Effects of Local Treatment in Combination with Systemic Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Purpose: Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival benefits. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the addition of local therapy to systemic treatments in patients with advanced EC. Methods and Materials: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Key eligibility criteria included studies that enrolled patients with histologically confirmed EC or esophagogastric junction cancer with metastasis or recurrence and compared survival benefits between the combined local and systemic treatment group and the systemic treatment alone group. Survival outcomes, represented by hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were pooled using a random effects model. The MINORS score was adopted for quality assessment. Risk of bias was statistically examined by Begg's and Egger's tests. Results: A total of 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 qualified retrospective studies including 14,489 patients were identified. Addition of local therapy to systemic treatment significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81; P < .0001) compared with systemic treatment alone. The subgroup analysis revealed that combined local and systemic treatment conferred a significant survival advantage in both patients with oligometastasis (PFS: HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; P < .0001; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; P < .0001) and recurrence (OS: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; P = .002). Conclusions: In conclusion, addition of local treatment to systemic therapy can improve survival in patients with advanced EC, particularly in those with oligometastasis or recurrent diseases.

Preoperative CT-based radiomic prognostic index to predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. A subset of patients may benefit from PORT. We aimed to identify patients with NSCLC who could benefit from PORT. METHODS: Patients from cohorts 1 and 2 with pathological Tany N2 M0 NSCLC were included, as well as patients with non-metastatic NSCLC from cohorts 3 to 6. The radiomic prognostic index (RPI) was developed using radiomic texture features extracted from the primary lung nodule in preoperative chest CT scans in cohort 1 and validated in other cohorts. We employed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regularisation model for data dimension reduction, feature selection, and the construction of the RPI. We created a lymph-radiomic prognostic index (LRPI) by combining RPI and positive lymph node number (PLN). We compared the outcomes of patients who received PORT against those who did not in the subgroups determined by the LRPI. RESULTS: In total, 228, 1003, 144, 422, 19, and 21 patients were eligible in cohorts 1-6. RPI predicted overall survival (OS) in all six cohorts: cohort 1 (HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.18-4.52), cohort 2 (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.26-2.14), cohort 3 (HR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.45-4.3), cohort 4 (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.52), cohort 5 (HR = 2.56, 95% CI: 0.73-9.02), cohort 6 (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 0.53-10.03). LRPI predicted OS (C-index: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.75) better than the pT stage (C-index: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.63), pT + PLN (C-index: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.46-0.70), and RPI (C-index: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.75). The LRPI was used to categorize individuals into three risk groups; patients in the moderate-risk group benefited from PORT (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.91; p = 0.02), while patients in the low-risk and high-risk groups did not. CONCLUSIONS: We developed preoperative CT-based radiomic and lymph-radiomic prognostic indexes capable of predicting OS and the benefits of PORT for patients with NSCLC.

Network analysis of histopathological image features and genomics data improving prognosis performance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer, but the prediction of prognosis remains a challenge. METHODS: We collected whole-slide histopathological images, corresponding clinical and genetic information from the The Cancer Imaging Archive and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases and randomly divided patients into training (n = 197) and validation (n = 84) cohorts. After feature extraction by CellProfiler, we used 2 different machine learning techniques (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation-regularized Cox and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination) and weighted gene co-expression network analysis to select prognosis-related image features and genes, respectively. These features and genes were integrated into a joint model using random forest and used to create a nomogram that combines other predictive indicators. RESULTS: A total of 4 overlapped features were identified, represented by the computed histopathological risk score in the random forest model, and showed predictive value for overall survival (test set: 1-year area under the curves (AUC) = 0.726, 3-year AUC = 0.727, and 5-year AUC = 0.764). The histopathological-genetic risk score (HGRS) integrating the genetic information computed performed better than the model that used image features only (test set: 1-year AUC = 0.682, 3-year AUC = 0.734, and 5-year AUC = 0.78). The nomogram (gender, stage, and HGRS) achieved the highest net benefit according to decision curve analysis compared to HGRS or clinical model. CONCLUSION: This study developed a histopathological-genetic-related nomogram by combining histopathological features and clinical predictors, providing a more comprehensive prognostic assessment for clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients.

Safety of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy on the Sheep with Pulmonary Cystic Echinococcosis: A Preliminary Study.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy showed the potential to effectively kill the cysts of pulmonary cystic echinococcosis (CE). However, little is known about its safety. This study was designed to investigate the safety of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) on the normal lung tissue adjacent to the cyst and blood of sheep naturally infected with pulmonary CE. METHODS: Twenty pulmonary CE sheep were randomly divided into control group (n = 5) and radiation groups with a dose of 30 Gray (Gy) (n = 5), 45 Gy (n = 5), and 60 Gy (n = 5), respectively. Animals in control group received no radiation. Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70), tumor growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 in the lung tissues adjacent to the cysts, which were considered to be closely related to the pathogenesis of CE, were evaluated after 3D-CRT. A routine blood test was conducted. RESULTS: The results showed that there were multiple cysts of various sizes with protoscoleces in the lung tissues of sheep, and necrotic cysts were found after 3D-CRT. 3D-CRT significantly increased the mRNA level of Hsp70, enhanced the protein level of TGF-ß and slightly increased the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in lung tissues adjacent to the cysts. 3D-CRT did not significantly alter the amount of WBC, HB and PLT in sheep blood. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that 3D-CRT may suppress the inflammation and induce less damage of the normal lung tissues and blood. We preliminarily showed that 3D-CRT under a safe dose may be used to treat pulmonary CE.

Enhanced prediction of postoperative radiotherapy-induced esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer: Dosiomic model development in a real-world cohort and validation in the PORT-C randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy-induced esophagitis (RE) diminishes the quality of life and interrupts treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing postoperative radiotherapy. Dosimetric models showed limited capability in predicting RE. We aimed to develop dosiomic models to predict RE. METHODS: Models were trained with a real-world cohort and validated with PORT-C randomized controlled trial cohort. Patients with NSCLC undergoing resection followed by postoperative radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015 were enrolled. The endpoint was grade ≥2 RE. Esophageal three-dimensional dose distribution features were extracted using handcrafted and convolutional neural network (CNN) methods, screened using an entropy-based method, and selected using minimum redundancy and maximum relevance. Prediction models were built using logistic regression. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and precision-recall curve were used to evaluate prediction model performance. A dosimetric model was built for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 190 and 103 patients were enrolled in the training and validation sets, respectively. Using handcrafted and CNN methods, 107 and 4096 features were derived, respectively. Three handcrafted, four CNN-extracted and three dosimetric features were selected. AUCs of training and validation sets were 0.737 and 0.655 for the dosimetric features, 0.730 and 0.724 for handcrafted features, and 0.812 and 0.785 for CNN-extracted features, respectively. Precision-recall curves revealed that CNN-extracted features outperformed dosimetric and handcrafted features. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models may identify patients at high risk of developing RE. Dosiomic models outperformed the dosimetric-feature model in predicting RE. CNN-extracted features were more predictive but less interpretable than handcrafted features.

Higher Lung and Heart Doses Decrease Early and Long-Term Survival, Respectively, in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Radiation.

Purpose: Cardiopulmonary toxic effects may reduce the efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have examined whether the heart and lung doses affect overall survival (OS). We investigated the correlation of heart and lung doses with OS in patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. Methods and Materials: This retrospective analysis included 307 patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. The total dose was 50 Gy. Landmark analyses were performed at 36 months, with hazard ratios (HRs) calculated separately for events occurring up to 36 months (early survival) and after 36 months (long-term survival). Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was performed to balance the characteristics of the high- and low-dose groups. We performed sensitivity analyses at 24 and 48 months. Results: The median follow-up period was 67.42 months. Heart doses were significantly correlated with long-term survival (HR, 1.14; P = .015) but not with early survival (HR, 0.97; P = .41) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .58). Lung doses were marginally significantly correlated with early survival (HR, 1.03; P = .07) but not with long-term survival (HR, 1.00; P = .85) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .12). Higher heart and lung doses were associated with decreased long-term and early survival, respectively, before and after sIPTW. Landmark analyses at 24 and 48 months showed consistent results. Conclusions: For patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT, a higher heart dose was associated with decreased long-term survival, whereas a higher lung dose was associated with decreased early survival.

Radiotherapy Improves Survival of Patients With Lymphovascular Invasion in pT1b Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for pT1b esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is unclear whether additional radiotherapy can improve patient survival. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy after ESD for pT1b ESCC. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study involving 11 hospitals in China. Between January 2010 and December 2019, patients with T1bN0M0 ESCC treated with or without adjuvant radiotherapy after ESD were included. Survival between groups was compared. RESULTS: Overall, 774 patients were screened, and 161 patients were included. Forty-seven patients (29.2%) received adjuvant radiotherapy after ESD (RT group) and 114 (70.8%) underwent ESD alone (non-RT group). There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the RT and non-RT groups. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was the only prognostic factor. In the LVI+ group, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved survival (5-year OS: 91.7% vs 59.5%, P = 0.050; 5-year DFS: 92.9% vs 42.6%, P = 0.010). In the LVI- group, adjuvant radiotherapy did not improve survival (5-year OS: 83.5% vs 93.9%, P = 0.148; 5-year DFS: 84.2% vs 84.7%, P = 0.907). The standardized mortality ratios were 1.52 (95% confidence interval 0.04-8.45) in the LVI+ group with radiotherapy and 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.15-1.42) in the LVI- group without radiotherapy. DISCUSSION: Adjuvant radiotherapy could improve survival in pT1b ESCC with LVI+ other than LVI- after ESD. Selective adjuvant radiotherapy based on LVI status achieved survival rates similar to those of the general population.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Significant progress has been made in the investigation of neoadjuvant immune-chemoradiotherapy (NICRT) and neoadjuvant immune-chemotherapy (NICT) on the outcomes of esophageal cancer patients. To summarize the current developments, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. Methods: A search strategy of prospective studies on esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy was predefined to scan PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and additional major conferences for prospective studies. Efficacy was assessed by pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and R0 resection rates. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), neoadjuvant therapy completion rate, surgical resection rate, and surgical delay rate. Differences between the NICRT and NICT groups were also analyzed. Results: A total of 38 studies qualified for the analysis. The pooled pCR, MPR, and R0 resection rates were 30, 58, and 99%, respectively. The pCR and MPR in the NICRT vs. NICT group were 38% vs. 28% (p=0.078) and 67% vs. 57% (p=0.181), respectively. The pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 24% (NICRT,58%, I2 = 61% vs. NICT,18%, I2 = 79%; p<0.001). In addition, the pooled neoadjuvant therapy completion and surgical resection rates were 92% and 85%, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant between the NICRT and NICT groups. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy is effective and safe in the short term for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, further randomized trials are needed to confirm which combined model is more favorable. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021284266, identifier CRD42021284266.

Famitinib enhances the antitumor effect of radioimmunotherapy in murine lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Combining antiangiogenic therapy with radioimmunotherapy is believed to further improve antitumor efficacy, but there is still a lack of evidence to support this. This study aimed to investigate the role of the tumor vascular-targeted agent famitinib with a combination of radiotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor in murine lung cancer. METHODS: The effect of VEGFA and HIF1A on clinical prognosis and the tumor immune microenvironment was analyzed using public databases. Enrichment analyses of post-irradiation gene expression and mRNAs related to immunotherapy efficacy were carried out based on GEO datasets. A C57BL/6 mouse subcutaneous tumor model was used to evaluate the antitumor effects of different treatment schemes. The tumor immunophenotyping was identified by flow cytometry. RESULTS: We demonstrated that high level of VEGFA and HIF1A expression in lung cancer was related to poor prognosis and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In a mouse model, the triple therapy of famitinib, radiotherapy and immunotherapy had the most dramatic antitumor activity. It significantly increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and reversed the immunosuppressive state of the tumor microenvironment in mice. Compared with radioimmunotherapy, the addition of famitinib further promoted the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and M1 type tumor associated macrophages, and reduced the number of myeloid suppressor cells. Therefore, triple therapy converted the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment into an immunostimulatory one. CONCLUSION: Famitinib can synergize with radioimmunotherapy by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment in murine lung cancer.

Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The best pattern of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer has not been determined. Our study evaluated the efficacy and postoperative events of different treatments using the Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically tracked randomized clinical trials from the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The following treatments were included: neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (NCRT + S), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCT + S), neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery (NRT + S), and surgery alone (S). The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools were used to assess the quality of included trials. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival or disease-free survival (PFS/DFS) were assessed through hazard ratios (HR). Locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, postoperative mortality, and postoperative morbidity were assessed through odds ratios (OR). These outcomes were compared between different treatments through Bayesian network meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty trials with 4384 patients were included. Compared with S, only NCRT + S could significantly improve OS for patients with esophageal cancer (HR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.88). NCRT + S and NCT + S significantly improved PFS/DFS compared with S (NCRT + S vs. S, HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.81; NCT + S vs. S, HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.97). NCRT + S significantly reduced both locoregional recurrence (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88) and distant metastasis (OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.90) compared with S. There were no differences in postoperative morbidity between the four treatments. However, NCRT + S also increased postoperative mortality compared with S (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.09-2.82) and NCT + S (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.11-3.51). CONCLUSION: NCRT + S is the most efficient neoadjuvant treatment for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer. However, NCRT + S increases the risk of postoperative mortality but not morbidity.

In vitro Scolicidal Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil and Radiation Against Protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus Sensu Lato.

PURPOSE: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.) is a globally distributed zoonosis. CE treatment is difficult, but radiation and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can be effective. However, the combination of radiation and 5-FU has not been reported. This study evaluated the effect of combination of 5-FU and radiation on E. granulosus s.l. protoscoleces (PSCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, PSCs were collected from the liver of diseased sheep, and some were exposed to a single dose of 20 Gy 6-MV X-ray combined with (5 µg/mL or 10 µg/mL) 5-FU in vitro. Methylene blue staining was used to detect the viability of the PSCs. Transcription of EgHSP70 and Egp38 was measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT- PCR). RESULTS: A single dose of radiation killed 18% of the PSCs, and 5-FU showed weak parasiticidal efficacy on the first day of treatment. After 14 d, 5 µg and 10 µg/mL of 5-FU killed 40.20% and 50.02% of the PSCs, whereas 20 Gy of radiation killed 31.44%. The combination of 5-FU (10 µg/mL) with 20 Gy of radiation showed 77.55% killing efficacy. qRT-PCR showed that 5-FU inhibited Egp38 expression, whereas radiation increased its expression. EgHSP70 was highly expressed 14 days after radiation treatment. The data indicate that 5-FU has parasiticidal efficacy against the PSCs of E. granulosus s.l. CONCLUSION: The lethal efficacy of PSCs caused by a single dose of radiation exposure is related to the upregulated expression level of Egp38 and EgHSP70. The killing effect of 5-FU (10 µg/mL) with 20Gy of radiation was significantly better than that of single treatment group. This study provided a basis for the potential role of 5-FU combined with radiation in the treatment of CE.

Anlotinib Enhances the Antitumor Activity of High-Dose Irradiation Combined with Anti-PD-L1 by Potentiating the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Murine Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radioimmunotherapy has become one of the most promising strategies for cancer treatment. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that antiangiogenic therapy can improve the efficacy of immunotherapy and sensitize radiotherapy through a variety of mechanisms. However, it is undefined whether angiogenesis inhibitors can enhance the effect of radioimmunotherapy. In this study, we aim to explore the role of anlotinib (AL3818) on the combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in Lewis lung carcinoma mouse. METHODS: C57BL/6 mouse subcutaneous tumor model was used to evaluate the ability of different treatment regimens in tumor growth control. Immune response and immunophenotyping including the quantification and activation were determined by flow cytometry, multiplex immunofluorescence, and multiplex immunoassay. RESULTS: Triple therapy (radiotherapy combined with anti-PD-L1 and anlotinib) increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and reversed the immunosuppressive effect of radiation on the tumor microenvironment in mouse model. Compared with radioimmunotherapy, the addition of anlotinib also boosted the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and M1 cells and caused a decrease in the number of MDSCs and M2 cells in mice. The levels of IFN-gamma and IL-18 were the highest in the triple therapy group, while the levels of IL-23, IL-13, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and Arg-1 were significantly reduced. NF-κB, MAPK, and AKT pathways were downregulated in triple therapy compared with radioimmunotherapy. Thus, the tumor immune microenvironment was significantly improved. As a consequence, triple therapy displayed greater benefit in antitumor efficacy. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that anlotinib might be a potential synergistic treatment for radioimmunotherapy to achieve better antitumor efficacy in NSCLC patients by potentiating the tumor immune microenvironment.

Postoperative radiotherapy improves survival of patients with ypN2 non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery - A propensity score matching study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

BACKGROUND: For patients with ypN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCS), the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of PORT on survival of ypN2 NSCLC patients after NCS. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2015, patients with ypN2 NSCLC after NCS were filtrated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the PORT and non-PORT groups. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were adopted to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: A total of 257 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. After PSM, 115 patients remained in each group. The survival of patients in the PORT group was significantly better than those in the non-PORT group. Median OS was 36 months vs. 26 months, and 5-year OS rate was 40.5% vs. 21.0% (p = 0.002). The median CSS was 38 months vs. 27 months, and the 5-year CSS rate was 43.7% vs. 22.1% (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that PORT was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82, p = 0.001) and CSS (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.78, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the following subgroups could benefit from PORT: age ≤ 70, diagnosed in the later period (2010-2015), white race, squamous cell carcinoma, grade III-IV, lobectomy, stage T3-4, or with positive regional nodes ≤3 or > 3. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ypN2 NSCLC after NCS, PORT significantly improves OS and CSS. These results need to be confirmed by further randomized studies.

[Review for N2 Sub-staging in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were heterogeneous groups and required further stratification. The International Society for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) divided N2 into three sub-stages: N2 at a single station without N1 involvement (N2a1), N2 at a single station with N1 involvement (N2a2), and N2 at multiple stations (N2b). These new descriptors significantly distinguished the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern of patients with different N2 sub-stages. The OS and DFS of N2a1 were not sufficiently distinguished from N1 at multiple stations (N1b). The OS and DFS of N2a2 were intermediate between those of N2a1 and N2b. Current evidence did not support the further subdivision of the N2b. The main recurrence pattern of N2a1, N2a2 and N2b were distant metastasis, and the risks of distant metastasis increased successively. N2a1 patients were at low risk of locoregional recurrence, which could not be reduced by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). N2a2 and N2b patients had a similar higher risk of locoregional recurrence, which could be reduced to a similar level of N2a1 patients by PORT.
.

A Nomogram for Predicting Brain Metastasis in IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Complete Resection: A Competing Risk Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastasis (BM) is one of the most common failure patterns of pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) can improve intracranial control but not overall survival. Thus, it is particularly important to identify the risk factors that are associated with BM and subsequently provide instructions for selecting patients who will optimally benefit from PCI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2011 and 2014, patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC who underwent complete resection in our institution were reviewed and enrolled in the study. Clinical characteristics, pathological parameters, treatment mode, BM time, and overall survival were analyzed. A nomogram was built based on the corresponding parameters by Fine and Gray's competing risk analysis to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year probabilities of BM. Receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration curves were chosen for validation. A statistically significant difference was set as P <0.05. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 53.2 months (range, 0.50-123.17 months). The median age was 57 (range, 25-80) years. Of the 517 patients, 122 (23.6%) had squamous cell carcinoma, 391 (75.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 144 (27.3%) received post-operative radiotherapy. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 94.0, 72.9, and 66.0%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year BM rates were 5.4, 15.7, and 22.2%, respectively. According to the univariate analysis, female, non-smokers, patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma, bronchial invasion, perineural invasion, and patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to develop BM. In a multivariate analysis, non-squamous cell carcinoma (subdistribution hazard ratios, SHR: 3.968; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.743-9.040; P = 0.0010), bronchial invasion (SHR: 2.039, 95% CI: 1.325-3.139; P = 0.0012), perineural invasion (SHR: 2.514, 95% CI: 1.058-5.976; P = 0.0370), and adjuvant chemotherapy (SHR: 2.821, 95% CI: 1.424-5.589; P = 0.0030) were independent risk factors for BM. A nomogram model was established based on the final multivariable analysis result. The area under the curve was 0.767 (95% CI, 0.758-0.777). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC after complete resection, a nomogram was established based on clinicopathological factors and treatment patterns for predicting the BM. Based on this nomogram, patients with a high risk of BM who may benefit from PCI can be screened.

Survival of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. Surgery is the primary treatment but with poor results. Attempts to improve patient survival have been made by introducing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both. However, randomized comparisons for all these strategies are not always available. This network meta-analysis compared the overall survival of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy with surgery alone to identify the most effective approach. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for relevant studies published before April 2021. Only phase II and III randomized controlled trials comparing the following treatments were included: surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), radiotherapy (NRT) or chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), radiotherapy (ART), or chemoradiotherapy (ACRT). The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) was identified as the measurement of effectiveness. A network meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the evidence under the Bayesian framework, and the relative effects of all possible comparisons were made. The ranking analysis was performed to support the decision in clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 19 relevant trials with 3,749 patients were identified. Compared with surgery alone, NCRT (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89) and NCT (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94) significantly improved OS, while other treatments, including NRT (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66-1.08), ACRT (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.49-1.08), ACT (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.75-1.21), and ART (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66-1.14), provided no significant survival advantage. None of the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments showed a statistically significant difference in OS to each other when compared in pairs. CONCLUSION: For resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, this network meta-analysis showed that NCRT may be the optimal strategy, NCT may be the second choice, while other multimodality treatments could not improve OS compared with surgery alone. It remains unclear whether ESCC will benefit from adding radiotherapy into the neoadjuvant treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: We registered this meta-analysis protocol at the prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=172745 (Identification code: CRD42020172745).

Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 2 is a novel prognostic marker in lung adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 2 (LCP2) is often ectopically expressed in various human tumors. However, the clinical significance and role of LCP2 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unclear. This study explored the prognostic significance of LCP2 in LUAD patients. METHODS: LCP2 expression in LUAD tissues was analyzed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Genotype-Tissue Expression databases. Western blotting was employed to detect LCP2 expression in LUAD. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses were performed to explore signaling pathways mediated by LCP2 co-regulatory genes. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine levels of LCP2 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in 68 LUAD patients. Associations between LCP2 expression and clinicopathological features, prognoses, and PD-L1 levels among the LUAD in-patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 68 LUAD in-patients, LCP2 expression was correlated with clinical stage and lymph node metastasis. LUAD patients with high LCP2 expression were associated with increased overall survival. LCP2 expression may be associated with an enrichment of several immune functions. Moreover, our immunohistochemistry results demonstrated that LCP2 expression was positively correlated with PD-L1 expression in LUAD tissues. CONCLUSIONS: In the study, LCP2 was found to be a favorable prognostic biomarker in LUAD patients.

Quaking I-5 protein inhibits invasion and migration of kidney renal clear cell carcinoma via inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition suppression through the regulation of microRNA 200c.

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that quaking I-5 protein (QKI-5) plays crucial roles in the metastasis of various kinds of cancers. However, the function and mechanism of QKI-5 in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) metastasis remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the mechanism of QKI-5 in the metastasis of KIRC. METHODS: The expression of QKI-5 was detected using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot in KIRC tissues and different cell lines. Immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the quantity of QKI-5 in primary and metastases of KIRC. Cell migration and invasion were measured using wound healing and transwell assays respectively. The quantity of epithelial mesenchymal transition marker proteins was detected using western blot and immunofluorescence staining. The interaction of QKI-5 via microRNA 200c (miR-200c) was confirmed using dual luciferase reporter assay. RESULTS: Although QKI-5 was significantly more likely to be downregulated in KIRC tissues than that in normal Kidney tissues, it was dramatically elevated in metastatic KIRC tumors. Upregulation of QKI-5 promoted cell migration and invasion and elevated the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker proteins, including vimentin, snail and slug, while it was downregulated for E-cadherin. Furthermore, a dual luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that QKI-5 was a direct target of miR-200c, and that miR-200c could reverse the effect of QKI-5 on cell migration, invasion, and expression of EMT marker proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that downregulation of QKI-5 by miR-200c attenuated KIRC migration and invasion via the EMT process, indicating that QKI-5 may be a potential therapeutic target and a key indicator of KIRC progression.