Role of osteoclast inhibitors in prostate cancer bone metastasis; a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of Osteoclast inhibitors in advanced prostate cancer metastasis treatment and their efficacy in reducing skeletal related events. METHODS: DATA SOURCE: A comprehensive search was done using search terms as "osteoclast inhibitors" "Bisphosphonates" "Zoledronic acid" " pamidronate" " Alendronate" "Denosumab" " Prostate cancer metastasis" in pubmed and Google scholar. Relevant articles were screened and collected . The collected articles were used to frame the review and data showing use of Osteoclast inhibitors In prostate cancer bone metastasis was collected. DATA SUMMARY: Prostate cancer metastasizes most commonly to the skeleton thus leading to significant morbidity ranging from pain, pathological fractures to spinal cord compression and are the primary cause of patient disability and reduced quality of life.Initially, radiation therapy and radiopharmaceuticals were the mainstay of treatment however the role of Bisphosphonates and denosumab has become an integral part of therapy to manage metastatic prostate cancer. These agents significantly decrease skeletal related events and enhance patients quality of life. Emerging therapies like Radium-223 have also shown promise in reducing skeletal related events and also improving survival rates in patients with bone metastasis. Other treatment options which are being used are systemic agents like Docetaxel, cabazitaxel, hormonal therapies like abiraterone and enzalutamide. Immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T has demonstrated a reduction in mortality among prostate cancer patients with metastasis, highlighting the need for further research in this area. Ongoing studies are investigating novel agents that target both tumor cells and the bone microenvironment. CONCLUSION: Osteoclast inhibitors are effective in reducing skeletal related events in advanced bone metastasis and improve the quality of life of patients.

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Readmissions of Atrial Fibrillation Among Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device Recipients: A Propensity Matched National Readmission Study.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder devices are increasingly utilized in minimally invasive procedures used to treat cryptogenic stroke. Data on the impact of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) among PFO occluder device recipients are limited. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried between 2016 and 2019 to identify PFO patients with and without AF. The 2 groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression models. The outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), Mechanical circulatory support use (MCS), Cardiogenic shock (CS), acute ischemic stroke, bleeding, and other cardiovascular outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v. 17. Out of 6508 Weighted hospitalizations for PFO occluder device procedure over the study period, 877 (13.4%) had AF compared to 5631 (86.6%) who did not. On adjusted analysis, PFO with AF group had higher rates of MCS (PSM, 4.5% vs 2.2 %, P value = 0.011) and SCA (PSM, 7.6% vs 4.6 %, P value = 0.015) compared to PFO with no AF. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of in-hospital mortality (PSM, 5.4% vs 6.4 %, P value = 0.39), CS (PSM, 8.3% vs 5.9 %, P value = 0.075), AKI (PSM, 32.4% vs 32.3 %, P value = 0.96), bleeding (PSM, 2.08% vs 1.3%, P value = 0.235) or the readmission rates among both cohorts. Additionally, AF was associated with higher hospital length of stay (9.5 ± 13.2 vs 8.2 ± 24.3 days, P-value = 0.012) and total cost ($66,513 ± $80,922 vs $52,013±$125,136, 0.025, P-value = 0.025) compared to PFO without AF. AF among PFO occluder device recipients is associated with increased adverse outcomes, including MCS use and SCA, with no difference in mortality and readmission rates among both cohorts. Long-term follow-up needs further studies.

The Spectrum of Heart Failure Management.

Heart failure, a complex cardiovascular condition, is a huge burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems and it is prevalent worldwide. Heart failure is caused by a wide variety of underlying conditions that include both cardiac and non-cardiac pathologies. Identifying the underlying cause enables us to apply etiology-based interventions. The spectrum of heart failure management ranges from classification to transplantation. In addition to its classification and monitoring, this article reviews various management strategies, including both conventional methods and the latest innovations. These include lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, device therapy, transplantation, and regenerative medicine.

Safety and Feasibility of Staged Versus Concomitant Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

The data on the safety and feasibility of performing concomitant or staged transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains limited. The Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify TEER and TAVI procedures from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019, using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification administrative data. A total of 627 weighted cases of TEER and TAVI procedures were included in the analysis. Of those cases, 453 underwent staged TEER after TAVI, whereas 174 had concomitant TAVI and TEER during the same admission. Patients who underwent staged procedures were mostly men (64.8%, p = 0.02) and had a higher median age of 85 years (interquartile range 79 to 88) versus 82 years (interquartile range 72 to 86) in the concomitant procedure group. The adjusted propensity-matched mortality rate was similar for staged versus same-admission procedures (6.1% vs 7.0%, p = 0.79). In-hospital complication rates, including acute kidney injury, vascular complications, need for percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical support, and pacemaker implantation, were higher for the same-admission TEER and TAVI group than TEER performed as a staged procedure. Nonhome facility discharges and length of hospital stay (15 vs 4 days) were also significantly higher for the concomitant same-admission TEER and TAVI groups. In conclusion, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality rate between patients who underwent concomitant or staged TEER and TAVI procedures, whereas complication rates were significantly higher in the concomitant group.