Idiopathic intracranial hypertension secondary to Superior Sagittal Sinus Stenosis: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disease characterized by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) without established etiology. Venous sinus stenosis contributes to IIH; however, it is still uncertain whether the stenosis is a primary cause of IIH or a secondary result in response to elevated ICP. Transverse sinus stenosis is frequently identified in patients with IIH and it is suggestive of raised ICP. Here, we report a case of IIH caused by intrinsic superior sagittal sinus stenosis (SSS). CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old man suffered from IIH with headache, papilledema, and visual impairment. Angiography demonstrated isolated SSS stenosis with a pressure gradient of 30 mmHg. SSS stenosis was resistant to revascularization by stenting alone and intrastent balloon angioplasty was then performed to overcome such resistance. The rigidity of the vein wall suggests that the vein is not collapsed and the stenosis is intrinsic, secondary to idiopathic anatomical local changes. Post-procedure headache disappeared and visual acuity improved. CONCLUSION: An isolated SSS stenosis could lead to intracranial hypertension and this condition should be taken into account in the diagnostic workup of IIH. By now, SSS stenosis is not mentioned in any current consensus guidelines or paper on the diagnostic workflow of intracranial hypertension.

Considerations on a mutation in the NOTCH3 gene sparing a cysteine residue: a rare polymorphism rather than a CADASIL variant.

Some missense mutations and small deletions in the NOTCH3 gene, not involving cysteine residues, have been described in patients considered to be affected by paucisymptomatic CADASIL. However, the significance of such molecular variants is still unclear. We describe a 49-year-old woman with a CADASIL-like phenotype, carrying a novel cysteine-sparing mutation in exon 29 of the NOTCH3 gene, and discuss the possible pathogenetic role of this molecular variant. Even though atypical clinical and MRI findings make a diagnosis of CADASIL unlikely in this patient, our report nevertheless underlines the intriguing genotype-phenotype relationship in NOTCH3 mutations and the importance of functional investigation to ascertain the role of new NOTCH3 mutations in CADASIL pathogenesis.

Superficial siderosis due to dural defect with thoracic spinal cord herniation.

Superficial siderosis (SS) of the central nervous system is a rare disorder caused by chronic or recurrent hemorrhages into the subarachnoid space with hemosiderin and ferritin deposition, which leads to neuronal damage. The source of bleeding remains unknown in 50% of cases. Recently, attention has been focused on fluid-filled collection in the spinal canal, suggesting the presence of a dural defect which may be the bleeding point. We present a patient with SS and spinal extradural fluid collection due to midthoracic dural defect with spinal cord herniation. The reduction of the spinal cord herniation and the repair of the dural defect resulted in the disappearance of the fluid collection and cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities. The case here reported is, to our knowledge, the first case of spinal cord herniation presenting with SS and confirms the key role played by dural lacerations in the pathogenesis of both SS and spinal cord herniation. The search for dural lacerations should be one of the primary aims in patients with SS.

A cortically blind patient with preserved visual imagery.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The loss or preservation of visual imagery in patients with cortical blindness may be helpful in resolving the controversial roles assigned by some researchers to the early visual cortex during the process of visual imagery. PATIENT AND METHODS: Here we report a patient with complete permanent cortical blindness coupled with denial of the blindness (Anton syndrome) as a result of bilateral occipital infarction. RESULTS: Interestingly, the patient's ability to visualize objects, color, and spatial imagery was preserved, although cerebral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography scans detected what was likely complete bilateral damage to the primary visual cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may support the hypothesis that the primary visual cortex, in which retinal spatial geometry is preserved, is not critical for visual imagery.

Clinical studies in stem cells transplantation for stroke: a review.

Stroke is a significant cause of long-term disability. Currently, once damage from a stroke is established little can be done to recover lost function. Cell transplantation emerged as possible alternative therapy, on the basis of animal studies showing that cells transplanted into the brain not only survive, but also lead to functional improvement in different neurodegenerative diseases. Stem cells have been tested in stroke patients as a possible treatment option. While initially stem cells seemed to work by a 'cell replacement' mechanism, it is emerging that cell therapy works mostly by providing trophic support to the injured tissue and brain, fostering both neurogenesis and angiogenesis. This review summarizes clinical studies on stem cell transplantation in stroke patients to evaluate the safety, feasibility of administration and tolerability of this experimental treatment. At present there is little evidence to assess the applicability of this treatment in stroke patients and well designed clinical trials are necessary to evaluate safety and toxicity as well as optimal cell type, route and time of delivery.

Inclusion body myopathy and frontotemporal dementia caused by a novel VCP mutation.

Hereditary inclusion body myopathy (IBM) with Paget's disease of the bone (PDB) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a rare autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations in the valosin-containing protein (VCP) gene. We report a novel heterozygous VCP gene mutation (R159C) in a 69-year-old Italian patient presenting with slowly progressive muscle weakness of the distal upper and proximal lower limbs since the age of 50 years, 18 years later FTD supervened. No dementia or myopathies were revealed in the family history covering two generations. Degenerative changes and rimmed vacuoles together with VCP- and ubiquitin-positive cytoplasmic and nuclear aggregates were observed at the muscle biopsy. Several elements support the pathogenic role of the R159C VCP gene mutation: the occurrence at the same codon of a different, previously identified pathogenic mutation within a VCP gene mutational hot-spot, the histopathological and biochemical evidence of muscle VCP accumulation and the combined clinical presentation of IBM and FTD. These findings suggest VCP gene investigation even in apparently sporadic cases.

Debunking 7 myths that hamper the realization of randomized controlled trials on intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although intravenous (IV) thrombolysis is the standard treatment for patients with ischemic stroke occurring within 3 hours from symptom onset, a few interventional neuroradiologists have been treating this category of patients by an intra-arterial (IA) route for >25 years. However, evidence is still required to support the clinical feeling that IA treatment, which needs longer time and greater complexity, leads to a better outcome. Therefore, the objective of the present review was to analyze beliefs and myths underlying the selection of patients for IA thrombolysis. METHODS: We identified and debunked the following myths on IA thrombolysis: (1) IA thrombolysis works better than IV because it achieves higher recanalization rates; (2) IA thrombolysis works better than IV after the 3-hour window; (3) IA thrombolysis works better than IV in vertebrobasilar stroke; (4) carotid duplex, transcranial doppler, CT angiography, or MRA should be used to screen for major vessel occlusion treatable with IA thrombolysis; (5) to be treated with IA thrombolysis, patients should be selected with diffusion/perfusion MRI; (6) IA thrombolysis should be used as a "rescue" therapy for IV thrombolysis; and (7) the efficacy of IA thrombolysis depends on the thrombolytic agent or the device used. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on acute stroke management with IA thrombolysis is scant. Therefore, neither clinicians nor patients have enough information to make truly informed decisions about the most appropriate treatment. Only randomized controlled trials can clear uncertainties about the possible superiority of IA over IV thrombolysis. Regretfully, case series on IA treatment have limited the organization of such trials and have only favored the spread of myths.