Increased oxidative stress caused by impaired mitophagy aggravated liver ischemia and reperfusion injury in diabetic mice.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence has suggested the detrimental role of oxidative stress in aggravating ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury in diabetic livers. Interplay between oxidative stress and mitophagy has been shown. However, the role and mechanism of mitophagy in regulating oxidative stress and IR injury in diabetic livers remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wild-type and db/db (DB) mice were subjected to a partial warm liver IR model. Liver injury, oxidative stress, mitophagy and related molecular pathways were analyzed. RESULTS: Here, we found that increased liver IR injury was observed in DB mice, as evidenced by higher levels of serum alanine aminotransferase and serum aspartate, worsened liver architecture damage and more hepatocellular death. DB mice also showed increased mitochondrial oxidative stress. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species scavenge alleviated liver IR injury in DB mice. Mechanistic analysis showed that 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase-mediated mitophagy was suppressed in DB mice post-IR. Pharmacological activation of 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase by its agonist effectively restored mitophagy activation, leading to decreased mitochondrial oxidative stress and attenuated liver IR injury in DB mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that diabetes increased oxidative stress to exacerbate liver IR injury by impairing 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase-mediated mitophagy. Strategies targeting oxidative stress and mitophagy might provide a promising approach to ameliorate liver IR injury in diabetes patients.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: choledochotomy versus transcystic approach?

PURPOSE: To compare the difference of primary suture following 3-port laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) between modified transcystic and transcholedochal approach in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent 3-port LCBDE by modified transcystic approach (n = 80) and those who underwent 3-port LCBDE by transcholedochal approach (n = 209) were included in this study. The operative time, duration of hospital stay, diameter of the cystic duct, diameter of the common bile duct (CBD), complications, and demographics were retrospectively analyzed in all patients. RESULTS: All operations were successfully performed. No patient was converted to laparotomy. No mortality was associated with the 2 groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for the operative time (91.94 ± 34.21 min vs. 96.13 ± 32.15 min), duration of hospital stay (9.82 ± 3.48 d vs. 10.74 ± 5.34 d), diameter of cystic duct (0.47 ± 0.09 cm vs. 0.47 ± 0.08 cm), and complications (2.5% vs. 2.87%) (all P > 0.05). A significant difference was observed in terms of the diameter of CBD (1.18 ± 0.29 cm vs. 1.04 ± 0.24 cm P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The modified transcystic LCBDE was safe and feasible for treating choledocholithiasis but it might be more suitable for the CBD with a smaller diameter.