AV-node isolation as an alternative to AV-node ablation in patients undergoing pace & ablate strategy.

INTRODUCTION: Atrioventricular (AV)-node ablation (AVNA) is a common therapy option for rate control strategy of permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that isolation of the AV nodal isolation (AVNI) is associated with a more frequent preservation of an adequate escape rhythm compared to AVNA. METHODS: This retrospective study included 20 patients with therapy-refractory AF being treated with AVNI and 40 historical AVNA-controls. In AVNI the AV-node region was mapped using a 3D mapping system. Ablation was performed around the previously mapped HIS-cloud regions isolating the atrium from the AV-node. In the AVNI group, ablation was performed with irrigated tip ablation catheter in all cases. The two approaches were compared regarding rate of escape rhythm, delta QRS, and procedural data. RESULTS: The number of patients with adequate escape rhythm in AVNI was significantly superior to AVNA immediately postoperative (90% vs. 40%, p < 0.01) and during follow-up (77% vs. 36%, p < 0.05). The median change in QRS width was 0 ms in AVNI versus +26 ms in AVNA (p < 0.01). Thirty percent new bundle branch blocks in AVNA were observed compared to 0% in AVNI (p < 0.01). In the AVNI group, fluoroscopy time and total dose area product were significantly lower (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that AV-node isolation using 3D navigation mapping system is a feasible and effective alternative to conventional AVNA. The precise application of radiofrequency lesions preserves a stable AV-junctional rhythm.

Novel electroanatomical map for permanent his bundle pacing: the Mont Blanc approach - influence of the learning curve and procedural outcome.

AIMS: Pacing the specific conduction system like the Bundle of His (HB) can lead to more physiologic activation patterns compared to traditional right ventricular apical pacing. The aim of this study was to estimate the feasibility and value of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for HB pacing during the learning curve and its impact on procedural outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients were treated using EAM of the His bundle region before implantation. Voltage and activation maps of HB potentials were performed. The activation time from His potential to R wave (ECG-reference) was measured and correlated to the HV interval. The atrial and ventricular potentials were blended so the active window could only see the His potential. After completing the activation map, it was transformed into a peak-to-peak voltage map of the HB. With reversed black and white colour scale, the exact point of the maximal His signal amplitude was visualized. Procedural data for the implantation were analysed using this innovative approach. The average total procedural time and fluoroscopy time was 88.2 ± 19.1 min and 10.9 ± 4.5 min, respectively. The 3D mapping time was 18.4 ± 5.1 min. The 13.9 ± 5.1 His potential points were needed in average to complete the map. No periprocedural complications were seen in this cohort. In 86.7% of cases, His bundle pacing was successful. The average threshold for the His bundle stimulation and the R-wave amplitude was 1.62 ± 1 V (@1.0 ms) and 4.8 ± 3.2 mV, respectively. The pacing impedance was 513.5 ± 102.8 Ω. Average paced QRS complex width was 116.9 ± 20.3ms. On average 2.6 ± 1.6 lead positions were targeted to find the optimal pacing site. CONCLUSION: Electroanatomical mapping-guided implantation of His-bundle leads can facilitate the identification of optimal pacing sites and allow to minimize procedure and fluoroscopy times even during the phase of the learning curve.