Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 147
Filtrar
2.
Am Heart J Plus ; 12: 100067, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38559603

RESUMO

Background: Despite limited randomized trial data demonstrating clinical efficacy, the utilization of Impella in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) has increased over time. Methods: We identified 75,769 hospitalizations with STEMI complicated by CS between October 2015 and December 2018 using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. From this cohort, hospitalizations were stratified according to IABP or Impella placement. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were divided into efficacy, safety, and device-related complications. Propensity-score matching was used to account for differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Logistic regression was performed to get the odds ratio and confidence intervals. Results: Among 75,769 admissions with STEMI and CS, hospitalizations with <18 years old, both IABP and Impella placement, and who underwent ECMO and/or LVAD implantation were excluded. After the exclusion, out of 72,791 admissions, 25,260 (34.70%) hospitalizations received IABP, and 7825 (10.75%) received Impella support. After propensity score-matched analysis, 7345 hospitalizations were included in each group. All-cause in-hospital mortality was higher in the hospitalizations requiring Impella support as compared to IABP (42.10% vs. 31.54%, adjusted OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60-1.84, P < 0.0001). Impella was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital complications and hospitalization cost compared with IABP. Conclusion: Impella compared with IABP in STEMI patients with CS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and other adverse clinical and procedural outcomes.

5.
Int J Cardiol ; 278: 186-191, 2019 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30579719

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heart Failure (HF) is a major driver of the readmissions/penalties in the US. Although extensive literature on rehospitalization attributed to HF, studies to compare outcomes for same-hospital vs. different-hospital readmissions are sparse. METHODS: Nationwide Readmission Database from 2010 to 14 utilized for HF-related hospitalization using appropriate ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes. 30-day readmissions were classified into two groups: same-hospital and different-hospital. A comparative analysis was conducted focusing on: in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization cost. Hierarchical two-level modeling and propensity score matching utilized to adjust confounders. RESULTS: 715,993 HF readmissions were identified, of which 21.3% were readmitted to different-hospital. Elderly, females, patients with higher co-morbidities and higher median household income were less likely to be readmitted to different-hospital. Index hospitalizations in a teaching hospital and/or larger hospital were associated with reduced different-hospital readmissions. Readmissions to the different hospital were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (7.7% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001), higher resource utilization (LOS:7.5 days vs. 6.1 days, p < 0.001 and Cost: $22,602 vs. $13,740, p < 0.001) after adjusting for propensity score match. Similar results were observed with propensity score matching of multiple high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSION: Resources should be directed towards minimizing different-hospital HF readmissions to improve patient outcomes by identifying the vulnerable subgroup and further tailoring in-hospital and post-discharge care.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(10): 1425-1435, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) has increased significantly, since its initial approval for use in selected patients with heart failure. Limited data exist as for current trends in implant-related in-hospital complications and cost utilization. The aim of our study was to examine in-hospital complication rates associated with CRT-D and their trends over the last decade. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated 378 248 CRT-D procedures from 2003 to 2012. We investigated common complications, including mechanical, cardiovascular, pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with CRT-D, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. Mechanical complications (5.9%) were the commonest, followed by cardiovascular (3.6%), respiratory failure (2.4%), and pneumothorax (1.5%). Age (≥65 years), female gender (OR, 95% CI; P value) (1.08, 1.03-1.13; 0.001), and the Charlson score ≥3 (1.52, 1.45-1.60; <0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality/complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing CRT-D has been increasing in the last decade. Age (≥65), female sex, and the Charlson score ≥3 were associated with higher complications. In patients who underwent CRT-D implantation, postoperative complications were associated with significant increases in cost.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/economia , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/economia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/economia , Cardioversão Elétrica/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/mortalidade , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/tendências , Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/tendências , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Cardioversão Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Cardioversão Elétrica/mortalidade , Cardioversão Elétrica/tendências , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Vascular ; 26(6): 615-625, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29973108

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the published literature has reported an inverse association between hospital volume and outcomes of coronary interventions, sparse data are available for percutaneous peripheral atherectomy (PPA). The aim of our study was to examine the effect of hospital volume on outcomes of PPA. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database of the year 2012, PPA with ICD-9 code of 17.56 was identified. The primary outcomes were mortality and amputation rates; secondary outcomes were peri-procedural complications, cost, and length of hospitalization and discharge disposition of the patient. Multivariate models were generated for predictors of the outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a total of 21,015 patients with mean age of 69.53 years, with 56% males. Higher hospital volume centers were associated with a significantly lower mortality (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.57, p < 0.0001), amputation rates (5.34% vs. 9.32%, p < 0.0001), combined endpoint of mortality and complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.58, p < 0.0001), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (4.86 vs. 6.79 days, p < 0.0001) and lower hospitalization cost ($23,062 vs. $30,794, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis for acute and chronic limb ischemia showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Hospital procedure volume is an independent predictor of mortality, amputation rates, complications, LOS, and costs in patients undergoing PPA with an inverse relationship.


Assuntos
Aterectomia/métodos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica , Aterectomia/efeitos adversos , Aterectomia/economia , Aterectomia/mortalidade , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/economia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Resuscitation ; 127: 105-113, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29674141

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the trends and predictors of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use in patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding MCS use in patients hospitalized after OHCA. METHODS: We conducted an observational analysis of MCS use in 960,428 patients hospitalized after OHCA between January 2008 and December 2014 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. On multivariable analysis, we also assessed factors associated with MCS use and survival to discharge. RESULTS: Among the 960,428 patients, 51,863 (5.4%) had MCS utilized. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was the most commonly used MCS after OHCA with frequency of 47,061 (4.9%), followed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 3650 (0.4%), and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVAD) 3265 (0.3%). From 2008 to 2014, there was an increase in the utilization of MCS from 5% in 2008 to 5.7% in 2014 (P trend < 0.001). There was a non-significant decline in the use of IABP from 4.9% to 4.7% (P trend = 0.95), whereas PVAD use increased from 0.04% to 0.7% (P trend < 0.001), and ECMO use increased from 0.1% to 0.7% (P trend < 0.001) during the study period. Younger, male patients with myocardial infarction, higher co-morbid conditions, VT/VF as initial rhythm, and presentation to a large urban hospital were more likely to receive percutaneous MCS implantation. Survival to discharge was significantly higher in patients who were selected to receive MCS (56.9% vs. 43.1%, OR: 1.16, 95% CI: (1.11-1.21), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a steady increase in the use of MCS in OHCA, especially PVAD and ECMO, despite lack of randomized clinical trial data supporting an improvement in outcomes. More definitive randomized studies are needed to assess accurately the optimal role of MCS in this patient population.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/estatística & dados numéricos , Coração Auxiliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Balão Intra-Aórtico/estatística & dados numéricos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(5): 715-724, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478273

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is widely accepted intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, but limited data are available regarding contemporary trends in major complications and in-hospital mortality due to the procedure. This study was aimed at exploring the temporal trends of in-hospital mortality, major complications, and impact of hospital volume on frequency of AF ablation-related outcomes. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify the AF patients treated with catheter ablation. In-hospital death and common complications including vascular access complications, cardiac perforation and/or tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, and transient ischemic attack, were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) codes. RESULT: In-hospital mortality rate of 0.15% and overall complication rate of 5.46% were noted among AF ablation recipients (n = 50,969). Significant increase in complications during study period (relative increase 56.37%, P-trend < 0.001) was observed. Cardiac (2.65%), vascular (1.33%), and neurological (1.05%) complications were most common. On multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]; P value), significant predictors of complications were female sex (OR = 1.40; CI = 1.17-1.68; P value < 0.001), high burden of comorbidity as indicated by Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR = 2.84; CI = 2.29-3.52; P value < 0.001), and low hospital volume (< 50 procedures). CONCLUSION: Our study noted a decline in AF ablation-related hospitalizations and complications associated with the procedure. These findings largely reflect shifting trends of outpatient performance of the procedure and increasing safety profile due to improved institutional expertise and catheter techniques.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Pacientes Internados , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(6): 1171-1181, 2018 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29152829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are sparse clinical data on the procedural trends, outcomes and readmission rates following FDA approval and expansion of Transcatheter mitral valve repair/MitraClip® . Whether a complex new technology can be disseminated safely and quickly is controversial. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Data (NRD) 2013-14. MitraClip® was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality + procedural complications. Secondary outcome included 30-day readmissions. Hierarchical two level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes. RESULTS: Our analysis included 2003 MitraClip® procedures. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9%. As expected, there was a significant increase in procedural volume post-FDA approval. Importantly, a corresponding downward trend in mortality and procedural complications was observed. Significant predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications included the use of vasopressors (P <0.001) and hemodynamic support (P < 0.001). Higher hospital volume (≥10 MitraClips/year) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and complications (P = 0.02). There were 304 (15.1%) 30-day readmissions, with heart failure being the most common cause of readmission. Elective procedures had lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001) and lower readmission rates (P = 0.011) compared with nonelective procedures. CONCLUSION: A significant increase in MitraClip® procedural volumes occurred post-FDA approval. Overall morbidity and mortality were low and trended downwards. Hospital procedure volume ≥10 cases were associated with lower mortality and overall complication rates. These data suggest a successful roll out of a very complex novel structural heart procedure.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendências , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/tendências , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/tendências , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Aprovação de Equipamentos , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto Jovem
11.
Int J Cardiol ; 250: 128-132, 2018 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29030143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined the effect of AF a commonly encountered arrhythmia with significant morbidity on mortality following a motor vehicle accident (MVA) related hospitalization. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify patients with AF (ICD-9 CM 427.31) and MVA (ICD-9 CM E810.0-E819.9), considered separately and together, from 2003 through 2012. Baseline characteristics were identified and multilevel mixed model multivariate analysis was employed to verify the impact of AF on in-patient mortality in survivors. RESULTS: Of an estimated 2,978,630 MVA admissions reported, 79,687 (2.6%) hospitalizations also had a diagnosis of AF. The in-hospital mortality was 2.6% in MVA alone and 7.6% in MVA and AF. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model (TMPM), and hospital characteristics, AF was independently associated with in-hospital mortality [Odds ratio (OR) 1.52, confidence interval (CI) 1.41-1.69, P value<0.0001]. In patients with MVA and AF, increasing age, CCI, and TMPM were associated with higher mortality. Female gender is associated with lower mortality (OR 0.84, CI 0.81-0.88, P -0.0016). Most patients with MVA and AF had a CHADS2 score of 2 (34.6%). Mortality and transfusion rates were higher in MVA and AF patients compared to patients with MVA alone across all CHADS2 scores. CONCLUSION: In patients with a MVA, the presence of AF is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/tendências , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veículos Automotores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
12.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 17(6): 579-585, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29017405

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have traditionally been excluded from large randomized clinical trials involving transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR). Technical enhancements, availability of new generation devices and improved outcomes have led to a marked increase in TAVR volume across the world including off label use in patients with BAV stenosis. Areas covered: In this manuscript, we have reviewed the currently available data regarding safety, efficacy, and outcomes of TAVR in patients with BAV stenosis. 11 large observational studies with near 1300 patients with BAV stenosis were included to summarizes outcomes of TAVR. Expert Commentary: The present review suggested that TAVR may be a safe and feasible treatment modality in BAV stenosis patients. New generation devices were associated with high device success rate whereas higher adverse procedural events were observed in early generation devices. There are no differences in post procedural outcomes with new generation TAVR devices for BAV when compared to tricuspid aortic anatomy. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcome and durability of TAVR in patients with BAV.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/anormalidades , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Doença da Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Desenho de Equipamento , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/patologia , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Am J Cardiol ; 120(9): 1653-1661, 2017 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28882336

RESUMO

There are sparse comparative data on in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who receive systemic thrombolytics versus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Database 2013 to 2014, subset of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Systemic and CDT were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions and secondary outcome was combined in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage. We used propensity score match analysis without replacement using Greedy's algorithm to adjust for possible confounders. We identified a total of 4,426 patients (3,107: systemic thrombolysis and 1,319: CDT) with acute PE who were treated with thrombolysis. In our 2:1 propensity score algorithm, in-hospital mortality was lower in the CDT group (6.12%) versus systemic thrombolytics (14.94%) (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.49, p <0.001). There was also a lower composite secondary outcome (in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage) in patients who received CDT (8.42%) versus those who received systemic thrombolytics (18.13%) (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.53, p <0.001). Thirty-day readmission was lower in patients with CDT group (7.65%) compared with systemic thrombolytics (10.58%, p = 0.009). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality, as well as bleeding during primary admission was significantly lower with CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics for patients with acute PE. There was also significant decrease in rate of readmissions among patients receiving CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics.


Assuntos
Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Pontuação de Propensão , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 120(4): 616-624, 2017 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648393

RESUMO

An estimated half of all heart failure (HF) populations has been categorized to have diastolic HF (DHF), but sparse data are available describing etiologies and predictors of 30-day readmission in DHF population. The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Database 2013 to 2014, a subset of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. DHF was identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 428.3x in primary diagnosis field. Readmission etiologies were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code in primary diagnosis field. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. In total, 192,394 patients with DHF were included, of which 40,927 (21.27%) patients were readmitted with total readmissions of 47,056 within 30 days. Predictors of increased readmissions were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.002, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001 to 1.0003, p <0.001), diabetes (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.11, p <0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.21, p <0.001), renal failure (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.25, p <0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09, p = 0.002), anemia (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.15, p <0.001), transfusion during index admission (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.23, p <0.001), discharge to the facility (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.16, p <0.001), length of stay >2 days, and Charlson comorbidity index ≥3, whereas obesity (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.85, p <0.001), elective admissions (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.94, p <0.001), and non-Medicare/Medicaid primary payer were predictors of lower readmission rate. Most common etiologies of readmission were acute HF (28.01%), infections (9.54%), acute kidney injury (5.35%), acute respiratory failure (4.86%), and pneumonia (3.92%). In conclusion, DHF population with higher comorbidity burden, longer length of stay, and discharge to facility were prone to increased readmissions, with most common etiologies of readmission being HF, infections, and acute kidney injury.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Insuficiência Cardíaca Diastólica/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca Diastólica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca Diastólica/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Curr Hypertens Rev ; 13(1): 41-45, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28245786

RESUMO

Aortic stenosis (AS) has an increasing prevalence with age and is commonly associated with hypertension. While it has been established that hypertension is associated with increased mortality in patients with AS, further randomized control trials addressing the use of antihypertensives specifically in patients with AS are needed. The management of hypertension in patients with AS needs a cautious approach due to complex hemodynamic and structural changes involved. Comorbidities like coronary artery disease, heart failure and arrhythmias further dictate management of hypertension in patients with AS. The aim of this article is to review the various agents used in the management of hypertension in patients with AS.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/mortalidade
18.
Am J Med ; 130(6): 678-687.e7, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161344

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The nationwide prevalence of cannabis use/abuse has more than doubled from 2002 to 2011. Whether the outpatient trend is reflected in the inpatient setting is unknown. We examined the prevalence and incidence of cannabis abuse/dependence as determined by discharge coding in a 10-year (2002-2011) National Inpatient Sample, as well as various trends among demographics, comorbidities, and hospitalization outcomes. METHODS: Cannabis abuse/dependence was identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 304.3* and 305.2* in adults aged 18 years or more. We excluded cases coded "in remission." National estimates of trends and matched-regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 2,833,567 (0.91%) admissions with documented cannabis abuse/dependence were identified, patients had a mean age of 35.12 ± 0.06 years, 62% were male, and there was an increasing trend in prevalence from 0.52% to 1.34% (P <.001). The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0.47 ± 0.006, and inpatient mortality was 0.41%. All of the above demonstrated an increasing trend (P <.001). Mean length of stay was 6.23 ± 0.06 days. The top primary discharge diagnoses were schizoaffective/mood disorders, followed by psychotic disorders and alcoholism. Asthma prevalence in nontobacco smokers had a steeper increase in the cannabis subgroup than in the noncannabis subgroup (P = .002). Among acute pancreatitis admissions, cannabis abusers had a shorter length of stay (-11%) and lower hospitalization costs (-7%) than nonabusers. CONCLUSION: Cannabis abuse/dependence is on the rise in the inpatient population, with an increasing trend toward older and sicker patients with increasing rates of moderate to severe disability. Psychiatric disorders and alcoholism are the main associated primary conditions. Cannabis abuse is associated with increased asthma incidence in nontobacco smokers and decreased hospital resource use in acute pancreatitis admissions.


Assuntos
Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
19.
Am J Med ; 130(6): 688-698, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The outcomes related to chest pain associated with cocaine use and its burden on the healthcare system are not well studied. METHODS: Data were collected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2001-2012). Subjects were identified by using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Primary outcome was a composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac arrest. RESULTS: We identified 363,143 admissions for cocaine-induced chest pain. Mean age was 44.9 (±21.1) years with male predominance. Left heart catheterizations were performed in 6.7%, whereas the frequency of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary interventions were 0.69% and 0.22%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality was 0.09%, and the primary outcome occurred in 1.19% of patients. Statistically significant predictors of primary outcome included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.35; P = .046), age >50 years (OR, 1.24, CI, 1.07-1.43; P = .004), history of heart failure (OR, 1.63, CI, 1.37-1.93; P <.001), supraventricular tachycardia (OR, 2.94, CI, 1.34-6.42; P = .007), endocarditis (OR, 3.5, CI, 1.50-8.18, P = .004), tobacco use (OR, 1.3, CI, 1.13-1.49; P <.001), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.5, CI, 1.29-1.77; P <.001), coronary artery disease (OR, 2.37, CI, 2.03-2.76; P <.001), and renal failure (OR, 1.27, CI, 1.08-1.50; P = .005). The total annual projected economic burden ranged from $155 to $226 million with a cumulative accruement of more than $2 billion over a decade. CONCLUSION: Hospital admissions due to chest pain and concomitant cocaine use are associated with low rates of adverse outcomes. For the low-risk cohort in whom acute coronary syndrome has been ruled out, hospitalization may not be beneficial and may result in unnecessary cardiac procedures.


Assuntos
Dor no Peito/etiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/complicações , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Dor no Peito/terapia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Fatores de Risco , Tabagismo/complicações , Adulto Jovem
20.
Am J Cardiol ; 119(5): 760-769, 2017 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109560

RESUMO

Heart failure (HF) is the most common discharge diagnosis across the United States, and these patients are particularly vulnerable to readmissions, increasing attention to potential ways to address the problem. The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Readmission Data 2013, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HF was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Readmission was defined as a subsequent hospital admission within 30 days after discharge day of index admission. Readmission causes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes in primary diagnosis filed. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Hierarchical 2-level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes. From a total 301,892 principal admissions (73.4% age ≥65 years and 50.6% men), 55,857 (18.5%) patients were readmitted with a total of 64,264 readmissions during the study year. Among the etiologies of readmission, cardiac causes (49.8%) were most common (HF being most common followed by coronary artery disease and arrhythmias), whereas pulmonary causes were responsible for 13.1% and renal causes for 8.9% of the readmissions. Significant predictors of increased 30-day readmission included diabetes (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, p value: 1.06, 1.03 to 1.08, p <0.001), chronic lung disease (1.13, 1.11 to 1.16, p <0.001), renal failure/electrolyte imbalance (1.12, 1.10 to 1.15, p <0.001), discharge to facilities (1.07, 1.04 to 1.09, p <0.001), lengthier hospital stay, and transfusion during index admission. In conclusion, readmission after a hospitalization for HF is common. Although it may be necessary to readmit some patients, the striking rate of readmission demands efforts to further clarify the determinants of readmission and develop strategies in terms of quality of care and care transitions to prevent this adverse outcome.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arritmias Cardíacas , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Feminino , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefropatias , Modelos Logísticos , Pneumopatias , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA