The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature. METHODS: A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.

[Prognostic importance of preoperative CEA in patients with colorectal cancer]. / Importanza prognostica del CEA preoperatorio nel paziente con cancro colorettale.

Carcinoembryonic antigen is an acid glycoprotein, the levels of which may increase in patients with colorectal carcinoma. The prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and their relationship to other risk factors are still debatable issues. Among 512 patients operated on for colorectal cancer, whose preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations were evaluated, linear correlations were established between carcinoembryonic antigen overexpression and carcinoma staging, diameter and grading, though these were not statistically significant. Moreover, metastatic cancers were significantly more frequent in patients with increased plasma concentrations of the marker (> 60 ng/ml). There were no correlations between increased carcinoembryonic antigen levels and age, ploidy, or site and shape of the cancers. As regards survival, patients with normal preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels had a better prognosis in terms both of lower local recurrence rates and long- term survival. In addition. In Dukes stages B and C elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen above the cut-off point can be considered a significant prognostic factor capable of identifying a group of patients at high risk who may be candidates for aggressive adjuvant therapies and follow-up. The findings of this study suggest that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels are of prognostic importance in relation both to cancer staging and to long-term survival, which may have significant clinical applications.