Relationships among pain and depressive and anxiety symptoms in clinical trials of pregabalin in fibromyalgia.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia, as defined by the American College of Rheumatology, is characterized by widespread pain lasting for at least 3 months, with pain in at least 11 out of 18 tender points when palpated with digital pressure. OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the relationship between changes in pain and symptoms of anxiety and depression, using data from pregabalin clinical trials. METHOD: Results from three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of pregabalin monotherapy in fibromyalgia (8-14 weeks) were pooled, and baseline to end-point changes in pain and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores were analyzed. Path-analysis evaluated the association between improvements in anxiety and depression and pain relief. RESULTS: Baseline HADS scores indicated moderate-to-severe anxiety in 38% of patients and moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms in 27%. The improvement in pain was not related to baseline levels of anxiety or depression. The correlation between changes in pain and depressive or anxiety symptoms was low-to-moderate. Path-analysis showed that most of the pain relief observed with pregabalin treatment was a direct analgesic effect and was not explained by improvement in mood. CONCLUSION: Response to treatment of pain in the pregabalin trials did not depend on baseline levels of anxiety or depressive symptoms, and pregabalin improved pain in fibromyalgia patients with or without depressive or anxiety symptoms. Changes in the level of anxiety or depression had a low-to-moderate impact on pain reduction. Pain reduction with pregabalin treatment appeared to result mostly from a direct treatment effect, rather than an indirect effect mediated through improvement in anxiety or depressive symptoms.

A comparison of pregabalin, lamotrigine, and placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the comparative efficacy of pregabalin for refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Four-hundred and thirty-four patients with partial seizures were randomized to pregabalin, lamotrigine, or placebo as adjunctive therapy for 17 weeks of double-blind treatment. In phase I (11 weeks), pregabalin was titrated over 1 week and lamotrigine over 5 weeks to fixed dosages of 300mg/day for both. In phase II (6 weeks), patients not yet seizure-free were increased to pregabalin 600mg/day or lamotrigine 400mg/day. RESULTS: During phase I, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a greater reduction in seizures with pregabalin versus placebo and lamotrigine. Across the 17 weeks of treatment, pregabalin showed a median percentage reduction from baseline in seizure frequency of -20.0% (p=.001) versus placebo, and -9.7% (p=.080) versus lamotrigine. The responder rate (> or =50% reduction in seizure frequency) for pregabalin exceeded that of placebo (36% vs 21%; p=.007) and lamotrigine (36% vs 24%; p=.04). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of pregabalin and lamotrigine. DISCUSSION: Pregabalin was demonstrated to be noninferior to lamotrigine in the treatment of refractory partial seizures. Overall conclusions were complicated by an unusually large and heterogeneous placebo response.

Central sensitization and Ca(V)α2δ ligands in chronic pain syndromes: pathologic processes and pharmacologic effect.

UNLABELLED: Central sensitization is one form of long-term plasticity in the central nervous system. Sustained activation of primary sensory fibers supplying dorsal horn can induce long-lasting increases in the discharge amplitude of primary afferent synapses. This is similar to the long-term potentiation that occurs in many other CNS regions. Drugs that limit the short-duration wind-up component of central sensitization include sodium channel blockers, NMDA antagonists, fast-acting opioids and the calcium-channel ligands gabapentin and pregabalin (S-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid). Pregabalin, like gabapentin, binds selectively to the Ca(V)α2δ auxiliary subunit of presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels. The conformational changes induced by this binding inhibit abnormally intense neuronal activity by reducing the synaptic release of glutamate and other neurotransmitters. Recent identification in animal models of increased Ca(V)α2δ protein expression in chronic pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia have drawn additional interest to drugs that bind the Ca(V)α2δ site. Experimental studies with animal models and healthy human volunteers have shown that pregabalin reduces nociceptive responses, particularly in conditions involving central sensitization. Since these actions occur with relatively modest effects on physiological and cognitive functions, pregabalin may be an important consideration in the pharmacotherapy of otherwise difficult-to-treat pain syndromes. PERSPECTIVE: This focus article discusses how the central nervous system plasticity phenomenon, central sensitization, is established in the induction and maintenance of chronic pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. In addition, it explores the neurophysiologic actions of the calcium-channel ligands gabapentin and pregabalin in limiting pathological manifestations of central sensitization.

Rapid onset of seizure suppression with pregabalin adjunctive treatment in patients with partial seizures.

