Posterior tibial vein approach to catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) remains a significant cause of morbidity in the American population. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral DVT is an effective therapy not only to restore venous patency but also to reduce the development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), especially in patients with extensive thrombosis involving the iliac and femoral venous segments. We hypothesized that delivery of thrombolytics through an access site in a vein distal to the segments containing thrombus would provide the greatest short- and long-term therapeutic clinical benefit with similar safety and efficacy. METHODS: All patients treated at a single institution between 2009 and 2016 undergoing mechanical and chemical thrombolysis for iliofemoral DVT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into groups by access site, including contralateral and ipsilateral femoral vein, popliteal vein, and posterior tibial vein (PTV). Preoperative demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outpatient charts were analyzed. Primary end points included evidence of incompetence after the procedure by duplex ultrasound assessment and development of complications of PTS as defined by the Villalta scale. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent mechanical and chemical thrombolysis, and 51 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thrombolysis access was through PTV (n = 27), popliteal vein (n = 20), or femoral vein (n = 4). More patients were female (55%), and the mean age was 57 years. Forty patients had unilateral DVT, whereas 11 patients had bilateral involvement. After lysis, 44 patients underwent percutaneous venous angioplasty and 11 patients underwent venous stenting in the acute setting. Although not statistically significant, mean operative times were slightly longer in the posterior tibial approach (156.7 minutes vs 130.6 minutes; P = .08), and mean fluoroscopy time was higher in the posterior tibial group (18.1 minutes vs 14.3 minutes; P = .17). Overall 90-day morbidity was 9.8%, and no deaths were recorded. Patency of the deep venous system was similar between the posterior tibial and the popliteal or femoral approach (95% vs 88%; P = .29); 21.6% developed symptoms of PTS. There was no difference for development of PTS between posterior tibial and popliteal or femoral approaches (22% vs 20.8%; P = .52). There was no difference in development of chronic nonocclusive DVT (37% vs 35%; P = .61). Median follow-up was 8.7 months (range, 0.4-58.9 months). CONCLUSIONS: The PTV approach to catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe and sensible option for the treatment of iliofemoral and femoropopliteal DVT. A larger cohort will be necessary to demonstrate superiority of tibial vein access in the treatment of iliofemoral DVT with popliteal involvement.

Revascularization for failed carotid artery stenting in a patient with a rare vertebral artery anomaly.

There is a growing cohort of patients requiring complex revascularization for failed carotid artery stenting. This revascularization can be complex in patients with coexisting supra-aortic vascular anomalies. Aberrant origin of the vertebral artery (VA) is an example of such an anomaly. Although VA anomalies are rare, their occurrence is of significant importance in endovascular and open vascular procedures. We report a case of a 78-year-old man with rare VA anomaly, whose left internal carotid artery ostium was inadvertently covered during a carotid artery stenting procedure. We discuss the carotid artery revascularization in this patient as well as the relevant literature.

Color-flow duplex screening for upper extremity proximity injuries: a low-yield strategy for therapeutic intervention.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of injury to the upper extremity screened with angiography as a result of proximity penetrating trauma is similar to that of the lower extremity, intervention rates seem to be higher. However, studies evaluating the incidence of injury as a result of proximity penetrating trauma have primarily focused on the lower extremity. This study shows the incidence and clinical significance of vascular injury as a result of proximity trauma to the upper extremity in a large cohort of patients screened with color-flow duplex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2012 on all patients undergoing color-flow duplex as a result of proximity penetrating trauma to the upper extremity. Data on injury location, mechanism, associated extremity and nonextremity injuries, and use and results of color-flow duplex were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients were identified who underwent color-flow duplex because of proximity penetrating trauma to the upper extremity. Injuries occurred in 370 extremities, with 253 located in the upper arm and 117 in the forearm. Overall, 18 (4.9%) injuries were identified on screening duplex ultrasound, of which 12 (3.2%) were arterial and 5 (1.4%) were venous. The therapeutic intervention rate for detected injuries to the upper arm was 1.6% (4/253), whereas no injuries of the forearm were identified that necessitated intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although color-flow duplex is an inexpensive and noninvasive means of detecting injuries as a result of proximity penetrating trauma, screening upper extremity wounds is unlikely to detect clinically significant arterial injuries in need of therapeutic intervention. Venous injuries in the form of deep venous thromboses were detected in only 1.4% of patients. These findings suggest that screening for proximity penetrating trauma of the upper extremity is unlikely to detect injuries at a rate that would prove cost-effective on formal decision analysis.