Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Spine J ; 23(9): 1296-1305, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37100245

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical invasiveness indices have been established for general spine surgery (surgical invasiveness index [SII]), spine deformity, and metastatic spine tumors; however, a specific index for thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) has not been developed. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a novel invasiveness index, incorporating TSS-specific factors for open posterior TSS surgery, which may facilitate the prediction of operative duration and intraoperative blood loss, and the stratification of surgical risk. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Overall, 989 patients who underwent open posterior TSS surgeries at our institution during the past 5 years were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: The operation duration, estimated blood loss, transfusion status, major surgical complications, length of hospital stay, and medical expenses. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 989 consecutive patients who underwent posterior surgery for TSS between March 2017 and February 2022. Among them, 70% (n=692) were randomly placed in a training cohort, and the remaining 30% (n=297) automatically constituted the validation cohort. Multivariate linear regression models of operative time and log-transformed estimated blood loss were created using TSS-specific factors. Beta coefficients derived from these models were used to construct a TSS invasiveness index (TII). The ability of the TII to predict surgical invasiveness was compared with that of the SII and assessed in a validation cohort. RESULTS: The TII was more strongly correlated with operative time and estimated blood loss (p<.05) and explained more variability in operative time and estimated blood loss than the SII (p<.05). The TII explained 64.2% of operative time and 34.6% of estimated blood loss variation, whereas the SII explained 38.7% and 22.5%, respectively. In further verification, the TII was more strongly associated with transfusion rate, drainage time, and length of hospital stay than SII (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: By incorporating TSS-specific components, the newly developed TII more accurately predicts the invasiveness of open posterior TSS surgery than the previous index.


Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Estenose Espinal , Humanos , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Duração da Cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA