Developing a Standardized Approach to Grading the Level of Brain Dysfunction on EEG.

PURPOSE: To assess variability in interpretation of electroencephalogram (EEG) background activity and qualitative grading of cerebral dysfunction based on EEG findings, including which EEG features are deemed most important in this determination. METHODS: A web-based survey (Qualtrics) was disseminated to electroencephalographers practicing in institutions participating in the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium between May 2017 and August 2018. Respondents answered 12 questions pertaining to their training and EEG interpretation practices and graded 40 EEG segments (15-second epochs depicting patients' most stimulated state) using a 6-grade scale. Fleiss' Kappa statistic evaluated interrater agreement. RESULTS: Of 110 respondents, 78.2% were attending electroencephalographers with a mean of 8.3 years of experience beyond training. Despite 83% supporting the need for a standardized approach to interpreting the degree of dysfunction on EEG, only 13.6% used a previously published or an institutional grading scale. The overall interrater agreement was fair ( k = 0.35). Having Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium nomenclature certification (40.9%) or EEG board certification (70%) did not improve interrater agreement ( k = 0.26). Predominant awake frequencies and posterior dominant rhythm were ranked as the most important variables in grading background dysfunction, followed by continuity and reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the preference for a standardized grading scale for background EEG interpretation, the lack of interrater agreement on levels of dysfunction even among experienced academic electroencephalographers unveils a barrier to the widespread use of EEG as a clinical and research neuromonitoring tool. There was reasonable agreement on the features that are most important in this determination. A standardized approach to grading cerebral dysfunction, currently used by the authors, and based on this work, is proposed.

When Is My Care Team Rounding? A Simple Signage Intervention to Increase Awareness of Rounding Times.

Patient and caregiver awareness of multidisciplinary rounds (MDR) times, and their subsequent involvement in MDR, aids in decreasing adverse health outcomes, reducing average length of stay, and increasing satisfaction. The objective of this study was to increase patient and caregiver awareness of MDR times using signage interventions and to assess the state of rounding processes with patient and caregiver satisfaction pre- and post-intervention. We administered survey questions to assess MDR interaction and awareness regarding MDR times. Patient and caregiver awareness of rounding times increased significantly by 25.87% (P = .0043) post-intervention. Although patients' confidence in the physician remained largely unchanged after the intervention due to high initial confidence levels, MDR satisfaction metrics increased slightly post-intervention. Thus, our signage intervention increased rounding time awareness in the MDR process.

Applying the Care and Communication Bundle to Promote Palliative Care in a Neuro-Intensive Care Unit: Why and How.

Background: Delivery of palliative care in neurointensive care units (neuro-ICUs) can be inconsistent, often due to absence of formal care triggers. The Care and Communication Bundle (CCB) of Quality Indicators provides a standardized process to deliver effective palliative care services in ICUs, but application of these indicators in this setting has not yet been systemically assessed. Objectives: To evaluate the fit of a CCB in the neuro-ICU through a novel scoring system and identify barriers to adherence. Design: CCB standards for a neuro-ICU were delineated. Assessment of documented indicators and barriers was conducted through electronic medical record retrospective review. Setting/Subjects: A 30-bed neuro-ICU in a large Academic Medical Center in the Southeastern United States. Chart reviews were conducted for 133 critically ill neurology and neurosurgery patients who expired between November 2018 and January 2020. Results: Results demonstrate moderate adherence to CCB standards, including excellent consistency in establishment of patient-centered communication and referral to supportive services (e.g., social work, spiritual support). Identified areas for improvement include documentation of patient and family involvement in care process (i.e., advance directive completion, interdisciplinary team meetings). Conclusions: Application of the CCB in the neuro-ICU is useful for examining adherence to time-based triggers of palliative care standards. The novel scoring system offers opportunities to motivate improvement and reduce variation in palliative care integration.

Palliative Care Services in the NeuroICU: Opportunities and Persisting Barriers.

BACKGROUND: End-of-life (EOL) supportive care, including palliative and hospice services, is an area of increasing importance in critical care. Neurointensivists face unique challenges in providing timely supportive care to terminally ill patients expected to expire in the NeuroICU. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the extent of effective utilization of, and recorded barriers to, palliative and hospice services in a dedicated 30-bed NeuroICU at a large academic medical center. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of patients who expired in the NeuroICU was conducted. The timeline from patient admission to arrival of palliative care services was traced. Qualitative review of chart notes was used to identify barriers to provision of palliative services. SETTING: A total of 330 patients expired in the NeuroICU during the study period, including 176 from the neurology and 154 from the neurosurgical service. RESULTS: Across services, 146 expired patients were never referred to palliative care or hospice services. Of those referred, over one-third were referred more than 4 days past admission to the NeuroICU. On average, patients were referred with less than 1 day before expiration. Common barriers to referral for supportive services were documented (e.g., patient expected to expire, family declined service). CONCLUSIONS: Despite benefits of palliative care and an in-hospital hospice opportunity, we identified lack of referral, and particularly delays in referral to services as significant barriers. Our study highlights these as missed opportunities for patients and families to receive maximum benefits from these services. Future research should solidify triggers for EOL services in this setting.

Using Intern-Led Quality Improvement to Reduce Readmissions for Specialty Service Patients Within an Academic Medical Center.

Introduction: Postdischarge patient calls are an effective intervention to decrease unplanned readmissions. Despite its efficacy, calls are time consuming and compete with other clinical obligations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the viability of intern-led quality improvement (QI) on conducting initial postdischarge calls to filter patients who require clinical or nurse follow-up. Methods: QI interns from an academic medical center's QI program completed postdischarge patient calls within 72 hours of patient discharge from a neurosurgery service between June 2018 and July 2019. QI interns filtered patients who required follow-up calls from a clinical service or nurse department. The departments called patients within 48 hours of requests. Unplanned readmission rate was compared between the cohort of patients who requested and received a follow-up call versus a cohort of patients who requested and did not receive a follow-up call (control). Results: QI interns completed 83.8% postdischarge patient calls within 72 hours of discharge. Reasons for unsuccessful calls included patient unresponsiveness (74.6%), wrong phone number on file (13.9%), and request to be called at a different time (11.5%). Nurses completed 57.2% follow-up requests within the targeted 48 hours and completed remaining requests within 7 days. QI intern postdischarge follow-up calls, in conjunction with nurse follow-up intervention, showed a significant (risk ratio = -3.31, p = 0.012) preventive effect on unplanned readmission rate. Conclusions: QI interns are a viable alternative to nurses to conduct the first contact of postdischarge patient follow-up calls. This system of QI interns filtering calls to the correct clinical service or nurse department increased postdischarge patient follow-up calls success rate and decreased readmission rates.

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) in the NeuroICU: Identification of Risk Factors and Time-to-CAUTI Using a Case-Control Design.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for 25% of all hospital-acquired infections. Neuro-critically ill patients are at 2-5 times greater risk of developing CAUTI because of increased use of indwelling urinary catheters due to neurogenic urinary retention. Despite the heightened risk of CAUTI occurrence for the neuro-critically ill, there is little data on specific characteristics of CAUTIs and risk factors among this population. The aim of this study was to identify characteristics and risk factors associated with CAUTI development in the neuro-critical patient population. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center case-control study in a tertiary care dedicated 30-bed neuroICU, approximately 3 controls (exact ratio-3.2) were randomly selected for each CAUTI case between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2018. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected, including prospectively collected data pertaining to urinary and bowel function. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify common patient characteristics, CAUTI risk factors and duration from catheterization to developing a CAUTI (Time-to-CAUTI). RESULTS: Of 3045 admissions during the study period, 1045 (34.30%) had a urinary catheter at some point during their admission. Of those, 45 developed a CAUTI, yielding a CAUTI incidence rate of 1.50%, corresponding to 4.49 infections/1000 catheter days. On average, CAUTI patients were older as compared to controls (66.44 years of age vs 58.09 years; p < 0.0001). In addition to old age, other risk factors included female gender (75.60% female vs 24.20% males in case group, p < 0.0001), increased neuroICU length of stay (18.31 in cases vs. 8.05 days in controls, p = 0.0001) and stool incontinence (OR = 3.73, p = 0.0146). CAUTI patients more often carried a primary diagnosis of SAH, and comorbidities of hypertension (HTN), vasospasm and diabetes. Time-to-CAUTI was 6 days on average, with an earlier peak for patients requiring two or more catheter placements. Presence of stool incontinence was significantly associated with CAUTI occurrence. CONCLUSION: Stool incontinence, older age, female sex, longer neuroICU LOS and presence of comorbidities such as HTN and diabetes were associated with CAUTI development in the neuro-critically ill population. Average Time-to-CAUTI after catheter placement was 6 days with earlier occurrence if more frequent catheterizations. Colonization of urinary catheters without infection might contribute to CAUTI diagnosis. Prospective research is needed to determine impact of prevention protocols incorporating these factors.

Electronic patient portal utilization by neurology patients and association with outcomes.

