What does "brainstem death" mean? A review of international protocols.

PURPOSE: The term "brainstem death" is ambiguous; it can be used to refer either exclusively to loss of function of the brainstem or loss of function of the whole brain. We aimed to establish the term's intended meaning in national protocols for the determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) from around the world. METHODS: Of 78 unique international protocols on determination of BD/DNC, we identified eight that referred exclusively to loss of function of the brainstem in the definition of death. Each protocol was reviewed to ascertain whether it 1) required assessment for loss of function of the whole brain, 2) required assessment only for loss of function of the brainstem, or 3) was ambiguous about whether loss of function of the higher brain was required to declare DNC. RESULTS: Of the eight protocols, two (25%) required assessment for loss of function of the whole brain, three (37.5%) only required assessment for loss of function of the brainstem, and three (37.5%) were ambiguous about whether loss of function of the higher brain was required to declare death. The overall agreement between raters was 94% (κ = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: There is international variability in the intended meaning of the terms "brainstem death" and "whole brain death" resulting in ambiguity and potentially inaccurate or inconsistent diagnosis. Regardless of the nomenclature, we advocate for national protocols to be clear regarding any requirement for ancillary testing in cases of primary infratentorial brain injury who may fulfill clinical criteria for BD/DNC.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le terme « mort du tronc cérébral ¼ est ambigu; il peut être utilisé pour désigner soit la perte de fonction du tronc cérébral uniquement, soit la perte de fonction du cerveau entier. Nous avons cherché à établir la signification voulue du terme dans les protocoles nationaux utilisés pour la détermination de la mort cérébrale/du décès selon des critères neurologiques (MC/DCN) du monde entier. MéTHODE: Sur 78 protocoles internationaux uniques sur la détermination de la MC/DCN, nous en avons identifié huit qui faisaient exclusivement référence à la perte de fonction du tronc cérébral dans la définition de la mort. Chaque protocole a été examiné pour déterminer s'il 1) exigeait une évaluation de la perte de fonction du cerveau entier, 2) exigeait une évaluation uniquement pour la perte de fonction du tronc cérébral, ou 3) était ambigu quant à savoir si la perte de fonction du cerveau supérieur était requise pour déclarer un DCN. RéSULTATS: Sur les huit protocoles, deux (25 %) exigeaient une évaluation de la perte de fonction de l'ensemble du cerveau, trois (37,5 %) ne nécessitaient qu'une évaluation de la perte de fonction du tronc cérébral, et trois (37,5 %) étaient ambigus quant à savoir si la perte de fonction du cerveau supérieur était nécessaire pour déclarer le décès. L'accord global entre les évaluateurs était de 94 %, (κ = 0,91). CONCLUSION: Il existe une variabilité internationale quant au sens voulu des termes « mort du tronc cérébral ¼ et « mort cérébrale totale ¼ qui entraîne une ambiguïté et un diagnostic potentiellement inexact ou incohérent. Quelle que soit la nomenclature, nous préconisons que les protocoles nationaux soient clairs en ce qui concerne toute exigence d'examens auxiliaires dans les cas de lésion cérébrale infratentorielle primaire qui pourraient répondre aux critères cliniques de MC/DCN.

Diphenhydramine-Induced Antimuscarinic Delirium Treated with Physostigmine and Transdermal Rivastigmine.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent physostigmine shortages present a challenge to healthcare providers treating antimuscarinic delirium. Other centrally acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine may represent a therapeutic alternative or adjunct during physostigmine shortage; however, previous reports of use have not documented serum antimuscarinic toxin concentrations, limiting evaluation of effectiveness. Combination therapy with physostigmine and rivastigmine has not been described. In this report, the authors present a case of diphenhydramine-induced antimuscarinic delirium with elevated diphenhydramine serum concentrations treated with physostigmine and transdermal rivastigmine without observed adverse effect. CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old female presented to an emergency department after ingesting 3.75 g (41.2 mg/kg) of diphenhydramine. She had antimuscarinic delirium with a presenting serum diphenhydramine concentration of 1500 ng/mL (therapeutic range, 25-112 ng/mL) and required two doses of physostigmine to avert intubation prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. At hospital hour 22, in the ICU, antimuscarinic delirium persisted but no further physostigmine was available due to hospital shortage. Therefore, a 9.5-mg transdermal rivastigmine patch was applied. By hospital hour 24, her delirium had resolved. A serum diphenhydramine concentration at hospital hour 25 was elevated at 760 ng/mL. Transdermal rivastigmine was discontinued at hospital hour 48 without recurrent delirium. Despite persistent normal mental status after rivastigmine discontinuation, the patient had a dry mouth, difficulty urinating, and mydriasis until hospital day 5. She never developed muscarinic toxicity. DISCUSSION: Transdermal rivastigmine may be a useful treatment alternative or adjunct during physostigmine shortage for antimuscarinic delirium and has a long duration of action without aspiration risk. Muscarinic toxicity was not observed.

Organic versus mixed specialist older adult inpatient mental health units for people with dementia.

Dementia presents a major public health challenge to healthcare providers globally. When older people with dementia need inpatient mental healthcare, they can be cared for in one of two different types of older adult ward. These patients can either be admitted to an organic inpatient ward for people with dementia or the subtypes of dementia, or they can be admitted to a mixed inpatient ward for older people who have either functional or organic conditions. Using a quality assurance pilot study, the authors aimed to investigate whether the quality of care for patients with dementia differed between mixed and organic inpatient wards in units exclusively serving older people. The quality of care on both types of ward was compared by analysing observed interactions between patients and staff, patient well-being and patient environment and mealtimes. The quality of care was measured with a specially developed instrument and against evidence-based standards of care. The ratings of both types of ward showed high levels of quality interactions between patients and staff. There were minimal differences in the quality of patient and staff interactions, patient well-being, and patient environment and mealtimes between the two types of ward. Further work on outcomes and carer experiences needs to be undertaken to establish the optimal care environment for people with dementia.

Ancillary Testing for Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria Around the World.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify similarities and differences in the diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing for determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) around the world. METHODS: We reviewed diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing for BD/DNC in 78 unique official national BD/DNC protocols obtained from contacts worldwide between January 2018 and April 2019. RESULTS: Details provided on the performance and interpretation of ancillary tests for determination of BD/DNC were variably provided and inconsistent. Approximately half of all protocols that included each ancillary test provided details about study performance: 63% of protocols that included conventional cerebral angiography, 55% of protocols that included electroencephalography, 50% of protocols that included somatosensory evoked potentials, 48% of protocols that included transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, 43% of protocols that included nuclear medicine flow study and 41% of protocols that included brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Similarly, about half of all protocols that included each ancillary test provided details about study interpretation: 66% of protocols that included electroencephalography, 59% of protocols that included brainstem auditory evoked potentials, 56% of protocols that included somatosensory evoked potentials, 55% of protocols that included transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, 52% of protocols that included conventional cerebral angiography and 49% of protocols that included nuclear medicine flow study. INTERPRETATION: Diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing in BD/DNC determination vary around the world. We hope that the World Brain Death Project will improve worldwide consensus on the diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing in BD/DNC, both for performance and interpretation.

Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria in Countries in Asia and the Pacific.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to 1) identify countries in Asia and the Pacific that have protocols for the determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) and 2) review the similarities and differences of these protocols in different countries. METHODS: Between January 2018 and April 2019, we attempted to communicate with contacts in the 57 countries in Asia and the Pacific to determine if they had official national BD/DNC protocols. We reviewed and compared the identified protocols. RESULTS: We identified contacts for 40 (70%) of the 57 countries in Asia and the Pacific, and successfully communicated with 37 of them (93% of countries with contacts identified, 65% of countries in Asia and the Pacific). We found that 24 of the 37 countries had BD/DNC protocols. Two (13%) of the 16 protocols that provided a definition of death referred to brainstem death. Kazakhstan and Israel required only 1 examination to declare BD/DNC, while 10 (71%) of the other 14 protocols required 2 examinations separated by 6-48 hours. The prerequisites, clinical examination, apnea testing procedure, and indications for/selection of ancillary tests varied. Ancillary testing was required for all determinations of BD/DNC in five (21%) countries. Thirteen (54%) of the protocols included information about the time of death, while 12 (50%) of them provided instructions about discontinuation of organ support. CONCLUSIONS: The protocols for conducting a BD/DNC determination vary markedly among countries in Asia and the Pacific. Since it is optimal to have internationally and intranationally consistent BD/DNC protocols, efforts should be made to harmonize protocols both within this region and worldwide.

Determination of death by neurologic criteria around the world.

OBJECTIVE: To identify similarities and differences in protocols on determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) around the world. METHODS: We collected and reviewed official national BD/DNC protocols from contacts around the world between January 2018 and April 2019. RESULTS: We communicated with contacts in 136 countries and found that 83 (61% of countries with contacts identified, 42% of the world) had BD/DNC protocols, 78 of which were unique. Protocols addressed the following prerequisites and provided differing instructions: drug clearance (64, 82%), temperature (61, 78%), laboratory values (56, 72%), observation period (37, 47%), and blood pressure (34, 44%). Protocols did not consistently identify the same components for the clinical examination of brain death; 70 (90%) included coma, 70 (90%) included the pupillary reflex, 68 (87%) included the corneal reflex, 67 (86%) included the oculovestibular reflex, 64 (82%) included the gag reflex, 62 (79%) included the cough reflex, 58 (74%) included the oculocephalic reflex, 37 (47%) included noxious stimulation to the face, and 22 (28%) included noxious stimulation to the limbs. Apnea testing was mentioned in 71 (91%) protocols; there was variability in the technique and target across protocols. Ancillary testing was included as a requirement for all determinations of BD/DNC in 22 (28%) protocols. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability in BD/DNC determination protocols around the world. Medical standards for death should be the same everywhere. We recommend that a worldwide consensus be reached on the minimum standards for BD/DNC.

Determination of death by neurologic criteria in Latin American and Caribbean countries.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) identify the countries in the Latin America/Caribbean Group of the United Nations (GRULAC) that have protocols for brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) and (2) review the similarities and differences between these protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2018 and April 2019, we obtained and reviewed BD/DNC protocols from countries in GRULAC. RESULTS: We communicated with contacts in 30/33 countries in GRULAC (91 % of countries) and found that 16 (53 % of countries with contacts, 48 % of Latin American/Caribbean countries) had BD/DNC protocols. Of the 13 protocols that provided a definition of death, 10 (77 %) referred to whole brain death. The number of exams/examiners, prerequisites for BD/DNC, and descriptions of the clinical assessment and apnea test were inconsistent among protocols. Although Brazil and Panama required an ancillary test, the indications for ancillary testing, and the types of accepted ancillary tests, varied by country. CONCLUSION: BD/DNC determination protocols in the countries in GRULAC are inconsistent. Acknowledging the fact that there are diverse cultural, legal and religious perspectives on death, and human and technological resources differ by region, we recommend that attempts be made to harmonize protocols on BD/DNC both regionally and worldwide.