Stigma and self-stigma among women within the context of the german "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation: A qualitative analysis of online forums and blogs.

BACKGROUND: In many countries, including Germany, it is recommended to abstain from alcohol during pregnancy to avoid harm to the baby. In this qualitative research study, analysis of online forums was conducted to explore women's perception of the German "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation with regard to stigma and self-stigma. METHODS: We used a grounded theory approach to analyze online forum discussions on alcohol use during pregnancy. Data consisted of 9 discussion threads from 5 different forums and blogs involving 115 participants in total. We used key concepts developed during analysis and the theory of stigma to interpret the posts. RESULTS: We identified five key themes: (1) Low alcohol health literacy as a breeding ground for stigmatization; (2) The widespread assumption that maternal abstinence is a prerequisite for being considered a "good mother"; (3) Interpersonal role conflicts and a guilty conscience as a result of stigmatization or self-stigmatization; (4) Paying little attention to the role of psychosocial factors in alcohol consumption, especially regarding partner responsibility during pregnancy.; (5) Understanding the "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation as a complete ban, associated with loss of autonomy. CONCLUSION: The current method of communicating the "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation may have unintended consequences. Specifically, misconceptions about the harm associated with low alcohol consumption and setting high expectations of motherhood are factors that can contribute to stigma or self-stigma and potentially undermine self-efficacy, help-seeking behavior, and overcoming the barriers to alcohol health literacy.

Researching Alcohol Consumption During Pregnancy. Opportunities and Challenges With Two Methods of Data Acquisition.

Qualitative research methods, primarily interviews, have become more common in the field of addiction research. Other data sources were often neglected, although sources such as social media can offer insights into the realities of people, since social media also plays a relevant role in today's living environments. This article examines the use of online forums as an underutilized data source in contrast to telephone interviews, to identify methodological opportunities and challenges. We analyzed nine discussion threads and seven interviews about 'alcohol consumption during pregnancy'. Discursive comparison of the results was performed with a focus on sampling issues, comparability and risks for participants and researchers. Key issues were present in both data sources. People with different opinions were openly hostile in forums, while tolerance was more often expressed in interviews. The interviews showed a rather mild communication style, which could be attributed to social desirability. In the forum discussions, the participants often expressed themselves very directly. To comprehensively grasp the subject matter of the research, it is important to recognize the types of communication promoted by different data sources. These results have implications for research about female substance use. Knowledge of the issues will bestow a valuable contribution to researchers working in the field of substance use to help develop appropriate research approaches, as they engage in research into this highly stigmatized and controversial area.

[Opinions on Alcohol Consumption During Pregnancy and The Role of The Medical Staff as an Expert in This Regard - A Grounded Theory Analysis of Online Forum Discussions]. / Meinungen zum Alkoholkonsum in der Schwangerschaft und zur diesbezüglichen ExpertInnenrolle von medizinischem Fachpersonal.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption during pregnancy carries many risks for the unborn child. Despite preventive measures, some pregnant women consume alcohol. The aim of this study is to identify possible reasons for consumption during pregnancy and also to shed light on the attribution of an expert role to medical professionals by those affected. METHODS: In this study, 9 discussion threads from online forums on the topic of alcohol consumption during pregnancy with a total of 115 discussion participants were analyzed using grounded theory. The discursive validation of the results took place in the research team. RESULTS: It turned out that the individual definition of the mother role has an influence on consumer behavior. Women who are very concerned about the child's well-being occasionally used alcohol in stressful situations or on social occasions, but often reported a guilty conscience after the consumption. Women who gave more weight to their own needs were more likely to consume for pleasure or because they felt they were being patronized by prohibitions. An equitable doctor-patient relationship and detailed, non-directive information were identified as beneficial factors for ascribing the expert role to the gynecologist. On the other hand, a paternalistic attitude and the issuing of bans proved to be a hindrance. DISCUSSION: All women showed a high need for information about alcohol consumption during pregnancy. The doctor-patient relationship seems to play an important role in conveying information. In addition, it became clear that the desire for support in women striving for abstinence is not being sufficiently fulfilled. CONCLUSION: Alcohol consumption during pregnancy should be addressed regularly in the care of all pregnant women. In addition to information on consumption risks, information on support offers is relevant.