Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2022(7): rjac310, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35794994

RESUMO

The incidence of coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) is 0.2-1.2% of the population. Its paradox of being a rare entity with presentation ranging from sudden cardiac death, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction to being clinically silent, asserts a challenge to its treating physician. Among the various major categories of CAA, we describe four different types of these anomalies in our retrospective evaluation over 2 years. They include - coronary cameral fistula with coronary aneurysm, congenital atresia of left main, anomalous aortic origin of left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex artery (LCx) with malignant LAD course, anomalous origin of left coronary artery from pulmonary artery (ALCAPA). Although the child with ALCAPA succumbed despite every possible and available timely efforts, other patients had good postoperative recovery and a brief hospital stay.

2.
Perfusion ; 36(5): 470-475, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509043

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: del Nido cardioplegia is a newer solution getting popular worldwide, whereas in Nepal, St. Thomas cardioplegia solution is conventionally used. There is no national recommendation on cardioplegia solutions supported by evidences from Nepalese studies. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of these solutions in Nepalese patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary revascularization, from May 2018 to December 2019, were randomized into St. Thomas and del Nido groups based on the cardioplegia administered, with 45 patients in each group. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters and cost of cardioplegia preparation in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The cardiopulmonary bypass time (106.13 ± 24.65 minutes vs 107.62 ± 18.69 minutes, p = 0.02), aortic cross clamp time (66.22 ± 15.40 minutes vs 72.07 ± 12.23 minutes, p = 0.04), volume (1059.22 ± 100.30 ml vs 1526.67 ± 271.81 ml, p < 0.001) and number of cardioplegia doses (1.00 ± 0.00 vs 2.51 ± 0.66, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with del Nido cardioplegia. A lower CPK-MB at second post-operative (59.91 ± 31.62 vs 73.82 ± 37.25, p = 0.03) and a higher left ventricle ejection fraction at discharge (56.33 ± 8.94% vs 50.45 ± 8.55%, p < 0.001) was observed in del Nido group. There was one death in St. Thomas group. ICU and hospital stay were similar in both groups. St. Thomas solution was found to be costlier than del Nido solution (USD 5.40 ± 0.96 vs USD 3.50 ± 0.34, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The del Nido cardioplegia was found to be efficacious, safe and more economical alternative to St. Thomas solution.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Parada Cardíaca Induzida , Soluções Cardioplégicas/uso terapêutico , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Humanos , Volume Sistólico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA