Mesangial hypercellularity predicts antiproteinuric response to dual blockade of RAS in primary glomerulonephritis.

The greater antiproteinuric efficacy of converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker combination (CEI+ARB), versus monotherapy with either drug, is not a consistent finding. We evaluated the clinicopathologic predictors of response to CEI+ARB in 43 patients with primary glomerulonephritis (GN), never treated with immunosuppressive drugs, and with persistent proteinuria after CEI alone. Main histological lesions were analyzed by obtaining on 557 glomeruli and 165 arteries formal score of mesangial cellularity, glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial damage, mononuclear cell infiltration, arteriosclerosis, and arteriolar hyalinosis. Duration of CEI and CEI+ARB therapy was similar (4.7+/-2.4 and 5.0+/-1.5 months). Proteinuria (g/day) decreased from 3.5+/-2.9 to 2.4+/-2.3 after CEI, and to 1.5+/-1.3 after CEI+ARB (P<0.0001). Reduction of proteinuria after CEI+ARB was greater in proliferative versus non-proliferative GN (-63.3+/-23.4 versus 42.4+/-23.7%, respectively; P=0.006). When patients were categorized in responders and non-responders to CEI+ARB, no difference between the two groups was detected in any demographic or clinical variable, whereas histology showed in responders a greater prevalence of proliferative GN (71.4 versus 31.8%, P=0.009) and higher score of mesangial cellularity (1.76+/-0.53 versus 1.20+/-0.22, P<0.0001). At multiple regression analysis (r(2)=0.476, P=0.001), response to CEI+ARB resulted independently related only to mesangial cellularity (P<0.0001). In conclusion, the best independent predictor of antiproteinuric efficacy of CEI+ARB in patients with primary GN is the degree of mesangial cellularity. This finding supports the experimental evidence that high angiotensin II contributes to proliferation of mesangial cells.

Coadministration of losartan and enalapril exerts additive antiproteinuric effect in IgA nephropathy.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and AT1-receptor antagonists (ARAs) are widely administered to reduce urinary protein loss and slow the progression of proteinuric nephropathy to end-stage renal failure. Our group recently observed that the combination of ACE inhibitors and ARAs may have an additive antiproteinuric effect, which may occur because ACE inhibitors do not completely reduce angiotensin II (Ang II) production. Ang II is also produced by chymase. Thus, combination therapy better antagonizes the effects of Ang II. The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether the additive antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors plus ARAs is dose dependent and related to the drug-induced reduction in systemic blood pressure. Therefore, enalapril (E; 10 mg/d) and losartan (LOS; 50 mg/d) were randomly administered alone and then in association; initial dosages were doubled when drugs were administered alone and in association. To determine the influence of the drug-dependent effect on reducing blood pressure and the reduction in urinary proteinuria, both ambulatory and office blood pressures were recorded. E and LOS administered alone reduced proteinuria by the same extent; no further reduction was observed when E and LOS alone were administered at a doubled dose. When E and LOS were coadministered, proteinuria decreased by a greater extent compared with E and LOS alone; an additional reduction in proteinuria was observed when combined therapy doses were doubled. The reduction in proteinuria was not correlated with clinical through blood pressure; however, reductions in diastolic and mean ambulatory blood pressures significantly correlated with the decrease in proteinuria, as well as with creatinine clearance. In conclusion, this study shows that combination therapy with E and LOS has an additive dose-dependent antiproteinuric effect that is likely induced by the drug-related reduction in systemic blood pressure. In normotensive proteinuric patients, it is likely that even a small reduction in systemic blood pressure may affect intraglomerular hemodynamics by a great extent because efferent arteriole regulation is hampered more completely by the coadministration of ACE inhibitors and ARAs.

Effect of posture on sodium excretion and diuretic efficacy in nephrotic patients.

It is well known that posture affects natriuresis in cirrhosis and heart failure. This study evaluates the role of posture on spontaneous urinary salt excretion (U(Na)V) and diuretic-induced natriuresis in nephrotic patients with mild renal impairment. U(Na)V and plasma concentrations of the main hormones involved in sodium regulation were evaluated at baseline (Baseline) and after furosemide administration (20 mg intravenously at 8:00 AM [Diuretic]) in seven nephrotic patients with mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance, 68.5 +/- 7.6 mL/min) in either the supine or upright position for 6 hours (from 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM). At baseline, U(Na)V was greater in the supine than upright position (sodium, 51.8 +/- 6.2 versus 38.3 +/- 6.1 mEq/d; P: < 0.01). Similarly, furosemide was more effective in increasing U(Na)V in the supine (sodium, 51.8 +/- 6.2 to 87.4 +/- 9.1 mEq/d; P: < 0.005) than upright position (sodium, 38.3 +/- 6.1 to 59.0 +/- 6.8 mEq/d; P: = not significant). Consequently, body weight decreased in the supine but not the upright position (-0.73 +/- 0.15 versus -0.17 +/- 0.22 kg; P: < 0. 05). Peripheral renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone (Aldo) concentrations were greater in the upright than supine position at both Baseline and Diuretic. A similar pattern was observed for hematocrit, used as an index of plasma volume. In addition, a positive correlation was detected between hematocrit and PRA (r = 0.89; P: < 0.001) in the upright position. Postural changes did not influence plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide. These data indicate that in nephrotic patients with mild impairment of glomerular filtration rate, the upright position causes a reduction in plasma volume; this hypovolemia activates the renin-Aldo system responsible for sodium retention in unstimulated conditions and a blunted natriuretic response to furosemide.

Additive antiproteinuric effect of converting enzyme inhibitor and losartan in normotensive patients with IgA nephropathy.

We tested the hypothesis that the combination of converting enzyme inhibitor (CEI) with losartan (LOS) produces a more profound antiproteinuric effect than either drug alone in normotensive patients with immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy. Eight normotensive (mean blood pressure, 88.9 +/- 2.1 mm Hg) patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy, nonnephrotic proteinuria (protein, 1 to 3 g/d), and normal or slightly reduced creatinine clearance (range, 69 to 119 mL/min) were studied. Clinical evaluations and laboratory tests were performed (1) before CEI treatment (basal) and after (2) CEI alone (CEI, 12 weeks); (3) the combination of CEI and LOS, the latter at a dosage of 50 mg/d (CEI + LOS, 4 weeks); (4) LOS alone (LOS; 50 mg/d; 12 weeks); (5) the combination of LOS and CEI (LOS + CEI, 4 weeks, at the same dosage as CEI + LOS); and (6) a doubled dose of either CEI alone or LOS alone for 4 weeks. CEI and LOS as monotherapy significantly reduced proteinuria by 38% and 30%, respectively. No further reduction of proteinuria was achieved by doubling the dose of CEI or LOS. Both combinations induced a more remarkable reduction of proteinuria (73%; P < 0.05 v other periods) than either drug administered alone. The antiproteinuric effect of CEI or LOS and the more remarkable effect achieved with both combinations was not dependent on the reduction of blood pressure and/or creatinine clearance. In conclusion, this study provides first-time evidence that the combination of CEI and LOS in normotensive patients with IgA nephropathy produces a more profound decrease in proteinuria than either drug. This additive antiproteinuric effect is not dependent on changes in systemic blood pressure and creatinine clearance. Nevertheless, a larger controlled study is required to confirm this novel observation.

Serial morphometric analysis of sclerotic lesions in primary "focal" segmental glomerulosclerosis.

The possibility of missing the diagnosis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has been primarily attributed to the focal distribution of the sclerotic lesions, but this assumption has not been verified by any serial morphometric analysis of renal biopsy specimens. The aim of this study is to assess the size and the distribution of sclerotic lesions in primary FSGS and to establish the minimum number of glomeruli and sections necessary for the diagnosis. Fourteen biopsies from adult nephrotic patients with primary FSGS were carefully selected from a group of 41 biopsies, to minimize the possibility of finding and misinterpreting nonspecific glomerular scars, and were serially cut to obtain 1485 consecutive 2 microns-thick sections that, after PAS staining, showed 182 glomeruli. Fifty-seven glomeruli were "complete", i.e., they emerged after the first section and disappeared before the last section. The percentage of glomeruli with sclerotic lesions was 31.5% in the starting section, 71.8% after the observation of all serial sections, and 81.7% when only the complete glomeruli were considered. The morphometric analysis on complete glomeruli revealed that the volume of the sclerotic lesions averaged just 12.5% +/- 2.2 SE of the entire glomerular volume, and the statistical analysis revealed that the minimum number of glomeruli needed in the starting section to exclude sclerotic lesions is eight (P < 0.01) or nine (P < 0.001). If fewer glomeruli are seen, it is necessary to cut 2 microns-thick serial sections, but to examine just one of every 11 (P < 0.001), the number of sections to examine being proportional to the number of glomeruli found. In conclusion, this study shows that the distribution of sclerotic lesions in primary FSGS is not focal, but diffuse; however, because of the small size of the sclerotic lesions, the probability of missing the diagnosis is statistically relevant when fewer than eight glomeruli are found in the starting section, unless a serial morphological analysis, even on a reduced number of sections, is made.

Evaluation of monoclonal/polyclonal ratio in kidney-transplanted patients treated with cyclosporine.

Fifty-seven kidney-transplanted outpatients, treated with cyclosporine alone or associated with azathioprine, prednisone, or methylprednisolone, were submitted to a monthly follow-up in order to determine cyclosporine blood levels and the monoclonal/polyclonal (M/P) ratio. Only methylprednisolone was able to modify the M/P ratio. This drug increased the M/P ratio, suggesting a cyclosporine metabolic inhibition. This effect disappeared in a few months in spite of the continuation of methylprednisolone treatment.