Quantifying the reduction of airborne infectious viral load using a ventilated patient hood.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers treating SARS-CoV-2 patients are at risk of infection by respiratory exposure to patient-emitted, virus-laden aerosols. Source control devices such as ventilated patient isolation hoods have been shown to limit the dissemination of non-infectious airborne particles in laboratory tests, but data on their performance in mitigating the airborne transmission risk of infectious viruses are lacking. AIM: We used an infectious airborne virus to quantify the ability of a ventilated hood to reduce infectious virus exposure in indoor environments. METHODS: We nebulized 109 plaque forming units (pfu) of bacteriophage PhiX174 virus into a ∼30-m3 room when the hood was active or inactive. The airborne concentration of infectious virus was measured by BioSpot-VIVAS and settle plates using plaque assay quantification on the bacterial host Escherichia coli C. The airborne particle number concentration (PNC) was also monitored continuously using an optical particle sizer. FINDINGS: The median airborne viral concentration in the room reached 1.41 × 105 pfu/m3 with the hood inactive. When active, the hood reduced infectious virus concentration in air samples by 374-fold. The deposition of infectious virus on the surface of settle plates was reduced by 87-fold. This was associated with a 109-fold reduction in total airborne particle number escape rate. CONCLUSION: A personal ventilation hood significantly reduced airborne particle escape, considerably lowering infectious virus contamination in an indoor environment. Our findings support the further development of source control devices to mitigate nosocomial infection risk among healthcare workers exposed to airborne viruses in clinical settings.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antipseudomonal bacteriophage therapy in rats: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVES: Pan-drug-resistant (PDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the three top-priority pathogens identified by the WHO, and bacteriophages have been investigated as an alternative therapy. However, knowledge on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of phage therapy is sparse, limiting its clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate the PK/PD of the antipseudomonal phage øPEV20 in vivo following intravenous administration. METHODS: Healthy Sprague-Dawley rats were given øPEV20 as a single intravenous bolus of ~6, 9 and 11-log10PFU/rat. Arterial blood was sampled over 72 h. At 72 h, the animals were killed and multiple tissues were harvested for biodistribution studies. A PK model was developed using the importance sampling algorithm and deterministic simulations with a PD model were performed. RESULTS: A three-compartment model with non-linear clearance described the exposure of øPEV20 in blood. Model evaluation indicated that the model was robust and parameter estimates were accurate. The median (standard error) values of model-predicted PK parameters for VC, VP1, VP2, Q1, Q2, Vm and Km were 111 mL/rat (8.5%), 128 mL/rat (4.97%), 180 mL/rat (4.59%), 30.4 mL/h/rat (19.2%), 538 mL/h/rat (4.97%), 4.39 × 1010 PFU/h/rat (10.2%) and 1.64 × 107 PFU/mL/rat (3.6%), respectively. The distribution of øPEV20 was not homogeneous; there was preferential accumulation in the liver and spleen. Deterministic simulations with a PD model confirmed the importance of the host immune system in facilitating phage-mediated bacterial elimination. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a robust PK model to describe the disposition of phages in healthy rats. This model may have significant potential in facilitating future preclinical and clinical PK/PD investigations.

Genetic association study of CYP1A1 polymorphisms identifies risk haplotypes in nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of disease globally, with smoking being the largest single cause. Phase I enzymes, including cytochrome P(450), family 1, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 (CYP1A1), are involved in the activation of carcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, to reactive intermediates that are capable of binding covalently to DNA to form DNA adducts, potentially initiating the carcinogenic process. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of CYP1A1 gene polymorphisms and haplotypes with lung cancer risk. A case-control study was carried out on 1,040 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and 784 controls to investigate three CYP1A1 variants, CYP1A1*2A (rs4646903; thymidine to cytosine substitution at nucleotide 3801 (3801T>C)), CYP1A1*2C (rs1048943; 2455A>G; substitution of isoleucine 462 with valine (exon 7)) and CYP1A1*4 (rs1799814; 2453C>A; substitution of threonine 461 with asparagine (exon 7)) using PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism methods. The CYP1A1*2A and CYP1A1*2C variants were significantly over-represented in NSCLC cases compared with controls, whereas the CYP1A1*4 variant was under-represented. CYP1A1 haplotypes (in allele order CYP1A1*4, CYP1A1*2C, CYP1A1*2A) CGC and CGT were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, whereas AAT was associated with decreased lung cancer risk in this population. The present study has identified risk haplotypes for CYP1A1 in NSCLC and confirmed that CYP1A1 polymorphisms are a minor risk factor for NSCLC.