOLs and 68 patients (134 eyes) received the T IOLs. Data were analyzed for the first implanted eye. At 12 months, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.02 ± 0.10 and 0.01 ± 0.08 (mean ± SD; P = .49; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.04) in the C IOL and T IOL groups, respectively. Corrected distance visual acuity was -0.02 ± 0.09 and -0.03 ± 0.06, respectively (P = .45; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.04). The increase in CCT was 14 ± 19 and 16 ± 28 µm, respectively (P = .63; 95% CI, -10.16 to 6.16). Mean absolute refraction spherical equivalent error from target refraction was 0.41 ± 0.28 for the C IOL and 0.25 ± 0.2 for the T IOL groups (P = .002; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.24). Glistenings were minimal (median grade 0), with no difference in grades between groups (P = .2). PROMs improved postoperatively and were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in visual outcomes between the Clareon IOL and Tecnis PCB00 IOL. Glistenings were rarely observed in either IOL with no difference in grades. There was no difference in perioperative or postoperative complications. Surgeon optimization of the A-constant for the Clareon IOL is recommended.

Acceptability of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in a public health care setting before and after COVID-19: a prospective patient questionnaire survey.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain patient acceptance of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A survey was devised using a 5-point Likert scale for questions related to ISBCS, which patients undertook during their cataract outpatient appointment pre-COVID-19 lockdown and by telephone during the lockdown. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed for 267 patients. Most respondents were aged over 71 (51%) and were female individuals (60%). Forty-five per cent agreed/strongly agreed with opting for ISBCS. A positive correlation was identified between opting for ISBCS and convenience to the patient (r=0.76, p<0.01) and family/carer/partner (r=0.71, p<0.01) and wanting to limit numbers of hospital visits (r=0.57, p<0.01). Fifty per cent agreed/strongly agreed that they were worried about the risk of simultaneous bilateral ocular complications, with this correlating with being less likely to opt for ISBCS (r=-0.49, p<0.01) and being scared of ISBCS (r=0.67, p<0.01). During COVID-19 lockdown, patients were less likely to want to minimise the time taken off work (p<0.05) and less intolerant of a prolonged hospital visit (p<0.05). Only 23% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that they had familiarity with ISBCS. CONCLUSIONS: ISBCS was acceptable to 45% of our sampled population, suggesting limited routine implementation in the NHS is possible. Convenience and reduction in hospital visits appeared to contribute to this acceptance. Half of the patients expressed concern regarding bilateral complications and such concerns need addressing. Some attitudes did appear to change during the COVID-19 lockdown period. The familiarity of the concept of ISBCS is low suggesting the need for patient education.

Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.

PURPOSE: To assess the biomechanical properties of corneas in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and to compare them with those of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), ocular hypertension (OHT), and normal controls (N). METHODS: Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc) were obtained using an ocular response analyzer for 28 eyes in 14 patients with NTG, 75 eyes in 38 patients with chronic POAG, 53 eyes of 27 patients with OHT, and 44 eyes of 22 N controls. IOP using Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOPGA) and ultrasonic central corneal thickness (CCT) were also measured for each eye. Analysis of variance test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: CH was significantly lower in the NTG group (9.88±2.02 mm Hg) compared with the N group (11.05±1.53 mm Hg; P<0.01). CRF was significantly lower in the NTG group (9.5±1.89 mm Hg) compared with the POAG group (11.15±2.35 mm Hg; P<0.01) and to the N group (11.00±1.75 mm Hg; P<0.01). CCT was not considered significantly different between the 4 groups. However, IOPcc was found to be significantly lower in NTG group compared with the POAG group and OHT group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: NTG was associated with significantly lower CRF than chronic POAG and N patients. CH and CRF could be a useful tool in early diagnosis of NTG.

Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes.

PURPOSE: Measuring corneal biomechanical properties may help detect keratoconus suspect corneas and eliminate the risk of ectasia after LASIK. METHODS: Data of 504 eyes separated into three groups were retrospectively reviewed: normal (n = 252), keratoconus suspect (n = 80), and keratoconus (n = 172). Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured with an ocular biomechanics analyzer. RESULTS: Mean corneal hysteresis was 10.6 +/- 1.4 (SD) mm Hg in the normal group, compared with 10.0 +/- 1.6 mm Hg in the keratoconus suspect group and 8.1 +/- 1.4 mm Hg in the keratoconus group. The mean CRF was 10.6 +/- 1.6 mm Hg in the normal group compared with 9.7 +/- 1.7 in the keratoconus suspect group and 7.1 +/- 1.6 mm Hg in the keratoconus group. Mean CH and CRF were significantly different between the three groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CH and CRF alone cannot be used to identify keratoconus suspect corneas. Analyzing signal curves obtained with the biomechanics analyzer may provide additional valuable information for selecting qualified patients for refractive surgery.

Cone dysfunction as a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with retinal antigens approximating 40 kiloDalton.

Reports on cancer-associated retinopathies (CAR) have increased in recent years as the autoimmune reactions responsible have become better understood. The 23-kDalton autoantigen 'recoverin' was the first retinal antigen implicated in CAR, but others have since been described. We report an additional case involving an autoantigen other than recoverin, with five-year follow-up of a 50-year-old woman suffering from the CAR syndrome, with ocular abnormalities restricted to cone dysfunction. The patient had a history of laryngeal carcinoma surgically removed 18 months prior to presenting to the ophthalmologist with photophobia and decreased vision in both eyes. The patient's abnormal retinal hypersensitivity included antibody activity with two retinal antigens approximating 40 kD, located within the outer segments of the photoreceptor layer. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a cancer-associated, cone-specific dystrophy involving an abnormal amount of immunologic activity with two retinal proteins approximating 40 kD, that may prove to be isoforms of the same antigen.