Existing literature on electronic patient portals demonstrates mixed findings for portal user demographic patterns and relationships between portal usage and clinical outcomes. This study sought to determine characteristics of portal users specific to a neurology patient population and examine whether usage predicted decreased clinic visits and risk of hospitalization. A cross-sectional analysis on 13,483 patients seen at a tertiary neurology outpatient clinic over a 1-year period found significant associations between demographics, and interactions between age, sex, and race. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to be portal users. While females had higher odds of portal usage overall, their probability decreased with increasing age. Portal users had higher rates of clinic utilization but no difference in hospitalization risk. These results highlight demographics that may need strategic targeting to increase portal uptake and the need for other interventions for populations more likely to experience health events resulting in hospitalization.

Introducing a Supportive Care Team for Advance Directive Education in a Neurological and Neurosurgical Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care includes delineation of patient treatment values (ie, advance care planning [ACP]). Advance care planning often includes advance directive (AD) completion and is underutilized, particularly among neurology and neurosurgery patients. Implementation of a supportive care team (SCT) in outpatient clinic settings may offer opportunities for AD education and completion. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the effectiveness of an integrative SCT composed of hospice volunteers and undergraduate quality improvement interns in their efforts to provide ACP education in neurological and neurosurgical outpatient clinics. Assessment includes a description of different types of SCT-patient encounters, as well as patient interest in and completion of ADs after interacting with the SCT. RESULTS: Across the data collection period, 2770 encounters were initiated. The majority of encounters resulted in patient ACP education. Some patients completed ADs during their SCT encounter (3.45%) or after their SCT encounter (10.18%). CONCLUSION: The SCT effectively enhances ACP education in this patient population. The utilization of trained interns to assist with ACP is beneficial and practical in clinic workflow.

Public perception towards bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) improves survival and neurological outcomes. Nonetheless, many OHCA patients do not receive bystander CPR during a witnessed arrest. Our aim was to identify potential barriers to bystander CPR. METHODS: Participants at CPR training events conducted in the USA between February and May 2018 answered a 14-question survey prior to training. Respondents were asked about their overall comfort level performing CPR, and about potential concerns specific to performing CPR on a middle-aged female, a geriatric male, and male and female adolescent patients. Open-ended responses were analysed qualitatively by categorising responses into themes. RESULTS: Of the 677 participants, 582 (86.0%) completed the survey, with 509 (88.1%) between 18 and 29 years of age, 341 (58.6%) without prior CPR training and 556 (96.0%) without prior CPR experience. Across all four scenarios of patients in cardiac arrest, less than 65% of respondents reported that they would be 'Extremely Likely' (20.6%-29.1%) or 'Moderately Likely' (26.9%-34.8%) to initiate CPR. The leading concerns were 'causing injury to patient' for geriatric (n=193, 63.1%), female (n=51, 20.5%) and adolescent (n=148, 50.9%) patients. Lack of appropriate skills was the second leading concern when the victim was a geriatric (n=41, 13.4%) or adolescent (n=68, 23.4%) patient, whereas for female patients, 35 (14.1%) were concerned about exposing the patient or the patient's breasts interfering with performance of CPR and 15 (6.0%) were concerned about being accused of sexual assault. Significant differences were observed in race, ethnicity and age regarding the likelihood of starting to perform CPR on female and adolescent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Participants at CPR training events have multiple concerns and fears related to performing bystander CPR. Causing additional harm and lack of skills were among the leading reservations reported. These findings should be considered for improved CPR training and public education.

Patient-perceived value of a specialty-specific welcome letter: What you say and how you say it.

BACKGROUND: Patient experience and clinical outcomes are improved when patients know what to expect. Providing valuable, appropriate information proves challenging considering variation in patient education, literacy, and limitations specific to patients with neurologic disease. Scaffolding of what to expect, care team members, needed materials, procedures, directions to facilities, and methods of communication are core aspects of improving patient readiness. METHODS: This study employed standard quality improvement methods. An existing (original) patient welcome letter was first analyzed to assess its literacy levels. Surveys were then administered to patients with neurologic disease assessing perception of readiness for ambulatory appointments and the overall value of the welcome letter. In addition to Likert-type scales, patients also provided open feedback on what should be included in the letter. A revised letter was then created with added content, improving literacy levels. The letter was further assessed through clinical and nonclinical groups including our neuromedicine Patient and Family Advisory Council. Response data were analyzed comparing the original vs the revised score using a t test assuming equal variances. RESULTS: The "overall value" score of the original welcome letter (3.79 of 5.0) improved to the revised score (4.63 of 5.0). Patients perceived the revised welcome letter as improving their readiness significantly as ambulatory patients with neurologic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Preparing patients for their neurology visits is important and affects visits' value. Sensitivity to literacy levels is an essential component of person-centered care among neurologic patients. Carefully created and assessed welcome letters help to achieve these goals by improving readiness for outpatient appointments and increases perceived overall value significantly.