Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Innov ; 2(5): 376-390, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38090381

RESUMO

Background: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare breast cancer subtype; most cases are triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) and are poorly responsive to conventional systemic therapy. Few potential diagnostic and prognostic markers for distinguishing between metaplastic TNBC and nonmetaplastic TNBC have been discovered. We performed bioinformatic analysis to explore the underlying mechanism by which metaplastic TNBC differs from nonmetaplastic TNBC and provides potential pathogenic genes of metaplastic TNBC. Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in metaplastic tumors and nonmetaplastic tumors from TNBC patients were screened using GSE165407. The GSE76275 data set and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were used to screen DEGs in TNBC and non-TNBC. Metascape and DAVID were used for the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs. Online databases, including UALCAN, GEPIA, HPA, Breast Cancer Gene-Expression Miner, and quantitative PCR and western blot, were used to examine KLK5 messenger RNA and protein expression in breast cancer. Analysis of KLK5­associated genes was performed with TCGA data, and the LinkedOmics database was used to detect the genes co-expressed with KLK5. STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) and Cytoscape were used to screen for hub genes. Kaplan­Meier plotter was used for survival analysis. Results: KLK5 was identified among the DEGs in nonmetaplastic TNBC and metaplastic TNBC. The KLK5 gene was overexpressed in nonmetaplastic TNBC but downregulated in metaplastic TNBC. KEGG and GO analyses revealed that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition was a pathogenic mechanism in metaplastic TNBC and an important pathway by which KLK5 and its associated genes DSG1 and DSG3 influence metaplastic TNBC progression. Prognosis analysis showed that only low expression of KLK5 in metaplastic TNBC had clinical significance. Conclusion: Our research indicated that KLK5 may be a pivotal molecule with a key role in the mechanism of tumorigenesis in metaplastic TNBC.

2.
Invest New Drugs ; 41(6): 808-815, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889382

RESUMO

Pemigatinib is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 inhibitor and has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and clinical activity in advanced solid tumors in Western population. This phase I trial evaluated pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics, preliminary safety and efficacy of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with advanced, solid tumors. Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors bearing FGF/FGFR1-3 alterations received oral pemigatinib at 13.5 mg once daily (QD) on a 2-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. The primary endpoint was PK/PD characteristics; secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years, 58.3% males). PK data demonstrated pemigatinib (13.5 mg QD) was rapidly absorbed with a geometric mean elimination half-life of 11.3 h. The geometric mean values of maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state were 215.1 nmol/L and 2636.9 h·nmol/L, respectively. The mean clearance adjusted by bioavailability at steady state was low (11.8 L/h), and the apparent oral volume of distribution was moderate (170.5 L). The PD marker, serum phosphate level, increased on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1 (mean: 2.25 mg/dL, CV% [percent coefficient of variation]: 31.3%) and decreased to baseline post 1 week off. Three (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Partial response was confirmed in one patient with FGFR1-mutant esophageal carcinoma and one with FGFR2-mutant cholagiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib had similar PK/PD characteristics to Western population and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and potential anti-cancer benefit in Chinese patients with FGF/FGFR1-3 altered, advanced, solid tumor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258527 [prospectively registered February 6, 2020]).


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Receptor Tipo 1 de Fator de Crescimento de Fibroblastos , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , População do Leste Asiático , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patologia , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética
3.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 20: 15330338211064434, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34931914

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the tolerance and pharmacokinetic characteristics of recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin) administered as single-dose or multiple-dose infusions in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This phase I trial was designed as a single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation study. The trial consisted of 2 parts: a single-dose part and a multiple-dose part, each with 3 dose comparison groups. Rh-endostatin was administered as an intravenous injection only once at a dose of 5 mg/m2, 7.5 mg/m2, or 10 mg/m2 in the single-dose part and as a daily intravenous injection for 14 days at the same doses in the multiple-dose part. The serum pharmacokinetics, toxicity and immunogenicity of rh-endostatin were evaluated. Results: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was not observed in any group. A few patients developed cardiotoxicity, such as QT prolongation or narrow arrhythmia. Other adverse events were slight coagulation abnormalities and haematological abnormalities. For rh-endostatin doses of 5 mg/m2, 7.5 mg/m2, and 10 mg/m2, the mean Cmax values in the single-dose part were 344 ± 38.7 ng/mL, 524 ± 157 ng/mL, and 800 ± 201 ng/mL, respectively, and the average AUC0-t values were 3290 ± 3790 ng•h/mL, 4940 ± 4380 ng•h/mL, and 5050 ± 3980 ng•h/mL, respectively. The Cmax ss values of the 3 doses in the multiple-dose part were 575 ± 270 ng/mL, 531 ± 106 ng/mL, and 864 ± 166 ng/mL, respectively, and the AUC0-τ values were 3610 ± 1040 ng•h/mL, 3290 ± 1090 ng•h/mL, and 5180 ± 1210 ng•h/mL, respectively. The Cmax of a single-dose regimen showed linear kinetic characteristics. The patients in the single-dose group were negative for serum antibodies against rh-endostatin, while one patient in the multiple-dose group was positive. Conclusions: Rh-endostatin as a daily intravenous injection for 14 days in patients with advanced solid tumors is safe and well tolerated, without DLT, at doses of 5 mg/m2, 7.5 mg/m2, and 10 mg/m2. Serum antibodies against rh-endostatin were very low after multiple infusions. For phase II trials, the recommended rh-endostatin dose is 10 mg/m2 as a daily intravenous injection for 14 days.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Endostatinas/administração & dosagem , Endostatinas/farmacocinética , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes , Adulto , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Angiogênese/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Endostatinas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Int J Genomics ; 2015: 197603, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26425543

RESUMO

This study has analyzed the gene expression patterns of an IPMN microarray dataset including normal pancreatic ductal tissue (NT), intraductal papillary mucinous adenoma (IPMA), intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC), and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) samples. And eight clusters of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with similar expression pattern were detected by k-means clustering. Then a survey map of functional disorder in IPMN progression was established by functional enrichment analysis of these clusters. In addition, transcription factors (TFs) enrichment analysis was used to detect the key TFs in each cluster of DEGs, and three TFs (FLI1, ERG, and ESR1) were found to significantly regulate DEGs in cluster 1, and expression of these three TFs was validated by qRT-PCR. All these results indicated that these three TFs might play key roles in the early stages of IPMN progression.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA