Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 18(2): 182-187, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29863452

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We investigated late mortality causes and risk factors in patients who were undergoing deceased-donor liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had deceased-donor liver transplant from February 1997 to June 2014 in the hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery and liver transplant unit at Dokuz Eylul University Hospital were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age and who survived more than 1 year after liver transplant. Causes of mortality and related risk factors after the first year were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 157 included patients, 102 patients (72%) received transplant procedures for hepatitis B and C secondary to chronic liver disease. Mean follow-up was 89.85 months (range, 14.4-240 months). Of 157 patients, 20 patients (12.7%) died: 12 patients (60%) died during posttransplant years 2-5 and 8 patients (40%) died after 5 years. Causes of death included malignancy in 8 patients (40%), recurrent hepatitis C infection in 3 patients (15%), infection in 3 patients (15%), coronary artery disease in 2 patients (10%), graft rejection in 2 patients (10%), and biliary complications in 2 patients (10%). Univariate analyses showed that long-term survival was significantly lower in patients older than 50 years (P = .001), when there was presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (P = .011), and when donor age was higher than 38 years (P = .045). Multivariate analyses identified recipient age (P = .007) and presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (P = 0.033) as factors that reduced long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: The main causes of late mortality in liver transplant are malignancy, recurrence of hepatitis C, infection, coronary artery disease, graft rejection, and biliary complications. Advanced age and hepatocellular carcinoma are independent risk factors that increase late mortality.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 17(1): 74-78, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29237362

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to analyze characteristics, risk factors, and incidence of de novo malignancies after liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hospital records of 557 patients who underwent liver transplant were analyzed from the point of de novo malignancy development. We evaluated the demographic features and survival of these patients retrospectively. RESULTS: The research covered 429 patients, 9 (2%) of whom developed de novo malignancy. All of these patients were male (100%), and their mean (SD) age was 51.33 (4.69) years (range, 45-65 y). Indications for transplant included alcohol related in 4 cases, chronic hepatitis B in 2 cases, chronic hepatitis B and C in 1 case, chronic hepatitis B and D in 1 case, and chronic hepatitis C and alcohol-related cirrhosis in 1 case. The mean (SD) time from transplant to cancer diagnosis was 63.41 (37.10) months (range, 17-122 mo). The types of tumors were lung cancer, lymphoma, neuroendocrine tumor of lung, nasopharyngeal cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Seven cases received chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Two cases received surgery and radiotherapy. One patient underwent surgical treatment. One patient died before treatment was started. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive therapies have helped prolong survival of patients who undergo liver transplant. However, this also has led to a rise in the incidence of long-term complications such as de novo malignancy. These patients are more likely to develop de novo malignancy than the general population, for which chronic immunosuppression is identified as a major risk factor. Early diagnosis and treatment of de novo malignancies can help obtain better prognosis and higher survival rates in these patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia/epidemiologia
3.
Hepat Mon ; 13(8): e7569, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24098309

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study of weight gain after transplantation and its associated factors is necessary to propose strategies to prevent and treat this problem. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate factors affecting the development of obesity after liver transplantation (LTx). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of 343 liver transplantation cases, which were followed between January 2001 and January 2010 at Dokuz Eylul University, were retrospectively analyzed. Patient pre-liver transplantation height, body weight, body mass index (BMI) measurements, as well as changes in body weight at the beginning, 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years post-transplantation were observed. BMI measurements with records of immunosuppressive therapies were obtained. RESULTS: The study was carried out with the records of 226 patients. 151 patients (66.8%) were male; 75 (33.2%) were female. The mean age was 46.19 ± 10.2 years. 123 of these liver transplants were performed from living donors, while 103 were from cadaveric donors. The causes of liver transplantation were hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection (28%), hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (24%), hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (24%), alcoholic liver disease (9%), cryptogenic liver disease (9%), autoimmune hepatitis (4%), and other (2%). In this study, the prevalence of obesity was 21% at the end of the second year, decreasing to 14% by the end of the fifth year. The mean BMI gradually increased during the follow-ups, reaching 25.1 kg/m² and 26 kg/m² six months after liver transplantation and at the end of the first year, respectively (P < 0.002). Obesity developed in 18.2% of post-transplant patients who were receiving a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Regarding the development of obesity after transplantation, no statistically significant difference was found between patients using cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC) (P = 0.07). Six months after liver transplantation, the mean body weight gain in the groups receiving steroids and not receiving steroids were 4.71 kg and 2.7 kg, respectively (P = 0.03). In the post-transplant period, there was no significant difference in patients who had received TAC and CsA for development of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), or hyperlipidemia (HL) (P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity prevalence before and after liver transplantation was comparable. Education of obese patients prior to surgery and recommendation of medical nutrition therapy should be appropriate. Similar medical care for the non-obese subjects could prevent increase in obesity prevalence. Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive agents had no significant effect on the development of weight gain and obesity. Avoiding the use of long-term steroid therapy and obesity education are the key measures for preventing obesity after liver transplantation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA