RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We describe time trend incidence (2009-2018) of non-work related Sickness Absence(SA) segmented by duration of episodes in Spain. METHODS: We used SA cases from a health insurance company ("mutua") in Spain. Overall non-work related SA incidence and incidence by duration of episodes (1-3 days, 4-15 days, 16-30 days, 31-90 days and> 90 days) were obtained. A time series ecological study was carried out with an inflection point in 2013. The annual percentage of change and 95% confidence interval were obtained. The analyses were stratified by age and sex. RESULTS: Overall incidence went from 35.3 cases per 100 workers-years in 2009 to 25.2 in 2013. From 2014, there is a sustained rise in the incidence of ITCC, ending 2018 with 34.1 cases per 100 workers-years. The overall incidence is determined mainly by processes less than 16 days in young population. The decrease in 2009-2013 occurred in all the duration segments, especially in 4 to 15 (APC=-11,2; 95% CI=(-14,1 a -8,2)) and more than 90 days (APC =-9,4; 95% CI =(-15,5 a -2,8)), mainly in young people. The rise in 2013-2018 was observed in all the segments, with the largest significant increase in sections of 1-3 days(younger workers: APC =18,9; 95% CI =(14,8 a 23,2)) and in more than 90 days (mainly in older ones). Time trend of SA showed similar pattern in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Time trend analysis of SA incidence by duration segments offers a detailed information of SA. These results are useful for professionals in the prevention and management of SA.
OBJETIVO: Describir la evolución temporal (2009-2018) de la incidencia de la incapacidad temporal por contingencia común (ITCC) según tramos de duración en España. MÉTODOS: Se consideraron casos de ITCC de la población afiliada de una mutua laboral. Se obtuvo la incidencia global de la incapacidad temporal por ITCC y por tramos de duración (1-3 días, 4-15 días, 16-30 días, 31-90 días y >90 días). Se realizó un estudio ecológico de series temporales considerando un punto de inflexión en 2013. Se calculó el porcentaje de cambio anual e intervalo de confianza del 95%. Los análisis se estratificaron por edad y sexo. RESULTADOS: La incidencia global pasó de 35,3 casos por cada 100 trabajadores-año en 2009 a 25,2 en 2013. A partir del 2014 se observa un ascenso sostenido de la incidencia de ITCC, finalizando el 2018 con 34,1 casos por cada 100 trabajadores-año. La incidencia global está determinada fundamentalmente por procesos menores a 16 días en población joven. El descenso en 2009-2013 se produjo en todos los tramos de duración, en especial en 4 a 15 (PCA=-11,2; IC 95%=(-14,1 a -8,2)) y más de 90 días (PCA=-9,4; IC 95%=(-15,5 a -2,8)), principalmente en jóvenes. El ascenso en 2013-2018 se observó en todos los tramos, siendo el incremento más significativo en tramos de 1-3 días (trabajadores de menor edad: PCA=18,9; IC 95%=(14,8 a 23,2)) y en más de 90 días (principalmente en mayores). La evolución de la ITCC presentó un patrón similar en ambos sexos. CONCLUSIONES: La descripción temporal de la incidencia de ITCC por tramos de duración ofrece una información detallada de la incapacidad temporal. Estos resultados son útiles para profesionales de la prevención y gestión de la ITCC.
Assuntos
Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha/epidemiologia , Tempo , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We describe the usefulness of performing an analysis of sickness absence (SA) incidence, segmented by the duration of episodes, in comparison with the more common analysis that considers the overall incidence of SA without segmentation. METHODS: We used data from a health insurance company ("mutua") in Spain during 2011 (230,332 episodes, 752,906 workers) and non-work related SA as a case study. We compared the overall incidence of SA and incidence segmented by duration of episodes: short (≤ 15 days), medium (16-30 and 31-90 days) and long (> 90 days). The analyses were also performed by age, as an example of one of the multiple variables that affect SA incidence. RESULTS: The overall incidence of SA was 30.6%, and declined steadily with increasing age. When SA incidence was analyzed by duration, we observed that: 1) the incidence of the episodes of short duration is the highest; 2) the overall excess observed in younger workers (<25 years) is driven mainly by short duration and 3) the pattern for long-term SA incidence was reversed, being more frequent among those ≥55 years of age relative to the youngest. CONCLUSIONS: Examining SA incidence by duration is more informative than relying on overall incidence of SA.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Se describe la utilidad de realizar un análisis de la incidencia de incapacidad temporal (IT) segmentado según la duración de los episodios, en comparación con el análisis que considera la incidencia global de la IT. MÉTODOS: Se considera un ejemplo utilizando datos de una mutua en España durante 2011 (230.332 episodios, 752.906 trabajadores) y la incapacidad temporal por contingencia común (ITcc). Comparamos la incidencia de ITcc global y la segmentada por la duración de los episodios: corta (≤ 15 días), media (16-30 y 31-90) y larga (> 90 días). Los análisis se realizaron también según edad, como ejemplo de una de las múltiples variables que afectan a la incidencia de la IT. RESULTADOS: La incidencia global de ITcc fue del 30,6%, mostrando una disminución con la edad (36,4% en <25 años frente a 29,3% en ≥55 años (RR = 1,24, IC del 95% = 1,22 - 1,27)). El análisis de la incidencia de ITcc segmentado por la duración de los episodios, permite obtener resultados más específicos: 1) la incidencia de corta duración es la más alta respecto al resto de segmentos (20,1% en la corta frente a 2,8% en larga duración (RR = 7,29, IC 95% = 7,19 7,40); 2) el exceso global observado en jóvenes se produce mayoritariamente por los episodios cortos (RR = 1,98, IC del 95% = 1,93-2,03, en <25 años frente a ≥55 años), y 3) la incidencia de larga duración cambia este patrón, siendo más frecuente en ≥55 años (5,2%) en relación a jóvenes (1,6%)(RR = 0,31, IC 95% = 0,29-0,34). CONCLUSIONES: El análisis de la incidencia de IT segmentada por duración ofrece una aproximación más precisa que la obtenida del análisis global.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sickness absence due to non work-related conditions is a major public health issue with important socio-economic implications, and is not homogenously distributed in Spain. The objective of this study is to compare cost differences of temporary sickness absence between Barcelona and Madrid. METHODS: A study was carried out based on incident cases of temporary sickness absence of more than fifteen days of duration, followed to case closure, in a retrospective cohort of workers in 2006. The study population consisted of workers of companies covered by the general regime of the Social Security System, and managed by an insurance company based in the provinces of Barcelona and Madrid in the year 2006. We compared the incidence, median duration and daily income base between Barcelona and Madrid, adjusting by sex, age and economic sector, using statistical models that take into account recurrent events in the period. RESULTS: 24.527 cases of temporary sickness absence were identified, 62% of which originated in Barcelona. The mean cost was 33% higher in Barcelona with respect to Madrid (2.589 euros vs 1941 euros). The incidence was 22% higher in Barcelona than Madrid (1,22, IC95%: 1,10-1,36) and mean daily income base per episode was 7,80 euros higher (IC95% :7,20-8,40). In the duration the time ratio was: 1,03 ( IC95%: 1,01-1,05). CONCLUSIONS: The higher incidence and daily income base of temporary sickness absence in Barcelona with respect to Madrid may explain the higher costs observed in the former.