RESUMO
Criminalizing those with mental illness is a controversial topic with a long and complex history in the United States. The problem has traditionally been dichotomized between criminals (i.e., "bad") in need of placement in jails and prisons and the mentally ill (i.e., "mad") who are need of treatment in psychiatric facilities. Recent trends demonstrate significant increases in the rates of mental illness in jails and prisons, as well as increased rates of violence within psychiatric hospitals. This would suggest that there are a group of justice involved individuals who are "indistinguishable" within the traditional dichotomous categories of dangerousness and mental illness. The authors argue for a more nuanced model that dimensionally conceptualizes dangerousness and mental illness; increased attention to situational factors that create facilities appropriate for those who are dangerous and mentally ill and more diversion programs for those inappropriate for incarceration or hospitalization.
Assuntos
Psiquiatria Legal/normas , Institucionalização/normas , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Violência/prevenção & controle , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/normas , Humanos , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/psicologia , Prisões/normasRESUMO
Existing literature on aggression within psychiatric hospitals suggests that treating an aggressive patient's symptoms could be complemented by (a) milieu environments that mitigate violence and (b) hospital-wide policies and procedures that focus on creating a safe environment. Described as an ecological approach, examples of how this broader, situational approach can reduce inpatient violence in psychiatric settings are provided throughout. The authors identify potential barriers to focusing on wards and institutional rules as well as patient treatment. Last, details of how this ecological approach has been implemented at one state hospital in California are provided.
Assuntos
Hospitais Psiquiátricos/tendências , Violência/prevenção & controle , Agressão/psicologia , Humanos , PrisõesRESUMO
During recent years, research about female sexual offender recidivism rates using official criminal justice records has increased. Although informative, rearrest or conviction rates may be insufficient for this population. This study examines two potential outcome measures for accurately studying recidivism among 57 female sexual offenders; a criminal recidivism measure based on formal legal charges and a reported recidivism measure based on child welfare reports. Based on the criminal recidivism outcome measure, 10(17.5%) women were charged for a subsequent sexual crime. The broader reported recidivism measure identified six additional women with subsequent contact with police or child welfare agencies for sexually inappropriate behaviors. There were no significant differences found between the 41 nonrecidivists and the 16 recidivists. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Assuntos
Abuso Sexual na Infância/estatística & dados numéricos , Criminosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pedofilia/epidemiologia , Prisioneiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Agressão/psicologia , Criança , Abuso Sexual na Infância/psicologia , Criminosos/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Psiquiatria Legal/métodos , Humanos , Nebraska , Pedofilia/psicologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Mulheres , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The current study compared a sample of female perpetrators reported to Child Protective Services (CPS) to a sample of women from the criminal justice system. Instead of examining a clinical or criminal justice sample in isolation, this comparison allows a more accurate description of female sexual offending. METHODS: Cases were drawn from a Midwestern state's child abuse registry, law enforcement records, and sex offender registry. The CPS sample consisted of 179 women, and the criminal justice system sample consisted of 57 women. All cases were reported to the agencies between 1994 and 2004. RESULTS: Victims ranged in age from 1 to 18 years old (M=9.98, SD=4.37). As hypothesized, there were statistically significant differences between the CPS and criminal justice samples. Specifically, the CPS sample had a majority of victims under age 12 (74.9%), while the criminal justice sample had a majority of victims between ages 13 and 19 (73.8%). The CPS sample had predominantly intrafamilial victims (97.8%), while the criminal justice sample had a majority of extrafamilial victims (63.3%). The CPS sample also showed significantly more female victims (63.7%), while the criminal justice sample had mostly male victims (62.1%). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in the victim's age, the victim's gender and the perpetrator-victim relationship between cases managed in the CPS and the criminal justice system. The results highlight the need for further research into child welfare and law enforcement collaboration.
Assuntos
Abuso Sexual na Infância/legislação & jurisprudência , Proteção da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Direito Penal/legislação & jurisprudência , Delitos Sexuais/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviço Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Abuso Sexual na Infância/prevenção & controle , Proteção da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Direito Penal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incesto/legislação & jurisprudência , Incesto/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Notificação de Abuso , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Delitos Sexuais/prevenção & controle , Delitos Sexuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Social/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
This study used a police sample to examine offense characteristics, recidivism rates, and other types of sexual offending among individuals suspected of exhibitionism. The sample consisted of 202 incidents of indecent exposure perpetrated by 106 identified individuals. Demographic information showed that one quarter of the sample had symptoms of a mental illness and one quarter had a history of substance abuse. More than 84% of the sample had other nonsexual criminal charges. Approximately 30% of the perpetrators were charged for more than one exposure incident. Masturbating during the offense, exposing to child victims, and speaking to the victim did not show any relationship to the occurrence of more sexually aggressive behaviors. However, individuals who had subsequent rape or molestation charges (16.9%) were more likely than those who did not to have had multiple exposure incidents and a history of physical assault charges.
Assuntos
Exibicionismo/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Vítimas de Crime/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Polícia , Recidiva , Delitos Sexuais/psicologiaRESUMO
Limited data exist analyzing the role of gender in workplace violence in health care settings. This study examined whether different types of threatening incidents with patients (physical, verbal, sexual, or posturing) were salient to male versus female staff across psychiatric settings (inpatient forensic, inpatient acute/chronic psychiatric, and outpatient psychiatric). Results indicated that although women disproportionately experienced sexualized threats, they were not more likely to report such incidents as salient and threatening. The study also assessed the extent to which situational variables contributed to staff's feelings of threat. Results showed that rapport with the patient, quality of relationships with coworkers, and presence of coworkers in the area were not significantly related to how threatened staff felt in a recent threatening incident. Findings are discussed within the context of staff training and organizational benefits.