Factors Associated with Parametrial Involvement in Endometrial Carcinoma in Patients Treated with Radical Hysterectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Describe factors associated with parametrial involvement, and how these factors modify the prognosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. METHODS: Observational study in which categorized patients according to those with and without parametrial involvement. A descriptive analysis and comparative analysis were performed for associations between parametrial spread and clinical, surgical, and pathology variables. RESULTS: We analyzed 85 patients, which 18 (21%) had parametrial involvement. Pathology factors associated with parametrial involvement were the endometrioid subtype, grade 3, and variants of poor prognosis (odds ratio (OR) 3.41, 95% CI 1.09-10.64; P = 0.035), myometrial invasion of over 50% (OR 7.76, 95% CI 1.65-36.44; P = 0.009), serosal involvement (OR 17.07, 95% CI 3.87-75.35; P < 0.001), ovarian metastasis (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.36-19.46; P = 0.016), positive peritoneal cytology (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.04-14.77; P = 0.044), and lymph node metastasis (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.16-9.97; P = 0.026). Five-year disease-free survival was 74% (95% CI 57.4-85.4) for the group without parametrial spread and 50.8% (95% CI 22.7-73.4) for the group with parametrial spread (P = 0.001). Similarly, 5-year overall survival was 85.2% (95% CI 67.9-93.6) for the group without parametrial spread and 47.5% (95% CI 8.1-80.2) for the group with parametrial spread (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Factors associated with parametrial involvement were histologies of poor prognosis, tumors affecting uterine serosa, cervix, or spread beyond the uterus. Additionally, parametrial involvement directly affects prognosis by reducing overall survival, disease-free survival and increasing odds for recurrence.

Comparison between Two Types of 22-Gauge Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Tumors.

Background: Tissue sampling using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is the gold standard for diagnosing malignant pancreatic tumors; however, its sensitivity and specificity are highly variable. Thus, fine-needle biopsy using cutting needles has been developed to overcome current limitations and improve diagnostic yield. Our study compared two fine-needle biopsy needles for tissue sampling for pancreatic solid lesions. Materials and Methods: Samples obtained from patients with pancreatic solid lesions using the 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needles (Franseen needle or reverse bevel needle) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were diagnostic yield and sample adequacy. The secondary outcome was diagnostic performance. The analysis was performed using 2 × 2 tables to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for each needle type. Proportions were compared using the Z test. For quantitative variables, a comparative analysis was performed using Student's t test. Qualitative and unpaired outcome variables were described using Fisher's exact test. Results: Sixty-three patients with pancreatic lesions were included in the analysis. The fine-needle biopsy Franseen and reverse bevel groups included 33 and 30 patients, respectively. An adequate sample was obtained in 97% of patients in the Franseen needle group versus 80% in the reverse bevel needle group; the diagnostic yields in these groups were 93.9 and 66.7%, respectively. Neither differences between needle passes nor complications were noted. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.5 and 100%, respectively, in the fine-needle biopsy Franseen group, versus 71 and 100%, respectively, in the reverse bevel needle group. Conclusions: The Franseen needle was more effective for sampling pancreatic tumors than the reverse bevel needle.

Introdução: A aquisição de tecido através de punção com agulha fina guiada por ecoendoscopia é o padrão para o diagnóstico de neoplasias pancreáticas malignas; contudo, a sua sensibilidade e especificidade é altamente variável. A biópsia por agulha fina (FNB) usando agulhas cortantes foi desenvolvida para ultrapassar as limitações atuais. Este estudo comparou duas agulhas de FNB na aquisição de tecido de lesões pancreáticas sólidas. Métodos: Amostras obtidas de doentes com lesões pancreáticas sólidas utilizando agulha de FND de 22 gauge (Franseen ou reverse bevel) foram avaliadas retrospetivamente. Os outcomes primárias foram a rentabilidade diagnóstica e a adequabilidade das amostras. O outcome secundário foi a performance diagnóstica. A análise estatística foi realizada através de tabelas de contingência 2 × 2 para cálculo da sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo e negativo e acuidade para cada tipo de agulha. As proporções foram calculadas utilizando o teste-Z. Para variáveis quantitativas foi realizada análise comparativa com teste t-Student. Variáveis qualitativas e não pareadas foram comparadas com teste exato de Fisher. Resultados: Foram incluídos 63 doentes com lesões pancreáticas (33 no grupo FNB Franseen e 30 no grupo reverse bevel). Foram obtidas amostras adequadas em 97% do grupo Franseen vs 80% no grupo reverse bevel, sendo a rentabilidade diagnóstica de 93.9 e 66.7%, respetivamente. Não houve diferenças no número de passagens nem nas complicações. A sensibilidade e especificidade foram, respetivamente, de 93.5 e 100% no grupo Franseen versus 71 e 100% no grupo reverse bevel. Conclusões: A agulha Franseen foi mais efetiva na aquisição de amostras de lesões pancreáticas do que a agulha reverse bevel.

Association of p16 and Ki-67 with Risk of Recurrence in Previously Treated Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to assess the association between the markers p16 and Ki-67 and recurrence of disease in patients previously treated for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). DESIGN: This is a case-control study at the National Cancer Institute conducted between 2005 and 2015. Of the patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of HSIL, 107 cases were selected. They were divided into 2 groups: 28 cases with recurrence after treatment and a control group of 79 patients without recurrence. We identified clinical, pathological, and treatment variables. METHODS: Two experienced pathologists performed immunohistochemical analysis of biomarkers; they agreed on their interpretation, and we calculated the odds ratios (ORs) associated with recurrence. For group comparisons, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank, χ2, or Fisher's exact test, depending on the type of variable. We conducted logistic regression models to estimate ORs and determine the factors associated with recurrence. The recurrence-free period was defined as the time frame between conization and either recurrence of disease or the last date the patient was seen. We used Kaplan-Meier plots to visualize survival curves and log-rank tests to compare the curves. We established a p value <0.05 as statistically significant. RESULTS: After pathologists performed immunohistochemical analysis, they achieved an agreement level of 83.7% for p16 and 60% for Ki-67. We did not find an association between recurrence and either p16 expression (p = 0.69) or the percentage of Ki-67 expression (p = 0.71). The recurrence-free period analysis did not reveal a difference in p16 expression (p = 0.57) nor in the percentage of Ki-67 expression in the 3-tiered scale (p = 0.56). LIMITATIONS: Our main limitation was a reduced sample size. CONCLUSION: We found no association between p16 and Ki-67 positivity and the risk of recurrence in previously treated HSIL.