The Impact of Progesterone Administration Routes on Endometrial Receptivity and Clinical Outcomes in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles.

Introduction Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) rely on endometrial receptivity (ER) for successful embryo implantation. This study aimed to compare the impact of different progesterone administration routes on ER assessed using optimal time for endometrial receptivity analysis (OpERA) and clinical outcomes in ART cycles. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 281 infertile women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). Patients were stratified based on progesterone administration routes: oral and vaginal progesterone (Group 1) vs. intramuscular progesterone (Group 2). OpERA was performed on 257 patients to assess ER. Clinical outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), and abortion rate (AR), were compared between the groups. Results OpERA results showed no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 in receptive (51.2% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.857), pre-receptive (44.1% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.933), or post-receptive (4.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.496) states. Clinical outcomes, including BPR (59.9% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.903), CPR (50.0% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.463), IR (52.5% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.748), and AR (44.3% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.882), did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Progesterone administration routes did not significantly affect ER or clinical outcomes, highlighting the need to prioritize understanding and enhancing ER instead of solely focusing on progesterone delivery methods. Identifying molecular pathways or biomarkers could improve receptivity and optimize ART, ultimately improving pregnancy outcomes.

Unlocking Infertility: Enhancing Pregnancy Rates With Personalized Embryo Transfers Using Optimal Time for Endometrial Receptivity Analysis in Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization.

Background Infertility remains a significant global challenge, and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) poses a considerable concern in assisted reproductive technology. Understanding the factors contributing to implantation failure is essential for developing accurate diagnostic tools and treatment strategies. Endometrial receptivity (ER) during the window of implantation is crucial for successful embryo implantation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures. Molecular-based endometrial receptivity analysis and next-generation sequencing provide insights into ER, but there is a lack of research on these in the Indian population, particularly in patients with RIF. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the effectiveness of Optimal Timing for Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (OpERA)-guided personalized embryo transfer (pET) in Indian patients with a history of RIF. Methodology The study includes 158 female patients with a history of failed embryo transfers who underwent OpERA testing before frozen embryo transfer. Patients were categorized based on the number of previous failed transfers. OpERA outcomes were assessed, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with and without OpERA. Endometrial preparation involved hormone replacement therapy, and OpERA testing was performed at the Neuberg Centre for Genomic Medicine using RNA extraction, cDNA conversion, and sequencing. Results OpERA outcomes showed no significant differences in receptive rates among patient groups. Group 3, with three or more failed transfers, exhibited significantly higher biochemical pregnancy rates (BPRs), clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs), and abortion rates (ARs) compared to Groups 1 and 2. OpERA with PGT-A showed significantly higher BPR, implantation rate, CPR, and lower AR compared to OpERA without PGT-A. Conclusions OpERA-guided pET, especially with PGT-A, demonstrated improved pregnancy outcomes, particularly in patients with a history of RIF. The study emphasizes the importance of OpERA in determining optimal transfer timing, moving beyond the traditional reliance on embryo quality alone. OpERA presents promise in predicting pregnancy outcomes for Indian patients with previous IVF failures. The integration of OpERA and PGT-A represents a significant advancement in personalized reproductive medicine, offering new hope for individuals grappling with infertility complexities.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical and Embryological Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques.

Background: The emergence of the COVID pandemic unfolded a series of precautions and dilemmas and the complete suspension of health services. With the gradual emergence of data showing near minimal effects of the virus on pregnancy, Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) services were gradually resumed following guidelines and advisories. Aim: The purpose of this study was to detect the COVID positivity rate in women undergoing ART treatment during the COVID pandemic and compare clinical and embryological outcomes to the ART cycles performed in the pre-COVID era. Study Setting and Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation, followed by a fresh or frozen embryo transfer (ET) between 1st October 2019 and 31st March 2020 (control group) and between 1st April 2020 and 31st September 2020 (study group) at Nova IVF Fertility Clinic, Ahmedabad. Material and Methods: The study group underwent ART during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in India and when gradual unlocking of facilities including ART was advised as per the national ART advisory by the ICMR in December 2020. The outcomes were compared with the control group (cycles in pre-covid time). Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS (v25.0) and included Mann-Whitney U, Fisher's exact and Pearson Chi-square as appropriate. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 367 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) stimulations were initiated. A total of 342 retrievals and 606 ETs (171 fresh and 435 frozen) were completed during the study period with a COVID positivity rate of 6.8% (25/367) amongst fresh and 3.9% (18/453) amongst frozen ETs, respectively; the PR and IR in the study group was similar to the control group (47.6 vs. 55.1 P = 0.4 and 68.7 vs. 66.4; P = 0.52, respectively). The maternal complication rates were similar in both groups with a COVID positivity rate of 10.2% (23/225) and 1 maternal death in the study group. The live birth rates were similar. Conclusions: We did not find a noteworthy difference in the clinical and embryological outcomes in the IVF cycles conducted in the COVID era as compared to the pre-COVID time. Thus, with adequate precautions and safety measures, ART services conducted during the COVID pandemic have comparable birth outcomes and can be safely advocated.

