Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia: Quantitative assessment tool.

INTRODUCTION: Currently there is no tool to quantify buccophonatory apraxia to stratify, compare and monitor patients longitudinally in an objective manner. Our aim in this study is to create a quantitative scale for buccophonatory apraxia and evaluate it in patients with the non-fluent/grammatical variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and other neurodegenerative diseases that occur with speech and/or language problems. METHODS: The scale was designed based on useful elements in the assessment of buccophonatory apraxia and the total was quantified in seconds. The scale was administered to 64 participants with diagnoses of: nfvPPA, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, as well as a group of healthy controls. RESULTS: Patients showed a significantly higher score compared to controls. The nfvPPA group had the highest mean score on the scale (429 seconds ± 278). The scale was useful to differentiate vnfPPA from svPPA and Parkinson's disease (area under curve [AUC] of 0.956 and 0.989, respectively), but less to differentiate it from Huntington's disease (AUC = 0.67) and lvPPA. There was a statistically significant relationship between total score and disease severity in nfvPPA (P < .029). CONCLUSIONS: The Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia could be useful to quantitatively evaluate buccophonatory apraxia in different neurodegenerative diseases, and compare patients, especially in nfvPPA.

Clinical applicability of diagnostic biomarkers in early-onset cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several diagnostic biomarkers are currently available for clinical use in early-onset cognitive impairment. The decision on which biomarker is used in each patient depends on several factors such as its predictive value or tolerability. METHODS: There were a total of 40 subjects with early-onset cognitive complaints (<65 years of age): 26 with Alzheimer's disease (AD), five with frontotemporal dementia and nine with diagnostic suspicion of non-neurodegenerative disorder. Clinical and neuropsychological evaluation, lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD core biochemical marker determination, medial temporal atrophy evaluation on magnetic resonance imaging, amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET were performed. Neurologists provided pre- and post-biomarker diagnosis, together with diagnostic confidence and clinical/therapeutic management. Patients scored the tolerability of each procedure. RESULTS: Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid-PET increased diagnostic confidence in AD (77.4%-86.2% after CSF, 92.4% after amyloid-PET, P < 0.01) and non-neurodegenerative conditions (53.6%-75% after CSF, 95% after amyloid-PET, P < 0.05). Biomarker results led to diagnostic (32.5%) and treatment (32.5%) changes. All tests were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarker procedures are well tolerated and have an important diagnostic/therapeutic impact on early-onset cognitive impairment.

Decreased striatal dopamine transporter uptake in the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) may develop atypical parkinsonian syndromes. However, there is no current biomarker to assess which patients are at high risk of developing parkinsonism. 123I-2ß-carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl)-nortropane (123I-FP-CIT)-SPECT detects striatal dopamine dysfunction in vivo. The objective of the present study was to study whether non-fluent/agrammatic patients without parkinsonism at baseline present decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake. METHODS: Visual and semi-quantitative assessments of the striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake ratio were carried out in 15 patients with nfvPPA, eight patients with the logopenic variant of PPA (lvPPA) and 18 controls. To rule out progranulin mutations or underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD), serum progranulin levels and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD (Aß42 , total-tau, phosphorylated-tau181 ) were determined. A second 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT analysis in the biomarker-enriched groups was also carried out. RESULTS: Patients with nfvPPA presented reduced striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding, especially in the left hemisphere (P = 0.002), compared with controls. All lvPPA patients had normal striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake. 123I-FP-CIT striatal binding in nfvPPA patients with normal progranulin and CSF biomarker levels (nfvPPA/bio-) was also significantly reduced (P < 0.05) compared with lvPPA patients with positive AD biomarkers. Sixty-four per cent (9/14) of nfvPPA patients and 80% of nfvPPA/bio- patients (8/10) showed a diminished individual left striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake ratio. On follow-up, seven nfvPPA/bio- patients developed parkinsonism (median 1.9 years; range 1.2-2.9), six of them with baseline reduced 123I-FP-CIT uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced striatal tracer uptake in nfvPPA patients prior to clinical parkinsonism can be detected by 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT, especially in those with nfvPPA/bio-, suggesting subclinical nigrostriatal degeneration. Decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding might identify PPA patients at increased risk of developing atypical parkinsonian syndromes, probably related to tau-pathology.

Clinical features and APOE genotype of pathologically proven early-onset Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVES: Early-onset Alzheimer disease (EOAD) diagnosis often represents a challenge because of the high frequency of atypical presentations. Our aim was to describe the clinical features, APOE genotype, and its pathologic correlations of neuropathologic confirmed EOAD. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical data (age at onset, family history, clinical presentation, diagnostic delay, diagnosis) and APOE genotype of patients with neuropathologically confirmed EOAD (<60 years). RESULTS: Forty cases were selected. Mean age at onset was 54.5 years (range 46-60). The mean disease duration was 11 years with a mean diagnostic delay of 3.1 years. A total of 37.5% had a nonmemory presentation. Behavioral/executive dysfunction was the most prevalent atypical presentation. Incorrect initial clinical diagnoses were common (53%) in patients with atypical presentations, but rare when anterograde amnesia was the presenting symptom (4%). The incorrect initial clinical diagnoses were 2 behavioral variant frontotemporal lobar degeneration, 2 normal pressure hydrocephalus, 1 semantic dementia, 1 primary progressive aphasia, 1 corticobasal degeneration, 1 pseudodementia with depression, and 1 unclassifiable dementia. APOE genotype was ε3/ε3 in 59%, with no significant differences between typical and atypical presentations. APOE ε4 was 3.3 times more frequent in subjects with family history of AD. A total of 97.5% of the cases presented advanced neurofibrillary pathology. A total of 45% of the patients had concomitant Lewy body pathology although localized in most cases and without a significant clinical correlate. CONCLUSION: One third of patients with pathologic confirmed EOAD presented with atypical symptoms. Patients with EOAD with nonamnestic presentations often receive incorrect clinical diagnoses.