Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow up Protocol Based on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Is Safe and Effective.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the safety and effectiveness of a contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) based follow up for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) surveillance at a mid-term period (4 years). METHODS: At the tertiary referral centre EVAR surveillance was based on plain abdominal radiograph and duplex ultrasound (CDU), with computed tomography angiography (CTA) reserved for any non-diagnostic imaging during the period 1999-2011 (Group A). From 2012, CEUS was performed when (a) any endoleak was detected at CDU, (b) sac growth > 5 mm within 6 months, and routinely for (c) patients with renal insufficiency (above Stage 3 chronic kidney disease), or (d) iodine contrast allergy (Group B). RESULTS: A total of 880 patients (mean age 75.6 ± 8.4 years; 824 male) who underwent EVAR between 1999 and 2015 and with a minimum of 1 year follow up were included. Six hundred and nineteen patients were in Group A (70%) and the remaining 261 in Group B (30%). Median follow up was 48 months (interquartile range 24-84). During the study period 318 CEUS scans were performed with no related complications. Indications for CEUS were the following: (a) 160 (50%) endoleak presence, (b) 34 (11%) significant sac expansions, (c) 91 (29%) renal insufficiency (Stage 3 or above CKD), and 33 (10%) iodine contrast allergies. CEUS was compared with CTA, with additional confirmation by angiographic and operative findings in the case of repair in the first 100 patients. CEUS had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in classifying endoleaks. No differences in endoleak, re-interventions and sac shrinkage percentage were seen between the two groups at 4 years. A 4 year analysis of CTA use found a 90% reduction with the introduction of CEUS. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a CEUS based protocol for EVAR follow up was safe and effective and it was similar to the previous CTA based follow up protocol with regard to identification of endoleaks in a mid-term period. Moreover, CEUS allowed for 90% reduction of CTA, thereby decreasing radiation exposure for patients.

Midterm Results of Low-Profile Stents to Treat Atherosclerotic Iliac Artery Disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of low-profile 4-F stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic iliac artery lesions. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2015, 63 patients (mean age 69.3 years; 42 men) received low-profile stents (Astron Pulsar or Pulsar-18) at the discretion of the operator to treat iliac artery occlusive disease. The majority of patients (40, 63.5%) had critical limb ischemia; 36 of 82 lesions were total occlusions. All procedures were performed with 4-F equipment. Outcomes evaluated included mortality, patency (primary, assisted primary, and secondary), absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR), and limb salvage. Associations of patient and procedure variables with patency and TLR outcomes were sought with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Via a brachial (n=46/63) or femoral (n=17/63) access, 82 stents were successfully deployed to treat the 82 lesions, with <30% residual stenosis. The overall access-related complication rate was 1.6% (brachial artery occlusion). Mean duration of follow-up was 24.1±22.3 months (range 1-72), during which 3 patients died and 1 major amputation occurred at 10 months. The 4-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency was 76.9% (95% CI 70.2% to 83.6%); the assisted primary and secondary patency estimates were 79.3% (95% CI 73% to 85.6%) and 91% (95% CI 84.5% to 97.5%). The 4-year freedom from TLR estimate was 73.8% (95% CI 67.4% to 80.2%). On multivariate analysis, the only associations confirmed involved Rutherford category 5/6 with primary patency (hazard ratio [HR] 5.7, 95% CI 4.4 to 7, p=0.02) and assisted primary patency (HR 6.1, 95% CI 4.9 to 7.3, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Use of a low-profile 4-F stent in atherosclerotic iliac lesions was safe and effective. At 4 years, the overall patency and the absence of TLR were good. Midterm outcomes were poor in patients with Rutherford category 5/6 ischemia. Finally, the use of stents with a ≥6-mm diameter and postdeployment balloon dilation are recommended in all cases.

Technical Notes for Treatment of a Pluri-Relapsing Iliac and Femoral Pseudoaneurysm.

BACKGROUND: To describe a technique that connects an Anaconda stent graft (Vascutek, Terumo, Inchinnan, Scotland) to a target artery in a hybrid method. CASE REPORT: The patient was a 65-year-old man with a huge pluri-relapsing iliac and femoral pseudoaneurysm of a previous aortobifemoral bypass. An Anaconda stent graft was used to repair the lesion. After partial dissection of the femoral bifurcation, the Anaconda stent graft was partially introduced via a direct puncture in the anterior wall of the femoral artery over a guidewire. The end of the stent graft outside that artery was cut and adjusted to the exact length to be sutured in an end-to-end fashion to the profunda femoral artery. The proximal sutureless telescoping anastomosis avoided a challenging and risky iliac surgical access. The distal surgical anastomosis guaranteed a stable suture in such a dynamic region. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid technique using the Anaconda stent graft herein described is a safe alternative for challenging iliofemoral aneurysmatic disease treatment. Longer follow-up and more patients are needed before this technique could be recommended for use.

Urgent endovascular revascularization in acute on chronic critical limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate early and one-year outcomes of urgent endovascular treatment in patients with acute on chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2013 104 patients with acute on chronic CLI (Rutherford class 4-6) were referred to two tertiary hospitals. In all cases the urgent endovascular revascularization was considered the first therapeutic option. Twenty-seven patients (26%) were excluded from this approach (long occlusion >30 cm of the femoro-popliteal tract and/or massive gangrene with abscess/osteomyelitis/necrotizing fasciitis). RESULTS: Seventy-seven out of 104 patients received an urgent endovascular treatment. They were predominantly male (43, 55.8%) with a mean age of 76.5 years (range 47-94). In 67 cases (87%) the patients had leg/foot lesions (54, 70.1%, Rutherford class 5, and 13, 16.9%, Rutherford class 6). During the follow-up (mean duration 6.2 months, range 1-24 months) the healing of the lesions and the relief of rest pain were obtained in 46 cases (59.7%). Estimated one-year primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage rates were 63.6%, 68.3, 69%, and 84.1%, respectively. At uni- and multivariate analysis patients in Rutherford class 6 showed poor results in terms of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Urgent endovascular treatment in selected patients with acute on chronic CLI represents a safe and effective option with good results in terms of healing of the ischemic lesions, relief of rest pain, and limb salvage. Patients in Rutherford class 6 showed fewer benefits with this approach.

Use of Tapered Balloons to Recanalize Occluded Below-the-Knee Arteries in Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of tapered balloon use in recanalization of long occlusions of below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: Forty-nine occluded BTK arteries in 35 diabetic patients with CLI were revascularized in our Diabetic Foot Center between January and September 2014 using tapered balloons. Twelve-month outcomes were evaluated in terms of healing of the lesions, survival, limb salvage, primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency. RESULTS: The patients were predominantly male (27/35, 77.1%) with a mean age of 70.9 years (±10.3 standard deviation [SD]). During the follow-up (mean duration 12.4 months ± 4 SD), healing of the lesions was obtained in 27 of the 35 cases (77.1%). Estimated 12-month survival and limb salvage were 85.7% and 91.1%, respectively. Estimated 12-month primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency were 78.3%, 79%, and 88.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of chronic renal failure affected survival (P = 0.005), and assignment to Rutherford class 6 affected limb salvage (P = 0.005), primary patency (P < 0.001), and primary assisted patency (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the presence of coronary artery disease affected primary patency (P = 0.001) and primary assisted patency (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tapered balloons are a safe and effective means to recanalize long occlusions of BTK arteries in diabetic patients with CLI. Outcomes are poorer in patients with major tissue loss and with a history of coronary artery disease. Further experience with larger groups is needed to validate these outcomes.

Subclavian steal syndrome presenting as recurrent pulmonary oedema associated with acute left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Subclavian steal syndrome typically presents as angina in patients with internal mammary artery grafts. Atypical clinical presentations have been rarely described. We report an unusual case of subclavian steal syndrome presenting as pulmonary oedema with acute left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and preserved ejection fraction in a patient with internal mammary artery graft and severe stenosis of the proximal left subclavian artery. After successful angioplasty and stenting of subclavian artery, the patient remained asymptomatic for six months, but then experienced acute diastolic dysfunction and recurrent pulmonary oedema associated with critical subclavian in-stent restenosis with stent deformation. This report points out that, in patients with internal mammary-to-LAD grafts, subclavian steal syndrome may present as acute left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary oedema even in the presence of normal ejection fraction.

Carotid endarterectomy in patients with acute neurological symptoms: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate our experience in urgent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with acute neurological symptoms comparing them with results obtained in stable symptomatic patients in a case-control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2005, 3336 consecutive CEAs were performed at our department. In 70 cases CEA was carried out in patients with acute neurological deficit; in all these patients, clinical presentations were recent (<24 h) or crescendo (defined as two or more episodes in 24 h, with complete recovery after each episode) TIAs (group 1). The control group was randomly obtained from our historical database and consisted of 352 stable symptomatic patients operated on in the same period (group 2). Early (30-day) results in the two groups were compared by chi(2) and Fisher exact tests; follow-up data were analysed by life-table analysis (Kaplan-Meier test) and results in subgroups were compared by means of log-rank test. RESULTS: Considering mortality and any neurological morbidity, the patients of group 1 showed a cumulative rate of death and neurological complication significantly higher than those in group 2 (5.4% and 0.3%, respectively; P=0.005); however, when analysing 30-day disabling strokes and deaths, the patients of group 1 had a cumulative complication rate of 1.4%, whereas in group 2 the corresponding figure was 0.3% (P=n.s.). In patients of group 1, univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate analysis for 30-day risk of stroke and death did not show any influence of comorbidities, clinical status, anatomical and surgical features. Estimated cumulative 36-month survival was significantly better in group 2 than in group 1. Considering the absence of ipsilateral stroke at 36 months, there were no differences between the two groups; however, analysing the estimated absence of any neurological events, both ipsilateral and contralateral, at 36 months, patients of group 1 had a higher risk than those of group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent CEA in patients with recent/crescendo TIA and appropriate carotid artery lesion, carries good early and long-term results, which, however, remain slightly poorer than those obtained in symptomatic patients with a stable neurological status.

Does the high-risk patient for carotid endarterectomy really exist?

BACKGROUND: High surgical risk is advocated as a major criterion for carotid artery stenting. To date, definitely accepted criteria to identify "high-risk" patients for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) do not exist. The aim of this study was to analyze the statistical weight of each single previously described risk factor on early and late results after carotid surgery in our experience. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,883 CEAs performed during a 6-year period in a single institution was performed. Early and late results in terms of mortality and neurologic events were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis for early and late risk of stroke and death were performed, considering the influence of age, sex, comorbidities, clinical symptoms, and anatomic features. RESULTS: The cumulative 30-day stroke and death rate was 1.3%. Univariate analysis and logistic regression did not show statistical significance for 30-day results in any of the considered variables. The three-year stroke-free survival was 94.5%, and it was significantly affected by chronic renal failure, respiratory insufficiency, and older age. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy is a safe procedure also in so-called high-risk subsets of patients. Severe comorbidities seem to affect only long-term survival.

Isolated inflammatory aneurysm of superior mesenteric artery: unexpected pathologic diagnosis.

A 78-year-old woman was admitted to our department because of the incidental finding during routine abdominal ultrasound examination of a large aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery. Presence of the aneurysm was confirmed at computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography, but its inflammatory origin was not recognized. No other aneurysm localization was found. Macroscopic intraoperative findings suggested the inflammatory nature of the lesion, but only histopathologic examination was diagnostic. Aneurismorraphy with prosthetic in-line reconstruction was performed. This report presents the previously undescribed possibility of an isolated inflammatory aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery.