Hardware failure for anterior chest wall and costal cartilage injuries: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Often missed in blunt chest wall injury, costal cartilage injuries can cause chest wall instability, refractory pain, and deformity. Notably, there is only a small amount of evidence regarding hardware performance when applied to costal cartilage. In a prior multicenter study, hardware failure rate was found to be approximately 3% following surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) for all fracture locations. The aim of the current study was to evaluate hardware performance for costal cartilage injuries. METHODS: All patients undergoing SSRF performed at our institution from 2016 to 2022 were queried, including both acute and chronic injuries. Both radiographic and clinical follow-up were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate for hardware failure defined as plate fracture, malposition, or screw migration following cartilage fixation. RESULTS: After screening 359 patients, 43 were included for analysis. Mean age was 64 years, and 67% of patients were male. Median number of fractures per patient was 7 with 60% of patients sustaining a flail chest injury pattern. Median total plates per operation was 6 and median costal cartilage plates was 3. In total, 144 plates were applied to the costal cartilage for the group. Mean follow-up was as follows: clinical 88 days, two-view plain radiography 164 days, and chest computed tomography 184 days. Hardware failure was observed in 3 of 144 plates (2.1%), in three separate patients. Two cases were asymptomatic and did not require intervention. One patient required revisional operation in the acute setting. CONCLUSION: In our institution, hardware failure for costal cartilage fractures was observed to be 2.1%. This aligns with prior reports of hardware failure during SSRF for all injury locations. Surgical stabilization of anterior and cartilaginous chest wall injury with appropriate plate contouring and fixation technique appears to provide adequate stabilization with a relatively low rate of hardware malfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Use of Low-Cost Task Trainer for Emergency Department Thoracotomy Training in General Surgery Residency Program.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is an uncommon but potentially lifesaving procedure that warrants familiarity with anatomy, instruments, and indications necessary for completion. To address this need, we developed a low-cost EDT trainer. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a low-cost EDT trainer to teach emergency department thoracotomy with a discussion-based teaching session. Secondary objective was to study the face validity of the low-cost EDT trainer. DESIGN: A prospective 2-phase randomized control study was conducted. Participants were randomly divided into two groups. In phase one, baseline medical knowledge for both groups was assessed using a multiple-choice question pretest. In Group 1, each participant was taught EDT using a one-on-one discussion with a trauma surgeon, whereas Group 2 used the EDT trainer and debriefing for training. In phase 2 (1 month later), all participants completed a knowledge retention test and performed a videoed EDT using our EDT trainer, the video recordings were later reviewed by content experts blinded to the study participants using a checklist with a maximum score of 22. The participants also completed a reaction survey at the end of phase 2 of the study. SETTING: OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, an urban tertiary care academic hospital in Columbus, Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: Nine senior surgery residents from training years 3 to 5. RESULTS: The mean score for the performance of the procedure for the simulation-based (Group 2) was significantly higher than that of the discussion-based (Group 1) (Rater 1: 21.2 ± 0.8 vs. 19.0 ± 2.0, p = 0.05, Rater 2: 20.4 ± 1.5 vs. 18.3±1.0, p = 0.04). Group 2 also was quicker than Group 1 in deciding to start the procedure by approximately 56 seconds. When comparing the mean pretest knowledge score to the mean knowledge retention score 30 days after training, the discussion-based group improved from 58.33% to 81.25% (p = 0.01); the simulation-trained group's scores remained at 68.33%. All the participants agreed or strongly agreed that the simulator provided a realistic opportunity to perform EDT and improved their confidence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study support our hypothesis that using a low-cost EDT trainer effectively improves general surgery residents' confidence and procedural skills scores in a simulated environment. Further training with low-cost simulators may provide surgical residents with deliberate practice opportunities and improve performance when learning low-frequency procedures.

An initiative to assess and improve the resources and patient care processes used among Chest Wall Injury Society collaborative centers study (CWIS-CC2).

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, the acute management of rib fractures has changed significantly. In 2021, the Chest Wall injury Society (CWIS) began recognizing centers that epitomize their mission as CWIS Collaborative Centers. The primary aim of this study was to determine the resources, surgical expertise, access to care, and institutional support that are present among centers. METHODS: A survey was performed including all CWIS Collaborative Centers evaluating the resources available at their hospital for the treatment of patients with chest wall injury. Data about each chest wall injury center care process, availability of resources, institutional support, research support, and educational offerings were recorded. RESULTS: Data were collected from 20 trauma centers resulting in an 80% response rate. These trauma centers were made up of 5 international and 15 US-based trauma centers. Eighty percent (16 of 20) have dedicated care team members for the evaluation and management of rib fractures. Twenty-five percent (5 of 20) have a dedicated rib fracture service with a separate call schedule. Staffing for chest wall injury clinics consists of a multidisciplinary team: with attending surgeons in all clinics, 80% (8 of 10) with advanced practice providers and 70% (7 of 10) with care coordinators. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have dedicated rib fracture research support, and 35% (7 of 20) have surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF)-related grants. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have marketing support, and 30% (8 of 20) have a web page support to bring awareness to their center. At these trauma centers, a median of 4 (1-9) surgeons perform SSRFs. In the majority of trauma centers, the trauma surgeons perform SSRF. CONCLUSION: Considerable similarities and differences exist within these CWIS collaborative centers. These differences in resources are hypothesis generating in determining the optimal chest wall injury center. These findings may generate several patient care and team process questions to optimize patient care, patient experience, provider satisfaction, research productivity, education, and outreach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

In- and out-of-hospital outcomes following surgical stabilization of rib fractures in 80 years and older: A single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has demonstrated benefit in patients with flail chest and multiple displaced fractures. There is mounting evidence for SSRF following chest wall injury (CWI) for the geriatric trauma population. A recent multi-center retrospective study highlighted a mortality benefit even for those patients aged 80 years and older. The objective of this investigation was to review our institutional experience with both in- and out-of-hospital outcomes within this patient population following SSRF. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients 80 years and older was performed at a high-volume level 2 trauma center from 2017 to 2021. SSRF volume is routinely >60 cases per year. Perioperative, inpatient, and outpatient data were collected as available. Primary outcomes were inpatient and 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included discharge on narcotics and freedom from narcotics at 30 days. RESULTS: 50 patients were included for review. Mean age was 86 years and mechanism of injury was most often fall. 28 of 50 (56%) patients had flail chest (radiographic). Mean number of ribs fixated was 4.7 and time to surgery 2.5 days. Inpatient mortality was 3/50 (6%), 90-day mortality was 9/50 (18%) of which three were attributable primarily to CWI (6/50, 12%). Of patients with follow-up of 1 year and beyond, 27/28 were alive (96%). With respect to narcotic consumption, 45% (21/47) were discharged on narcotics with 90% (28/31; N limited by missing data) being narcotic-free at 30 days. CONCLUSION: In this high-risk patient population, inpatient mortality was comparably low to prior reports, though 90-day mortality was doubled when incorporating CWI-related deaths. Narcotic use was seen in the minority of patients upon discharge, and most progressed to being narcotic-free at 30 days post-hospitalization. Inpatient outcomes alone may not adequately define both the benefit and risk of SSRF performed in patients 80 years and older.

Surgical stabilization of severe chest wall injury following cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) contributes to significant chest wall injury similar to blunt trauma. With benefits realized for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) for flail injuries and severely displaced fractures following trauma, SSRF for chest wall injury following CPR could be advantageous, provided good functional and neurologic outlook. Experience is limited. We present a review of patients treated with SSRF at our institution following CPR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing SSRF following CPR was performed between 2019 and 2020. Perioperative inpatient data were collected with outpatient follow-up as able. RESULTS: Five patients underwent SSRF over the course of the 2-year interval. All patients required invasive ventilation preoperatively or had impending respiratory. Mean age was 59 ± 12 years, with all patients being male. Inciting events for cardiac arrest included respiratory, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, pulseless electrical activity, and anaphylaxis. Time to operation was 6.6 ± 3 days. Four patients demonstrated anterior flail injury pattern with or without sternal fracture, with one patient having multiple severely displaced fractures. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture was performed appropriately to restore chest wall stability. Mean intensive care unit length of stay was 9.8 ± 6.4 days and overall hospital length of stay 24.6 ± 13.2 days. Median postoperative ventilation was 2 days (range, 1-15 days) with two patients developing pneumonia and one requiring tracheostomy. There were no mortalities at 30 days. One patient expired in hospice after a prolonged hospitalization. Disposition destination was variable. No hardware complications were noted on outpatient follow-up, and all surviving patients were home. CONCLUSION: Chest wall injuries are incurred frequently following CPR. Surgical stabilization of these injuries can be considered to promote ventilator liberation and rehabilitation. Careful patient selection is paramount, with surgery offered to those with reversible causes of arrest and good functional and neurologic outcome. Experience is early, with further investigation needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level V.

The right team at the right time - Multidisciplinary approach to multi-trauma patient with orthopedic injuries.

Integrated, multidisciplinary team approach to the multiply injured patient can help optimize care, minimize morbidity, and reduce mortality. It also provides a framework for accelerated postinjury rehabilitation course. The characteristics and potential benefits of this approach, including team dynamics and interactions, are discussed in this brief review. Emphasis is placed on synergies provided by specialty teams working together in the framework of care coordination, timing of surgical and nonsurgical interventions, and injury/physiologic considerations. REPUBLISHED WITH PERMISSION FROM: Bach JA, Leskovan JJ, Scharschmidt T, Boulger C, Papadimos TJ, Russell S, Bahner DP, Stawicki SPA. Multidisciplinary approach to multi-trauma patient with orthopedic injuries: the right team at the right time. OPUS 12 Scientist 2012;6(1):6-10.

Colosplenic contained perforation secondary to colonic lymphoma.

We present the case of patient with colosplenic perforation from a colonic lymphoma. He initially was diagnosed with a splenic abscess subsequently developed a contained colonic perforation, underwent surgical treatment and intraoperatively was diagnosed with lymphoma. This is a rare entity in a non-immunocompromised host and has been scarcely reported.

Anion gap as a predictor of trauma outcomes in the older trauma population: correlations with injury severity and mortality.

The relationship among traumatic injury, the associated metabolic/physiologic responses, and mortality is well established. Tissue hypoperfusion and metabolic derangement may not universally correlate with initial clinical presentation. We hypothesized that anion gap (AG) could be a useful gauge of trauma-related physiologic response and mortality in older patients with relatively lower injury acuity. We retrospectively analyzed data from 711 trauma patients older than 45 years. Parameters examined included demographics, injury characteristics, laboratories, morbidity, and mortality. Univariate and survival analyses were performed using PASW 18. A stepwise correlation exists between increasing Injury Severity Score and AG. Although AG less than 8 to 15 was not associated with a significant increase in mortality, greater mortality was seen for AG greater than 16 with further stepwise increases for AGs greater than 22. Anion gap correlated moderately with serum lactate and poorly with base excess. Increasing AG also correlated with morbidity and greater incidence of intensive care admissions. The presence of any complication increased from 28.6 per cent for patients with AG 12 or less to 45.5 per cent for patients with AG 22 or greater (P < 0.04). These findings support the contention that "low acuity" trauma patients with high AGs may not appear acutely ill but may harbor significant underlying metabolic and physiologic disturbances that could contribute to morbidity and mortality. Higher AG values (i.e., greater than 16) may be associated with worse clinical outcomes.