A woman in her fifties with a post-operative infection, generalised rash and organ failure. / En kvinne i 50-årene med postoperativ infeksjon, generalisert utslett og organsvikt.

Background: Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease caused by superantigen-producing Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Staphylococcal TSS received special attention from 1978 to 1981, when an epidemic was observed associated with the use of hyper-absorbent tampons. Today the disease is rare and generally not related to menstruation, but can occur postpartum or in post-surgical wounds, intrauterine devices (IUDs), burns or other soft tissue injuries, mastitis or other focal infections. The annual incidence of staphylococcal TSS is around 0.5/100 000 and around 0.4/100 000 for streptococcal TSS. The mortality in menstrual-related cases is < 5 % and up to 22 % in non-menstrual related cases. Case presentation: This article presents a case of a middle-aged woman who developed symptoms of toxic shock syndrome five days after elective breast cancer surgery, with high fever, multiorgan failure and a characteristic desquamation of the palms. Interpretation: Toxic shock syndrome is a potentially lethal, toxin-mediated disease. Symptoms develop quickly, within hours. Early recognition and appropriate surgical management, intensive care and antibiotics are therefore important to reduce mortality and sequelae.

Lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal and steroidal aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients: the potential role of the adipokine leptin.

PURPOSE: The aromatase inactivator exemestane may cause clinical disease stabilization following progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors like letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer, indicating that additional therapeutic effects, not necessarily related to estrogen-suppression, may be involved in this well-known "lack of cross-resistance". METHODS: Postmenopausal women with ER positive, HER-2 negative, locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled in the NEOLETEXE-trial and randomized to sequential treatment starting with either letrozole (2.5 mg o.d.) or exemestane (25 mg o.d.) followed by the alternative aromatase inhibitor. Serum levels of 54 cytokines, including 12 adipokines were assessed using Luminex xMAP technology (multiple ELISA). RESULTS: Serum levels of leptin were significantly decreased during treatment with exemestane (p < 0.001), regardless whether exemestane was given as first or second neoadjuvant therapy. In contrast, letrozole caused a non-significant increase in serum leptin levels in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an additional and direct effect of exemestane on CYP-19 (aromatase) synthesis presumably due to effects on the CYP19 promoter use that is not present during therapy with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole. Our findings provide new insights into the influence of clinically important aromatase inhibitors on cytokine levels in vivo that contribute to the understanding of the clinically observed lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal and steroidal aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on March 23rd 2015 in the National trial database of Norway (Registration number: REK-SØ-84-2015).

Breast sarcoidosis: Clinical features, imaging, and histological findings.

Breast sarcoidosis is an extremely rare entity (about 1%). Conventional imaging significantly contributes to the detection of breast lesions, but it has been unable to establish a definite diagnosis. Histological examination should be mandatory, over imaging assessments, in order to confirm an early diagnosis and to avoid unjustified treatments. Malignancy should be excluded as a primary differential diagnosis. However, in the presence of granulomas, it is important to recognize other granulomatous disorders such as tuberculosis, Wegener's granulomatosis, or idiopathic granulomatous mastitis, since therapeutic strategies differ. This report clarifies the current clinical assessments and differential diagnosis of breast sarcoidosis.

Accuracy of breast MRI in patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with clinical and pathological assessments.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in locally advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast tumours before, during and after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET) for evaluation of tumour response in comparison with clinical and pathological assessments. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled postmenopausal patients treated neoadjuvant with letrozole and exemestane given sequentially in an intra-patient cross-over regimen. Fifty-four patients were initially recruited, but only 35 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and confirmed to participate with a median age of 77. Tumours were scanned with MRI prior to treatment, during the eighth week of treatment and prior to surgery. Additionally, changes in longest diameter on clinical examination (CE) and tumour size at pathology were determined. Pre- and post-operative measurements of tumour size were compared in order to evaluate tumour response. RESULTS: The correlation between post-treatment MRI size and pathology was moderate and higher with a correlation coefficient (r) 0.64 compared to the correlation between CE and pathology r = 0.25. Post-treatment MRI and clinical results had a negligible bias towards underestimation of lesion size. Tumour size on MRI and CE had 0.82 cm and 0.52 cm lower mean size than tumour size measured by pathology, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The higher correlation between measurements of residual disease obtained on MRI and those obtained with pathology validates the accuracy of imaging assessment during NET. MRI was found to be more accurate for estimating complete responses than clinical assessments and warrants further investigation in larger cohorts to validate this finding.

Changes in serum estrogenic activity during neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole and exemestane.

The aromatase inhibitors (AIs), letrozole (Femar®/Femara®) and exemestane (Aromasin®), are widely used to treat estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer in postmenopausal patients. In the setting of metastatic breast cancer, these drugs may be used after another causing new responses in selected patients after progressing on the first choice. The precise explanation for this "lack of cross resistance" is still missing. NEOLETEXE is a neoadjuvant, randomized, open-label, cross-over trial. Postmenopausal patients with ER-positive, HER-2 negative, locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled. All patients were randomized to treatment starting with either letrozole or exemestane for at least 2 months followed by another 2 months on the alternative AI. The total estrogenic activities in blood samples were determined using the AroER tri-screen assay developed in the Chen laboratory. Using this highly sensitive assay, estrogenic activity was detected at three time points for all patients. Importantly, a significantly higher total estrogenic activity was found during therapy with exemestane compared to letrozole in 21 out of 26 patients. When letrozole was included in the AroER tri-screen assay, the estrogenic activities in most samples collected during exemestane treatment were further reduced, suggesting that low levels of androgens remained in specimens obtained after exemestane treatment. Our results suggest the AroER tri-screen to be a very sensitive method to estimate the overall estrogen-mediated activity in human samples even during therapy with highly potent aromatase inhibitors. In the present study, serum estrogen activity was significantly higher during exemestane therapy when compared to letrozole therapy.

The NEOLETEXE trial: a neoadjuvant cross-over study exploring the lack of cross resistance between aromatase inhibitors.

The aromatase inhibitor letrozole (Femar®/Femara®) and the aromatase inactivator exemestane (Aromasin®) differ in their biochemical effect on the aromatase enzyme. Letrozole is a competitive aromatase inhibitor while exemestane binds irreversibly to the aromatase enzyme. This pharmacological difference is of clinical interest since a lack of cross-resistance has been documented. It has been demonstrated in several clinical trials that exemestane may cause a disease regression following resistance to nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The exact mechanism(s) behind this phenomenon is yet unknown. Here, we present the NEOLETEXE trial with the aim of exploring the individual mechanisms involved behind the observed lack of cross resistance. Clinical trial registration: The trial has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of South-East Norway (project number 2015/84).