Hygiene Practices and Early Childhood Development in the East Asia-Pacific Region: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Poor hygiene might be a risk factor for early childhood development (ECD). This study investigated the associations of three hygiene practices ('wash hands before a meal,' 'wash hands after going to the toilet,' and 'brush teeth'), separately and combined, with ECD. Six thousand six hundred ninety-seven children (4 [0.8] years) from the East Asia-Pacific Early Child Development Scales validation study were included in this cross-sectional analysis. The hygiene variables were recoded to have comparable values as 'always,' 'sometimes,' and 'never.' These variables were then grouped to create combined categories. The binary outcome variables, poor ECD, were defined as a score < age-specific 25th centile. Modified Poisson regression models were used to analyse the associations. Data collection was performed between 2012 and 2014, and the analyses were conducted in April 2022. Compared with children who 'always' washed their hands before a meal, those who did it 'sometimes' (Prevalence Ratio [PR]: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.16-1.46]) or 'never' (PR: 1.35 [1.18-1.55]) had a higher likelihood of poorer overall development. Comparable results were identified for the other two hygiene practices and the other four domain-specific outcomes (p < 0.05). Compared with children who always followed the three hygiene practices, the likelihood of poor overall ECD increased as the combined hygiene practice decreased among children with poor hygiene practices (PRnever: 1.67 [1.40-2.00]; PRrarely: 1.49 [1.30-1.71]; PRsometimes: 1.30 [1.14-1.49]). Children who did not always follow good hygiene practices had a higher likelihood of poor ECD independently of sociodemographic factors. Considering these findings, future hygiene practice interventions and trials should consider including ECD outcomes.

Trends in the prevalence and social determinants of stunting in India, 2005-2021: findings from three rounds of the National Family Health Survey.

Objectives: To assess social determinants of stunting and the shifts in contributions of socio-demographic factors to national prevalence trends in India between 2005 and 2021. Methods: We leveraged data from three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3: 2005-2006, NFHS-4: 2015-2016, NFHS-5: 2019-2021) for 443 038 children under 5 years. Adjusted logistic regression models and a Kitigawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition were deployed to examine how wealth, residence, belonging to a marginalised social group, maternal education and child sex contributed to changes in stunting prevalence. Results: The decrease in stunting prevalence was notably slower between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 (annual average rate of reduction (AARR): 1.33%) than between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 (AARR: 2.20%). The protective effect of high wealth diminished from 2015 onwards but persisted for high maternal education. However, an intersection of higher household wealth and maternal education mitigated stunting to a greater extent than either factor in isolation. Residence only predicted stunting in 2005-2006 with an urban disadvantage (adjusted OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.29). Children from marginalised social groups displayed increased likelihoods of stunting, from 6-16% in 2005-2006 to 11-21% in 2015-2016 and 2020-2021. Being male was associated with 6% and 7% increased odds of stunting in 2015-2016 and 2019-2021, respectively. Increased household wealth (45%) and maternal education (14%) contributed to decreased stunting prevalence between 2005 and 2021. Conclusions: Stunting prevalence in India has decreased across social groups. However, social disparities in stunting persist and are exacerbated by intersections of low household wealth, maternal education and being from a marginalised social group. Increased survival must be accompanied by needs-based interventions to support children and mitigate mutually reinforcing sources of inequality.

Are body dysmorphic symptoms dimensional or categorical in nature? A taxometric investigation in adolescents.

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a debilitating mental health condition which usually emerges during adolescence and is characterised by distressing and impairing appearance concerns. It is currently unclear whether body dysmorphic concerns represent an extreme manifestation of normal appearance concerns (a dimensional conceptualisation), or whether they are qualitatively distinct (a categorical conceptualisation). This study aimed to determine whether body dysmorphic symptoms are dimensional or categorical in nature by investigating the latent structure using taxometric procedures. Body dysmorphic symptoms were assessed using validated measures among 11-16-year-old school pupils (N=707). Items of the Body Image Questionnaire Child and Adolescent version were used to construct four indicators that broadly corresponded to the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BDD (appearance concerns, repetitive behaviours, impairment, and insight). Indicators were submitted to three non-redundant taxometric procedures (MAMBAC, MAXEIG and L-MODE). Overall, results of all three taxometric procedures indicated a dimensional latent structure of body dysmorphic symptoms. The current study provides preliminary evidence that body dysmorphic symptoms are continuously distributed among adolescents, with no evidence of qualitative differences between mild and severe symptoms. Implications for clinical practice and research are discussed.