The Surgical Care Improvement Project Antibiotic Guidelines: Should We Expect More Than Good Intentions?

Since 2006, the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) has promoted 3 perioperative antibiotic recommendations designed to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. Despite good evidence for the efficacy of these recommendations, the efforts of SCIP have not measurably improved the rates of surgical site infections. We offer 3 arguments as to why SCIP has fallen short of expectations. We then suggest a reorientation of quality improvement efforts to focus less on reporting, and incentivizing adherence to imperfect metrics, and more on creating local and regional quality collaboratives to educate clinicians about how to improve practice. Ultimately, successful quality improvement projects are behavioral interventions that will only succeed to the degree that they motivate individual clinicians, practicing within a particular context, to do the difficult work of identifying failures and iteratively working toward excellence.

New utility for an old tool: can a simple gait speed test predict ambulatory surgical discharge outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were to design prediction models based on a functional marker (preoperative gait speed) to predict readiness for home discharge time of 90 mins or less and to identify those at risk for unplanned admissions after elective ambulatory surgery. DESIGN: This prospective observational cohort study evaluated all patients scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery. Home discharge readiness and unplanned admissions were the primary outcomes. Independent variables included preoperative gait speed, heart rate, and total anesthesia time. The relationship between all predictors and each primary outcome was determined in separate multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, gait speed with adjusted odds ratio of 3.71 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-11.26), P = 0.02, was independently associated with early home discharge readiness of 90 mins or less. Importantly, gait speed dichotomized as greater or less than 1 m/sec predicted unplanned admissions, with odds ratio of 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.76, P = 0.008) for those with speeds 1 m/sec or greater in comparison with those with speeds less than 1 m/sec. In a separate model, history of cardiac surgery with adjusted odds ratio of 7.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.34-24.41; P = 0.001) was independently associated with unplanned admissions after elective ambulatory surgery, when other covariates were held constant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the use of novel prediction models based on gait speed testing to predict early home discharge and to identify those patients at risk for unplanned admissions after elective ambulatory surgery.

A case of adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve failure.

The adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve controls airway pressure during manual ventilation. Failure of the APL valve during induction of anesthesia may occur, and the anesthesiologist must be aware of solutions for this occurrence.

Ascending aortic aneurysms: asymmetrical differences in aortic cross-sectional wall motion detected by epiaortic echocardiography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vivo cross-sectional conformational changes of ascending aortic wall excursion in patients undergoing resection for aortic aneurysm with those undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using epi-aortic echocardiography. DESIGN: A prospective observational investigation. SETTING: A single tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four patients undergoing elective ascending aorta resection and 23 elective CABG patients. INTERVENTION: In an open-chest model and with use of an epi-aortic echocardiographic probe, measurements of aortic wall excursion were made on the ascending aortic aneurysms. Control measurements were made on the transitional neck portions of the aneurysmal aortas (internal control) and CABG aortas (external control). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The aortic aneurysm measurements exhibited no difference (2.8%, p < 0.62) between the excursion of the anterior and posterior walls. In contrast, under similar hemodynamic conditions, the anterior wall of the aneurysm neck moved 48.2% (p < 0.0004) more than the posterior wall. Similarly, in the CABG control group, the anterior wall moved 24% (p < 0.027) more than the posterior wall. CONCLUSION: This in vivo study documented a lack of asymmetric aortic wall motion in ascending aortic aneurysms. In contrast, both the internal and external control groups (aneurysm neck and CABG) demonstrated asymmetric wall motion. The lack of asymmetric wall motion may be an important aspect of aneurysm pathophysiology and key to the development of management strategies for timing of surgical intervention.

Inside the black box: current policies and concerns with the United States Food and Drug Administration's highest drug safety warning system.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the United States Food and Drug Administration use of the black-box warning system to promote drug safety and to examine the droperidol black-box warning as a case study. RECENT FINDINGS: Scientific studies report that there is no basis to issue a black-box warning for perioperative administration of droperidol for postoperative nausea and vomiting on the basis of the potential of adverse cardiac events (prolongation of the QT interval and/or development of torsades de pointes). SUMMARY: Rather than relying on well conducted clinical investigations, the Food and Drug Administration subjectively issued a black-box warning to droperidol, which effectively removed droperidol from clinical practice for the indication of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Newer data suggest that the incidence of prolongation of the QT interval and the occurrence of torsades de pointes is similar to more expensive alternative medications used to treat postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Scientific principles and clinical implications of perioperative glucose regulation and control.

Development of hyperglycemia after major operations is very common and is modulated by many factors. These factors include perioperative metabolic state, intraoperative management of the patient, and neuroendocrine stress response to surgery. Acute insulin resistance also develops perioperatively and contributes significantly to hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcomes in critically ill and postsurgical patients. A majority of the investigations use the term "hyperglycemia" very loosely and use varying thresholds for initiating treatment. Initial studies demonstrated improved outcomes in critically ill, postsurgical patients who received intensive glycemic control (IGC) (target serum glucose <110 mg/dL). These results were quickly extrapolated to other clinical areas, and IGC was enthusiastically recommended in the perioperative period. However, there are few studies investigating the value of intraoperative glycemic control. Moreover, recent prospective trials have not been able to show the benefit of IGC; neither an appropriate therapeutic glycemic target nor the true efficacy of perioperative glycemic control has been fully determined. Practitioners should also appreciate technical nuances of various glucose measurement techniques. IGC increases the risk of hypoglycemia significantly, which is not inconsequential in critically ill patients. Until further specific data are accumulated, it is prudent to maintain glucose levels <180 mg/dL in the perioperative period, and glycemic control should always be accompanied by close glucose monitoring.

The new Food and Drug Administration drug package insert: implications for patient safety and clinical care.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the scientific, regulatory, and public health agency that regulates many products, including food products, drugs, medical devices, radiation emitting devices, and cosmetics for the federal government of the United States. The FDA's mission is to assure that consumer products made and sold in the United States are safe, effective, and pure. The purpose of the package insert (also known as prescription drug product insert or professional labeling) is to provide detailed drug information compiled and distributed by the drug manufacturer, after FDA review and approval. In 2006, the standard format for the package insert was changed in an attempt to make it more user-friendly and a more efficient resource tool for practitioners. According to the Institute of Medicine, in-hospital adverse drug reactions occur at a rate of 400,000 per year and incur $3.5 billion of extra hospital expense. It is expected that the new package insert format will enhance rapid access to important pharmacologic information and improve patient safety by decreasing medication errors.

Pulse pressure and risk of adverse outcome in coronary bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Among ambulatory patients, an increase in pulse pressure (PP) is a well-established determinant of vascular risk. The relationship of PP and acute perioperative vascular outcome among patients having coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is less well known. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study involving 5436 patients having elective CABG surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Of these, 4801 met final inclusion criteria. Comprehensive data were captured for medical history, intraoperative and postoperative physiologic and laboratory measures, diagnostic testing, and clinical events. The relationship between preoperative hypertension (systolic, diastolic, PP) and ischemic cardiac and cerebral outcomes and death was assessed using multivariable logistic regression; P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventeen patients (19.1%) had fatal and nonfatal vascular complications, including 146 patients (3.0%) with cerebral and 715 patients (14.9%) with cardiac events. In-hospital mortality occurred in 147 patients (3.1%). Among all blood pressure variables measured preoperatively, PP was most strongly associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. PP increments of 10 mm Hg (above a threshold of 40 mm Hg) were associated with an increased risk of cerebral events (adjusted odds ratio: 1.12; 95% CI [1.002-1.28]; P=0.026). The incidence of a cerebral event and/or death from neurologic complications nearly doubled for patients with PP>80 mm Hg versus

Preoperative beta-blocker use: impact of national guidelines on clinical practice.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if recommendations regarding perioperative beta-blocker therapy were followed by an increase in the number of eligible presurgical patients receiving beta-blockers and the number achieving the recommended heart rate (HR <60 beats per minute [bpm]). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. MEASUREMENTS: The records of all 718 patients who underwent elective vascular surgery or coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2001 and March 2002 (pre-guideline) and those who did so between April 2002 and September 2003 (post-guideline) were reviewed. Percentage of eligible patients who received beta-blockers preoperatively and the target HR achieved in pre-guideline versus post-guideline patients were recorded. Differences were assessed using the unpaired t test and chi2 analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 is reported. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty percent of the post-guideline patients in the vascular surgery group were receiving beta-blockers at the time of preanesthetic evaluation versus 48% of pre-guideline patients (P = nonsignificant [NS]). Mean HR in the vascular surgery post-guideline beta-blocker group (70 +/- 14 bpm) was higher than in the pre-guideline beta-blocker group (65 +/- 11 bpm) (P < 0.01). Only 22% of those vascular surgery patients in the post-guideline group who were taking beta-blockers achieved the target HR of less than 60 bpm versus 29% of the vascular surgery patients taking beta-blockers in the pre-guideline group (P = NS). In the coronary artery bypass grafting group, 80% of post-guideline patients received beta-blocker before anesthesia assessment versus 75% of pre-guideline patients (P = NS). Mean HR in the post-guideline beta-blocker group (67 +/- 15 bpm) was similar to the pre-guideline beta-blocker group (64 +/- 13 bpm) (P = NS). Only 28% of the post-guideline patients who were receiving beta-blockers achieved the target HR of less than 60 bpm, which was not significantly different from the 17% achieved in the pre-guideline group (P = NS). CONCLUSION: At our institution, preoperative beta-blocker use was not significantly changed by publication of the recommendations.

Task analysis of the preincision surgical period: an independent observer-based study of 1558 cases.

Intense production pressure has focused on the preincision period (from patient-on-table to incision) as an important component of overall operating room efficiency. We conducted a prospective study in which trained independent observers measured the performance of anesthesiologists, surgeons, and nursing staff to determine anesthesia release time (ART, patient-on-table until release for surgical preparation) and surgical preparation time (SPT, start surgical preparation to incision) and the factors, including delays, that affect their duration. We enrolled 1558 patients undergoing elective surgery in a tertiary medical center. The mean ART was 21 +/- 16 min. Mean SPT was 22 +/- 13 min, and mean case length was 207 +/- 123 min. Significant variation was seen in both ART (range, 1-115 min) and SPT (range, 1-130 min). Multivariate regression analysis revealed ASA physical status, age, level of resident training, invasive monitoring, case length, and case number in the room were all positive predictors of ART duration (P < 0.05). In contrast, gender, body mass index, number of anesthesia personnel concurrently in the room, and number of rooms covered per anesthesia attending were not predictors for ART (P > 0.05). Delays affected both ART and SPT and were encountered in 24.5% of all procedures (surgery 66.8%, anesthesiology 21.7%, and logistical 11.5%). For operating room scheduling purposes, we conclude that assigning a constant fixed duration for anesthetic induction is inappropriate and will result in creating erroneous administrative expectations.

Task analysis of the preincision period in a pediatric operating suite: an independent observer-based study of 656 cases.

We designed this cross-sectional investigation to assess anesthesia release time (ART = patient-on-table until release for surgical preparation) and surgical preparation time (start of surgical preparation to incision) of children undergoing anesthesia and surgery (n = 656). Data collected by trained independent observers included variables such as age, ASA physical status, anesthetic technique, and placement of invasive monitoring. We found that mean ART was 11.0 +/- 9.7 min and the mean surgical preparation time was 11.1 +/- 10.0 min. Also, ART ranged from 7 +/- 7 min (for mask anesthesia) to 52 +/- 18 min (general anesthesia/endotracheal tube and invasive hemodynamic monitoring). The percentage of ART of the total case length was 15% +/- 7%, with a wide variability depending on the total case length. We also found that there is a significant variability in ART as a function of the surgical service involved (analysis of variance; P = 0.0001), ASA physical status (P = 0.0001), and age. For example, younger children had a significantly longer ART as compared with older children (P = 0.001). Room coverage ratio by the attending anesthesiologist and training level of the anesthesia resident did not impact ART (P = not significant). We conclude that ART in children undergoing surgery is highly variable and is a function of factors such as the surgical service involved, age of the child, and ASA physical status of the child. These factors should be considered when scheduling a surgical case.

Resident teaching versus the operating room schedule: an independent observer-based study of 1558 cases.

Efforts to improve operating room efficiency may threaten clinician training. Therefore, we designed a prospective, observational study to determine the actual time spent teaching anesthesiology residents during the interval from patient-on-table to skin incision and to determine whether anesthesia teaching in the peri-induction period increases the time to surgical incision. This study was conducted in an inpatient operating room suite of a tertiary academic medical center. Of 1558 cases examined, 75% had an element of teaching (mean percent teaching per case = 46.4). A 33% decrease in teaching occurs when the attending anesthesiologist concurrently directed care in 2 rooms (P < 0.001). The percent teaching significantly increased as a function of ASA physical status classification and time of day of surgical case (P = 0.001). Teaching accounted for a mean increase of time to incision of 4.5 +/- 3.2 min, but represented only 3% of the mean surgical case length (207 +/- 132 min). We conclude that teaching occurs in the majority of cases in the operating room and although it contributes to increased time to incision, this increase is insignificant compared with the time required to complete the surgical procedure.