Lack of effect of efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics of tipranavir-ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

Previously it has been shown that tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) does not affect efavirenz (EFV) plasma concentrations. This study investigates the effect of steady-state EFV on steady-state TPV/r pharmacokinetics. This was a single-center, open-label, multiple-dose study of healthy adult female and male volunteers. TPV/r 500/200 mg twice a day (BID) was given with food for 24 days. After dosing with TPV/r for 10 days, EFV 600 mg once a day was added to the regimen. Intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was done on days 10 and 24. Validated bioanalytical high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods were used to determine plasma tipranavir (TPV), ritonavir (RTV), and EFV concentrations. Thirty-four subjects were entered into the study, and 16 subjects completed it. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for TPV and RTV area under the curves, C(max)s, and C(min)s comparing TPV/r alone and in combination with EFV were 0.97 (0.87 to 1.09), 0.92 (0.81 to 1.03), and 1.19 (0.93 to 1.54) for TPV and 1.03 (0.78 to 1.38), 0.92 (0.65 to 1.30), and 1.04 (0.72 to 1.48) for RTV. Frequently observed adverse events were diarrhea, headache, dizziness, abnormal dreams, and rash. EFV had no effect on the steady-state PK of TPV or RTV, with the exception of a 19% increase in the TPV C(min), which is not clinically relevant. TPV/r can be safely coadministered with EFV and without the need for a dose adjustment.

Development and psychometric validation of the HIV Treatment Knowledge Scale.

Accurate treatment knowledge is required for patients to successfully manage complex medical conditions. Existing HIV knowledge scales focus on disease transmission and risk factors. This is the first study to develop and validate a scale to measure HIV treatment knowledge about complex treatment issues such as adherence, side-effects and drug resistance. A total of 346 participants were recruited into this cross-sectional study. Participants included HIV-positive patients (n=130), HIV-hepatitis C co-infected patients (n=22), hepatitis C patients, (n=78), community healthcare providers (n=35) and college students (n=81). Participants completed the proposed HIV Treatment Knowledge Scale and a validated measure of general knowledge about HIV transmission and risk factors. Two-week test-retest data were collected. Results demonstrated that the HIV Treatment Knowledge Scale was significantly correlated with general HIV knowledge across all samples. Among HIV-positive patients, the HIV Treatment Knowledge Scale was positively associated with time since HIV diagnosis. HAART-experienced patients had significantly higher treatment knowledge than HAART-naïve patients. HIV-positive patients scored significantly higher than hepatitis C patients and college students on HIV treatment knowledge. Test-retest reliability (r=0.83) and internal consistency (reliability coefficient=0.90) were both satisfactory. The HIV Treatment Knowledge Scale is a novel, easy-to-administer measure demonstrating high levels of validity and reliability. It has important applications as a clinical teaching tool with patients and healthcare workers and it could be used as an outcome indicator in HIV educational intervention studies.

Interactions between protease inhibitors and acid-reducing agents: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review of the available pharmacokinetic and clinical data on drug interactions between protease inhibitors (PIs) and acid-reducing agents, and their clinical relevance. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Medline and EMBASE, abstracts of the previous 2 years of major conferences were searched and the drug information service of the manufacturer of every currently available PI was contacted. All data were summarized, and verified by at least two authors. RESULTS: A total of 1231 references were identified, 22 of which were studies of pharmacokinetic interactions between PIs and acid-suppressive agents and a further 12 of which provided pharmacokinetic and/or clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: Many pharmacokinetic studies show a lack of a drug interaction between at least one acid-reducing agent and most PIs. Little clinical information is available, except on interactions between atazanavir and acid-reducing agents. This is probably a consequence of the complexity of the interaction.

The effect of ABCB1 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir alone and in combination with ritonavir.

This genotype panel study investigated the effect of ABCB1 polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T), exon 21 (G2677T/A), and exon 12 (C1236T) on saquinavir pharmacokinetics and on the expression and activity of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in peripheral blood monocytic cells (PBMCs). One hundred and fifty healthy volunteers were genotyped to identify 15 TT3435 and 15 CC3435 individuals. In these individuals, saquinavir pharmacokinetics were assessed after administration of a single oral dose of saquinavir 1,000 mg and saquinavir/ritonavir 1,000/100 mg. PBMC P-gp expression and activity were assessed in 15 and 19 subjects. The co-administration of ritonavir on study day 2 caused a significant increase in saquinavir exposure, in both TT3435 and CC3435 individuals. No correlation was observed between the ABCB1 C3435T, G2677T/A, and C1236T polymorphisms, separately and in haplotypes, with saquinavir pharmacokinetics, administered with or without ritonavir and with PBMC P-gp expression and activity. In conclusion, ABCB1 polymorphism has no pronounced effect on saquinavir exposure.

Birth defects after maternal exposure to corticosteroids: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are first-line drugs for the treatment of a variety of conditions in women of childbearing age. Information regarding human pregnancy outcome with corticosteroids is limited. METHODS: We collected prospectively and followed up 184 women exposed to prednisone in pregnancy and 188 pregnant women who were counseled by Motherisk for nonteratogenic exposure. The primary outcome was the rate of major birth defects. A meta-analysis of all epidemiological studies was conducted. The Mantel-Haenszel summary odds ratio was calculated for the pooled studies with 95% confidence intervals. A cumulative summary odds ratio was also calculated by combining studies in chronological order. Chi-squared for homogeneity was determined to establish the comparability of the studies. RESULTS: In our prospective study, there was no statistical difference in the rate of major anomalies between the corticosteroid-exposed and control groups. In the meta-analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel summary odds ratio for major malformations with all cohort studies was 1.45 [95% CI 0.80, 2.60] and 3.03 [95% CI 1.08, 8. 54] when Heinonen et al. ('77) was removed. This suggests a marginally increased risk of major malformations after first-trimester exposure to corticosteroids. In addition, summary odds ratio for case-control studies examining oral clefts was significant (3.35 [95% CI 1.97, 5.69]). CONCLUSIONS: Although prednisone does not represent a major teratogenic risk in humans at therapeutic doses, it does increase by an order of 3.4-fold the risk of oral cleft, which is consistent with the existing animal studies.