Tocilizumab Evaluation in HLA-Desensitization before Kidney Transplantation as an Add-On Therapy to Apheresis: The TETRA Study.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization strategies improve access to transplantation in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Tocilizumab could be a valuable addition to more traditional desensitization regimens. We investigated the effect of tocilizumab as an add-on therapy to our standard of care (SoC) desensitization strategy based on rituximab and apheresis. METHODS: In this study, we prospectively included highly sensitized patients to receive monthly tocilizumab infusions for 6 months before our SoC regimen (Toci + SoC group). We compared the reductions in the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) rebound at post-transplantation and kidney function at 1-year post-transplantation to patients treated by SoC (based on apheresis and two doses of rituximab). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in the SoC group; seven in the Toci + SoC group. Reductions in pre-transplantation MFI were similar between groups. At 1-year post-transplantation, there was no absolute difference in overall MFI rebounds, including donor-specific antibodies. Toci + SoC helped lower the rebound of antibodies with more elevated baseline MFIs. Graft function and survival rates were similar at one-year post-transplantation (median eGFR 62.8 vs. 65.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 for SoC and Toci + SoC, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab as an add-on to SoC desensitization may help control the post-transplantation rebound of antibodies with elevated baseline MFIs. However, reductions in pre-transplantation MFIs were similar with or without tocilizumab. Further studies are needed to validate this pilot study.

Immune responses following tocilizumab therapy to desensitize HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

Kidney transplant candidates (KTCs) who are HLA highly sensitized (calculated panel-reactive alloantibodies >95%) have poor access to deceased kidney transplantation. In this single-center prospective study, 13 highly sensitized desensitization-naïve KTCs received IV tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks. We evaluated tolerability as well as immune responses, that is, T cell, B cell, T follicular helper (Tfh) subsets, blood cytokines (IL-6, soluble IL-6 receptor-sIL-6R-, IL-21), blood chemokines (CXCL10, CXCL13), and anti-HLA alloantibodies. Tocilizumab treatment was well-tolerated except in one patient who presented spondylodiscitis, raising a note of caution. Regarding immune parameters, there were no significant changes of percentages of lymphocyte subsets, that is, CD3+ , CD3+ /CD4+ , CD3+ /CD8+ T cells, and NK cells. This was also the case for Tfh cell subsets, B cells, mature B cells, plasma cells, pre-germinal center (GC) B cells, and post-GC B cells, whereas we observed a significant increase in naïve B cells (p = .02) and a significant decrease in plasmablasts (p = .046) over the tocilizumab treatment course. CXCL10, CXCL13, IL-21, total IgG, IgA, and IgM levels did not significantly change during tocilizumab therapy; conversely, there was a significant increase in IL-6 levels (p = .03) and a huge increase in sIL-6R (p = .00004). There was a marginal effect on anti-HLA alloantibodies (class I and class II). To conclude in highly sensitized KTCs, tocilizumab as a monotherapy limited B cell maturation; however, it had almost no effect on anti-HLA alloantibodies.

Immortal Time-Bias-Corrected Survival of Highly Sensitized Patients and HLA-desensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: In the setting of kidney transplantation (KT), we assessed the efficacy of desensitization and compared the survival of desensitized patients (HLA-incompatible KT) with similarly sensitized patients receiving HLA-compatible KT or sensitized patients still on a waiting list after adjusting for the usually unaccounted immortal time bias. METHODS: All patients in a French KT center on the waiting list between August 1994 and December 2019 with a high level of sensitization (panel-reactive antibodies [PRAs] ≥80%) were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A time-varying covariate Cox survival model was used to account for the immortal time bias. A landmark analysis was used as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 326 patients with high PRAs were followed, among which 147 (45%) remained on the waiting list at the time of last follow-up and 179 benefited from a KT. Thirty-six patients were desensitized, of which 30 received a kidney transplant, including eight deceased kidney donors. There were no differences in mortality rates between desensitized KT patients, nondesensitized KT patients, and waitlisted patients after adjusting for immortal time bias (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48, P = 0.22). Death-censored graft survival was similar between desensitized and nondesensitized KT patients (HR = 0.92, P = 0.88 adjusting for donor age >65 years, donor status, and time on the waiting list). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year post-KT was similar for desensitized KT patients (53.3 ± 21 vs. 53.6 ± 21 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for nondesensitized patients; P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: HLA-desensitization was effective for highly sensitized patients and gave access to KT without detrimental effects on patient or graft survival rates.

Apheresis Efficacy and Tolerance in the Setting of HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation.

Nearly 18% of patients on a waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) are highly sensitized, which make access to KT more difficult. We assessed the efficacy and tolerance of different techniques (plasma exchanges [PE], double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP], and immunoadsorption [IA]) to remove donor specific antibodies (DSA) in the setting of HLA-incompatible (HLAi) KT. All patients that underwent apheresis for HLAi KT within a single center were included. Intra-session and inter-session Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) decrease in DSA, clinical and biological tolerances were assessed. A total of 881 sessions were performed for 45 patients: 107 DFPP, 54 PE, 720 IA. The procedures led to HLAi KT in 39 patients (87%) after 29 (15-51) days. A higher volume of treated plasma was associated with a greater decrease of inter-session class I and II DSA (p = 0.04, p = 0.02). IA, PE, and a lower maximal DSA MFI were associated with a greater decrease in intra-session class II DSA (p < 0.01). Safety was good: severe adverse events occurred in 17 sessions (1.9%), more frequently with DFPP (6.5%) p < 0.01. Hypotension occurred in 154 sessions (17.5%), more frequently with DFPP (p < 0.01). Apheresis is well tolerated (IA and PE > DFPP) and effective at removing HLA antibodies and allows HLAi KT for sensitized patients.

Marginal Impact of Tocilizumab Monotherapy on Anti-HLA Alloantibodies in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates are difficult to desensitize, which reduces their chances of receiving a transplant. METHODS: We administered tocilizumab as a monotherapy (8 mg/kg once a mo) to 14 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Highest mean fluorescence intensities of anti-HLA antibodies obtained before and after tocilizumab administration were compared from raw and diluted sera. RESULTS: The administration of tocilizumab significantly reduced dominant anti-HLA antibody sensitization. However, this decrease in mean fluorescence intensities was minor compared with the initial values. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab as a monotherapy was not sufficient to allow highly sensitized kidney-transplant candidates to undergo transplantation and, therefore, was not an effective desensitization method.

Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection with double-filtration plasmapheresis, low dose IVIg plus rituximab after kidney transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) at early or late post-transplantation remains challenging. We performed a single-center single-arm study where four cases of acute ABMR and nine cases of chronic active ABMR (defined by Banff classification) were treated with double-filtration plasmapheresis (two cycles of three consecutive daily sessions with a 4-day gap between). At the end of the third and sixth DFPP sessions, the patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 . After a median follow-up of 1078 (61-1676) days, kidney-allograft survival was 50%. Before DFPP/rituximab therapy, the median donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 9160 (4000-15 400); 45 days (D45) later it had significantly decreased to 7375 (215-18 100) (P = .018). In addition, at one-year (Y1) post-therapy, MFI had decreased further, that is, 4060 (400-7850) (P = .001). In two patients, DSA MFIs decreased and remained below 2000. The slope of estimated glomerular-filtration rate within the 6 months preceding intervention was -1.18 mL/min/month and remained unchanged at -1.29 mL/min/month within the year after intervention. Proteinuria remained unchanged. Baseline Banff scores on repeat allograft biopsies (post-therapy D45, Y1) did not show any improvement. Side-effects were mild to moderate. We conclude that the combined DFPP/rituximab significantly decreased DSAs in ABMR kidney-transplant recipients but did not improve renal function or renal histology at 1-year follow-up.

Characterization of the novel HLA-A*26:208 allele by sequencing-based typing.

The novel HLA-A*26:208 allele was characterized using two next generation sequencing technologies.

Tocilizumab Trough Levels Variability in Kidney-Transplant Candidates Undergoing Desensitization.

The presence of anti-HLA antibodies is an increasing challenge in kidney transplantation. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), has been proposed to complement conventional desensitization therapy. We aimed to describe TCZ plasma trough concentrations and their variability and to investigate the link between TCZ concentration and the evolution of anti-HLA antibodies. Sensitized kidney-transplant candidates treated monthly with TCZ (8 mg/kg) for desensitization were retrospectively included. TCZ concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Seventy-four TCZ concentrations from 10 patients were analyzed. The TCZ trough concentration ranged from <1.0 to 52.5 mg·L-1, with a median of 25.6 mg·L-1 [25th-75th percentiles: 13.2-35.3 mg·L-1). The inter- and intra-individual coefficients of variation were 55.0% and 33.0%, respectively. The TCZ trough concentration was not related to IL-6 (rho = -0.46, p = 0.792), soluble IL-6R (rho = -0.81, p = 0.65) concentrations or reduction of anti-HLA antibodies (mixed-effects model adjusting, effect of TCZ trough concentration: rho = -0.004, p = 0.26). The individual median TCZ concentration tended to be associated with the number of antibodies, with an initial MFI > 3000 that dropped to <3000 after TCZ treatment (rho = 0.397, p = 0.083). TCZ trough concentrations in kidney-transplant candidates treated for desensitization were highly variable. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to study the possible link between TCZ concentrations and the reduction of anti-HLA antibodies.

Characterization of the novel HLA-B*15:514 allele in a French hematopoietic stem cell donor.

The novel HLA-B*15:514 allele was characterized using two next-generation sequencing technologies.

Characterization of the novel HLA-DQB1*03:01:46 variant allele in a French hematopoietic stem cell donor.

HLA-DQB1*03:01:46 differs from HLA-DQB1*03:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution at codon 142.3 in exon 3.

Characterization of the novel HLA-DQB1*05:236N null allele in a French hematopoietic stem cell donor.

HLA-DQB1*05:236N differs from HLA-DQB1*05:03:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution at codon 34.1 in exon 2.

Characterization of two novel HLA alleles, C*03:03:58 and DQB1*06:288, in a French hematopoietic stem cell donor.

Two novel HLA alleles were detected using two next generation sequencing technologies.

Identification of four novel HLA-A alleles.

Four novel HLA-A alleles were detected using two next-generation sequencing technologies.

Characterization of the novel HLA-B*07:398 allele in a French hematopoietic stem cell donor.

HLA-B*07:398 differs from HLA-B*07:02:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution at codon 98.3 in exon 3.

Characterization of the novel HLA-C*02:185 allele in a kidney transplant recipient.

HLA-C*02:185 differs from HLA-C*02:02:02:01 by one nucleotide substitution at codon 180 in exon 3.

Characterization of the novel HLA-DRB1*15:170 allele in a French hematopoietic stem cell donor.

HLA-DRB1*15:170 differs from HLA-DRB1*15:01:01:03 by one nucleotide substitution at codon 85 in exon 2.

Identification of seven novel HLA-C alleles.

Seven novel HLA-C alleles were detected using two next-generation sequencing technologies.

Transfusion-related acute lung injury: critical neutrophil activation by anti-HLA-A2 antibodies for endothelial permeability.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is a major complication of hemotherapy that may occur after the transfusion of any blood type component. Several clinical reports have suggested the presence of anti-HLA antibodies in the blood product. This study sought to examine the role of anti-HLA-A2 antibodies in polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) activation and thus in endothelial permeability. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PMN activation was assessed by both nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NADPH oxidase) activity and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. A coculture assay of EA.hy926 endothelial cells with PMNs or differentiated-PLB-985 cells, a model of neutrophil-like cells, was performed to estimate the impact of ROS on endothelial permeability. RESULTS: Anti-HLA-A2 antibodies significantly increased PMN activation, with subsequent endothelial dysfunction. Phagocyte NADPH oxidase (NOX2) activity was shown to be involved in this process and ROS themselves were demonstrated to induce VE-cadherin cleavage and endothelial permeability. CONCLUSION: Our data may support the existence of a critical anti-HLA-A2 antibody threshold for PMN activation, with NOX2 activity and subsequent endothelial permeability in the two-hit model of TRALI.

Nonspecific immunoglobulin replacement in lung transplantation recipients with hypogammaglobulinemia: a cohort study taking into account propensity score and immortal time bias.

BACKGROUND: After lung transplantation (LT), immunoglobulin (Ig) G plasma concentrations<6 g/L are common and correlate with an increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and a poorer survival. METHODS: We conducted an open substitution intervention with nonspecific intravenous Ig (IVIg), in all patients with IgG plasma less than 6 g/L post-LT in 54 of 84 consecutive recipients since 1998 who survived more than 3 months. Pre-LT and post-LT events were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Both substituted and nonsubstituted groups demonstrated similar donor or recipient characteristics and events over a median follow-up of 2.8 years (Q1-Q3, 1.4-5.7], except for initial diagnosis with more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and less cases of pulmonary arterial hypertension in NS group. Intravenous Ig substitution started 3.5 months (0.5-9.4) after transplantation and lasted 4.5 months after (1.0-17.7), mean cumulative dose was 52.8±47.7 g. In multivariate Cox regression model, hypogammaglobulinemic patients who were substituted with IVIg had actually a 5-year survival (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.49; P=0.29) and CLAD-free 5-year survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.67; P=0.27) really close to nonhypogammaglobulinemic and nonsubstituted patients. Complementary analysis using propensity score and time-dependent analysis showed that survival and CLAD-free survival were not different in both groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous Ig post-LT achieved similar survival and CLAD-free survival in recipients with hypogammaglobulinemia as compared to those with normal IgG plasmatic rate. A randomized control trial is required to confirm benefic effects of IVIg and disentangle mechanisms, including protection from infections, acute cellular and humoral rejections in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia after LT.