PURPOSE: To determine the time at which pregabalin demonstrates seizure-suppressing activity when given as adjunctive treatment to patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Data from four similar 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials in patients with refractory partial seizures were pooled to provide an adequate sample to compare the proportion of patients free of seizures on each study day between pregabalin (combined 150-600 mg/day groups) and placebo (combined groups). A generalized estimating equation (GEE) statistical model was used to perform pairwise comparisons on each study day. In several pregabalin dosage groups the dosage was escalated during days 1-7, whereas in others pregabalin was initiated at a fixed dosage without escalation. RESULTS: The proportion of patients free of seizures on any treatment day was greater in the combined pregabalin groups compared with baseline. Differences were not observed between the placebo group and baseline. A significantly greater proportion of patients were free of seizures in the combined pregabalin 150-600 mg/day and the pregabalin 600 mg/day fixed-dosage groups compared with the placebo groups from treatment day 2 onward (p < 0.05). From day 8 (coinciding with completion of the 1-week dosage-escalation period in two studies) onward, the proportion of patients free of seizures per day in the pregabalin groups remained relatively constant. DISCUSSION: This exploratory analysis of a refractory population using a rigorous endpoint demonstrates that pregabalin rapidly reduced the frequency of partial seizures. At the dosing schemes most commonly used in placebo-controlled trials, significant seizure-suppressing activity was observed after only 2 days of treatment.

The effects of pregabalin on sleep disturbance symptoms among individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbances are common in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effects of pregabalin on sleep in patients with FM. METHODS: Analyses were based on two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of pregabalin (300mg, 450mg, and 600mg daily) in adult FM patients. Sleep outcomes included the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale and a daily diary assessment of sleep quality. Treatment effects were evaluated using analysis of covariance. Clinically important differences (CID) in the Sleep Quality Diary and MOS Sleep Disturbance scores were estimated using mixed-effects models of changes in scores as a function of patients' global impressions of change. Mediation modeling was used to quantify the direct treatment effects on sleep in contrast to indirect influence of the treatment on sleep via pain. RESULTS: A total of 748 and 745 patients were randomized in the respective studies. Patients were predominantly Caucasian females, average age 48-50 years, on average had FM for 9-10 years, and experienced moderate to severe baseline pain. Pregabalin significantly improved the Sleep Quality Diary (P<0.001), MOS Sleep Disturbance (P<0.01), MOS Quantity of Sleep (P<0.003), and MOS Sleep Problems Index scores (P<0.02) relative to placebo. Treatment effects for the 450mg and 600mg groups exceeded the estimated CID thresholds of 0.83 and 7.9 for the Sleep Quality Diary and MOS Sleep Disturbance scores, respectively. Mediation models indicated that 43-80% of the benefits on sleep (versus placebo) were direct effects of pregabalin, with the remainder resulting from an indirect effect of treatment via pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate improvement in FM-related sleep dysfunction with pregabalin therapy. The majority of this benefit was a direct effect of pregabalin on the patients' insomnia, while the remainder occurred through the drug's analgesic activity.

Pregabalin for postherpetic neuralgia: placebo-controlled trial of fixed and flexible dosing regimens on allodynia and time to onset of pain relief.

UNLABELLED: Time to onset of pain relief and improvement in allodynia in 269 patients with postherpetic neuralgia was examined in a 4-week randomized trial comparing flexibly dosed pregabalin (150-600 mg/d), fixed-dose pregabalin (300 mg/d), and placebo. For each patient with clinically meaningful pain reduction (>or=30%) at end point, onset of pain relief was defined as the first study day on which a patient reported >or=1-point reduction in pain relative to baseline. Average dose achieved was 396 mg/d in the flexible-dose group compared with 295 mg/d in the fixed-dose group. Median pain relief onset times were 3.5 days (flexible-dose), 1.5 days (fixed-dose), and >4 weeks (placebo). Compared with placebo, significantly more patients in both pregabalin treatment groups achieved >or=30% and >or=50% pain reduction at end point. Almost 95% of patients had brush-evoked allodynia, with 68% having moderate to severe allodynia (>or=40/100 mm). At baseline, pain and allodynia were highly correlated. Independent of treatment assignment, improvement in pain and improvement in allodynia were significantly correlated. Allodynia could serve as a useful surrogate outcome measure in future studies. Pregabalin was significantly better than placebo in alleviating allodynia (flexible-dose reduction, 26 mm; fixed-dose, 21 mm; placebo, 12 mm). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were more frequent in the fixed-dose group. PERSPECTIVE: A flexible-dose regimen reduces discontinuations, facilitates higher final doses, and results in a slightly greater pain relief. Allodynia (touch-evoked pain) can be of disabling severity and is present in nearly all patients with postherpetic neuralgia. Allodynia severity is correlated with pain severity and improvement in allodynia is correlated with clinical response.

A 14-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled monotherapy trial of pregabalin in patients with fibromyalgia.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pregabalin monotherapy in patients with fibromyalgia in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. After 1 week of single-blinded administration of placebo, 750 patients meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to pregabalin (300 mg/d, 450 mg/d, 600 mg/d) or placebo, administered twice daily for 14 weeks. The primary outcome variable was comparison of end point mean pain scores, derived from daily diary ratings of pain intensity (0 to 10 scale), between each of the pregabalin groups and the placebo group. If positive, additional primary efficacy parameters included the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score. Compared with placebo-treated patients, mean changes in pain scores at the end point in pregabalin-treated patients were significantly greater (P < .001: 300 mg/d, -0.71; 450 mg/d, -0.98; 600 mg/d, -1.00). Compared with placebo, significantly more pregabalin-treated patients reported improvement on PGIC (P < .01 for all 3 pregabalin doses) and significant improvements in total FIQ score for the 450 mg/d (P = .004) and the 600 mg/d (P = .003) doses. Compared with placebo, all 3 doses of pregabalin were associated with significant improvement in sleep. The most commonly reported pregabalin-related adverse events were dizziness and somnolence, which tended to be dose-related. PERSPECTIVE: This randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 300, 450, and 600 mg/d of pregabalin monotherapy demonstrated that all 3 doses were efficacious for up to 14 weeks for the treatment of fibromyalgia and were well tolerated by most patients. These results provide evidence that pregabalin is an important treatment option for patients with fibromyalgia.

Mixed effects modeling of weight change associated with placebo and pregabalin administration.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize change from baseline weight over time for pregabalin and placebo administration. METHODS: Asymptotic fraction of baseline weight was modeled with a nonmixture model and a mixture model as a function of baseline weight, exposure, time, covariate effects, and subject-specific random effects. Model fit was assessed using standard diagnostic plots. Predictive performance was assessed using both data similar to the original data, and open-label data. RESULTS: The nonmixture model indicated that a typical patient (baseline weight 82 kg) receiving placebo or 300 mg/day pregabalin approached an asymptotic fractional change from baseline weight of [mean (95% prediction interval for typical individual)] 0.7% (-5.5% to 7.4%) or 2.5% (-3.8% to 9.1%), respectively, with a half-life of 17 days. Substantial between-subject variability is observed, with some drug-treated subjects remaining weight neutral or losing weight, at all levels of exposure. Structural fixed effects parameters for the two submodels (mixture model) were in close agreement with each other and with those for the nonmixture model. The mixture model described two subpopulations differing in interindividual variability. No significant interindividual-varying covariates influencing the mixture probabilities were identified other than exposure. Both models had adequate fit; both models performed well during external validation. Predictive performance (nonmixture model) was adequate to ~900 days. CONCLUSIONS: The weight of a typical 82-kg patient receiving placebo or pregabalin (300 mg/day) approaches an asymptotic fractional change from baseline weight of 0.7%, or 2.5%, respectively, with a half-life of 17 days. Substantial between-subject variability remains unexplained.

Erectile dysfunction associated with pregabalin add-on treatment in patients with partial seizures: five case reports.

Sexual dysfunction has been reported in both men and women with epilepsy. Associated factors are diverse but include, among others, antiepileptic drugs. We present the cases of 5 men who reported mild to moderate erectile dysfunction or impotence for the first time when treated with the new antiepileptic drug pregabalin as add-on therapy.

Pregabalin add-on treatment in patients with partial seizures: a novel evaluation of flexible-dose and fixed-dose treatment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregabalin as add-on therapy for patients with partial seizures administered as fixed dose or as flexible dose adjusted to optimal seizure reduction and tolerability. METHODS: Patients receiving antiepileptic drugs (98.8% between 1 and 3 AEDs; 1.2% on more than 3 AEDs) and experiencing > or =4 partial seizures during the 6-week baseline period and no 4-week seizure-free interval were randomized (1:2:2) to placebo (n = 73), pregabalin fixed dose (600 mg/day BID; n = 137), or pregabalin flexible dose (n = 131; 150 and 300 mg/day for 2 weeks each; 450 and 600 mg/day for 4 weeks each, BID) for 12 weeks. Dosage could be adjusted based on tolerability and maintained when a 4-week seizure-free period was achieved. Primary efficacy parameter was reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. RESULTS: Both pregabalin regimens significantly reduced seizure frequency compared with placebo, by 35.4%, for flexible dose (p = 0.0091) and 49.3% for fixed dose (p = 0.0001) versus 10.6% for placebo, and the fixed-dose group was superior to the flexible-dose group (p = 0.0337). Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 6.8% (placebo), 12.2% (pregabalin flexible dose), and 32.8% (pregabalin fixed dose). Patients receiving pregabalin fixed dose discontinued due to adverse event earlier than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin administered twice daily, either as fixed (600 mg/day), or as flexible (150-600 mg/day) dose, was highly effective and generally well-tolerated as add-on therapy for partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Lower incidence of adverse events and discontinuations were achieved in patients receiving pregabalin when dosing was individualized to optimize efficacy and tolerability.