Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AJOG Glob Rep ; 2(2): 100038, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36275497

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Maternal-fetal Rh-alloimmunization is a rare but potentially fatal event, most often caused by maternal exposure to D-antigen-presenting Rh-positive erythrocytes at the time of delivery. Prophylaxis with anti-D immune globulin is highly effective with a low side-effect profile and results in a dramatically decreased risk of alloimmunization. Postpartum anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis is recommended by national societies to reduce Rh-alloimmunization. We hypothesized that a small number of postpartum patients do not receive prophylaxis as indicated.  . OBJECTIVE: We investigated patients in 2 separate health systems that did not receive indicated prophylaxis and devised a suite of Electronic Health Record interventions to prevent future errors. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed charts retrospectively from Electronic Health Record data of 2 urban academic health systems, the MetroHealth System and Oregon Health & Science University. We identified all Rh-negative postpartum patients and their infants delivering from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of postpartum patients not receiving indicated anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis. Once cases of missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis were identified, we reviewed individual charts to determine the relevant clinical circumstances and potential causes for error. RESULTS: Of 29,801 deliveries over 5 years (15,444 at MetroHealth System and 14,357 at Oregon Health & Science University), there were 3087 Rh-negative postpartum patients, of whom 7 were alloimmunized and ineligible for prophylaxis. Anti-D immune globulin was indicated for 2162 (70.0%) women as they delivered an Rh-positive infant. A total of 37 indicated patients did not receive postpartum anti-D immune globulin. Twenty patients were offered prophylaxis and declined. We missed a total of 17 opportunities, thus our institutions appropriately offered indicated anti-D prophylaxis to 99.2% of patients over a period of 5 years. Of the 17 true misses, anti-D immune globulin was ordered for some patients, whereas others did not have an anti-D immune globulin order placed. A toolkit in the Electronic Health Record consisting of decision-support hard stops, automated documentation, and longitudinal reporting was implemented at the MetroHealth System in the year after its inception. The Toolkit identified and helped prevent 4 potential misses, resulting in a 100% anti-D prophylaxis rate at the MetroHealth System. CONCLUSION: Given the serious nature of Rh-alloimmunization, we believe missed prophylaxis should be a never event. Through examination of our current processes, we identified areas of improvement and developed a Postpartum Anti-D Immune Globulin Prophylaxis Electronic Health Record Toolkit, which showed improvement in administration rates. Such a toolkit has the potential to identify patients appropriately and avoid missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis events.

2.
Crit Care Med ; 50(3): 418-427, 2022 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34415866

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Results of pre-post intervention studies of sepsis early warning systems have been mixed, and randomized clinical trials showing efficacy in the emergency department setting are lacking. Additionally, early warning systems can be resource-intensive and may cause unintended consequences such as antibiotic or IV fluid overuse. We assessed the impact of a pharmacist and provider facing sepsis early warning systems on timeliness of antibiotic administration and sepsis-related clinical outcomes in our setting. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled quality improvement initiative. SETTING: The main emergency department of an academic, safety-net healthcare system from August to December 2019. PATIENTS: Adults presenting to the emergency department. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to standard sepsis care or standard care augmented by the display of a sepsis early warning system-triggered flag in the electronic health record combined with electronic health record-based emergency department pharmacist notification. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary process measure was time to antibiotic administration from arrival. A total of 598 patients were included in the study over a 5-month period (285 in the intervention group and 313 in the standard care group). Time to antibiotic administration from emergency department arrival was shorter in the augmented care group than that in the standard care group (median, 2.3 hr [interquartile range, 1.4-4.7 hr] vs 3.0 hr [interquartile range, 1.6-5.5 hr]; p = 0.039). The hierarchical composite clinical outcome measure of days alive and out of hospital at 28 days was greater in the augmented care group than that in the standard care group (median, 24.1 vs 22.5 d; p = 0.011). Rates of fluid resuscitation and antibiotic utilization did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center randomized quality improvement initiative, the display of an electronic health record-based sepsis early warning system-triggered flag combined with electronic health record-based pharmacist notification was associated with shorter time to antibiotic administration without an increase in undesirable or potentially harmful clinical interventions.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Algoritmos , Humanos , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(6): 1591-1597, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33501526

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accelerated translation of real-world interventions for hypertension management is critical to improving cardiovascular outcomes and reducing disparities. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a positive deviance approach would improve blood pressure (BP) control across diverse health systems. DESIGN: Quality improvement study using 1-year cross sections of electronic health record data over 5 years (2013-2017). PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥ 18 with hypertension with two visits in 2 years with at least one primary care visit in the last year (N = 114,950 at baseline) to a primary care practice in Better Health Partnership, a regional health improvement collaborative. INTERVENTIONS: Identification of a "positive deviant" and dissemination of this system's best practices for control of hypertension (i.e., accurate/repeat BP measurement; timely follow-up; outreach; standard treatment algorithm; and communication curriculum) using 3 different intensities (low: Learning Collaborative events describing the best practices; moderate: Learning Collaborative events plus consultation when requested; and high: Learning Collaborative events plus practice coaching). MAIN MEASURES: We used a weighted linear model to estimate the pre- to post-intervention average change in BP control (< 140/90 mmHg) for 35 continuously participating clinics. KEY RESULTS: BP control post-intervention improved by 7.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.0-9.1], from 67% in 2013 to 74% in 2017. Subgroups with the greatest absolute improvement in BP control included Medicaid (12.0%, CI 10.5-13.5), Hispanic (10.5%, 95% CI 8.4-12.5), and African American (9.0%, 95% CI 7.7-10.4). Implementation intensity was associated with improvement in BP control (high: 14.9%, 95% CI 0.2-19.5; moderate: 5.2%, 95% CI 0.8-9.5; low: 0.2%, 95% CI-3.9 to 4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Employing a positive deviance approach can accelerate translation of real-world best practices into care across diverse health systems in the context of a regional health improvement collaborative (RHIC). Using this approach within RHICs nationwide could translate to meaningful improvements in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade
4.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 39(10): 920-924, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453202

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perinatal exposure to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major public health issue, and poor testing rates leave many children with infection unidentified. We sought to use the electronic health record (EHR) to promote guideline-directed HCV testing among infants born to mothers with HCV infection in an urban, safety-net hospital system. METHODS: Our study population was identified using our EHR database, Epic. Children were included in the study if they had perinatal HCV exposure, were 18 months to 18 years of age and had at least 1 encounter in a primary or urgent care clinic during the study period. Our study included retrospective (October 2011 to February 2015) and prospective (February 2015 to May 2018) arms. Our EHR-based intervention was initiated in the prospective arm and recommended a one-time HCV antibody test at or after the age of 18 months using a health maintenance reminder. The health maintenance reminder activated a point-of-care alert and a linked HCV testing order set in all prespecified encounters during the intervention period. RESULTS: Median time to appropriate HCV testing decreased from 96.2 months preintervention to 9.1 months postintervention (P < 0.0001), and rate of completed antibody testing increased from 14% to 61% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among children with perinatal HCV exposure, using a point-of-care alert within the EHR significantly increased the HCV antibody testing rate in accordance with American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations. More effective EHR-based interventions combined with increased provider awareness of appropriate HCV testing in perinatally exposed infants is imperative.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite C/virologia , Humanos , Lactente , Mães , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(6): 864-70, 2015 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26060294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reporting of adverse events (AEs) following vaccination can help identify rare or unexpected complications of immunizations and aid in characterizing potential vaccine safety signals. We developed an open-source, generalizable clinical decision support system called Electronic Support for Public Health-Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP-VAERS) to assist clinicians with AE detection and reporting. METHODS: ESP-VAERS monitors patients' electronic health records for new diagnoses, changes in laboratory values, and new allergies following vaccinations. When suggestive events are found, ESP-VAERS sends the patient's clinician a secure electronic message with an invitation to affirm or refute the message, add comments, and submit an automated, prepopulated electronic report to VAERS. High-probability AEs are reported automatically if the clinician does not respond. We implemented ESP-VAERS in December 2012 throughout the MetroHealth System, an integrated healthcare system in Ohio. We queried the VAERS database to determine MetroHealth's baseline reporting rates from January 2009 to March 2012 and then assessed changes in reporting rates with ESP-VAERS. RESULTS: In the 8 months following implementation, 91 622 vaccinations were given. ESP-VAERS sent 1385 messages to responsible clinicians describing potential AEs. Clinicians opened 1304 (94.2%) messages, responded to 209 (15.1%), and confirmed 16 for transmission to VAERS. An additional 16 high-probability AEs were sent automatically. Reported events included seizure, pleural effusion, and lymphocytopenia. The odds of a VAERS report submission during the implementation period were 30.2 (95% confidence interval, 9.52-95.5) times greater than the odds during the comparable preimplementation period. CONCLUSIONS: An open-source, electronic health record-based clinical decision support system can increase AE detection and reporting rates in VAERS.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Gestão de Riscos , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Adolesc Health ; 56(5 Suppl): S21-6, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25863550

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study the impact on adolescent immunization rates of direct messages to parents/guardians. METHODS: Electronic health record rules identified adolescents needing an immunization. Parents/guardians of adolescents were messaged via a single vendor using automated text, prerecorded voice, and/or postcard. RESULTS: Parents/guardians of 3,393 patients, ages 11-18 years, with one or more primary care visits in the prior 2 years, identified as needing (average of 2.04 years) a vaccination (meningococcal conjugate, human papillomavirus, or tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccines) were messaged (mean age, 14 years; 50% male; 38% African-American; 23% white; 19% Hispanic; and 79% public health insurance). A total of 7,094 messages were sent: 3,334 automated voice (47%), 2,631 texts (37%), and 1,129 postcards (16%). After the first message, 865 adolescents (25.5%) received at least one vaccine. Within 24 weeks of messaging 1,324 vaccines (745 human papillomavirus; 403 meningococcal conjugate; and 176 tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccines) occurred in 959 visits (83.8% physician visits and 16.2% nurse visits). Average visits generated $204 gross reimbursement for $1.77 in messaging expenses per vaccine given. No differences in immunization completion rates occurred by age, gender, race/ethnicity, or insurance type. At 24 weeks, one message was more effective than two or three messages (35.6%, 19.4%, and 24.1% effectiveness, respectively; p < .0001). Texts and postcards correlated with more vaccination visits (38.8% and 40.1%, respectively) than phone calls (31.5%; p = .04). More vaccines due led to increasing message effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Automated texts, voice messages, and postcards had a significant positive effect on vaccination rates in adolescents needing vaccination and required minimal financial expenditure.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Pais/educação , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Vacinação , Adolescente , Serviços de Saúde do Adolescente/economia , Criança , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços Postais , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/métodos , Telecomunicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA