Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in context of laboratory blood test values. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent both MRCP and US as part of their choledocholithiasis workup. MRCP findings, reviewed by two board-certified radiologists, laboratory findings, and US reports were collected. RESULTS: Our study included 243 patients. On US examination 74 cases were found dilated (30.5%), while 94 cases showed dilation (38.7%) by MRCP. The overall accuracy of US was 76.1%, where 185 patients had similar MRCP and US findings, 7.8% had false positive ultrasound, and 16% had false negative ultrasound finding. The accuracy of ultrasound was significantly higher in males (p = .013). In addition, a significant difference in duct dilatation as found by ultrasound and accuracy of diagnosis (p = .01). CONCLUSION: Although US has a relatively low accuracy, its properties of being cost-effective and non-invasive make it an ideal first step in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. If a patient has elevated liver enzymes or a high risk of choledocholithiasis, we recommend that MRCP be performed even no dilation was seen on US.

Salvaging the Digit in Invasive Subungual Malignancies Using a Triple Technique under Awake Local Anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Amputation for subungual malignancy (SUM) was thought to be the gold standard in preventing recurrence and metastasis. The rationale behind this aggressive treatment was never based on scientific evidence. Even though multiple recent studies supported more conservative management by illustrating successful results of the digit salvage technique, especially for "in situ" SUM, this salvage approach is not well supported for the more aggressive type of the "invasive" SUM; herein, we salvaged two cases of "invasive" SUM. Case Presentation. We present two cases of invasive SUM without radiographic evidence of intraosseous involvement, where we avoided digit amputation for both invasive subungual squamous cell carcinoma of the thumb and invasive subungual melanoma of the ring finger. Both were salvaged by using a triple technique under awake local anesthesia which included (I) radical excision of the nail bed unit including both eponychium and periosteum, (II) dorsal cortical bone shaving using a high-speed burr for the distal phalanx, and (III) flap coverage. Brunelli flap was used for the thumb in the first case, and V-Y plasty combined with proximal nail fold advancement flap was used for the ring finger in the second case. There was no evidence of local or distant recurrence, with a good functional outcome after 2.5 years in the first case and 2 years in the second. CONCLUSION: Ensuring complete resection with negative margins while preserving the functionality of the affected digit is considered to be the optimal challenge in treating "invasive" subungual malignancies. These two case reports contribute by reporting a successful digit salvage. The safety of this procedure could be confirmed by larger series and longer follow-up periods.