Follicular phase cycle programming using estradiol in oocyte donors-a convenient and effective approach.

Objective: To study the efficacy of estradiol for cycle programming in oocyte donors when administered in the follicular phase only. Design: Prospective interventional study. Setting: Single fertility center. Patients: Ninety-three oocyte donors underwent programmed stimulation using estradiol in the follicular phase. Their previous unprogrammed cycles were used as historical controls. Interventions: Donors received 8 mg of estradiol hemihydrate from day 2 till 1 day before the start of stimulation. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures studied were the number of oocytes retrieved, duration of stimulation, and total gonadotropin dose. The number of mature oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate were the secondary outcomes. Results: The average number of oocytes retrieved was higher in the study group (36.4 vs. 32.5). The duration of stimulation (9.22 vs. 9.21 days) and the total gonadotropin dose were similar (3,085.5 vs. 3,026 IU) between both groups. The mean number of mature oocytes retrieved was higher in the study group (30.1 vs. 26.3), but the maturation rate was similar (84.6% vs. 81.2%). The fertilization rate (77.8% vs. 78.7%), number of blastocysts, blastulation rate (32.7% vs. 33.2%), implantation rate (59.3% vs. 66.3%), and pregnancy rate (77.3% vs. 77.1%) showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Estradiol usage in the follicular phase alone is an effective and convenient option for cycle programming in oocyte donors. It can yield similar mature oocytes and does not affect the clinical outcomes. Further larger sample-sized studies may be needed to validate its use which can also be extended to routine in vitro fertilization cycles. Clinical Trials Registration Number: CTRI/2020/09/027815.

A Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy of Two Different Estradiol Formulations during In Vitro Fertilization.

Improvements in stimulation protocols, introduction of vitrification, and changes in clinical practices have contributed to improved efficacy and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. This has also led to a concomitant increase in number of cycles requiring hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol for performing an embryo transfer. Successful implantation is dependent on endometrial thickness which in turn is regulated by temporal regulation of hormones. Careful control of estrogen levels determines uterine receptivity. One of the most used drugs for achieving appropriate endometrial lining of >7 mm in HRT is estradiol valerate. Although different estrogen formulations with varying physicochemical properties exist, there is not enough literature to support if the differences translate into a discernible clinical outcome in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) setting. Objective and Method. In this study, retrospective in nature, we compare the efficacy of oral estradiol hemihydrate with estradiol valerate in HRT cycles in 2,529 Indian women, undergoing treatment at a center in India between Jan 2017 and May 2019. Results. Our results primarily indicate that between the estradiol valerate and estradiol hemihydrate treatment groups, the implantation rate (IR) was 47.42% and 49.07%, respectively (P value 0.284), and the endometrial thickness (mean ± SEM in mm) that was achieved was 9.25 ± 0.038 mm and 9.57 ± 0.058 mm (P value < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences observed in the secondary outcome measures including clinical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy, and live birth rate. Conclusions. Hence, this study concludes that oral estradiol hemihydrate and estradiol valerate are therapeutically equivalent and provide similar clinical outcomes in an IVF setting.

Effect of Endometrial Thickness and duration of Estrogen Supplementation on In Vitro Fertilization-Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes in Fresh Ovum/Embryo Donation Cycles.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding optimal endometrial thickness and duration of estrogen supplementation in embryo transfer cycles, at present. AIMS: To observe the effect of endometrial thickness and/or duration of estrogen supplementation on in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in fresh ovum/embryo donation cycles. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. The study was conducted from January 2015 to November 2017. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and fifty seven fresh blastocyst transfer cycles in the recipients of oocyte/embryo donation regardless of reproductive history and diagnosis conducted at Nova IVF Fertility, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Of these, 315 women had single embryo transfer (SET), while 642 had double embryo transfer (DET). Only fresh blastocysts derived from oocytes of young donors (≤30 years) and transferred in a uniform hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycle were included. The effect of endometrial thickness and duration of estrogen on live birth rate (LBR) and other IVF/ICSI outcomes were analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A significant improvement in LBR was noted in the recipients with each millimeter increase in endometrial thickness starting from 6 mm after transfer of either single (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3, P = 0.003) or double (OR = 1.14, P = 0.0218) blastocysts. Lower LBR was observed in recipients having SET and who received estrogen supplementation of <10 days (OR = 0.72; P = 0.02). Implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate also improved significantly with endometrial thickness, but there was no change in clinical abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: After minimizing the possible oocyte factor by including only donor oocytes and that of COH using a uniform HRT protocol, LBR improved with each millimeter increase in endometrial thickness starting from 6 mm. Shorter duration of estrogen supplementation (<10 days) reduced the chances of live birth in recipients after transfer of a single blastocyst.

Chemotherapy Can Interfere in Implantation in In-vitro Fertilization.

Improvement in cancer treatments has allowed more women to plan a pregnancy once the disease is cured. The effects of chemotherapy on ovaries are well proven but those on the uterus, especially the endometrium and embryo implantation are still unknown. Usage of newer tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as nilotinib has revolutionized the management of leukemias. Although nilotinib has been reported to be safe in pregnancy, further studies are needed to evaluate its effect on the process of embryo implantation, especially in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization. We report a case where successful pregnancy outcome was achieved after stoppage of nilotinib before embryo transfer in a woman who had previous four failed attempts while on nilotinib and no other obvious cause of implantation failure. Despite optimal endometrial thickness and receptivity, the pale appearance of endometrium on hysteroscopy was attributed to be a possible effect of nilotinib and prompted us to withhold it.

The Influence of Delayed Blastocyst Development on the Outcome of Frozen-Thawed Transfer of Euploid and Untested Embryos.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to compare live birth rates (LBRs) following frozen embryo transfer (FET) of euploid day 5 with day 6 blastocysts. We also compared LBRs following FET of untested blastocysts vitrified on day 5 and day 6 in self-oocyte and ovum donation (OD) cycles. DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. SETTING: Nova IVF Fertility, Ahmedabad. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven FET using self-oocytes following preimplantation genetic testing A (PGT-A), 464 FET following OD, and 907 FET using self-oocytes without PGT-A testing between January 2016 and December 2017 were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: LBR following FET in day 5 versus day 6 blastocysts in euploid embryos using self-oocytes and in untested embryos using both self and donor oocytes. RESULTS: In PGT-A cycles, no statistically significant difference was observed in LBRs following transfer of euploid blastocysts developed on day 5 or day 6 (D5: 53%; D6:40%, P = 0.83). However, the LBRs with day 5 blastocysts were higher compared with day 6 group in untested group using both self and donor oocytes (self D5: 52.7%; D6: 38.2%; P = 0.001 and OD D5: 44.7%; D6: 29.8%; P = 0.001). Miscarriage rates were comparable in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated comparable pregnancy outcomes following FET of euploid embryos vitrified on day 5 and day 6. However, higher LBRs were reported in day 5 group in untested embryos.

Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Twin Deliveries as Compared to Singleton Deliveries following In vitro Fertilization.

BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancy is an iatrogenic complication following in vitro fertilization (IVF) that can be decreased using elective single-embryo transfer. However, the risks associated with twin pregnancy following IVF as compared to singleton IVF pregnancy need to be further evaluated. AIM: This study aims to compare the maternal, perinatal, and neonatal complications in singleton and twin pregnancies following IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Settings and Design: Retrospective observational cohort study using previously collected routine patient data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Singleton and twin deliveries following IVF/ICSI from January 2014 to August 2015 were included. Data were collected from patient records and the obstetricians of the patients. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: SPSS was used for analysis. Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test were used for continuous and categorical data, respectively. Significance was kept at 0.05. RESULTS: There were 897 singleton and 382 twin deliveries (total of 1661 babies). The mean gestational age at delivery was lower in twin deliveries (34.9 ± 3.1 weeks) as compared to singleton deliveries (36.8 ± 3.2 weeks, P < 0.001). The overall incidence of maternal complications was higher in twin pregnancies (29.3% vs. 21.3%, odds ratio = 1.53, 95% confidence interval = 1.17-2.01; P = 0.003). The mean birth weight of babies was significantly lower (2.02 ± 0.58 kg vs. 2.71 ± 0.68 kg; P < 0.001) and the incidence of stillbirth plus neonatal death was higher (7.5% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.01) in the twin group as compared to the singleton group. CONCLUSION: Twin deliveries, following IVF/ICSI deliver at lower gestational age, have lower birth weight and have higher odds of stillbirth plus neonatal death as compared to singleton deliveries following IVF/ICSI.

Personalized Embryo Transfer Helps in Improving In vitro Fertilization/ICSI Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure.

AIMS: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes in patients of recurrent implantation failure (RIF), who had embryo transfer (ET) following a receptive (R) endometrial receptivity array (ERA) and a personalized embryo transfer (pET) after a nonreceptive (NR) ERA. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. STUDY PERIOD: July 2013-September 2017. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and forty-eight patients having unexplained RIF who underwent ERA test were included in the study. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients having a receptive (R) ERA and those having a NR ERA who underwent a pET-based on ERA. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square and t-test. RESULTS: ERA predicted receptive (R) endometrium at P + 5 in 82.3% (204/248) patients and NR in 17.7% (44/248) patients. Average failed previous in vitro fertilization cycles were 3.67 ± 1.67 among receptive ERA patients and 4.09 ± 1.68 among NR ERA patients. Pregnancy rate (PR), clinical PR, implantation rate (IR), abortion rate (AR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and cumulative PR were comparable between patients having receptive ERA who had a routine Embryo Transfer (ET) and those with an NR ERA who underwent a pET. CONCLUSIONS: ERA is helpful in identifying the window of implantation (WOI) through genetic expressions of the endometrium to pinpoint embryo transfer timing. pET guided by ERA in patients of RIF with displaced WOI improves IRs and OPRs.

Prevalence of structural birth defects in IVF-ICSI pregnancies resulting from autologous and donor oocytes in Indian sub-continent: Results from 2444 births.

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the incidence of birth defects in In-Vitro Fertilization-Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (IVF-ICSI) pregnancies with autologous and donor oocytes. As a secondary outcome, the prevalence of birth defects in IVF-ICSI pregnancies was compared with those from spontaneous conceptions in India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 2444 births resulting from IVF-ICSI cycles from autologous (n = 1743) and donor oocytes (n = 701) during a 3-year period in an Indian infertility center. Birth defects, if any, were noted antenatally and followed till the neonatal period, in case of live birth. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of birth defects in IVF-ICSI pregnancies in this study was 29/2444 (118.6/10 000 births) and the most common congenital anomaly was cardiac malformation (32.7/10 000 births) followed by genitourinary (28.6/10 000 births). The risks of birth defects resulting from autologous and donor oocytes did not differ (114.7/10 000 vs 128.38/10 000; P > 0.05). However, pregnancies resulting from autologous oocytes had a higher trend of gastrointestinal birth defects (20.5/10 000 births vs 0), though not statistically significant. The risk of cardiovascular birth defects resulting from IVF-ICSI pregnancies was much higher compared with the natural conceptions in India (32.7/10 000 vs 12.7/10 000 births; P = 0.03), whereas the risk of central nervous system malformations was much lower (8.1/10 000 vs 60.18/10 000 births; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no significant difference in birth defects resulting from IVF-ICSI with autologous or donor oocytes. The births resulting from IVF-ICSI pregnancies did not tend to have a higher rate of birth defects a compared with natural conceptions. The differences in the prevalence of certain birth defects (cardiovascular or central nervous system) reported in IVF-ICSI pregnancies may be due to improved surveillance modalities and early detection in pregnancies following IVF-ICSI. A study with larger number of sample size will give us better understanding of the prevalence of reported incidence in this study.

India's First Child using PGT-M, PGT-A and HLA Matching for Helping a Sibling having ß-Thalassemia Major.

ß-thalassemia is a common single-gene disorder in India, with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) being the only cure. HSCT with matched unrelated donor is less successful, whereas finding a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor is difficult. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) with HLA matching is a novel option to have a matched sibling for HSCT for couples having an affected child. We present the first such case report in India. A couple, both carriers of ß-thalassemia and having an affected son, underwent PGT-M with HLA matching combined with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies of embryos to have a ß - thalassemia-free child. This resulted in birth of a 10/10 HLA-matched sibling.