Perinatal outcomes in twin late preterm pregnancies: results from an Italian area-based, prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple gestations represent a considerable proportion of pregnancies delivering in the late preterm (LP) period. Only 30% of LP twins are due to spontaneous preterm labor and 70% are medically indicated; among this literature described that 16-50% of indicated LP twin deliveries are non-evidence based. As non-evidence-based delivery indications account for iatrogenic morbidity that could be prevented, the objective of our observational study is to investigate first neonatal outcomes of LP twin pregnancies according to gestational age at delivery, chorionicity and delivery indication, then non evidence-based delivery indications. METHODS: Prospective cohort study among twins infants born between 34 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks, in Emilia Romagna, Italy, during 2013-2015. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among 346 LP twins, 84 (23.4%) were monochorionic and 262 (75.7%) were dichorionic; spontaneous preterm labor accounted for 85 (24.6%) deliveries, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes for 66 (19.1%), evidence based indicated deliveries were 117 (33.8%), while non-evidence-based indications were 78 (22.5%). When compared to spontaneous preterm labor or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, pregnancies delivered due to maternal and/or fetal indications were associated with higher maternal age (p <  0.01), higher gestational age at delivery (p <  0.01), Caucasian race (p 0.04), ART use (p <  0.01), gestational diabetes (p <  0.01), vaginal bleeding (p <  0.01), antenatal corticosteroids (p <  0.01), diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) (p <  0.01), and monochorionic (p <  0.01). Two hundred twenty-six pregnancies (65.3%) had at least one fetus experiencing one composite of adverse perinatal outcome. Multivariate analysis confirmed that delivery indication did not affect the composite of adverse perinatal outcomes; the only characteristic that affect the outcome after controlling for confounding was gestational age at delivery (p <  0.01). Moreover, there was at least one adverse neonatal outcome for 94% of babies born at 34 weeks, for 73% of those born at 35 weeks and for 46% of those born at 36 weeks (p <  0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the decision to deliver or not twins in LP period should consider gestational age at delivery as the main determinant infants' prognosis. Delivery indications should be accurately considered, to avoid iatrogenic early birth responsible of preventable complications.

Delivery indication matters for perinatal outcomes in late preterm newborns.

BACKGROUND: The late preterm (LP) rate in Western countries is 3-6% of all births, accounting for about two-thirds of the entire preterm population. However, all LP babies are not the same. AIMS: To identify pregnancies at risk for adverse outcomes in the LP period, we investigated how gestational age (GA) at delivery, delivery indication and prenatal risk factors may affect neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study among singleton infants born between 34 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks, in Emilia Romagna, Italy, during 2013-2015. OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to, respectively, investigate the effects of GA at delivery, circumstances at parturition and prenatal risk factors, on study outcomes after controlling for confounding variable. RESULTS: Among 1867 births, 302, 504, and 1061 infants were born at 34, 35, and 36 weeks, respectively. There were no neonatal deaths. An increased risk of composite neonatal outcome was observed among 34 and 35 weeks deliveries compared with 36 weeks, and among indicated deliveries compared with spontaneous. When studying prenatal risk factors, neonatal morbidity was associated with pre gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM), maternal obesity, bleeding and polyhydramnios; instead, preeclampsia had a protective effect. CONCLUSION: LP with indicated deliveries at 34 or 35 weeks, or with specific prenatal risk factors have worse neonatal outcome when compared to 36. Such differences should be considered when counseling patients and planning interventions such as timing of delivery in LP period.

Ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies in a single center: diagnostic performances twenty years after the Eurofetus Study.

PURPOSE: To establish the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting fetal anomalies looking at the concordance between prenatal and postnatal diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of concordance between prenatal and postnatal/autoptic diagnosis of fetuses with congenital abnormalities. Data are from a single center (Policlinico di Modena); all fetuses included were born between 2017 and 2018 and with a follow-up of at least 6 months. We included all deliveries (including perinatal deaths) and termination of pregnancy (TOP) for fetal indication. We calculated sensibility, sensitivity, Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratio, positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound. RESULTS: During the study period 5920 deliveries, including perinatal deaths, and 28 TOP for fetal indication were registered at our center. The prevalence of congenital malformations was 2.6% (153/5920). At least one ultrasound was performed in our center in 1250 women delivering in our unit. All 28 TOP had the anomaly scan performed in our center. Among the total 1278 women scanned in our unit, there were 128 (10%) suspicious scans. In 5/128 (3.9%) cases we diagnosed a false alarm; in 8/128 (6.2%) cases an evolutive malformation with in-utero regression. The prenatal diagnosis was confirmed in 77 (60.2%) cases at birth and in 28/128 (21.9%) at postmortem analysis while there were 10/128 false positive (7.8%). Among the 153 congenital malformations diagnosed at birth, the anomaly scan was performed in our Prenatal Medicine Unit in 92 (60.1%) fetuses. Among these, there were 15 false negatives (9.8%) while in 77/92 (83.7%) the malformation at birth agreed with the sonographic diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were 87.5% (IC95 80.2-92.8%) and 99.1% (IC95 98.4-99.6%) respectively with a Positive Likelihood Ratio and Negative Likelihood Ratio of 101.3 (IC95 54.5-188.5) and 0.13 (IC95 0.08-0.2); Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value were 91.3% (IC95 85-95.1%) and 98.7(IC95 98-99.2%). CONCLUSION: Anomaly scan in pregnancy allows the diagnosis of congenital malformations with a sensibility of 87.5% and specificity of 99.1%. The main limitations of this study are its retrospective design and that it was conducted in a single referral center.