Multiscale Optical Imaging Fusion for Cervical Precancer Diagnosis: Integrating Widefield Colposcopy and High-Resolution Endomicroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Early detection and treatment of cervical precancers can prevent disease progression. However, in low-resource communities with a high incidence of cervical cancer, high equipment costs and a shortage of specialists hinder preventative strategies. This manuscript presents a low-cost multiscale in vivo optical imaging system coupled with a computer-aided diagnostic system that could enable accurate, real-time diagnosis of high-grade cervical precancers. METHODS: The system combines portable colposcopy and high-resolution endomicroscopy (HRME) to acquire spatially registered widefield and microscopy videos. A multiscale imaging fusion network (MSFN) was developed to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe (CIN 2+). The MSFN automatically identifies and segments the ectocervix and lesions from colposcopy images, extracts nuclear morphology features from HRME videos, and integrates the colposcopy and HRME information. RESULTS: With a threshold value set to achieve sensitivity equal to clinical impression (0.98 [p = 1.0]), the MSFN achieved a significantly higher specificity than clinical impression (0.75 vs. 0.43, p = 0.000006). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that multiscale optical imaging of the cervix allows the highly sensitive and specific detection of high-grade precancers. SIGNIFICANCE: The multiscale imaging system and MSFN could facilitate the accurate, real-time diagnosis of cervical precancers in low-resource settings.

HPV-positive cervical squamous cell carcinoma metastasis to the breast, mimicking primary tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic disease to the breast is a rare condition, with contralateral breast metastasis being the most common primary site. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a patient who underwent treatment for an HPV positive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix who, during follow-up, complained of a nodule in her left breast. Anatomopathological results indicating squamous carcinoma, which was not able to be differentiated from breast metaplastic carcinoma. Resection of the lesion was carried out, confirming carcinoma with squamous cell differentiation with negativity for GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, p63 and SOX10, but with positivity for p16 and for high risk HPV, confirming a single metastatic lesion of cervical carcinoma. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In the presence of SCC in the breast, the differential diagnosis may consider the presence of primary lesion, metaplastic carcinoma with squamous cell differentiation or metastatic disease. The use of markers such as p63, SOX10 and p16, may help for a definitive diagnosis.