Ischial osteochondroma as an unusual source of pregnancy-related sciatic pain: a case report.

BACKGROUND: While most cases of sciatica result from degenerative conditions of the low back, some cases result from conditions of the hip and pelvic region. Sciatica developing in relation to pregnancy or labor also presents unique considerations. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old African American woman with a history of hypertension and polycystic ovary syndrome presented to a chiropractor at a hospital-based outpatient clinic with a seven-week history of low back pain with radiation into the right lower extremity which began during labor. The chiropractor performed a brief trial of care, yet when the patient's symptoms worsened, ordered lumbar spine radiographs, followed by lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which were both normal. The chiropractor then ordered hip radiographs, which were suggestive of ischial osteochondroma, and referred the patient to an orthopedic oncologist. MRI findings were compatible with an osteochondroma with associated adventitial bursitis and mass effect on the sciatic nerve. The patient initially chose conservative management with bursa aspiration and therapeutic injection. Despite initial relief, there was eventual return of symptoms. The patient elected to undergo surgical removal, with a positive outcome. CONCLUSION: The key distinguishing features that led to a diagnosis of osteochondroma in this case included attention to the patient-reported symptoms and history, worsening of symptoms despite conservative care, and lack of explanatory findings on lumbar imaging. This case highlights the benefit of evaluating the hip and pelvis when the clinical features of sciatica cannot be ascribed to a lumbar etiology. This case also illustrates the role of a chiropractor working in an integrative health system to facilitate timely imaging and referrals to resolve a challenging diagnosis.

Moderate sedation: what radiologists need to know.

OBJECTIVE: The number of procedures conducted within the radiology department using moderate sedation is rising. Anecdotal evidence suggests that there is an inconsistency in the education of radiology trainees regarding moderate sedation. CONCLUSION: The purpose of this article is to give an overview and concise summary of the use of moderate sedation as put forth by the American Society of Anesthesia, American College of Radiology, and Society of Interventional Radiology. In addition, we will review the commonly used medications for moderate sedation and their reversal agents.

Diagnostic performance of dual-time 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Perform a comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic performance of dual time point deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PUBMED were queried between January 2000 and January 2011. Studies were included if they: 1) used dual time point FDG-PET as a diagnostic test for pulmonary nodules, 2) used pathology or clinical follow-up as the reference standard, and 3) reported absolute number of true-positive (TP), true-negative (TN), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) results or stated sufficient data to derive these values. Summary sensitivity (SN), summary specificity (SP), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+) and (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated. Heterogeneity of the results was assessed using Forest plots and the value of inconsistency index (I(2)). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 10 articles with a total of 816 patients and 890 pulmonary nodules. The summary sensitivity was 85% (82%-89% at 95% confidence interval [CI]) and summary specificity was 77% (CI: 72%-81%), with a LR+ of 2.7 (CI: 1.4-5.2) and a LR- of 0.26 (CI: 0.14-0.49). Diagnostic odds ratio was 11 (CI: 3.8-32.2). Significant heterogeneity was found in the sensitivity (I(2) = 77%) and specificity (90.3%). CONCLUSION: Dual time point FDG-PET demonstrates similar sensitivity and specificity to single time point FDG-PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. The additive value of the dual time point FDG-PET is questionable, primarily because of the significant overlap of benign and malignant nodule FDG-PET characteristics and lack of consensus criteria for quantitative thresholds to define nodules as malignant.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of appendicitis in adults: a meta-analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Perform a meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were queried between January 1995 and December 2009. Prospective and retrospective studies were included if they: used MRI as a diagnostic test for appendicitis, used pathology or clinical follow-up as the reference standard, and reported absolute number of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results, or stated sufficient data to derive these values. Summary sensitivity, summary specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+) and (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated. Heterogeneity of the results was assessed using Forest plots and the value of inconsistency index (I(2)). RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by eight articles with a total of 363 patients (mean age 26.9 ± 7.2 years; 86.2 % female). The appendix was not found in eight patients, with one article not reporting such data. The summary sensitivity was 97% (92%-99% at 95% confidence interval [CI]) and summary specificity was 95% (CI: 94%-99%), with a LR+ of 16.3 (CI: 9.1-29.1) and a LR- of 0.09 (CI: 0.04-0.197). Diagnostic odds ratio was 299.85 (CI: 97.5-921.61). No heterogeneity was found in the sensitivity (I(2) = 0.0, P = .4589). Minimal heterogeneity was found in the specificity (I(2) = 21.9%, P = .2553). CONCLUSION: MRI appears promising in the evaluation of acute appendicitis, although larger future studies are warranted to confirm the results.