Advanced Multi-Layer Watertight Closure versus Conventional Closure in Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery.

Background: In total joint replacement procedures, surgeons have increasingly adopted advanced multi-layer, watertight closure. The objective of the study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes for advanced multi-layer, watertight closure patients to those with conventional closure with sutures and skin staples. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years were included in the study if they underwent total joint arthroplasty of the hip or knee as an elective, primary, inpatient procedure between January 2014 and March 2019. Cohorts having advanced multi-layer, watertight closure or conventional closure were compared using multivariable regression analysis of surgical site infections, length of stay, operating room time, procedure time, discharge status, readmissions, reoperations, and hospital emergency department visits. Results: A total of 1828 patients received at least one total hip or knee replacement, of which 434 (23.7%) had advanced multi-layer, watertight closure and 1394 (76.3%) had conventional closure. Unadjusted time to readmission, when occurring, was considerably longer following advanced multi-layer, watertight closure (89.9 vs 51.1 days, p < 0.0001), and a lower proportion of the advanced multi-layer, watertight closure cohort required reoperation within 90 days (0.0% vs 2.6%, p < 0.0001). Adjusted mean hospital length of stay was approximately half of a day shorter for advanced multi-layer, watertight closure patients (1.10 vs 1.65 days; p < 0.001), and they were also more likely to be discharged to home (Odds Ratio: 4.61; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Among patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty in a highly optimized real-world clinical practice, advanced multi-layer, watertight closure was associated with significantly shorter inpatient length of stay and increased likelihood of being discharged to home compared with conventional closure. These findings suggest that advanced multi-layer, watertight closure is a valuable component of an optimal workflow for total hip or knee replacement, and may be especially valuable for high-risk patients.

Prospective, Randomized Study of Direct Anterior Approach vs Posterolateral Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Concise 5-Year Follow-Up Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Interest in direct anterior approach (DAA) has increased over the last decade. In our previously published study comparing DAA to posterolateral approach (PA), early 3-month benefits were noted in terms of pain and function. There was no difference noted at 6 or 12 months. This study reports average 5-year follow-up of our original study. METHODS: Originally there were 43 DAA patients and 44 PA patients. At an average 5-year follow-up, patients were evaluated clinically with a University of California at Los Angeles activity score, Harris hip score, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr Survivorship analysis was calculated. Radiographs were evaluated for loosening and evidence of radiolucent lines. RESULTS: There were 2 deaths 1 in each group, neither was related to the implant or procedure. Four patients were lost to follow-up: 2 in the DAA group and 2 in the PA group. There was no statistical difference between surgical approaches in terms of Harris hip score, University of California at Los Angeles activity score, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. The 7-year survivorship was not significantly different. There were no loose implants at average 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both DAA and PA yield good results at an average 5-year follow-up in terms of survivorship, function, rate of complications, and radiographic analysis.

The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty is common. Various reconstruction options are available. The purpose of our study is to report on one such reconstruction option, titanium metaphyseal sleeves. METHODS: We describe a series of 45 patients (46 knees) who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty and were treated with a porous metaphyseal sleeve between August 2000 and September 2009 at two centers. Patients were followed for a minimum of four years, and at final follow-up, 40 patients (40 knees) were available for review. Patients were evaluated using The Knee Society's Knee Scoring System at each follow-up. Radiographs (standing anteroposterior, lateral, and sunrise views) were taken at six weeks, three months, and final evaluations. RESULTS: Mean Knee Society Scores increased from 36 (range 10 to 69) pre-operatively to 90 (range 38 to 100) at final follow-up. Mean alignment on final radiographic evaluation was 5° (range 3° to 8° valgus). Mean pre-operative alignment was 6° (range 15° varus to 18° valgus). Mean range of motion was 125° (range 80° to 140°) pre-operatively and 115° (range 95° to 130°) postoperatively. One device failed to achieve ingrowth and was revised at two years. All other knees were radiographically stable and ingrown. CONCLUSIONS: Metaphyseal sleeves provide an alternative for bone loss reconstruction in revision total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Benefits of a direct anterior approach (DAA) versus a posterior-lateral (PA) approach to THA were assessed in a single-surgeon, IRB-approved, prospective, randomized clinical study. Subjects (43 DAA and 44 PA) were evaluated at 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary end point was ability to climb stairs normally and walk unlimited at each time point. Secondary end points included assessment by several outcome instruments. DAA subjects performed better during the immediate post-operative period; they had lower VAS pain scores on the first post-operative day, more subjects climbing stairs normally and walking unlimited at 6 weeks, and higher HOOS Symptoms scores at 3 months. There were no significant differences between groups at later time points. Findings confirm previous reports of benefits of DAA versus PA in early post-operative phases.

Large-diameter modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: incidence of revision for adverse reaction to metallic debris.

Large-diameter modular metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) may offer reduction in wear debris and improved stability. Four studies are summarized here that used a large-diameter modular MOM system. A total of 1076 THAs were performed. This article presents data from 779 of these THAs with minimum 2-year follow-up (mean, 4.2 years) or revision since index THA (21 hips, with 1 more pending). Overall survivorship at 2 years was 98.6%; at 5 years, it was 97.0%. Seven revisions for an adverse reaction to metallic debris (ARMED), and 1 additional pending revision for ARMED, showed marked variability in presenting symptoms and intraoperative and postoperative findings. Data show good clinical performance of the modular MOM system, but suggest that surgeons must be diligent in monitoring MOM THA patients and aggressive in diagnosing and revising patients with a potential ARMED.

Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty.

A total of 208 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective randomized, institutional review board-approved study that compared preoperative surgical plan to postoperative 2-dimensional radiographic alignment measured by a blinded reviewer for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implanted using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) compared with conventional TKA instrumentation. The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the coronal tibial component alignment (P < .03) and failed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in the mechanical axis, femoral coronal/sagittal, and tibial sagittal alignment. Knee Society Score knee and function scores and 6-minute walk test were equivalent between the 2 treatment groups at all postoperative intervals. There was a statistically significant increase in the skin-skin time (P < .0001) and the time until first bone cut (P < .0001) for the CAS knees compared with those implanted with conventional instrumentation. The use of CAS in this randomized clinical trial conducted at high-volume centers did not offer a clinically meaningful improvement in postoperative alignment, clinical, functional, or safety outcomes compared with conventional TKA.

The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference?

Aging boomers and younger patients requiring total knee arthroplasty demand and/or expect better function, improved durability, and a quicker recovery. In response to this demand, surgeons are modifying surgical techniques, and industry is examining implant design. One proposal is the gender-specific implant, but the development of separate systems for men and women may prove to be unnecessary.